The JRE with him was very eye opening. Right off the bat when he started speaking of how to clean up the oceans, bring to light the huge issue with mercury poisoning, & showing how autism had a direct link to vaccines. The man is very knowledgeable & you can tell comes from a place of actually wanting to help & make a change rather than throwing around political rhetoric.

The problem is as far as I know he is still a huge climate activist which I fear will handicap both businesses & the public by the policies he is supporting. Also would like to know how he feels about CBDC, 15 minute cities, & the entire WEF narrative.

Well if he strays too far off the path they’ll just do him like they did his relatives.

Nothing against the guy I’d vote for him. Seems genuine enough.

97% of scientists agree with those funding them.

Dude bent the knee to Israel like his dad

Rogan ethering the typical libshiit bluechecks

[QUOTE=Zelensky post_id=1684838723]Rogan ethering the typical libshiit bluechecks

[img]https://i.imgur.com/YWDKDLs.png[/][/QUOTE]Pour one out for Tom, it’s absolutely over

[img]https://media0.giphy.com/media/3xz2BPbIqcqpFDKXsI/200w.gif?cid=6c09b952lbccbm6k9nn2ht5zdibbwfvau8g2p9g62y5nadst&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=200w.gif&ct=g[/img]

or maybe it makes Joe money so it is a good fuking idea for him

and maybe Hotez has nothing to do with that industry

He's a doctor. He doesn't work for Pharma. He teaches medicine, treats kids, and saves lives. And for you pieces of chit to go after him because a politician said so is just so typical.

Scientists need to look out for themselves and stop giving a chit about the public. You rabble don't make funding decisions anyway. Nobody cares what you think.

Try explaining anything scientific to a lay idiot, and it will just turn into a bullshyt situation. How can you teach people who don't even know the basics? People try to explain, but it's a total waste of time.

Feel free to do your own reading, and actually learn what the evidence shows. Or don't. Nobody needs to waste time with you scum anymore. Public science communication is largely a giant waste of time and effort.

I've been tracking a lecture series on quantum mechanics MIT posted years ago. Nearly 1 M views of first video. By video 20, only 20k or so views, which checks out. Of the 1 M or so people, only around 20k had the chops to even bother watching all the lectures. Of those, probably only half understood enough to be able to solve any problems. Maybe of that half, around 1/10 of them actually get it. And this is a 100 yr old undergraduate subject with no serious difficulties that the public shows a lot of interest in.

So, the public is retarded. Why bother? Let the meatheads watch Joe Rogan. No one cares. Whoever you elect will have a nice talking to and will do as they are told on science issues. Maybe there will be some pissing and moaning, but it is far easier to convince and explain something to a president or congressman than a bunch of fuking randos.

Even when u give the public free info, they won't use it.

Imagine still thinking scientists today are not just as corrupt as the Pharmaceutical companies they represent in their studies & practices. Damn you are truly blind. When funding and pay structure is stacked against academia science in favor of paradigm consensus, it creates an unfair, inaccurate and corrupt narrative. The scientific community has become a fuhking joke. “Trust the sCIeNcE”

Paul. You're free to post what you want, but I'm not going to bother with you. We have already established that you are a crackpot who doesn't believe stars formed naturally or in the theory of evolution. Any further engagement with you on anything science related is a waste of effort for me.

Hard science is not the same as soft science. One of the biggest sleight of hands the system has pulled has been to convince people to use “science” as a blanket term. Studies can be structured to say all types of things…and pharmaceutical companies have been caught blatantly bullsh!tting results in order to push products that are profitable even when they know they are dangerous and/or ineffective. Same with modeling. You can create a model to tell you all kinds of things. That doesn’t make the studies or models “science”. If you think studying the effectiveness and safety profile of an mRNA injection through a clinical trial carried out by the same people who created the product and have billions of dollars riding on the results is the same thing as quantum mechanics then I don’t know what to tell you.


As far as Rogan, he is one of the very few people who have given Tulsi a legit platform to and has repeatedly promoted her as one of the best presidential candidates in the country. Seems like you could appreciate that. He also had Hotez on his show multiple times. Because you don’t have to silence people you disagree with. You can let them make their case and see if it stands up on its own. I already posted the link to the most recent Hotez episode. Feel free to go back and watch it since you seem to agree with him so much. Spoiler alert….. it hasn’t aged well at all.

COPE

So why is he shilling for Pharma?

ironically a lowIQ take (but maybe not cuz miscers are generally stupid nosharkcels).

the reason the initial video got so many view is way more people have an interest in knowing what quantum mechanics are/basics. thas enough. unless you plan on working at hadron why know more? most people have this esp due to time considerations MOST people have with jobs kids whatever....that you apparently don't.

are you working at hadron? no??? but do you feelz smarters now when you drivez down the street to your officecel job?

if anything it shows that many people have the capability of watching 20 videos but don't cuz theres so much content out there on everything else.

medicine is not a soft science

rest of your post is ignored

You won't get any understanding out of just the first lecture.

What I am saying is the public says they want to know QM. So MIT puts the entire course up for free. And only a tiny fraction of the public actually bothers to even watch the videos. The point being made is that the public is fuking dumb and useless when it comes to science. They pretend to have an interest in science, but they really don't.

If they did, they would have done better in school.

quitz whilest you be ahead muh brotha....reread what I wrote.


not sure why you can't comprehend that quantum mechanics has low appeal/interest to begin with.

autism level 9000.

Fukkin lmao at this moron

So you have 70 hours to watch MIT videos and countless days to create hundreds of alts to larp on the internet but can’t be bothered to address the other points in my post. On the bright side at least your current alt doesn’t have a “what would Stalin do” in the sig as you adamantly shill for big Pharma and other capitalist entities.

low iq nosharkcel spotted. see sig wincel

Rogan did not start this beef.



^^^
Hotez reportedly made a couple of tweets calling out the JRE/RFK interview.

Then Rogan invited Hotez to prove his assertion on the show with no time limits and with the bonus of money going to charity. I think it got up to $2.5M being allegedly offered for Hotez to go on the show and make his case against RFK.

Not really

100k is still 100k

Unless you got bezos or oil money that’s still a decent amount to wager freely

Nope. It has high appeal. The public always talks about it.1 M views.

Joe has promoted, platformed, and also directly spread misinformation on vaccines and other areas of medicine on his show. Peter was right about that.

Can you provide five examples of misinformation? Because I can provide five examples of misinformation pushed by the mainstream that Joe pushed back against and was 100% correct about.



Edit to add- Peter was on the Rogan podcast and spread mis/disinformation just lmao. So don’t count those as examples.

lol @ Brett Weinstein

Peter is a quack.

ok so my experts data says X
your experts data says Y
either could be corrupted
so where does that leave us?

GTFOH with forcing/coercing/mandating people to take an experimental chemical
you take it if you want, leave me the fukc alone

ha Tate

I wish you guys came to this conclusion way earlier, instead of trying to corner people into taking the vaccine they didn't want.