I like that you have linked something of substance and from a more credible source. I've read the parts you screenshotted, my takeaway is that noone, including scientists, is immune to confirmation bias. It could be a positive thing if the climate changes occur more rapidly than previously thought, that might mean that the damage we have done is more quickly corrected for. The fact remains though right that humans are accelerating and disturbing a dynamical process which we don't yet fully understand and are already seeing dire consequences of. Ignoring climate change even, it doesn't take a genius to see that it is not good to pollute and destroy the environment as much as we humans are doing.

So I will agree that humans need to think long term, but we really suck at it.

Humans also need to do a better job at analysis and critical thinking.

The mainstream climate change agenda has literally nothing to do with saving the environment or saving humanity.

That narrative is simply a scary story to spook the children and a fig leaf of righteousness to cover a naked totalitarian power grab.

First please educate yourself more on animal foods. I am serious- do yourself a favor here.




Then consider the government actions to shut down farming in the Netherlands- the second biggest food exporter in the world and some of the most efficient farms besides.


I consider the below a must watch. Probably would have already made a thread if the misc hadn't been down:




Good interview which start on the farm seizures but also touches on other insane measures that are taking place, one being that France was fined 500 million euros for failing to build "green energy" infrastructure while being one of the countries with the lowest emissions because of their nuclear energy plants:




And here is an article about the UN Climate Reparations slush fund:

A New Climate Change Loss and Damage Fund Established at U.N. Climate Change ConferenceLink:
https://reason.com/2022/11/21/a-new-...ge-conference/

The real kicker?

China, the world biggest greenhouse gas emitter is considered one of the developing countries.So I hope that after reading this at least a few more people will GET IT.

It's a lie.

Right, those are the singular three options to do anything good for the planet. You are ascribing viewpoints to me that I have not presented as the singular options of action.

Figuring out what is the best course of action to take is not an easy question, but does that mean we shouldn't want to try and instead keep living as we always have?

Good. That's one thing we definitely agree on.



Trust me, I am not for enriching the elites, they have done that enough already. Regarding climate change taxes, that is a complex problem because taxes are fundamentally distortive. We would need to think hard on whether taxes are the solution and if yes on possible forms of taxes and their downsides.

Regarding EVs, I agree, they are environmentally destructive. As such, I would rather see more options for public transportation than an increased focus on EVs over normal cars.

Regarding eating bugs, as much as I would dislike eating bugs, you cannot deny they are a more environmentally friendly source of food than meat. But you don't have to eat bugs and I probably won't either. I myself stopped eating meat 7 days a week and now more like 4 times a week. If all of us who had that option did similar, or even 6 days a week, that would be a good first step. It's no big deal, on my non meat days I just eat more veg like roasted asparagus and brussel sprouts and ****, delicious.

Again, these are not the only options to "save the planet".

Notice that they are NOT focused on pollution or destruction. They want to set limits to CO2, N, and CH4/methane which are all naturally occurring and on the table of elements.



^^^
Humans contribute one third of 1% of CO2 in the atmosphere.



^^^
CO2 makes up only 0.4% of total gases in the atmosphere.

Think about that a little.

0.4% of total atmosphere is CO2. Humans contribute 0.33% to that 0.4%.




^^^
There isn't enough metal on the planet to run the world on batteries and extracting all of the metal that exists is a nasty polluting and destructive process.

If that wasn't enough there isn't good evidence that warming is even happening. It was forecast, but actual temperature data has failed to support the hypothesis.

At present we actually have an anomalously cold snowy winter in the northern hemisphere.

https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/gl...r-56-year-high

Does this look environmentally friendly to you?



Link:

I know it is hard to take in that such evil liars have taken grip of the levers of power.

Yeah, I need to get up and do real stuff too.

When they propose decent solutions then I'll be all ears. Until then, fuk off with this climate change bs.

no doubt the earth is warming/climate is changing

is it caused by what I do on a daily basis? fuk no.

Not going to stop driving my gas powered car, eating meat, or traveling via aircraft just cuz libs want me to. 90% of plastic doesn't even get recycled. but let's blame it on the individual consumer. "every little bit helps"....bullchit.

California all electric cars by 2035? right, end well will it not. I'll leave this state by then. Seems like some kind of money grab by the politicians.

https://www.godlikeproductions.com/f...age5301631/pg1
WAR ON GLOBAL AGRICULTURE: THE UNSUSTAINABLE ‘SUSTAINABLE’ UN AGENDA 2030