Forum
»
Officer Matt Schneider of Glendale police force tortures man in front of family
02-16-2019, 06:30 AM
-
#61
- DaveIndeed
- Registered User
-
- DaveIndeed
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Age: 42
- Posts: 2,416
- Rep Power: 8599
-
-
I watched it for about a minute until he calmly asked the guy for his name and he was like, "Well why do I even have to answer?" and I decided that getting tazed 11 times in the balls was justified.
Next question.
Next question.
02-16-2019, 06:43 AM
-
#62
- maxoutonshrugs
- Registered User
-
- maxoutonshrugs
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Posts: 103
- Rep Power: 491
-
-
Originally Posted By mrsloppyfist⏩
After searching a little I think this post probably sums it up. It looks like the guy has had some prior burglary and drug charges, and maybe the cops saw a drug transaction prior or something. The left turn signal was just their "reason" for pulling them over. Maybe the cops have run into him on street before. None of that makes it right with the force, but thats probably how this all transpired. Who knows though. It would be strange that they randomly saw this car commit a traffic violation that happened to have meth in it.bullchit aside i can tell you what really was going on
cops target ''poor/dirty looking people'' they follow them for awhile to see if they get nervous as meth heads usually tweek out when they see cops and get very nervous
I dont doubt the cops followed them for awhile then saw them going into the parking lot so they went around to catch them on the other side which can be seen in the video
they shouldn't target people by looks but thats part of the job
cops target ''poor/dirty looking people'' they follow them for awhile to see if they get nervous as meth heads usually tweek out when they see cops and get very nervous
I dont doubt the cops followed them for awhile then saw them going into the parking lot so they went around to catch them on the other side which can be seen in the video
they shouldn't target people by looks but thats part of the job
02-16-2019, 06:45 AM
-
#63
- MiniManletBrah
- Registered User
-
- MiniManletBrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Age: 35
- Posts: 10,856
- Rep Power: 1200
-
-
Originally Posted By maxoutonshrugs⏩
Why ask for ID if they knew who he was?After searching a little I think this post probably sums it up. It looks like the guy has had some prior burglary and drug charges, and maybe the cops saw a drug transaction prior or something. The left turn signal was just their "reason" for pulling them over. Maybe the cops have run into him on street before. None of that makes it right with the force, but thats probably how this all transpired. Who knows though. It would be strange that they randomly saw this car commit a traffic violation that happened to have meth in it.
If they saw a drug deal happen they would have no need to use the left turn signal as an excuse for interaction.
02-16-2019, 06:47 AM
-
#64
- BearyManilowe
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 15,222
- Rep Power: 130112
-
-
Originally Posted By RonaldMcflurry⏩
Tough talk from a tough guy.I wish people who felt like you do would all just kill themselves. srs.
***Mariah Carey is my 10/10 Crew***
***Misc Dads Crew***
02-16-2019, 06:54 AM
-
#65
- maxoutonshrugs
- Registered User
-
- maxoutonshrugs
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Posts: 103
- Rep Power: 491
-
-
Originally Posted By MiniManletBrah⏩
I don't mean that they know him by name, but that they recognize him from any of his priors, and then targeted him. He has 20 entries in the AZ Public Access to Court Website so there is a chance they encountered him in the past and targeted him.Why ask for ID if they knew who he was?
If they saw a drug deal happen they would have no need to use the left turn signal as an excuse for interaction.
If they saw a drug deal happen they would have no need to use the left turn signal as an excuse for interaction.
02-16-2019, 07:00 AM
-
#66
- RonaldMcflurry
- I woke up like dis
-
- RonaldMcflurry
- I woke up like dis
- Join Date: Jun 2016
- Posts: 14,495
- Rep Power: 80496
-
-
Originally Posted By MBisonSon⏩
Nah there are good guys who are cops. It is just that they will cover and lie for the bad ones every time.They're scumbags for the most part.
If not by themselves already, the badge does it.
While I'm sure they exist, I have yet to meet a clean officer.
And I'm not talking speeding or jaywalking, serious stuff least of which (but most common) is stalking.
If not by themselves already, the badge does it.
While I'm sure they exist, I have yet to meet a clean officer.
And I'm not talking speeding or jaywalking, serious stuff least of which (but most common) is stalking.
Nuggets of Wisdom
02-16-2019, 07:12 AM
-
#67
- StiffSproles
- #Pray4G(.)(.)
-
- StiffSproles
- #Pray4G(.)(.)
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Posts: 12,438
- Rep Power: 22944
-
-
It's unfortunate that people will have a tainted view of ALL police officers because of this one bad apple.
My girlfriend is a police officer and it sucks seeing how many people look at you dirty and have so much hate because of incidents like these. I never realized how tough the job was until I did a ride along and saw first hand.
Even if there was more to the story, this guy just needs to get forced out of the force. Just a person who shouldn't have become a police officer to begin with.
My girlfriend is a police officer and it sucks seeing how many people look at you dirty and have so much hate because of incidents like these. I never realized how tough the job was until I did a ride along and saw first hand.
Even if there was more to the story, this guy just needs to get forced out of the force. Just a person who shouldn't have become a police officer to begin with.
*United States Space Force Vet*
"I have embraced my Autism. I am a proud Autist. I believe it endows me with special powers that are incomprehensible to pathetic normies like you. I would gladly sacrifice any chance at a normal life to benefit from the GIFT that is AUTISM."-Drips617
02-16-2019, 07:33 AM
-
#68
- DrewDarden
- Join Date: Nov 2016
- Posts: 23,057
- Subscribers: 5
- Rep Power: 510742
-
-
I can't comment on the turn signal thing because I have no idea.
But it's very strange to me how people can watch that video and decide the police were 100% at fault.
The guy's wife and kids are in the car and he decides to:
1. Argue with the police
2. Refuse to produce his identification
3. Refuse to identify himself even verbally
4. Physically resist being pulled out of the car
5. Probably hiding things in his bag or between seats as the officer stated
So what do you expect a police officer to do? Just say "Oh ok, nevermind then, you really didn't have to comply."
What if those kids were killed in a drug purchase later on that afternoon and these cops hadn't one their due diligence? All of you cop haters would have been calling for their badges for not doing their jobs and investigating this person who is clearly acting suspiciously.
You want to know the one thing that would have prevented the whole thing from happening? If the guy had just complied like a normal fuking person.
It seems to me that most of the people arguing against the police officers here are showing that they have a strong bias from the jump by calling them pigs, etc.
But it's very strange to me how people can watch that video and decide the police were 100% at fault.
The guy's wife and kids are in the car and he decides to:
1. Argue with the police
2. Refuse to produce his identification
3. Refuse to identify himself even verbally
4. Physically resist being pulled out of the car
5. Probably hiding things in his bag or between seats as the officer stated
So what do you expect a police officer to do? Just say "Oh ok, nevermind then, you really didn't have to comply."
What if those kids were killed in a drug purchase later on that afternoon and these cops hadn't one their due diligence? All of you cop haters would have been calling for their badges for not doing their jobs and investigating this person who is clearly acting suspiciously.
You want to know the one thing that would have prevented the whole thing from happening? If the guy had just complied like a normal fuking person.
It seems to me that most of the people arguing against the police officers here are showing that they have a strong bias from the jump by calling them pigs, etc.
Misc Lifting Crew (Team Lead)
Summer 2026 Q&A Series:
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=1000018276&f=1001
02-16-2019, 07:35 AM
-
#69
- Stringer-Bell
- Banned
-
- Stringer-Bell
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Age: 41
- Posts: 3,748
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
What the hell sort of outfit is that female news anchor wearing..... she looks like a clown or an extra in Selena
02-16-2019, 07:38 AM
-
#70
- MiniManletBrah
- Registered User
-
- MiniManletBrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Age: 35
- Posts: 10,856
- Rep Power: 1200
-
-
Originally Posted By DrewDarden⏩
He didn't argue, he was respectful in his answers and was questioning why he had to ID himself as he was a passenger and it was apparently a traffic stop.I can't comment on the turn signal thing because I have no idea.
But it's very strange to me how people can watch that video and decide the police were 100% at fault.
The guy's wife kids are in the car and he decides to:
1. Argue with the police
2. Refuse to produce his identification
3. Refuse to identify himself even verbally
4. Physically resist being pulled out of the car
5. Probably hiding things in his bag or between seats as the officer stated
So what do you expect a police officer to do? Just say "Oh ok, nevermind then, you really didn't have to comply."
What if those kids were killed in a drug purchase later on that afternoon and these cops hadn't one their due diligence? All of you cop haters would have been calling for their badges for not doing their jobs and investigating this person who is clearly acting suspiciously.
But it's very strange to me how people can watch that video and decide the police were 100% at fault.
The guy's wife kids are in the car and he decides to:
1. Argue with the police
2. Refuse to produce his identification
3. Refuse to identify himself even verbally
4. Physically resist being pulled out of the car
5. Probably hiding things in his bag or between seats as the officer stated
So what do you expect a police officer to do? Just say "Oh ok, nevermind then, you really didn't have to comply."
What if those kids were killed in a drug purchase later on that afternoon and these cops hadn't one their due diligence? All of you cop haters would have been calling for their badges for not doing their jobs and investigating this person who is clearly acting suspiciously.
He also didn't physically resist being pulled out the car he was wrapped up in the seat belt.
What indicates he was hiding stuff in the seats?
02-16-2019, 07:49 AM
-
#71
Originally Posted By DrewDarden⏩
While I agree that he could've handled the situation better than he did, none of that justifies or vindicates the actions of that sociopath scumbag officer.I can't comment on the turn signal thing because I have no idea.
But it's very strange to me how people can watch that video and decide the police were 100% at fault.
The guy's wife and kids are in the car and he decides to:
1. Argue with the police
2. Refuse to produce his identification
3. Refuse to identify himself even verbally
4. Physically resist being pulled out of the car
5. Probably hiding things in his bag or between seats as the officer stated
So what do you expect a police officer to do? Just say "Oh ok, nevermind then, you really didn't have to comply."
What if those kids were killed in a drug purchase later on that afternoon and these cops hadn't one their due diligence? All of you cop haters would have been calling for their badges for not doing their jobs and investigating this person who is clearly acting suspiciously.
You want to know the one thing that would have prevented the whole thing from happening? If the guy had just complied like a normal fuking person.
It seems to me that most of the people arguing against the police officers here are showing that they have a strong bias from the jump by calling them pigs, etc.
But it's very strange to me how people can watch that video and decide the police were 100% at fault.
The guy's wife and kids are in the car and he decides to:
1. Argue with the police
2. Refuse to produce his identification
3. Refuse to identify himself even verbally
4. Physically resist being pulled out of the car
5. Probably hiding things in his bag or between seats as the officer stated
So what do you expect a police officer to do? Just say "Oh ok, nevermind then, you really didn't have to comply."
What if those kids were killed in a drug purchase later on that afternoon and these cops hadn't one their due diligence? All of you cop haters would have been calling for their badges for not doing their jobs and investigating this person who is clearly acting suspiciously.
You want to know the one thing that would have prevented the whole thing from happening? If the guy had just complied like a normal fuking person.
It seems to me that most of the people arguing against the police officers here are showing that they have a strong bias from the jump by calling them pigs, etc.
02-16-2019, 07:58 AM
-
#72
- Stringer-Bell
- Banned
-
- Stringer-Bell
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Age: 41
- Posts: 3,748
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By MiniManletBrah⏩
He didn't argue lol wut? And did you not see him pick up some sort of backpack thing and have his hands in and out of it a bunch before the officer told him to stop (mostly while the officer walked toward the back of the car to radio in the back passengers ID # or whatever), and kept turning to the left/side/looking down between the seats doing the old "I've got a bunch of stuff in my hand (looks like some money in the left hand, a soda in the right hand at some point) so I'm busy moving clutter and various objects around the front of the car while the officers talking to me and I'm facing away organizing all this chit in the center console" routine lol c'mon dude, just stopHe didn't argue, he was respectful in his answers and was questioning why he had to ID himself as he was a passenger and it was apparently a traffic stop.
He also didn't physically resist being pulled out the car he was wrapped up in the seat belt.
What indicates he was hiding stuff in the seats?
He also didn't physically resist being pulled out the car he was wrapped up in the seat belt.
What indicates he was hiding stuff in the seats?
If the dude didn't want to get pulled out he sure as hell went about it in the worst way possible: to do the upset, guilty guy "why me i didnt do anything" routine. Guy was froggy, jittery, suspicious, confrontational, etc from the start...
Like the guy you quoted said: what's the cop supposed to say to Mr. tattoo'd up skinny pill head? Oh ok sir, sorry for bothering... then later that week that same guy gets arrested for burglary, assault, whatever, the same *******s complaining about cops forcing him to identify himself are the same ones that would chit all over the cops for letting them go after they had him pulled over... I can see the thread now: "Cops have future double murder suspect pulled over, let him go when he refuses to give ID"
Excessive force? Sure. But when dealing with cops just identify yourself if you have nothing to hide... that first taze was absolutely justified, dude had his entire left arm tucked inside his abdomen, that's a good way to get SHOT by a fukn cop let alone tazed
02-16-2019, 08:03 AM
-
#73
Full bodycam video
LMAO at everyone jumping to bash the cops without seeing the full video.
DUDE WAS REACHING INTO/AROUND A BAG
DUDE RESISTED EVEN WHEN COP WAS CALM AND GAVE PLENTY OF WARNINGS
FAT KUNT IN THE BACK SWUNG A BAG FULL OF BOTTLED DRINKS AND HIT THE OTHER OFFICER IN THE HEAD
METH FOUND IN THE CAR
The cop was a overzealous with the taser after handcuffing though and that chit is inexcusable
Both sides are at fault honestly but people need to see all of the evidence before we jump to believing whatever the media presents
LMAO at everyone jumping to bash the cops without seeing the full video.
DUDE WAS REACHING INTO/AROUND A BAG
DUDE RESISTED EVEN WHEN COP WAS CALM AND GAVE PLENTY OF WARNINGS
FAT KUNT IN THE BACK SWUNG A BAG FULL OF BOTTLED DRINKS AND HIT THE OTHER OFFICER IN THE HEAD
METH FOUND IN THE CAR
The cop was a overzealous with the taser after handcuffing though and that chit is inexcusable
Both sides are at fault honestly but people need to see all of the evidence before we jump to believing whatever the media presents
Starting Weight: 8 lbs 6 oz
02-16-2019, 08:08 AM
-
#74
- MisterJustice
- Praise The Sun
-
- MisterJustice
- Praise The Sun
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Posts: 6,608
- Rep Power: 26705
-
-
Why not just give him the ID? if youre clean, then why start fighting against it? it will be over much easier and much faster if you just comply with that simple request
of course that wouldnt work if youre a criminal/hiding something and youre trying to evade and dodge
Also ive watched all the episodes of TV show Cops recently, and starting to fumble with the bag is a good way to end up on cops bad side, how should a cop know whether there is a weapon, drug or whatever?
of course that wouldnt work if youre a criminal/hiding something and youre trying to evade and dodge
Also ive watched all the episodes of TV show Cops recently, and starting to fumble with the bag is a good way to end up on cops bad side, how should a cop know whether there is a weapon, drug or whatever?
☀ Praise The Sun ☀
My new free supplement for increasing test levels
http://i.imgur.com/e0rCOjx.gif
All content generated by this account is a work of fiction and may serve only the purpose of possible entertainment value. Any resemblance to actual events or people is purely coincidental and not intentional.
02-16-2019, 08:09 AM
-
#75
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
-
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Posts: 14,453
- Rep Power: 202205
-
-
Originally Posted By Pisdauf⏩
So that justifies the cop pulling dude’s pants down and tasering him in the balls?Full bodycam video
LMAO at everyone jumping to bash the cops without seeing the full video.
DUDE WAS REACHING INTO/AROUND A BAG
DUDE RESISTED EVEN WHEN COP WAS CALM AND GAVE PLENTY OF WARNINGS
FAT KUNT IN THE BACK SWUNG A BAG FULL OF BOTTLED DRINKS AND HIT THE OTHER OFFICER IN THE HEAD
METH FOUND IN THE CAR
The cop was a overzealous with the taser after handcuffing though and that chit is inexcusable
LMAO at everyone jumping to bash the cops without seeing the full video.
DUDE WAS REACHING INTO/AROUND A BAG
DUDE RESISTED EVEN WHEN COP WAS CALM AND GAVE PLENTY OF WARNINGS
FAT KUNT IN THE BACK SWUNG A BAG FULL OF BOTTLED DRINKS AND HIT THE OTHER OFFICER IN THE HEAD
METH FOUND IN THE CAR
The cop was a overzealous with the taser after handcuffing though and that chit is inexcusable
Nothing in the world would justify that sort of behavior by a cop. Not one thing.
02-16-2019, 08:12 AM
-
#76
- Stringer-Bell
- Banned
-
- Stringer-Bell
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2010
- Age: 41
- Posts: 3,748
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Pisdauf⏩
Yea people, unfortunately lots here on the misc too, just see the part the news tells them....Full bodycam video
LMAO at everyone jumping to bash the cops without seeing the full video.
DUDE WAS REACHING INTO/AROUND A BAG
DUDE RESISTED EVEN WHEN COP WAS CALM AND GAVE PLENTY OF WARNINGS
FAT KUNT IN THE BACK SWUNG A BAG FULL OF BOTTLED DRINKS AND HIT THE OTHER OFFICER IN THE HEAD
METH FOUND IN THE CAR
LMAO at everyone jumping to bash the cops without seeing the full video.
DUDE WAS REACHING INTO/AROUND A BAG
DUDE RESISTED EVEN WHEN COP WAS CALM AND GAVE PLENTY OF WARNINGS
FAT KUNT IN THE BACK SWUNG A BAG FULL OF BOTTLED DRINKS AND HIT THE OTHER OFFICER IN THE HEAD
METH FOUND IN THE CAR
and LOL at bleeding heart morons watching that ****gy little news production showing how the cops came in from a certain angle and they didn't have a clear line of sight to see a failed turn signal from the vehicle going in to the lot on the other side.... The officers, being from that area and knowing almost all of the citizens from that area, know the occupants of the car are all offenders and are probably holding, so lo and behold they pull them over, politely ask for ID, and the passenger basically hands the cops the right to search them on a platter by refusing to identify himself and arguing, then they taze the dumb meth head and find meth... They should have just shot the poor bastard and send the kids to foster homes, unfortunately the kids now will grow up hating cops and smoking meth just like their junkie parents
100% justified, good job cops, next
Originally Posted By Peter
Yea your right... that cop should have to take a minimum of 1 hours of sensitivity training after work next tuesday and tell him not to do it againSo that justifies the cop pulling dude’s pants down and tasering him in the balls?
Nothing in the world would justify that sort of behavior by a cop. Not one thing.
Nothing in the world would justify that sort of behavior by a cop. Not one thing.
But seriously the pricks in this car are riding around with meth and children and you're worried about his NUTS? The guy smokes/injects meth and you're worried about his fragile ballsack???
02-16-2019, 08:25 AM
-
#77
- badreligion
- Meh
-
- badreligion
- Meh
- Join Date: Jan 2006
- Location: Groton, Connecticut, United States
- Posts: 25,200
- Rep Power: 55006
-
-
Originally Posted By DrewDarden⏩
Was there probable cause to remove him from the car ? NoI can't comment on the turn signal thing because I have no idea.
But it's very strange to me how people can watch that video and decide the police were 100% at fault.
The guy's wife and kids are in the car and he decides to:
1. Argue with the police
2. Refuse to produce his identification
3. Refuse to identify himself even verbally
4. Physically resist being pulled out of the car
5. Probably hiding things in his bag or between seats as the officer stated
So what do you expect a police officer to do? Just say "Oh ok, nevermind then, you really didn't have to comply."
What if those kids were killed in a drug purchase later on that afternoon and these cops hadn't one their due diligence? All of you cop haters would have been calling for their badges for not doing their jobs and investigating this person who is clearly acting suspiciously.
You want to know the one thing that would have prevented the whole thing from happening? If the guy had just complied like a normal fuking person.
It seems to me that most of the people arguing against the police officers here are showing that they have a strong bias from the jump by calling them pigs, etc.
But it's very strange to me how people can watch that video and decide the police were 100% at fault.
The guy's wife and kids are in the car and he decides to:
1. Argue with the police
2. Refuse to produce his identification
3. Refuse to identify himself even verbally
4. Physically resist being pulled out of the car
5. Probably hiding things in his bag or between seats as the officer stated
So what do you expect a police officer to do? Just say "Oh ok, nevermind then, you really didn't have to comply."
What if those kids were killed in a drug purchase later on that afternoon and these cops hadn't one their due diligence? All of you cop haters would have been calling for their badges for not doing their jobs and investigating this person who is clearly acting suspiciously.
You want to know the one thing that would have prevented the whole thing from happening? If the guy had just complied like a normal fuking person.
It seems to me that most of the people arguing against the police officers here are showing that they have a strong bias from the jump by calling them pigs, etc.
Is he required to give ID if he's a passenger ? An article I read said no
The cop was using a blatant abuse of authority saying he would be arrested and finger printed when no crime had been committed and then they proceed to assault him . I'm not a cop hater by any means and I understand what they do is a tough job and that generally they are all decent people trying to make a living but this was an instance of a cop abusing his authority.
Also according to this article there is no way the officer could have even seen the car pull in so the traffic stop alone was unjustified
https://www.abc15.com/news/local-new...gnal-violation
In Hoots We Trust.
02-16-2019, 08:46 AM
-
#78
I blame SCOTUS for rubber stamping pretextual stops, bogus investigatory detentions, ID'ing passengers as a matter of course, and for deferring to basically every officer's use of force under almost every circumstance, including violations of state law, training, and department policy, and even including constitutional violations that aren't "clearly established."
Congress said long ago that these idiots should be individually liable for rights violations. SCOTUS has legislated from the bench to manufacture a qualified immunity defense for law enforcement that conflicts with a duly enacted federal statute.
This is the result
Congress said long ago that these idiots should be individually liable for rights violations. SCOTUS has legislated from the bench to manufacture a qualified immunity defense for law enforcement that conflicts with a duly enacted federal statute.
This is the result
Posting from CCF State Penitentiary. F7-Work Pod.
Raw dog crew.
02-16-2019, 09:03 AM
-
#79
02-16-2019, 09:17 AM
-
#80
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
-
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Posts: 14,453
- Rep Power: 202205
-
-
Originally Posted By Stringer-Bell⏩
Regardless of what he did, the cop had no excuse for how he handled the situation. It was beyond unprofessional.But seriously the pricks in this car are riding around with meth and children and you're worried about his NUTS? The guy smokes/injects meth and you're worried about his fragile ballsack???
The cop clearly has issues with remaining unemotional and does not belong on a police force anywhere. He’s exactly the type that will shoot someone very soon in the near future because he wanted to act like Rambo. Fuk him.
02-16-2019, 09:19 AM
-
#81
02-16-2019, 09:25 AM
-
#82
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
-
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Posts: 14,453
- Rep Power: 202205
-
-
Originally Posted By esmile⏩
Huehuehue.Jeez that was nuts
02-16-2019, 09:42 AM
-
#83
- RocknRollMuscle
- Registered User
-
- RocknRollMuscle
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
- Posts: 25,599
- Rep Power: 44521
-
-
i hate edited videos.
not listening to liberal media on cop issues.
not listening to liberal media on cop issues.
Weight Loss: Go carnivore or keto/low carb. Create calorie deficit. Buy packaged healthy meals if needed. Meat is good and heals, stop being lied to.
Youtube Dr. Shawn Baker to change your life today.
02-16-2019, 10:08 AM
-
#84
- friesbruh
- Registered User
-
- friesbruh
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2017
- Location: Ohio, United States
- Age: 41
- Posts: 15,154
- Rep Power: 162706
-
-
Mr "Innocent" Johnny Wheatcroft is actually a career-criminal with numerous dismissed charges by the DA & grand jury in addition to what's below.
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1506A1 (F4) BURGLARY 3RD DEG-UNLAW ENTRY 2/16/2018 Pled Guilty As Charged 6/28/2018
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505A1 (F6) BURGLARY POSSESS TOOLS 2/16/2018 Pled Guilty As Charged 6/28/2018
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505 (F6) BURGLARY TOOLS POSSESSION 2/10/2014 Pled Guilty As Charged 5/27/2014
Search Warrant on Johnny's res.
10/28/2013 RSW - Returned Search Warrant Order - Party () 10/31/2013
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1506 (F4) BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE 10/6/2013 Dismissed - Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 7/1/2014
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505 (F6) BURGLARY TOOLS POSSESSION 10/6/2013 Pled Guilty As Charged Pled Guilty As Charged 5/27/2014
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3407 (F4) DANGEROUS DRUG VIOLATION 6/10/2013 Dismd Pros Mot Dismissed By Prosecution Motion 8/29/2013
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1814 (F3) THEFT-MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION 4/22/2006 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 9/26/2006
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1814 (F3) THEFT-MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION 4/22/2006 Pled Guilty As Charged Pled Guilty As Charged 2/16/2007
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3415 (F6) DRUG PARAPHERNALIA VIOLATION 4/29/2005 Pled to Reduced Charge Pled Guilty To Reduced Charge 9/14/2005
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3415 (F6) DRUG PARAPHERNALIA VIOLATION 4/29/2005 Dismissed - Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 9/14/2005
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1506A1 (F4) BURGLARY 3RD DEG-UNLAW ENTRY 2/16/2018 Pled Guilty As Charged 6/28/2018
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505A1 (F6) BURGLARY POSSESS TOOLS 2/16/2018 Pled Guilty As Charged 6/28/2018
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505 (F6) BURGLARY TOOLS POSSESSION 2/10/2014 Pled Guilty As Charged 5/27/2014
Search Warrant on Johnny's res.
10/28/2013 RSW - Returned Search Warrant Order - Party () 10/31/2013
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1506 (F4) BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE 10/6/2013 Dismissed - Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 7/1/2014
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505 (F6) BURGLARY TOOLS POSSESSION 10/6/2013 Pled Guilty As Charged Pled Guilty As Charged 5/27/2014
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3407 (F4) DANGEROUS DRUG VIOLATION 6/10/2013 Dismd Pros Mot Dismissed By Prosecution Motion 8/29/2013
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1814 (F3) THEFT-MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION 4/22/2006 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 9/26/2006
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1814 (F3) THEFT-MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION 4/22/2006 Pled Guilty As Charged Pled Guilty As Charged 2/16/2007
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3415 (F6) DRUG PARAPHERNALIA VIOLATION 4/29/2005 Pled to Reduced Charge Pled Guilty To Reduced Charge 9/14/2005
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3415 (F6) DRUG PARAPHERNALIA VIOLATION 4/29/2005 Dismissed - Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 9/14/2005
Bills crew / Bud Light crew / extra onion crew / M&P crew / lcp2 crew / ap3 crew / Trump crew / mcdonalds app crew / cat-owner crew / Tin Cup crew / self-checkout crew / country music crew / RIP snails crew / 214CE crew
02-16-2019, 11:40 AM
-
#85
Originally Posted By friesbruh⏩
And?Mr "Innocent" Johnny Wheatcroft is actually a career-criminal with numerous dismissed charges by the DA & grand jury in addition to what's below.
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1506A1 (F4) BURGLARY 3RD DEG-UNLAW ENTRY 2/16/2018 Pled Guilty As Charged 6/28/2018
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505A1 (F6) BURGLARY POSSESS TOOLS 2/16/2018 Pled Guilty As Charged 6/28/2018
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505 (F6) BURGLARY TOOLS POSSESSION 2/10/2014 Pled Guilty As Charged 5/27/2014
Search Warrant on Johnny's res.
10/28/2013 RSW - Returned Search Warrant Order - Party () 10/31/2013
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1506 (F4) BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE 10/6/2013 Dismissed - Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 7/1/2014
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505 (F6) BURGLARY TOOLS POSSESSION 10/6/2013 Pled Guilty As Charged Pled Guilty As Charged 5/27/2014
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3407 (F4) DANGEROUS DRUG VIOLATION 6/10/2013 Dismd Pros Mot Dismissed By Prosecution Motion 8/29/2013
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1814 (F3) THEFT-MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION 4/22/2006 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 9/26/2006
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1814 (F3) THEFT-MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION 4/22/2006 Pled Guilty As Charged Pled Guilty As Charged 2/16/2007
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3415 (F6) DRUG PARAPHERNALIA VIOLATION 4/29/2005 Pled to Reduced Charge Pled Guilty To Reduced Charge 9/14/2005
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3415 (F6) DRUG PARAPHERNALIA VIOLATION 4/29/2005 Dismissed - Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 9/14/2005
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1506A1 (F4) BURGLARY 3RD DEG-UNLAW ENTRY 2/16/2018 Pled Guilty As Charged 6/28/2018
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505A1 (F6) BURGLARY POSSESS TOOLS 2/16/2018 Pled Guilty As Charged 6/28/2018
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505 (F6) BURGLARY TOOLS POSSESSION 2/10/2014 Pled Guilty As Charged 5/27/2014
Search Warrant on Johnny's res.
10/28/2013 RSW - Returned Search Warrant Order - Party () 10/31/2013
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1506 (F4) BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE 10/6/2013 Dismissed - Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 7/1/2014
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1505 (F6) BURGLARY TOOLS POSSESSION 10/6/2013 Pled Guilty As Charged Pled Guilty As Charged 5/27/2014
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3407 (F4) DANGEROUS DRUG VIOLATION 6/10/2013 Dismd Pros Mot Dismissed By Prosecution Motion 8/29/2013
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1814 (F3) THEFT-MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION 4/22/2006 Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment Dismissed Due To Grand Jury Indictment 9/26/2006
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-1814 (F3) THEFT-MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION 4/22/2006 Pled Guilty As Charged Pled Guilty As Charged 2/16/2007
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3415 (F6) DRUG PARAPHERNALIA VIOLATION 4/29/2005 Pled to Reduced Charge Pled Guilty To Reduced Charge 9/14/2005
Johnny Wheatcroft 13-3415 (F6) DRUG PARAPHERNALIA VIOLATION 4/29/2005 Dismissed - Plea Other Dismissed Due To Plea On Other Count 9/14/2005
Posting from CCF State Penitentiary. F7-Work Pod.
Raw dog crew.
02-16-2019, 11:46 AM
-
#86
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
-
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Posts: 14,453
- Rep Power: 202205
-
-
Originally Posted By SippyCups⏩
He must think that gives cops the right to taser a man’s genitals.And?
02-16-2019, 11:54 AM
-
#87
- BeerCalories
- Registered User
-
- BeerCalories
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2013
- Posts: 2,527
- Rep Power: 3659
-
-
Have 4channers found his address yet?
02-16-2019, 11:56 AM
-
#88
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
-
- Peter Ruby
- Yes, I lift.
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Posts: 14,453
- Rep Power: 202205
-
-
Originally Posted By BeerCalories⏩
1 million pizzas on the way.Have 4channers found his address yet?
02-16-2019, 12:02 PM
-
#89
02-16-2019, 12:06 PM
-
#90
Originally Posted By Vhagar⏩
Imagine if every police officer, including half the c- students I went to High School with, could just decide who should be tased in the dick as a favor to society. Maybe you should try a country other than America if that suits you.Maybe the cop was doing society a favor and trying to keep him from breeding
Posting from CCF State Penitentiary. F7-Work Pod.
Raw dog crew.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts