Forum
»
SCOTUS ends Affirmative Action: LOL @ DEIcells srs
07-01-2023, 06:26 AM
-
#61
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
Do you have a definition? If so, provide it.Just stick your head in a wood chipper, you retarded piece of subhuman trash.
Funny how the Trust the Science™ crew no longer knows what the definition of a female or woman is.
Funny how the Trust the Science™ crew no longer knows what the definition of a female or woman is.
Man, logic must really piss you off. Usually, you try to play the civilized fascist. But it looks like the mask slipped a bit today huh, Cornell?
I always knew it was war.

We will destroy you.
07-01-2023, 06:31 AM
-
#62
- Phil9
- Registered User
-
- Phil9
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Age: 39
- Posts: 27,396
- Rep Power: 35470
-
-
Originally Posted By ButWhoWasNoodz⏩
All academic records are sealed to the general public under FERPA, dummy. You seem mad as fuk and probably never exceeded high school.That's how Obama got in, too, and one reason why his records were sealed. b b but the smartest president ever!! lmao.
07-01-2023, 06:34 AM
-
#63
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
They should unseal them all IMO. People need to know how retarded our leaders are.All academic records are sealed to the general public under FERPA, dummy. You seem mad as fuk and probably never exceeded high school.
07-01-2023, 06:35 AM
-
#64
07-01-2023, 11:55 AM
-
#65
- BullittEV
- Registered User
-
- BullittEV
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 27,652
- Rep Power: 261167
-
-
Originally Posted By Putinist⏩
Sorry heshe, most rational Americans dont give a fuk about your illogical mental gymnastics that someone born with a uterus can be a man.Do you have a definition? If so, provide it.
Man, logic must really piss you off. Usually, you try to play the civilized fascist. But it looks like the mask slipped a bit today huh, Cornell?
I always knew it was war.
We will destroy you.
Man, logic must really piss you off. Usually, you try to play the civilized fascist. But it looks like the mask slipped a bit today huh, Cornell?
I always knew it was war.

We will destroy you.
USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
07-01-2023, 12:48 PM
-
#66
07-01-2023, 12:52 PM
-
#67
07-01-2023, 01:16 PM
-
#68
- BullittEV
- Registered User
-
- BullittEV
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 27,652
- Rep Power: 261167
-
-
Originally Posted By Putinist⏩
Yes, a woman with XX chromosomes/a uterus mutilated their body and pretends to be a man and you encourage that.Did you see the pics linked tardface?
Next?
USMC 0311
*Ice Hockey/Lacrosse Crew*
*fukkin zeezbrah when pickin up chicks but do one thing to fuk it up/cant sustain after that night crew*
*C7 GS Vette Crew*
07-01-2023, 01:31 PM
-
#69
- veggie530
- Not Aware
-
- veggie530
- Not Aware
- Join Date: Jan 2009
- Location: United States
- Posts: 12,078
- Rep Power: 155340
-
-
Originally Posted By Putinist⏩
yawn. "I'll try to explain away the norm with 0.00001% of the populations examples."That is a circular definition. What is a female? Let's start there. Someone with a uterus is basically what you are implying, and that could be a definition. According to you, an XY person with Swyer syndrome is a female. Let's also assume you mean someone born with a uterus since hysterectomies are a thing. Let's also assume they need not work because as you said, some cannot reproduce. However, according to you, this is now a woman:

This person was born with a uterus...
And so was this one:

As to your other question of whether that person is a woman, that depends on your definition of woman. Until we have a suitable one, any debate on this is pointless as it is a semantic dispute over a definition. That is why I ask what YOU think a woman is.
I understand you come at these questions from a place of hatred, ignorance, and bigotry, but any rigorous analysis of the situation will show you the difficulty in appropriately dichotomizing the species.
If you want to partition the species into 2 genders, you need to provide a specific definition that unambiguously selects to which of the 2 a given person belongs.
Clearly, my explanation and words are wasted on you though because you've never paid attention to definitions or thought rigorously in your life. You're a slob. An uncultured and uneducated swine who is incapable of higher reasoning. Your rules are contradictory. Your logic is flawed, and the best course of action for you is to die, boomer, so your spawn can live better lives.

This person was born with a uterus...
And so was this one:

As to your other question of whether that person is a woman, that depends on your definition of woman. Until we have a suitable one, any debate on this is pointless as it is a semantic dispute over a definition. That is why I ask what YOU think a woman is.
I understand you come at these questions from a place of hatred, ignorance, and bigotry, but any rigorous analysis of the situation will show you the difficulty in appropriately dichotomizing the species.
If you want to partition the species into 2 genders, you need to provide a specific definition that unambiguously selects to which of the 2 a given person belongs.
Clearly, my explanation and words are wasted on you though because you've never paid attention to definitions or thought rigorously in your life. You're a slob. An uncultured and uneducated swine who is incapable of higher reasoning. Your rules are contradictory. Your logic is flawed, and the best course of action for you is to die, boomer, so your spawn can live better lives.
Or you could be intellectually honest and just say what you mean: biological sex is biological sex, and you think gender is different than that and that it's okay for biological men/women to identify as whatever they please. stop with the "but the intersex!!!" argument ffs.

Is this person black? I'll wait.
August 2023:
BW: 194
B: 315 x 3, 225 x 14 (PR: 335)
S: 315 x 2, 225 x 18 (PR's)
DL: 405 x 1 (PR); Trap Bar DL: 405 x 1
OHP: 185 x 3 (PR), 135 x 16
Chins: 22(PR) Pushups: 83 (PR: 101)
1 Mile: 6:45 (PR: 5:52)
07-03-2023, 11:33 AM
-
#70
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
-
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 27,183
- Rep Power: 223047
-
-
That certainly explains a lot.


"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."
- PJ O'Rourke
07-03-2023, 11:36 AM
-
#71
Originally Posted By veggie530⏩
The point is your definition is useless as a partition on the set of humans. Those examples render the definition useless. If you insist there are two genders, we need a systematic way to determine which of the two genders a person falls under. We must be able to do this unambiguously for the entire fuking population.yawn. "I'll try to explain away the norm with 0.00001% of the populations examples."
Or you could be intellectually honest and just say what you mean: biological sex is biological sex, and you think gender is different than that and that it's okay for biological men/women to identify as whatever they please. stop with the "but the intersex!!!" argument ffs.

Is this person black? I'll wait.
Or you could be intellectually honest and just say what you mean: biological sex is biological sex, and you think gender is different than that and that it's okay for biological men/women to identify as whatever they please. stop with the "but the intersex!!!" argument ffs.

Is this person black? I'll wait.
You could define it as having a y chromosome or not. But then, you'll have weird situations where a person with androgen insensitivity who has a vagina and breasts and looks just physiologically like your wife or sister will be labeled a man.
Again, the entire concept of "black" is another bullshyt construction that is meaningless when scrutinized. But that won't stop people like you from being prejudiced asshoels anyway.
That you cannot assign an arbitrary human to a given race without ambiguity shows it isn't a fuking partition on the set. Just because Americans are retarded and suck at basic logic doesn't mean nature has to conform to their version of fake reality.
PS just to piss you off, he's white. HAHAHAHAHA seethe.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
