Forum
»
What's faster: A magnetic train going 200 mph or a car going 200 mph?
05-30-2016, 12:57 PM
-
#91
- smoked04
- Shadilay
-
- smoked04
- Shadilay
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 4,975
- Rep Power: 16539
-
-
Originally Posted By YeBrah⏩
U wot?its the same speed lmao
neither is faster than the other
when you have the velocities of the 2 objects it doesn't matter what the friction is when looking only at speed
neither is faster than the other
when you have the velocities of the 2 objects it doesn't matter what the friction is when looking only at speed
The train has a greater mass, along with the magnetic propulsion, would be going faster at 200mph than the car at 200mph.
Misc is full of potatoes.
🇺🇸
OIF
05-30-2016, 12:58 PM
-
#92
- SomedayIllBeMe
- Registered User
-
- SomedayIllBeMe
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 31
- Posts: 681
- Rep Power: 3176
-
-
Originally Posted By mrmk5110⏩
Highly unlikely. Consider how easy it is to get a driver's license. Literally hundreds of thousands of people can drive. However, far less people are capable train pilots(especially magnetic trains). A train pilot is far more skilled and trained to drive a train, than a person to drive a car. You need to go to school and training to learn to drive a train. So the train pilot will keep the train much straighter than a car driver. Even if you take the best car driver, the best train driver will still keep the train straighter. Even robots cannot match the finesse and skill of a seasoned train pilot.It is true that a car will do this, but unless otherwise stated we can't 100% assume that this circumstance is true. What if it is self driving and is able to keep the car perfectly straight for the entire time?
Consider for a moment how advanced the piloting technology in fighter jets is. But they are still manned by human pilots. Why? Because humans are more capable of piloting than AI systems.
Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily.
05-30-2016, 12:59 PM
-
#93
05-30-2016, 01:00 PM
-
#94
05-30-2016, 01:03 PM
-
#95
- -Al-
- Registered User
-
- -Al-
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 1,128
- Rep Power: 1403
-
-
Originally Posted By StiffSproles⏩
Even if there is friction if the net Acceleration on the two systems is the same their speeds will be equivalent.They are both going 200mph, but the trainhas no frictionsince it's a magnetic relationship with the metal trail and is basically hovering. The car has to deal with friction all the time because there is always a tug with the tire and concrete.
So obviously I believe the magnetic train will travel faster than the car. What do you think?
So obviously I believe the magnetic train will travel faster than the car. What do you think?
The car however will take far more energy to travel the same distances as train as it has to constantly exert a force in order to maintain its speed unlike the train which just needs an initial push to get it going.
In short, the car has a constant force being exerted on it but as its speeds not changing it doesn't have a net acceleration and all its forces are in equilibrium (friction = propelling force).
There are no parallel forces acting on the train and therefore it's acceleration is also zero.
Both will travel at the same velocity but if you value not going bankrupt on an energy bill you'll opt for the train.
^^^()()GERMANIC CREW()()^^^
WE'RE ALL GOING TO MAKE IT BROS
WE ALLS GUN TO MAKE IT
Positive Crew 2.0
#Mcfreako inspired
05-30-2016, 01:04 PM
-
#96
Originally Posted By SomedayIllBeMe⏩
You might think that, but in fact the train would get there faster. Think of what requires more effort, a pull or a push? It requires significantly less effort to pull than to push. So apply this to our scenario; the train is literally beingpushedby magnets. The car, however, uses it's tires to pull itself along the road. There is a greater synergy between the magnets, working together, vs the opposite effects of a rubber tire pulling itself across asphalt. Magnet + magnet is far more efficient than tire - asphalt.
It's like a rock climber pushing off the mountain face to reach the top, vs being pulled up by a pully system. Obviously he'll get up more quickly by being pulled up.
It's like a rock climber pushing off the mountain face to reach the top, vs being pulled up by a pully system. Obviously he'll get up more quickly by being pulled up.
05-30-2016, 01:06 PM
-
#97
- SomedayIllBeMe
- Registered User
-
- SomedayIllBeMe
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 31
- Posts: 681
- Rep Power: 3176
-
-
Originally Posted By -Al-⏩
This. You worded it better than I did.The car however will take far more energy to travel the same distances as train as it has to constantly exert in order to maintain its speed unlike the train which needs a initial push to get it going.
The car needs to be constantly spinning it's tires and exerting energy, the train just cruises on the force of magnets. Therefore the train will be faster. They both have the same initial speed, 200mph, but since the car is required to exert more energy it will be slower than the train.
Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily.
05-30-2016, 01:09 PM
-
#98
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
-
- mrmk5110
- Chillflix and Net
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Posts: 2,384
- Rep Power: 4008
-
-
Originally Posted By SomedayIllBeMe⏩
Well we train robots to do many other things more accurately than a human can do aka much of our major manufacturing.Highly unlikely. Consider how easy it is to get a driver's license. Literally hundreds of thousands of people can drive. However, far less people are capable train pilots(especially magnetic trains). A train pilot is far more skilled and trained to drive a train, than a person to drive a car. You need to go to school and training to learn to drive a train. So the train pilot will keep the train much straighter than a car driver. Even if you take the best car driver, the best train driver will still keep the train straighter.Even robots cannot match the finesse and skill of a seasoned train pilot.
Consider for a moment how advanced the piloting technology in fighter jets is. But they are still manned by human pilots. Why? Because humans are more capable of piloting than AI systems.
Consider for a moment how advanced the piloting technology in fighter jets is. But they are still manned by human pilots. Why? Because humans are more capable of piloting than AI systems.
I disagree that a robot can't be more accurate than a seasoned pilot
Praise the Helix Fossil
*6'4" Master Race Crew*
BPL: Liverpool
NHL: Flyers
IG: _markatron
Follow and I'll follow back
05-30-2016, 01:11 PM
-
#99
- -Al-
- Registered User
-
- -Al-
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 1,128
- Rep Power: 1403
-
-
I
200mph is a rate of change over time. If both the train and car are displacing a certain distance at the same time that means their changing their position at equal rates. Their speeds are equivalent however the car is exponentially less efficient maintaining that speed.
Originally Posted By SomedayIllBeMe⏩
Their speeds won't change because even though the car is wasting way more energy to maintain its 200mph it is still traveling st 200mph.This. You worded it better than I did.
The car needs to be constantly spinning it's tires and exerting energy, the train just cruises on the force of magnets. Therefore the train will be faster. They both have the same initial speed, 200mph, but since the car is required to exert more energy it will be slower than the train.
The car needs to be constantly spinning it's tires and exerting energy, the train just cruises on the force of magnets. Therefore the train will be faster. They both have the same initial speed, 200mph, but since the car is required to exert more energy it will be slower than the train.
200mph is a rate of change over time. If both the train and car are displacing a certain distance at the same time that means their changing their position at equal rates. Their speeds are equivalent however the car is exponentially less efficient maintaining that speed.
^^^()()GERMANIC CREW()()^^^
WE'RE ALL GOING TO MAKE IT BROS
WE ALLS GUN TO MAKE IT
Positive Crew 2.0
#Mcfreako inspired
05-30-2016, 01:12 PM
-
#100
05-30-2016, 01:13 PM
-
#101
- -Al-
- Registered User
-
- -Al-
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 1,128
- Rep Power: 1403
-
-
Originally Posted By NVious⏩
Finally someone gets it 👍Obviously a pitbull, once it's jaw locks, both are immobilized.
^^^()()GERMANIC CREW()()^^^
WE'RE ALL GOING TO MAKE IT BROS
WE ALLS GUN TO MAKE IT
Positive Crew 2.0
#Mcfreako inspired
05-30-2016, 01:15 PM
-
#102
Originally Posted By Raven2392⏩
No not at all. One is consuming more fuel to make energy to maintain that speed but they're both going identical speeds. Neither is faster.If they are both going 200/mph they are both doing the same speed and one is not faster than the other? Is this over my head?
05-30-2016, 01:15 PM
-
#103
- SomedayIllBeMe
- Registered User
-
- SomedayIllBeMe
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Age: 31
- Posts: 681
- Rep Power: 3176
-
-
Originally Posted By KTTY⏩
Don't blame me, I'm just reiterating what the other dude said.I knew that at some point someone would go way over the top and ruin a great trolling thread
*******
*******
Originally Posted By mrmk5110⏩
It depends on the context. If this thread came up in like the year 2116 then it is possible an auto piloted car might have the same degree of precision as the train. But with current technology I still think the train would be faster. Humans have to train the robots, therefore the robot can never surpass humans. It's like how you can't teach someone to be smarter than you; you can only impart as much as you know. Robots can only repeat with consistency greater than a human. I think once humanity and our technology advances, though, it might be a closer race. But it's impossible to say with certainty.Well we train robots to do many other things more accurately than a human can do aka much of our major manufacturing.
I disagree that a robot can't be more accurate than a seasoned pilot
I disagree that a robot can't be more accurate than a seasoned pilot
Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily.
05-30-2016, 01:20 PM
-
#104
- GenghisBro
- Banned
-
- GenghisBro
- Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Location: United States
- Posts: 5,866
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
They stated the velocity is the same between the train and the car. They're the same speed. The vector diagram between alinearpath from point A to B if they both travel at 200 km/s will reach the same destination at the same time if nothing obstructs the point of travel from either vehicle. They're the same velocity in a vacuum and it's the same velocity if it's 200 km/s ramming up your butt. They travel at the same velocity...It's a different matter if the vehicle travels at a non-linear path with many different types of friction acting upon it.
05-30-2016, 01:23 PM
-
#105
Originally Posted By IH8RICE⏩
You're right. lol @ this having 100+ replies though.No not at all. One is consuming more fuel to make energy to maintain that speed but they're both going identical speeds. Neither is faster.
RIP Pedro Suarez Vertiz. Te queremos Hermano
If your right leg is Thanksgiving and your left leg is Christmas, can I come and visit you between the holidays?
05-30-2016, 01:28 PM
-
#106
- 0hseeper
- Registered User
-
- 0hseeper
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2015
- Age: 56
- Posts: 32
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
If two cars are parked next to each other, one a very fast sports car, and the other a very slow econobox, and someone was asked which car is faster and they answered the sports car, would they be wrong since they are both going exactly 0mph? Or does potential play into this? If the car is only capable of 200, and the train could easily do 250 or 300, would it be wrong to call the train faster even if they are currently going the same speed?
05-30-2016, 01:29 PM
-
#107
- Ken-O
- Usuario registrado
-
- Ken-O
- Usuario registrado
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Posts: 41,198
- Rep Power: 243727
-
-
[QUOTE=GenghisBro post_id=1444962333]They stated the velocity is the same between the train and the car. They're the same speed. The vector diagram between a[b]linear[/b]path from point A to B if they both travel at 200 km/s will reach the same destination at the same time if nothing obstructs the point of travel from either vehicle. They're the same velocity in a vacuum and it's the same velocity if it's 200 km/s ramming up your butt. They travel at the same velocity...It's a different matter if the vehicle travels at a non-linear path with many different types of friction acting upon it.
[youtube]nkQ17qxGdro[/yutube]
[youtube]h6X3j3SV8fQ[/youube][/QUOTE]You are forgetting about[b]friction[/b]dumbass. Friction is a force applied[b]downwards[/b], not backwards like you think, and its caused by gravity pulling matter to the center of the universe, causing the tires to have friction with the road, noticeably slowing down the car.
Now Genius, if the car is going 200 mph and suddenly it loses its tires and starts floating, keeping the same acceleration force, will it go faster or slower?
The answer to OP is the car, because of the train not having any friction
[youtube]nkQ17qxGdro[/yutube]
[youtube]h6X3j3SV8fQ[/youube][/QUOTE]You are forgetting about[b]friction[/b]dumbass. Friction is a force applied[b]downwards[/b], not backwards like you think, and its caused by gravity pulling matter to the center of the universe, causing the tires to have friction with the road, noticeably slowing down the car.
Now Genius, if the car is going 200 mph and suddenly it loses its tires and starts floating, keeping the same acceleration force, will it go faster or slower?
The answer to OP is the car, because of the train not having any friction
"The flowers bloom, then wither... The stars shine and one day become extinct. This earth, the sun, the galaxies and even the big universe, someday will be destroyed. Compared with that, the human life is only a blink, just a little time. In that short time - people are born, laugh, cry, fight, are injured, feel joy, sadness, hate someone, love someone. All in just a moment. And then, are embraced by the eternal sleep called death."
05-30-2016, 01:30 PM
-
#108
- StiffSproles
- #Pray4G(.)(.)
-
- StiffSproles
- #Pray4G(.)(.)
- Join Date: Mar 2015
- Posts: 12,438
- Rep Power: 22944
-
-
Originally Posted By Ken-O⏩
Wow, this makes 100% sense. Very good explanation and very intuitive.You are forgetting aboutfrictiondumbass. Friction is a force applieddownwards, not backwards like you think, and its caused by gravity pulling matter to the center of the universe, causing the tires to have friction with the road, noticeably slowing down the car.
Now Genius, if the car is going 200 mph and suddenly it loses its tires and starts floating, keeping the same acceleration force, will it go faster or slower?
The answer to OP is the car, because of the train not having any friction
Now Genius, if the car is going 200 mph and suddenly it loses its tires and starts floating, keeping the same acceleration force, will it go faster or slower?
The answer to OP is the car, because of the train not having any friction
*United States Space Force Vet*
"I have embraced my Autism. I am a proud Autist. I believe it endows me with special powers that are incomprehensible to pathetic normies like you. I would gladly sacrifice any chance at a normal life to benefit from the GIFT that is AUTISM."-Drips617
05-30-2016, 01:32 PM
-
#109
- GenghisBro
- Banned
-
- GenghisBro
- Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Location: United States
- Posts: 5,866
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Ken-O⏩
That's not what the question asked. If they're both travelling at the same velocity, they're traveling the same speed in a direction. Were not accounting other variables that obstruct the vehicles point of destination like a muddy terrain.You are forgetting aboutfrictiondumbass. Friction is a force applieddownwards, not backwards like you think, and its caused by gravity pulling matter to the center of the universe, causing the tires to have friction with the road, noticeably slowing down the car.
Now Genius, if the car is going 200 mph and suddenly it loses its tires and starts floating, keeping the same acceleration force, will it go faster or slower?
The answer to OP is the car, because of the train not having any friction
Now Genius, if the car is going 200 mph and suddenly it loses its tires and starts floating, keeping the same acceleration force, will it go faster or slower?
The answer to OP is the car, because of the train not having any friction
05-30-2016, 01:34 PM
-
#110
- DrBroscientist
- Dr since 117BC.
-
- DrBroscientist
- Dr since 117BC.
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: Australia
- Age: 32
- Posts: 5,652
- Rep Power: 2897
-
-
The train OP. Trains are longer than cars so if they start at the same spot, obviously the train will finish first (the car will have to catch up with the rest of the train's length).
Do you even basic science?
Do you even basic science?
"Have faith in the Lord Fifth, gain eternal life! When the Lord Fifth appears, who dares to cause strife!"
"Heyyy. Hi there! Hello! Im Lord Third. Let me tell you something, do you know how high I can count? I can count to three"
Little Haowie, dont you worry, it said, eyes shining brightly. My dream is that, upon entering the Black Lands, there will be people there shouting the name of Lord Fifth. Then, my two great armies will join together to become like my wings!
05-30-2016, 01:39 PM
-
#111
- Ken-O
- Usuario registrado
-
- Ken-O
- Usuario registrado
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Posts: 41,198
- Rep Power: 243727
-
-
Originally Posted By GenghisBro⏩
LMAO, what the fuk you trying to say man? Are you trolling right now with your nonsense?That's not what the question asked. If they're both travelling at the same velocity, they're traveling the same speed in a direction.Were not accounting other variables that obstruct the vehicles point of destination like a muddy terrain.
Now you bringing muddy terrains and ****? lulz, if you are trolling, son im proud, because you are really rustlin my jimmies with your poverty physics trolling.
"The flowers bloom, then wither... The stars shine and one day become extinct. This earth, the sun, the galaxies and even the big universe, someday will be destroyed. Compared with that, the human life is only a blink, just a little time. In that short time - people are born, laugh, cry, fight, are injured, feel joy, sadness, hate someone, love someone. All in just a moment. And then, are embraced by the eternal sleep called death."
05-30-2016, 01:43 PM
-
#112
- PriestAndrettii
- Registered User
-
- PriestAndrettii
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2014
- Location: United States
- Posts: 580
- Rep Power: 465
-
-
Originally Posted By YeBrah⏩
This.....Who ever thinks otherwise needs to attend 7th grade again.its the same speed lmao
neither is faster than the other
when you have the velocities of the 2 objects it doesn't matter what the friction is when looking only at speed
neither is faster than the other
when you have the velocities of the 2 objects it doesn't matter what the friction is when looking only at speed
To be continued....
05-30-2016, 01:46 PM
-
#113
- GenghisBro
- Banned
-
- GenghisBro
- Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2014
- Location: United States
- Posts: 5,866
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Ken-O⏩
Amigo if they're travelling at the same speed, what type of question is it if someone asks which one is faster? They're at the same speed even with friction in the car. Decreasing the friction would increase the speed of the train no doubt, but if it's travelling at the same velocity as the car it's not going faster than it. You might have to review your basic physics from high school senior.LMAO, what the fuk you trying to say man? Are you trolling right now with your nonsense?
Now you bringing muddy terrains and ****? lulz, if you are trolling, son im proud, because you are really rustlin my jimmies with your poverty physics trolling.
Now you bringing muddy terrains and ****? lulz, if you are trolling, son im proud, because you are really rustlin my jimmies with your poverty physics trolling.
05-30-2016, 01:48 PM
-
#114
- GreenWave1
- Saved
-
- GreenWave1
- Saved
- Join Date: May 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,299
- Rep Power: 158563
-
-
Awesome thread.
Some guys are playing along and replying with humor.
Some guys are replying seriously.
OP is staying in character and rolling along.
10/10
Some guys are playing along and replying with humor.
Some guys are replying seriously.
OP is staying in character and rolling along.
10/10
Jesus is my lifting partner.
05-30-2016, 01:51 PM
-
#115
- Ken-O
- Usuario registrado
-
- Ken-O
- Usuario registrado
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Posts: 41,198
- Rep Power: 243727
-
-
Originally Posted By GenghisBro⏩
Oh i get it now, Mr troll.Amigo if they're travelling at the same speed, what type of question is it if someone asks which one is faster?They're at the same speed even with friction in the car. Decreasing the friction would increase the speed of the train no doubt, but if it's travelling at the same velocity as the car it's not going faster than it. You might have to review your basic physics from high school...
I gotta give it to you, you really trolled me at first lol. Reps for being a good subtle troll. I get carried away in these kinds of threads and i never know when miscers are trolling like you or when they are legit retarded Physics-wise like you seemed to be. Carry on my friend, i shall bait no more.
"The flowers bloom, then wither... The stars shine and one day become extinct. This earth, the sun, the galaxies and even the big universe, someday will be destroyed. Compared with that, the human life is only a blink, just a little time. In that short time - people are born, laugh, cry, fight, are injured, feel joy, sadness, hate someone, love someone. All in just a moment. And then, are embraced by the eternal sleep called death."
05-30-2016, 01:52 PM
-
#116
- PriestAndrettii
- Registered User
-
- PriestAndrettii
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2014
- Location: United States
- Posts: 580
- Rep Power: 465
-
-
Originally Posted By Ken-O⏩
Dude......200mph = 200 mph.You are forgetting aboutfrictiondumbass. Friction is a force applieddownwards, not backwards like you think, and its caused by gravity pulling matter to the center of the universe, causing the tires to have friction with the road, noticeably slowing down the car.
Now Genius, if the car is going 200 mph and suddenly it loses its tires and starts floating, keeping the same acceleration force, will it go faster or slower?
The answer to OP is the car, because of the train not having any friction
Now Genius, if the car is going 200 mph and suddenly it loses its tires and starts floating, keeping the same acceleration force, will it go faster or slower?
The answer to OP is the car, because of the train not having any friction
Both objects have different force vectors applied to them due to the difference in friction and wind resistance, but at the end of the day they both achieve a speed of 200mph.
It might take the train 100 Newtons to achieve a speed of 200 mph
It may take the car 10000000000000000000 Newtons to achieve a speed of 200mph
But they are both traveling 200 mph.
To be continued....
05-30-2016, 01:56 PM
-
#117
- GreenWave1
- Saved
-
- GreenWave1
- Saved
- Join Date: May 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,299
- Rep Power: 158563
-
-
Originally Posted By Ken-O⏩
Meta-trolling.Oh i get it now, Mr troll.
I gotta give it to you, you really trolled me at first lol. Reps for being a good subtle troll. I get carried away in these kinds of threads and i never know when miscers are trolling like you or when they are legit retarded Physics-wise like you seemed to be. Carry on my friend, i shall bait no more.
I gotta give it to you, you really trolled me at first lol. Reps for being a good subtle troll. I get carried away in these kinds of threads and i never know when miscers are trolling like you or when they are legit retarded Physics-wise like you seemed to be. Carry on my friend, i shall bait no more.

Jesus is my lifting partner.
05-30-2016, 01:59 PM
-
#118
now i aint gay but 200 mph 200 mph
the question wasn't who reaches 200 mph faster?
fukin *******s
the question wasn't who reaches 200 mph faster?
fukin *******s
Look, i know i don't really know you and all, and i know you probably hear this like everyday, but your just so perfect to me. The few hours we talked were really great even if the convo was stale, your really pretty and chill, and your country thats just perfect :'D i really dont know how to explain it, but i think i have feelings for you somehow. i never felt like this with someone i just met, but i felt the need to get it off my chest. sorry for being all weird just idk how to explain it D:
05-30-2016, 02:01 PM
-
#119
- Ken-O
- Usuario registrado
-
- Ken-O
- Usuario registrado
- Join Date: Sep 2008
- Location: Chihuahua, Mexico
- Posts: 41,198
- Rep Power: 243727
-
-
Originally Posted By PriestAndrettii⏩
Nice try doofus. Like im really gonna bait for that lol.Dude......200mph = 200 mph.
Both objects have different force vectors applied to them due to the difference in friction and wind resistance, but at the end of the day they both achieve a speed of 200mph.
It might take the train 100 Newtons to achieve a speed of 200 mph
It may take the car 10000000000000000000 Newtons to achieve a speed of 200mph
But they are both traveling 200 mph.
Both objects have different force vectors applied to them due to the difference in friction and wind resistance, but at the end of the day they both achieve a speed of 200mph.
It might take the train 100 Newtons to achieve a speed of 200 mph
It may take the car 10000000000000000000 Newtons to achieve a speed of 200mph
But they are both traveling 200 mph.
If trolling: fuk off
If serious: Go read the basics on physics. You can start with searching "Physics" on wikipedia (srs). Then come back to this thread and realize how dumb you look.
"The flowers bloom, then wither... The stars shine and one day become extinct. This earth, the sun, the galaxies and even the big universe, someday will be destroyed. Compared with that, the human life is only a blink, just a little time. In that short time - people are born, laugh, cry, fight, are injured, feel joy, sadness, hate someone, love someone. All in just a moment. And then, are embraced by the eternal sleep called death."
05-30-2016, 02:37 PM
-
#120
- -Al-
- Registered User
-
- -Al-
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 1,128
- Rep Power: 1403
-
-
Originally Posted By Ken-O⏩
m8 ur aving quite teh giggle dere r'nt uNice try doofus. Like im really gonna bait for that lol.
If trolling: fuk off
If serious: Go read the basics on physics. You can start with searching "Physics" on wikipedia (srs). Then come back to this thread and realize how dumb you look.
If trolling: fuk off
If serious: Go read the basics on physics. You can start with searching "Physics" on wikipedia (srs). Then come back to this thread and realize how dumb you look.
^^^()()GERMANIC CREW()()^^^
WE'RE ALL GOING TO MAKE IT BROS
WE ALLS GUN TO MAKE IT
Positive Crew 2.0
#Mcfreako inspired
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
