I mean men for thousands of years, across time and cultures know what the right answer is about how to order society if you want to have a surviving culture. Even low IQ tribes know. It's really not that complicated to fix.

Nope, I'm Gen Z and it's only getting worse. Sloots openly hit on my Chad 21 year old friend. Sloots know he has 20 girls on his rotation and they don't care

Meanwhile, I'm a 5'10 ****** incel and I get absolutely nothing. Women HAVE to be whores for Chad because Chads have no reason to interact with average women if they won't give up sex easily. And women would rather give up sex easily to Chads than settle with average men like me

Japan is what our future looks like, if we didn't have Astronauts

women like the challenge of "taking" what other women want to have...thus being envied. i saw that actor that played rudy on a clip and he was talking about how women don't want to be treated well...something about the 11th man. if 10 men are sitting in bar being all nice to a woman -- she actually wants the 11th man that comes in, says "sup" and turns his back as he talks with friends. they don't want the genuine man that says what he feels and means it when he says she's the best. she wants to win over the dude that doesn't really care if she likes him. nice "average" dudes are a dime a dozen.

When I was in Jr High in the 80's a few girls were sexually active at 12 or 13, then a few more as we entered highschool, but most were chaste until they found the one they would marry.

My friends slutty little girl tells me that most of her firends that are girls start having sex at 11 these days, mostly with older boys. She had a 23 year old boyfriend when she was 13 and he went to jail. She had been watching porn on her phone since she was much younger and I guess it densesitzes them to it. She and most of her friends are all bisexual now.

Granted, these are lower class of public school kids, but I feel sorry for a good kid these days who wants a virgin bride when he gets to be in his 20's.

All of what you say is true to a certain extent, but I know so many top tier men that are happily married with children. I personally don’t know the state of their marriages, but on surface, they appear to be great fathers and good husbands.

I think a large percentage of society will always want to be in monogamous relationships, even top tier men. I also know top tier dudes that are still playing the field well in their late 30s, but they are aware that their time to secure a youngish, atttactive woman to wife up is running out. Of course there are some that will remain bachelors.

I do agree that the top beneficiaries of sexual liberation are not women, but top tier men. Pussy on easy mode.

This.. women need guidance from Alpha Males and they love Drama/adventure not boring Men who do what there told

Do you think African Americans will stop murdering and stealing in our life time?


Tigers don't change their stripes brah

Slooting is a product of a peace time society where women are highly protected and have very little to worry about.

The thing is, most of those mean you speak of got married in a time where marriage had its benefits and it was basically the only path. And women were much more wholesome and prude than today, the women that can be classified as “wife material” are only a small fraction than compared to the previous generations of women.


I don’t see many men settling down nowadays and marrying women with body count as high as women have today (aka promiscuous), that’s one of the reasons that marriage rates are falling more and more every year.


Sure some men will go for the taught path and get married to a woman, have kids etc, but most men won’t IMO.

Men with options have zero incentive to get married nowadays, actually the opposite. Which yeah, it’s bad for society.

It will never be accepted breh. Women will never accept sharing one man.

it'll get way worse before it gets better

lol

They'll get worse.

i imagine at some point not too long ago people would've said society will never accept women becoming men and men becoming women....but here we are at a point where anything you can imagine as being taboo falls pretty quickly.

Things do not improve in the west until it collapses or goes through a massive, likely violent political realignment where commies are being hung from trees or impaled alive along the highways again.

Women are retarded and they are only doing what they are programmed to do when you destroy patriarchal systems. No patriarchy, no civilization. What is happening right now is that western nations are being weakened to the point where they will be overrun, and the people that overrun them will be patriarchal and they will breed these dumb whores and put them back in the kitchen.

In short, nothing is going to change because these useless kunts vote and determine elections now, so politicians pander to them to stay in power and maintain the personal gravy train.

Until then, it will gradually degenerate into what you see in African communities. Fatherless homes, disgusting women the state has to support, massive crime and social problems, wealthy men hoarding women.

Its already happening. The sheer number of women who are sugar babies is insane. The internet has given whores access to wealthy men.

Your ancestors were right about everything, including women. Islam is right about women. They should simply never be taken seriously.

Well like you said, Chads will always be non-monogamous so many times she will settle to being one of Chad’s rotation.

The problem with sex with Chad is that she’s awakened to sex with a really hot man, so to settle with Timothy will most likely mean she’s not attracted to him.

I remember the Sega tennis model I had a 4 month fling with 16 years ago and he honestly ruined me. Then I became obsessed with him and any hot man. It really ruined my life with a lot of emotional grief until I lost my sex drive recently and that saved me after years of heartbreak because of course I got attached and hurt.

The only change I see there is if she realizes she can’t tie down Chad and her childbearing years are coming to an end she can withhold sex with Timothy because she’s not attracted to him at this point and then just rarely have sex with him. Or she could sneak off with Chad if he’ll still have her.

Chads just really mess things up. And I mean Chad in the sense of good looking—not necessarily financially well off. The guys I liked were mostly 20-25 so they’re broke lol.

Society should penalize promiscuity in men just as hard as promiscuity in women. Lol at thinking women should change things. Aren't men supposed to be leaders? Either everyone tries to coordinate on monogamy as a social norm and it's men who need to start enforcing this norm (and yeah you'll get deviations from that norm but it will be the main norm) or you get promiscuity in both men and women. You cannot force just one gender to be pure, the math doesn't add up; who are the high value men going to bang if the women aren't promiscuous anymore? High value men currently reward promiscuity in women because it's in their short-term interests. But in the long run it's destabilizing for society because of a growing pool of incels who could eventually decide to get violent.

You cannot have chad running around and imprint on a bunch of women. Look at the start of the movie Casanova; the men are furious at Casanova and with good reason, he's a big threat to the stability of society.

IMO as religion is no longer a solution we should turn to economic solutions. We should reward people who try to live traditionally, e.g. delete student loans for women who choose to have a baby early, more economic benefits to marriage etc. Heavy taxation on the use of dating apps, etc.

The tax breaks are definitely a good idea. However, men aren’t wired to be monogamous, so I don’t know how much they would get behind this.

We aren't slaves to our biology. Western culture got successful by designing cultural solutions to biological problems, e.g. putting a penalty on polygamy/polygyny. We can do the same with economics, people tend to buy less of something when it becomes more expensive. If it costs (a lot) more to be promiscuous, people are going to be less promiscuous on average.

The evidence indicates that historically, society moved from a sexual inequality scenario where men in the elites had 3-4 women to a monogamy-based solution. A possible explanation is that the very men who benefit from sexual inequality realized that it is for the good of society as a whole to keep themselves in check and adopted religious norms aimed at that goal.

"Historically, the emergence of monogamous marriage is particularly puzzling since the very men who most benefit from polygynous marriage—wealthy aristocrats—are often those most influential in setting norms and shaping laws. Yet, here we are."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...?ref=quillette

A lot of you live in a bubble or on social media.

A vast majority of women are AVERAGE. They work a basic job, drive a basic car, and live in a basic apartment/house. Any guy with some confidence can walk up to her and she will 100% fall for him.

Sure if you live in a high class attractive city full of millionaires like San Diego or LA, polygamy may very well be the case. The women are good digging sloots. But in a regular degular city full of average people, it's not happening. Women make claims of wanting this or that but end up falling in love and having 4 kids by 5'6 Sanchez who works in construction.

All it takes is leaving your bubble, opening up your eyes, and looking around. Polygamous relationships will never happen.

We’re ****ed either way. Either things keep going the way they are with slooting and moral decay. Or we go into war/chaos end of western society type of event.

You think of your mother as a whore too, OP?

So what's the deal with women...is it something psychological that makes them get obsessed with the best looking dude(s) they've ever had sex with?

Does this kinda show that's there's a lot of emotion tied to sex and overall it's probably better for a woman to have purity and save herself for the man that's willing to court/marry her before something as intimate as sex?

Perhaps in a more sexually free society it sorta becomes just a fun thing to do instead of this special thing meant to tie people together for the long haul...the long haul being the age 40s, 50s, 60s years that sorta go beyond just having fun.

There's only one couple under 40 I know that even has kids. That's the whole problem.

I agree that the best for society, and especially child-rearing as I believe the children should be raised with their mother and father in the household. The number of kids being raised by mostly single moms has more than doubled between 1968 and 2017. This definitely creates problems.The best is if both the mother and father could be in love and raise their kids in a loving household. Unfortunately our technology and women working has made those relationships rare.

In the 1970s it's not like it would be that easy for a man to get in touch with my Mom on a land line where my Dad could easily pick up the phone and plus she was at home with me. Add in cell phones and women working and you see infidelity skyrocket because of the 1:1 connections. Then add in social media where a woman's high school boyfriend messages her when she's going through a rough time in her marriage.
Well Ken-O is obviously in that top 1% of men and I don't know much about the city where he lives in, but I live in an area where the median house price is over $2 million, but most of the men are Asian and Indian, and they tend to marry their own race.

It's really hard to find a white man who isn't a computer nerd. The guys I saw always had multiple other women that I found out about via social media.

There are a lot of 5'6 Sanchez guys who work in construction in the area, but I usually see them with Hispanic wives.

So yeah, I don't know how the rest of America lives. I live in a bubble lol.Not all women. Very few women I know IRL are obsessed with finding the best looking dudes. On here I only know of SS (if she is a real person) and me (in the past, as I stopped caring when I lost my sex drive in menopause), and IRL I only know one woman like this.

But I can say if the guy has a chitty personality I didn't get attached regardless of how good looking he is. Most young guys are fun and excited about life, so that on top of good looks makes it to the point where I'm obsessed with every text I receive. I'd get a dopamine hit and constantly check my phone. It just was really upsetting and caused emotional trauma when he would block and unblock me, ghost and return and play games. Then you have to go searching for the next dopamine hit.

Most of the attractive women in my area have married down significantly in terms of looks match, most likely for money. But I'm in Gen X.

On here I see guys talking about the women in Gen Z and I assume the lower half of millennials mostly having sex with Chads. But they could be spouting incel garbage.

and perhaps we are just seeing the beginning of women with psychological problems that will stem from being flings of chad instead of having a relationship with any depth beyond banging. when they enter their mid 30s, 40s, 50s -- for 90% the amount of effort chad will extend to bang will drop to nothing. i see a good bit of promiscuous women on fb that get crazier and crazier with age...probably future crazy cat ladies as the looks of the men willing to relationship them drops lower and lower. heck, i see perpetually single overweight women in their 50s still complaining about the looks of the guys willing to potentiomally take them on. psychotic.