Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » New Omicron vaccine (4th jab) coming March 2022
  1. Results 61 to 73 of 73
  2. Page 3 of 3
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3

Thread: New Omicron vaccine (4th jab) coming March 2022

post 1652273703 12-09-2021, 07:31 PM
-
#61
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Thanks for looking it up so everyone can see it and laugh at it.

That's after the second edit though the first try was even worse off.

And thanks for answering my previous question, even though that question was not posed to you...



So, apologies to Stoli, it was Reliance who said that, not you.

In my defense, all you vaxcuck are interchangeable NPC's.

Edit : but back to J.L.C., did you finally find the vial of Comirnaty at your local pharmacy?
No problem! 'Twas easy because i just posted it in another thread, but as usual you buried the lead.
post 1652274193 12-09-2021, 07:42 PM
-
#62
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩


Now go find that vial of Comirnaty at your local pharmacy.

Edit : Oh and by the way...



Please do enroll in an ESL class, it will help with your communication skills, should prevent using terms you don't really know the definition of.
But that's what you do. Endlessly push the topic forward to never be resolved.

Queue irrelevant Canada diatribe.
post 1652274283 12-09-2021, 07:44 PM
-
#63
  1. trufflepigg
  2. Registered User
  1. trufflepigg
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2012
  4. Posts: 2,548
  5. Rep Power: 5536
Originally Posted By Reliance012⏩
Leaky vaccines are a theoretical concern for an evolutionary increase in virulence. Ironically, this is most problematic for unvaccinated individuals, not vaccinated. But there are a number of assumptions that need to be met for it to happen and the theoretical concern doesn’t outweigh the direct benefits of vaccination. Not even close.
the theoretical concern? You mean the possibility that the vaccinated will need to be boosted semi-annually for the rest of their lives, and all unvaccinated would die off, requiring a subscription service for the rest of your life to big pharma?

you're talking about imperfect vaccine theory:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science...irus-dangerous

yeah we gotta save a bunch of 80 year olds, that's totally worth the risk
you sounded smart as I read your post, but your last sentence made you a *******
I'm sure you're highly educated, most people with zero street smarts are
post 1652274453 12-09-2021, 07:49 PM
-
#64
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By trufflepigg⏩
the theoretical concern? You mean the possibility that the vaccinated will need to be boosted semi-annually for the rest of their lives, and all unvaccinated would die off, requiring a subscription service for the rest of your life to big pharma?

you're talking about imperfect vaccine theory:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science...irus-dangerous

yeah we gotta save a bunch of 80 year olds, that's totally worth the risk
you sounded smart as I read your post, but your last sentence made you a *******
I'm sure you're highly educated, most people with zero street smarts are
Can you expand on why "the vaccinated will need to be boosted semi-annually for the rest of their lives"?

Current data show reliable CD4 and CD8 responses from the mRNA vaccines.
post 1652274883 12-09-2021, 07:59 PM
-
#65
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
To whoever feels like replying to this guy in a effort to engage in honest discussion, just remember that that is not possible.

Source:



This person will fudge numbers intentionally in his argument's favour.
If you want to throw the accusation of intention, provide the link for context.

While screen caps demonstrate fixation, they do not demonstrate intention.
post 1652275593 12-09-2021, 08:13 PM
-
#66
  1. WHChampion
  1. WHChampion
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 9,616
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 60006


Sad that lefties went from skeptical of big pharma to defending these shameless cash grabs.
post 1652275663 12-09-2021, 08:15 PM
-
#67
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I mean, the numbers were off in the direction that didn't suit your argument...

Oh wait, they were! Imagine that!
Plus then there were edited to, I guess, suit your argument?

This derailment (burying) wouldn't be intentional, would it?
post 1652275923 12-09-2021, 08:20 PM
-
#68
  1. hendrixfreak70
  2. My eyes are up here.
  1. hendrixfreak70
  2. My eyes are up here.
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 29,413
  6. Subscribers: 16
  7. Rep Power: 751004
Just LOL at giving colds variant names.
post 1652276653 12-09-2021, 08:35 PM
-
#69
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Please refer to my previous post with the definition of the term "burying the lead".

Protip: If someone posts "prove that I did it intentionally" instead of "I didn't do it intentionally", that says something, doesn't it?

Just remember, I didn't dig this up, you did:
Geez, we've covered this so many times.

I made a mistake, corrected, explained, and apologized. Yet, you divert every thread I post in away from its topic.

You have screen caps of my posts from 3-4 months ago.
post 1652276733 12-09-2021, 08:36 PM
-
#70
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  1. Reliance012
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2012
  4. Posts: 7,601
  5. Rep Power: 51600
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Thanks for looking it up so everyone can see it and laugh at it.

That's after the second edit though the first try was even worse off.

And thanks for answering my previous question, even though that question was not posed to you...



So, apologies to Stoli, it was Reliance who said that, not you.

In my defense, all you vaxcuck are interchangeable NPC's.

Edit : but back to J.L.C., did you finally find the vial of Comirnaty at your local pharmacy?
Dude, seriously, at some point you’ve got to grow up and give up this try-hard witty gimmick. I interact regularly with posters who I vehemently disagree with. We argue. Occasionally name call. But at the very minimum, I know I’m engaging with an adult. You’re not dumb. The best way to describe it is a serious lack of maturity. Smiley faces and one liners that you think are clever. Rinse and repeat. Cool man. You sure showed them.
"Seen in the light of evolution, biology is, perhaps, intellectually the most satisfying and inspiring science. Without that light it becomes a pile of sundry facts -- some of them interesting or curious but making no meaningful picture as a whole."
post 1652277513 12-09-2021, 08:53 PM
-
#71
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 8,412
  6. Rep Power: 55161


"The reason we are being murdered with genetic altering drugs is its slow acting and it causes your body to malfunction and destroy itself so there is a "plausible deniability" factor. Unlike most poisons which leave more evidence of being the direct cause of death."

1,151+ pages of peoples accounts of Covid-19 vaccine damage:
https://vestibular.org/forum/dizziness/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/
post 1652277613 12-09-2021, 08:56 PM
-
#72
  1. Jestbrah
  2. Registered User
  1. Jestbrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 28,748
  6. Rep Power: 170226
Originally Posted By WHChampion⏩


Sad that lefties went from skeptical of big pharma to defending these shameless cash grabs.
well yeah they won them the presidency and tons of other seats and told them to put their money in their stocks and watch their net worth triple

whats sad is normal people thinking somehow this was all to benefit them LOLOLOLOLOLOL
**worthless college major crew**

*Always picks 4 Crew*

**HTC**
post 1652278263 12-09-2021, 09:10 PM
-
#73
  1. bibimbape
  2. Registered User
  1. bibimbape
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 369
  6. Rep Power: 668
What do vaxcels and antivaxcels have in common?




































































Both will never be fully vaccinated.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts