Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Misc.
» Is this paedo-panic just the Satanic panic all over again?
03-07-2024, 06:27 PM
#901
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Did you read the definition I posted?
You said providing GAHT justifies a mental illness, then defined justification as meaning to absolve.
As shown in the definitions above, absolve is an archaic use of justify. Regardless, absolve means to remove blame or forgive.
Physicians prescribe and administer GAHT. Their profession does not function to remove blame nor to forgive. They do not absolve nor justify their patients' conditions.
As shown in the definitions above, absolve is an archaic use of justify. Regardless, absolve means to remove blame or forgive.
Physicians prescribe and administer GAHT. Their profession does not function to remove blame nor to forgive. They do not absolve nor justify their patients' conditions.
Here it is again..
to free someone of responsibility for something.
The responsible action would be to place a person that is in a state of dysphoria into psychiatric care, not give them drugs that mask their condition by placing them in a state of euphoria.
They absolutely absolve their patients conditions by the very nature of the drugs they administer
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,622
- Rep Power: 248,259
-
03-07-2024, 06:32 PM
#902
Originally Posted By Paul Kreul⏩
I disagree that they are responsible for their condition.
Did you read the definition I posted?
Here it is again..
to free someone of responsibility for something.
The responsible action would be to place a person that is in a state of dysphoria into psychiatric care, not give them drugs that mask their condition by placing them in a state of euphoria.
They absolutely absolve their patients conditions by the very nature of the drugs they administer
Here it is again..
to free someone of responsibility for something.
The responsible action would be to place a person that is in a state of dysphoria into psychiatric care, not give them drugs that mask their condition by placing them in a state of euphoria.
They absolutely absolve their patients conditions by the very nature of the drugs they administer
They receive psychiatric care. Hormones are part of the treatment.
Conversion therapy doesn't work nor help.
Physicians do not remove responsibility by treating. Medicine is neither religion nor law.
Lol at state of euphoria.
03-07-2024, 06:41 PM
#903
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
They are responsible for the drugs they administer
I disagree that they are responsible for their condition.
They receive psychiatric care. Hormones are part of the treatment.
Conversion therapy doesn't work nor help.
Physicians do not remove responsibility by treating. Medicine is neither religion nor law.
They receive psychiatric care. Hormones are part of the treatment.
Conversion therapy doesn't work nor help.
Physicians do not remove responsibility by treating. Medicine is neither religion nor law.
Hormones mask the condition
Never claimed it did. Psychiatric help, and above all God is the ultimate healer
Medicine has absolutely become a religion in which the perpetrators of it declare it law…you would be one of those
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,622
- Rep Power: 248,259
-
03-07-2024, 06:47 PM
#904
Originally Posted By Paul Kreul⏩
So?
They are responsible for the drugs they administer
Hormones mask the condition
Hormones mask the condition
That's their responsibility.
It has nothing to do with removing patients' responsibility for their condition.
Mask the condition? Seems like the opposite
03-08-2024, 07:57 AM
#905
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
You claimed it wasn’t their responsibility though.. confused are you??
So?
That's their responsibility.
It has nothing to do with removing patients' responsibility for their condition.
Mask the condition? Seems like the opposite
That's their responsibility.
It has nothing to do with removing patients' responsibility for their condition.
Mask the condition? Seems like the opposite
How would it be the opposite when only the symptom of dysphoria is temporarily masked and the cause is never addressed?
Explain..
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,622
- Rep Power: 248,259
-
03-08-2024, 08:07 AM
#906
Originally Posted By Paul Kreul⏩
No.
You claimed it wasn’t their responsibility though.. confused are you??
How would it be the opposite when only the symptom of dysphoria is temporarily masked and the cause is never addressed?
Explain..
How would it be the opposite when only the symptom of dysphoria is temporarily masked and the cause is never addressed?
Explain..
I said physicians can't, and don't, remove patients' responsibility for their conditions nor, or do, they forgive their patients for having a condition.
Hard to mask/hide feeling like a gender that differs from sex when one takes masculinizing or feminizing hormones to change their appearance. Rather, it puts it right out there on display
03-08-2024, 05:04 PM
#907
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
You think taking something to build muscle is the same as gender dysphoria?
No.
I said physicians can't, and don't, remove patients' responsibility for their conditions can, or do, they forgive their patients for having a condition.
Hard to mask/hide feeling like a gender that differs from sex when one takes masculinizing or feminizing hormones to change their appearance. Rather, it puts it right out there on display
I said physicians can't, and don't, remove patients' responsibility for their conditions can, or do, they forgive their patients for having a condition.
Hard to mask/hide feeling like a gender that differs from sex when one takes masculinizing or feminizing hormones to change their appearance. Rather, it puts it right out there on display
Seems to me one is showcasing the traits of a person’s biological gender while the other is denying it.
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 17,622
- Rep Power: 248,259
-
03-09-2024, 06:25 AM
#908
Originally Posted By Paul Kreul⏩
Are you conceding on the ineffective and more dangerous arguments?
You think taking something to build muscle is the same as gender dysphoria?
Seems to me one is showcasing the traits of a person’s biological gender while the other is denying it.
Seems to me one is showcasing the traits of a person’s biological gender while the other is denying it.
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts