Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » This is super interesting a guy analyzes the "lunar lander"
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 116
  2. Page 3 of 4
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: This is super interesting a guy analyzes the "lunar lander"

post 1665164163 07-29-2022, 04:57 AM
-
#61
  1. J3remy
  2. Unregistered User
  1. J3remy
  2. Unregistered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: Thailand
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 5,658
  7. Rep Power: 9059
Im 99% sure the footage was shot on Earth for security, propaganda, backup reasons

Unfortunately the whole case is a black and white issue (no pun intended), they either went and nothing was faked, or everything was faked, the truth is always somewhere in the middle, imo pretty sure they actually went
post 1665165313 07-29-2022, 05:53 AM
-
#62
  1. meatlog
  2. Ayyyy
  1. meatlog
  2. Ayyyy
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: West Chester, Ohio, United States
  5. Posts: 2,418
  6. Rep Power: 9896
The so-called truth about the moon landings has been so well ingrained into peoples psyches that they cannot even begin to consider that it was all faked. From a young age in school, we were told about the 'heroes' that first landed on the moon and drip fed stories about space exploration thereafter in the all the years that followed.

With all the proven fake NASA footage out there, people will still blindly defend the moon landing hoax till their dying breath without ever considering for a second that perhaps their government lied to them. Pure cognitive dissonance.

If you have any capacity for thinking outside the box, there is no way that after watching this video, that you would still have a unmoveable hard-line position and back the official accounts of the moon landing, there has to be at least one part of this video which makes you think the other way and say you know what? he has a point there...
you can't just say errp derp its been debooonked lol
post 1665168423 07-29-2022, 07:30 AM
-
#63
  1. plebmaximus
  2. Registered User
  1. plebmaximus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 8,998
  6. Rep Power: 51569
Adlerian is off his meds again
Lifting Crew
post 1665171123 07-29-2022, 08:23 AM
-
#64
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By meatlog⏩
The so-called truth about the moon landings has been so well ingrained into peoples psyches that they cannot even begin to consider that it was all faked. From a young age in school, we were told about the 'heroes' that first landed on the moon and drip fed stories about space exploration thereafter in the all the years that followed.

With all the proven fake NASA footage out there, people will still blindly defend the moon landing hoax till their dying breath without ever considering for a second that perhaps their government lied to them. Pure cognitive dissonance.

If you have any capacity for thinking outside the box, there is no way that after watching this video, that you would still have a unmoveable hard-line position and back the official accounts of the moon landing, there has to be at least one part of this video which makes you think the other way and say you know what? he has a point there...
you can't just say errp derp its been debooonked lol
Why didn't Russia call the US out then? If anyone could prove it didn't happen it would be them.
post 1665172773 07-29-2022, 08:51 AM
-
#65
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By plebmaximus⏩
Adlerian is off his meds again
Please counter anything I've said with something more logical.

How would government intelligence agencies spend massive resources spying on Elvis and then allow no time or attention to how the moon rocket was being built?

You cannot answer that because I am right and you are a retard.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1665172933 07-29-2022, 08:53 AM
-
#66
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
Why didn't Russia call the US out then? If anyone could prove it didn't happen it would be them.
Russia was tracking a signal going to the moon.

They didn't have a guy with binoculars tracking the moon rocket to the surface of the moon lol.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1665172953 07-29-2022, 08:53 AM
-
#67
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Please counter anything I've said with something more logical.

How would government intelligence agencies spend massive resources spying on Elvis and then allow no time or attention to how the moon rocket was being built?

You cannot answer that because I am right and you are a retard.
I already answered this for you.

Do you think the FBI shows up at Grumman and says let me audit your drawings?
post 1665173073 07-29-2022, 08:54 AM
-
#68
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Russia was tracking a signal going to the moon.

They didn't have a guy with binoculars tracking the moon rocket to the surface of the moon lol.
You know they had radar back then right? And like the US knew all the Russian launches that weren't in the media and vice versa. They had the capability to track anything that went into space.
post 1665173183 07-29-2022, 08:56 AM
-
#69
  1. brovine
  2. Banned
  1. brovine
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 824
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By meatlog⏩
The so-called truth about the moon landings has been so well ingrained into peoples psyches that they cannot even begin to consider that it was all faked. From a young age in school, we were told about the 'heroes' that first landed on the moon and drip fed stories about space exploration thereafter in the all the years that followed.

With all the proven fake NASA footage out there, people will still blindly defend the moon landing hoax till their dying breath without ever considering for a second that perhaps their government lied to them. Pure cognitive dissonance.

If you have any capacity for thinking outside the box, there is no way that after watching this video, that you would still have a unmoveable hard-line position and back the official accounts of the moon landing, there has to be at least one part of this video which makes you think the other way and say you know what? he has a point there...
you can't just say errp derp its been debooonked lol
bruh we have reflectors up there...

Also the videos have a bunch of weird chit you can't fake (at least not back then with the tech they had)...how did they fake how every dust particle was affected by gravity?

And how the fuk did they get our flag up there? Other countries have seen our flag on the moon via probes. And it is now a faded flag because of the radiation.

post 1665173203 07-29-2022, 08:56 AM
-
#70
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,066
  6. Rep Power: 143443
Originally Posted By Barteh⏩
It's okay brah they just lost the technology that's all.
Or they lied and never had it.
As
post 1665173593 07-29-2022, 09:02 AM
-
#71
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Posts: 20,365
  5. Rep Power: 362412
lmao no wonder they got away with the scamdemic you have to be below handicapped levels of stupid to believe this.


post 1665173883 07-29-2022, 09:07 AM
-
#72
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 15,250
  5. Rep Power: 107906
Originally Posted By knightofday⏩
ITT: people who still don’t know/understand that the moon landing was a motion picture creation srs

There’s hours of testimony from industry professionals of all types dismantling the fake videos, audio, landing site etc.

It’s one of those things where once you dig, if you have an iq above 100, you can’t help but accept it was all fake srs
There's an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence that we did in fact land on the moon. Dismissing it all for thoroughly disproved CT nonsense cements you as a sub 70iq troglodyte.
“Steroids is now just a word that the lazy and ignorant use to describe any guy that has more muscle and dedication than them”– Mike O'Hearn


"I am like getting the feeling of cumming in the gym; I'm getting the feeling of cumming at home; I'm getting the feeling of cumming backstage; when I pump up, when I pose out in front of 5000 people I get the same feeling, so I am cumming day and night. It's terrific, right? So you know, I am in heaven."
post 1665173913 07-29-2022, 09:08 AM
-
#73
  1. Sil3nt1
  2. Registered User
  1. Sil3nt1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,096
  6. Rep Power: 102554
post 1665174923 07-29-2022, 09:22 AM
-
#74
  1. brovine
  2. Banned
  1. brovine
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 824
  6. Rep Power: 0
This thread is basically full of butthurt Russians who can't let Americans have one thing lmao.
post 1665175433 07-29-2022, 09:30 AM
-
#75
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
You know they had radar back then right? And like the US knew all the Russian launches that weren't in the media and vice versa. They had the capability to track anything that went into space.
Do you know what radar is?
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1665175553 07-29-2022, 09:31 AM
-
#76
  1. Sil3nt1
  2. Registered User
  1. Sil3nt1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,096
  6. Rep Power: 102554
post 1665175693 07-29-2022, 09:34 AM
-
#77
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Do you know what radar is?
coming from the guy that thinks his oven replicates the conditions of the moon.

And continue to ignore ALL the other points addressing your concerns about the FBI monitoring aerospace companies...it's a crazy theory on your end.
post 1665176053 07-29-2022, 09:39 AM
-
#78
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Sil3nt1⏩
The biggest issue with the moon landing is that NASA has no plans for how they built anything.

That's a lie as it simply is not possible that no agency was monitoring its construction. That is just not going to happen now and especially not in the 60s as there was EXTREME fear that the country had foreign spies running around in high places.

In addition, there's a lot of question about the ability of various devices supposedly used on the moon to actually work.

In another thread, we talked about this issues. On the Joe Rogan show, he showed a moonwalk video that was clearly fake. Two guys were talking on the moon and one fell. Some unseen force yanked the guy to his feet and it looked like he was on a tether. It could not have been anything else.

Lighting on the moon isn't even near the issue.

The video shown on Rogan was clearly fake. So, some or all of the moon landing was also fake.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1665176123 07-29-2022, 09:39 AM
-
#79
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
coming from the guy that thinks his oven replicates the conditions of the moon.

And continue to ignore ALL the other points addressing your concerns about the FBI monitoring aerospace companies...it's a crazy theory on your end.
Retarded ****gitry.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1665176173 07-29-2022, 09:41 AM
-
#80
  1. Sil3nt1
  2. Registered User
  1. Sil3nt1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,096
  6. Rep Power: 102554
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
The biggest issue with the moon landing is that NASA has no plans for how they built anything.

That's a lie as it simply is not possible that no agency was monitoring its construction. That is just not going to happen now and especially not in the 60s as there was EXTREME fear that the country had foreign spies running around in high places.

In addition, there's a lot of question about the ability of various devices supposedly used on the moon to actually work.

In another thread, we talked about this issues. On the Joe Rogan show, he showed a moonwalk video that was clearly fake. Two guys were talking on the moon and one fell. Some unseen force yanked the guy to his feet and it looked like he was on a tether. It could not have been anything else.

Lighting on the moon isn't even near the issue.

The video shown on Rogan was clearly fake. So, some or all of the moon landing was also fake.
listing joe rogan as a source lmao

ever done lsd before
post 1665176973 07-29-2022, 09:53 AM
-
#81
  1. twptwp
  2. Registered User
  1. twptwp
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 864
  6. Rep Power: 2536
LOL @ people that think USA landed and fired from the moon with something that looks like candy wrapped in tinfoil. Think about it.
post 1665177333 07-29-2022, 10:00 AM
-
#82
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,066
  6. Rep Power: 143443
People can be so stupid trusting the same people stealing their tax dollars.
As
post 1665177723 07-29-2022, 10:06 AM
-
#83
  1. 78novacaine
  2. Registered User
  1. 78novacaine
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Posts: 15,477
  5. Rep Power: 176552
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Retarded ****gitry.
Hello pot, meet kettle.
Permabulk/bloatlord Crew
Tradie Crew
HTC
post 1665177773 07-29-2022, 10:07 AM
-
#84
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Posts: 20,365
  5. Rep Power: 362412
phew it's a good thing that I have high IQ adlalarian on my side defending the cause.
post 1665178233 07-29-2022, 10:14 AM
-
#85
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Retarded ****gitry.
again - you can't counter ANY of my points with anything other than your ridiculous idea that the FBI would somehow be protecting those files.

And again - before you bring that up - all drawings for the government have a distribution code on them as to their security clearance. Higher security drawings are not allowed to leave the contractors facility and today's digitized drawings, the highest level security drawings are kept on computers that are not connected to any network. The facility is secure and the people with access have security clearance - but you think the FBI is going to walk into these places and say "show us that the drawings are protected" or are they going to put armed guards around the drawings from 60 years ago?
post 1665178493 07-29-2022, 10:19 AM
-
#86
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  1. miscinbro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 22,420
  6. Rep Power: 46435
Originally Posted By Cleveland33⏩
again - you can't counter ANY of my points with anything other than your ridiculous idea that the FBI would somehow be protecting those files.

And again - before you bring that up - all drawings for the government have a distribution code on them as to their security clearance. Higher security drawings are not allowed to leave the contractors facility and today's digitized drawings, the highest level security drawings are kept on computers that are not connected to any network. The facility is secure and the people with access have security clearance - but you think the FBI is going to walk into these places and say "show us that the drawings are protected" or are they going to put armed guards around the drawings from 60 years ago?
I highly doubt it would have been possible even if they wanted to, I know for a fact many corners were cut in the race to get it done first - and meticulous records were not part of that.

Hell, there is a guy on YouTube who cuts WWII boots in half because nobody really knows exactly what was in each kind. Boots.
post 1665178853 07-29-2022, 10:23 AM
-
#87
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
Lmao at the stop motion film at 7:50


Bu.bu..but my frame rates
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
post 1665178993 07-29-2022, 10:25 AM
-
#88
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
The biggest issue with the moon landing is that NASA has no plans for how they built anything.

That's a lie as it simply is not possible that no agency was monitoring its construction. That is just not going to happen now and especially not in the 60s as there was EXTREME fear that the country had foreign spies running around in high places.

In addition, there's a lot of question about the ability of various devices supposedly used on the moon to actually work.

In another thread, we talked about this issues. On the Joe Rogan show, he showed a moonwalk video that was clearly fake. Two guys were talking on the moon and one fell. Some unseen force yanked the guy to his feet and it looked like he was on a tether. It could not have been anything else.

Lighting on the moon isn't even near the issue.

The video shown on Rogan was clearly fake. So, some or all of the moon landing was also fake.
Grumman and NASA were monitoring the construction - where do you get the idea that they were not?
post 1665179593 07-29-2022, 10:34 AM
-
#89
  1. EagleOfWar
  2. Registered User
  1. EagleOfWar
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2011
  4. Posts: 15,643
  5. Rep Power: 107090
Originally Posted By J3remy⏩
Im 99% sure the footage was shot on Earth for security, propaganda, backup reasons

Unfortunately the whole case is a black and white issue (no pun intended), they either went and nothing was faked, or everything was faked, the truth is always somewhere in the middle, imo pretty sure they actually went
I’m undecided on what I believe honestly, but I don’t believe the footage was real at all. Gun to my head i’d probably say they never went.
This body holding me, be my reminder here that I am not alone.
Makes me feel eternal, all this Pain is an Illusion.
post 1665181103 07-29-2022, 11:01 AM
-
#90
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Sil3nt1⏩
listing joe rogan as a source lmao

ever done lsd before
MORONIC

Joe Rogan didn't film the f@cking moon landing, retard. He showed it on his program which you can easily google to easily watch the video. It has nothing to do with Joe Rogan.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts