Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Is this paedo-panic just the Satanic panic all over again?
  1. Results 901 to 908 of 908
  2. Page 31 of 31
  3. First
  5. 29
  6. 30
  7. 31

Thread: Is this paedo-panic just the Satanic panic all over again?

post 1698888543 03-07-2024, 07:27 PM
-
#901
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
You said providing GAHT justifies a mental illness, then defined justification as meaning to absolve.

As shown in the definitions above, absolve is an archaic use of justify. Regardless, absolve means to remove blame or forgive.

Physicians prescribe and administer GAHT. Their profession does not function to remove blame nor to forgive. They do not absolve nor justify their patients' conditions.
Did you read the definition I posted?

Here it is again..



to free someone of responsibility for something.


The responsible action would be to place a person that is in a state of dysphoria into psychiatric care, not give them drugs that mask their condition by placing them in a state of euphoria.

They absolutely absolve their patients conditions by the very nature of the drugs they administer
post 1698888833 03-07-2024, 07:32 PM
-
#902
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
Did you read the definition I posted?

Here it is again..

to free someone of responsibility for something.


The responsible action would be to place a person that is in a state of dysphoria into psychiatric care, not give them drugs that mask their condition by placing them in a state of euphoria.

They absolutely absolve their patients conditions by the very nature of the drugs they administer
I disagree that they are responsible for their condition.

They receive psychiatric care. Hormones are part of the treatment.

Conversion therapy doesn't work nor help.

Physicians do not remove responsibility by treating. Medicine is neither religion nor law.

Lol at state of euphoria.
post 1698889293 03-07-2024, 07:41 PM
-
#903
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I disagree that they are responsible for their condition.

They receive psychiatric care. Hormones are part of the treatment.

Conversion therapy doesn't work nor help.

Physicians do not remove responsibility by treating. Medicine is neither religion nor law.
They are responsible for the drugs they administer

Hormones mask the condition

Never claimed it did. Psychiatric help, and above all God is the ultimate healer

Medicine has absolutely become a religion in which the perpetrators of it declare it law...you would be one of those
post 1698889533 03-07-2024, 07:47 PM
-
#904
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
They are responsible for the drugs they administer

Hormones mask the condition
So?

That's their responsibility.

It has nothing to do with removing patients' responsibility for their condition.

Mask the condition? Seems like the opposite
post 1698914023 03-08-2024, 08:57 AM
-
#905
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
So?

That's their responsibility.

It has nothing to do with removing patients' responsibility for their condition.

Mask the condition? Seems like the opposite
You claimed it wasn’t their responsibility though.. confused are you??


How would it be the opposite when only the symptom of dysphoria is temporarily masked and the cause is never addressed?

Explain..
post 1698914543 03-08-2024, 09:07 AM
-
#906
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
You claimed it wasn’t their responsibility though.. confused are you??


How would it be the opposite when only the symptom of dysphoria is temporarily masked and the cause is never addressed?

Explain..
No.

I said physicians can't, and don't, remove patients' responsibility for their conditions nor, or do, they forgive their patients for having a condition.

Hard to mask/hide feeling like a gender that differs from sex when one takes masculinizing or feminizing hormones to change their appearance. Rather, it puts it right out there on display
post 1698935423 03-08-2024, 06:04 PM
-
#907
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
No.

I said physicians can't, and don't, remove patients' responsibility for their conditions can, or do, they forgive their patients for having a condition.

Hard to mask/hide feeling like a gender that differs from sex when one takes masculinizing or feminizing hormones to change their appearance. Rather, it puts it right out there on display
You think taking something to build muscle is the same as gender dysphoria?

Seems to me one is showcasing the traits of a person’s biological gender while the other is denying it.
post 1698958503 03-09-2024, 07:25 AM
-
#908
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Paul
You think taking something to build muscle is the same as gender dysphoria?

Seems to me one is showcasing the traits of a person’s biological gender while the other is denying it.
Are you conceding on the ineffective and more dangerous arguments?
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts