Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Dave Chappelle has a message (IG vid). Pulling a Kanye.
  1. Results 61 to 70 of 70
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
post 1623657881 11-25-2020, 10:19 AM
-
#61
  1. Vexidi
  2. ( . )( . )
  1. Vexidi
  2. ( . )( . )
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 37,351
  7. Rep Power: 459730
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey
He was broke with a kid. I hate you bootstrap type people, this was a bad business deal no matter how you put it.

It's either get raped or stay broke.

These are all bootstrap Capitalists you're talking to who've never been in the show biz. Imagine calling someone a whiny bitch when you have no idea how the business works LOL

Dave looks like a genuine man and I don't like when genuine people get fuked over. The other celebrities? I couldn't care less.
Give me a break man. He walked away from 50 million dollars and knew the implications of not renegotiating. That's how entertainment works and how it will always work. You never ever sign over full rights to your IP. Literally the most basic rule when you're an artist. Dude dropped the ball hard and its his own fault. He still had 10 million in the bank when he bounced and now he's getting huge checks from Netflix. He's not a man with a sob story who you should rush to defend.
post 1623663901 11-25-2020, 11:24 AM
-
#62
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Posts: 47,223
  6. Rep Power: 275363
Originally Posted By Ad4mG1lchrist
I forgive him for that. In the beginning, it really looked like that cop was just kneeling on his neck and letting him die no fukks given. The truth came out later.
We all did but his special was less about what Chauvin did and more about defending the rioters. And defending Micah Xavier Johnson murdering several policemen.

Like how disconnected and delusional do you have to be? I can take edgy jokes, I can take mocking conservatives. I can't take defending retributive BLM cop killings against innocents
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω
Pre-Med crew
★ NUFC ☆
₪ DEFQON.1 AUSTRALIA 2016 ₪
177 lbs | O: 165 /// B: 275 /// S: 335 /// D: 390
post 1623665471 11-25-2020, 11:41 AM
-
#63
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By sword_
Man streaming didn't even exist when Chappelle's Show came out.

It's kinda ****ed that he can't profit off his own IP.

I do agree it was wrong of him to sign the contract, but at the time he was struggling with a newborn with his wife and needed the money. People get jerked around by contracts all the time. Who knew the man would sell the best selling DVD of all time?

Dave is just asking his fanbase to help renegotiate things for him. I'm in full support of the man.


EDIT: Netflix pulled Chappelle's Show in response.
well apparently its not his IP because he signed it over to viacom. Ok yeah he has some points but it makes it really hard for me to give a chit for him because he is loaded now and even the evil viacom he is complaining about gave him a 50 million offer he walked away from because he didnt like they had their fingers in his creative control. All the other guys go through the same chit, Rogan is finding out there is still strings attached and they want more control than he thought with his spotify deal, oh well thats what happens with big money deals.

i get he is trying to pull off a chess move here and get inbetween netflix and viacom and warn viacom he will try to sabatage any future contracts they make on his show unless they renegotiate his old contracts they currently have no obligation to do. Even if he pulls it off, it will be because he is in a unique position at the top to do so, i dont see how it will help any of the people at the bottom, if he wants to make a real change he will need to get into promotions and represent these people, be another Al Haymond type that every athlete/performer loves because he gets them the best deals.





Here Bill Burr talks about the big labels getting into the podcasting business with all encompassing contracts and owning a piece of any future podcast signed comedians do. It is pretty fuked up, i just dont feel much pity for the guys that already made it, this chit has been going on forever, michael jackson buying out the rights to the beetle catalog ect. I dont really care about the rich fighting the rich. Im just the pleb who paid my netflix bill for them to buy the right from viacom and even after its already been paid its been pulled for some moral support for a multimillionaire. I dont get a partial refund on my bill.
post 1623665591 11-25-2020, 11:43 AM
-
#64
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Vexidi
Give me a break man. He walked away from 50 million dollars and knew the implications of not renegotiating. That's how entertainment works and how it will always work. You never ever sign over full rights to your IP. Literally the most basic rule when you're an artist. Dude dropped the ball hard and its his own fault. He still had 10 million in the bank when he bounced and now he's getting huge checks from Netflix. He's not a man with a sob story who you should rush to defend.
That was his chance too, he could have renegotiated then. They wanted him bad enough for 50 million, he had the power then to renegotiate his rights to the show. Thats where I dont see the "original contract" as being so fuking horrible, dave is the one that walked away from 50 million.
post 1623666021 11-25-2020, 11:48 AM
-
#65
  1. cadetduke
  2. Ex Sports Card Shop Owner
  1. cadetduke
  2. Ex Sports Card Shop Owner
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Location: Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
  5. Posts: 13,309
  6. Rep Power: 54109
Why am I supposed to care about someone that walked away from a $50MM contract because they went mental?
post 1623666521 11-25-2020, 11:54 AM
-
#66
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  1. meanstringbean
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 11,550
  6. Rep Power: 58418
Originally Posted By JStrez
Apparently Netflix took the Chapelle show off their streaming service. Dave signed the contract well in advance of streaming so there’s no knowing this would happen. It’s just a ****ty thing to do to not have control over content that you created. Props to Dave for actually saying something and major props to Netflix to take it off because they know Dave’s worth.
Not really. Without Viacom then that is low budget and on Youtube. Viacom paid for everything. Took the risk for everything. Thus they own the product.
post 1623668651 11-25-2020, 12:16 PM
-
#67
  1. MTCC
  2. Registered User
  1. MTCC
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 1,039
  6. Rep Power: 1589
Originally Posted By gmenfan40
Hey i'm a fan and all, but you can't get mad years later when you literally consented to getting royally fukked by willingly signing your rights away of your own work/name...
The issue here isnt that he signed a contract. Its more so what is legal within a contract itself and how this is explained. I agree with Dave on this one, no entity should own your creative rights on any project for eternity.
post 1623671611 11-25-2020, 12:46 PM
-
#68
  1. MaiGainsbrough
  2. Registered User
  1. MaiGainsbrough
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 985
  6. Rep Power: 4047
Originally Posted By MTCC
The issue here isnt that he signed a contract. Its more so what is legal within a contract itself and how this is explained. I agree with Dave on this one, no entity should own your creative rights on any project for eternity.
The best way to avoid that is by not signing a contract that says it will own your creative rights for eternity.
**Neuroscience Crew**
The AI is always right
post 1623674521 11-25-2020, 01:20 PM
-
#69
  1. RIKTER
  2. Registered User
  1. RIKTER
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 31,602
  6. Rep Power: 241807
Wasn't he offered something 50 million to continue his show and turned it down??? Yeah, they really screwed him!!
post 1623711091 11-25-2020, 08:42 PM
-
#70
  1. sword_
  2. uberschwert
  1. sword_
  2. uberschwert
  3. Join Date: May 2005
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 107,635
  6. Rep Power: 912964
Originally Posted By CaliSuperSport
We all did but his special was less about what Chauvin did and more about defending the rioters. And defending Micah Xavier Johnson murdering several policemen.

Like how disconnected and delusional do you have to be? I can take edgy jokes, I can take mocking conservatives. I can't take defending retributive BLM cop killings against innocents
Dude has smoke for everyone on his last special. Calls out #MeToo women, is pro-gun, makes fun of "The Alphabet People" (LGBTQI), and white meth addicts in Ohio. If anything the Left was trying to "cancel" him, not the right.

He just gives his own opinions on what he sees in the world and he isn't married to one position. He's been wrong and admitted it.

The media was deceptive in showing one side of the George Floyd story TBH and Chappelle was no different here.
A hit was sent, from the President, to raid your residence /
Because you had secret evidence, and documents /
On how they raped the continents, and it's the prominent /
Dominant Islamic, Asiatic Black Hebrew

- GZA "4th Chamber"
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts