not gonna post pics of myself on misc *******
srs

Because she looks like a light-skinned black woman. Obviously she's mixed given her features, but a naive person would think she's black on first looks. Same with people like Stacey Dash. People identify them as black, because their black features stand out more than their others.
Rashida Jones is like 50% black, but yet looks like an Italian-American, or any other American white woman with dark features. And that's why most people by first impression think she's white.

I already said she isn't even all that.

But it seems like you're saying we shouldn't be allowed to talk about black women because the misc is racist? That isn't addressing the issue.

She is literally coming last. Not the kind I would want to be associated with

Obviously

lmao. I'll be sure to use this response next time a white guy calls me a ni**er. "Excuse me! I'm Black in a sense!"

I did my ancestry DNA too and it came back 56% western africa (ghana, cote de l'ivoire, togo), and 44% central european (german, french, british mixes.)

At the end of the day, me and a wesley snipes colored dude are both ni**as. Vanessa Williams and Stacy Dash are no less black than I am because I assure you, having a Chris Brown skin complexion, green eyes and all... I'm still the "black equestrian" at whichever barn i ride at, or the "black engineer" in whichever firm I'm consulting. Never in my life have i been "black in a sense". If I'm not "really" black because i'm not dark enough then dark ni**as need to sidestep me with that "self hate" nonsense if i'm seen with a white girl because hey... i'm not REALLY black, just black in a sense... don't you see my sparkly green kkk white man eyes?

Only king Arthur could pull me out

I'm Black,, I understand that you identify as Black and this country will treat you as a Black man but that's only because of the one drop rule. You and Wesley Snipes are not the same.

Is she a runner or a law firm. Strong name

Shelly Ann Fraser Pryce would definitely get the D.

Loads of attractive female athletes, spent a good hour today being mesmerized by Jessica's Ennis' bottom during the high jump.

Yes, I'd stick it in her ras.

I want you to remember this statement when you read about stories similar to the one about Bow Wow not identifying with certain "black" issueshttp://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/b...rstand-n618971

"Man i only believe what the eyes see. Im mixed. I dont know what my ancestors was doing. I only know what i see." In other words you are certainly right, myself and wesley snipes are not the same. I am the less "intimidating" looking black to caucasian individuals in the states. I get that. I do get different treatment. is it bullchit? yeah.

i'm the "Black" equestrian/engineer/student/manager/lifter to caucasian people, aka not white. And in the same breath i'm the "lightskin" brotha/co-worker/lifter aka not "really" black dude to the wesley snipe color african americans. you see my predicament? blue lives matter? black lives matter? i don't fuq wit none of yall.

Your life sounds like a Tragic Mullato story. If you have children with a white Roman, know that your kids won't be Black.

Schippers has way too many masculine traits.









The strong large jawbone, the thicker brows, small lips, the square face.. Her body shape is very manly as well. No breast, broad shoulders, no fat on thighs, hips, or buttocks.

Pryce actually has a more feminine face and body.







Fuller lips, more rounded/oval face, thinner eyebrows. Her body shape is also more feminine. She has more fat on her thighs and buttocks, proving her natural pear shape.

Overall Schippers looks like she'd make moreso an attractive man than women. She doesn't have enough womanly traits for me to find her sexually attractive.

Pryce is a somewhat decent looking woman.

Of the two as a heterosexual man, I'd choose Pryce.

Would definitely go for Dafne Schiffers on the left.

No thanks jeff

Lol @ u trying to win the black contest nobody entered.

schippers is straight up breeding material. she would make alpha males. abort the females because they would come out too manly.

If I could catch her

The results in this thread are quite interesting. A mixture of culture, media, and biological drive to reproduce.

Of course people will argue they prefer Schippers because she's simply prettier however based off of scientific evaluation that's not true. She has the ideal man bone structure however.

Then given a more feminine face on a woman with a more womanly body type, however on here she is rated as less attractive. For varying reasons. Her skin color, her ethnicity, her hair type. All irrelevant scientifically. Of the two, Pryce is the most womanly and has the most feminine attributes.

As much as people like to argue preference, people's attraction to certain things is largely due to culture and media influence.

For example. Not long ago, big butts were considered unattractive, particularly in European culture. So much so that many a European would be offended if some told her, her butt looked big. Same was true for a woman having fuller lips.

As noted these features were common in Africans. Hence why they were ridiculed so often. Since Africans arrived in America. People would equate their larger lips and bigger backsides to ugliness and less "pristine".

As noted, men overall particularly European men did not like bigger backsides and instead preferred smaller backsides and women with tiny lips. While women with bigger backsides and fuller lips were seen as ugly and primitive.

However, as we see today having a bigger fuller butt is all the rage. What was once seen as unattractive, is now attractive. But why? Simple, the white European mainstream made the adoption of a larger butt and larger lips acceptable and currently "attractive".

It was simple. In the 90's and early 2000's when rap culture glmarouized women with larger rear ends, Europeans adopted this trait of beauty and trademarked it as their own. With lighter skinned women of course. Faces of Jennifer Lopez, Jessica Biel, and Kim Kardashian, trade marked the bigger butt to make it appeal to the white population.

The once beautiful and superior flatter rear end was now seen as ugly and the new bountiful and fuller butt that African women have always had yet were made fun of for was now the new it thing.

Same with fuller lips. It was showcased on a lighter woman (Angelina Jolie) and then touted as beautiful to the world and the general white audience.

It's funny how two features that were once deemed hideous on Africans, was now deemed beautiful on European women.

Years before, white men did not like the idea of a thicker fuller rounder butt. However, as seen through this message forum.
Bigger butts are deemed "HNNNNNNGGGGGG"

Just goes to show that attraction is really not only biological, but in a large part cultural and influenced by ones culture and surroundings.

Seeing as white women are the cultural norm in our society and their features are deemed as more beautiful. With constant media images of them everywhere promoting them as them the beauty standard or features similar to theirs, it's no surprise why white, Latina, and Asian women are considered beautiful, yet not black women who are the furthest from the European standard of beauty.

This of course is worldwide. European imperialism instilled the belief as whiteness=superior in every culture and continent they dominated.

Does this make it true?

No. White features are not more beautiful. Human features vary across ethnicity and all are beautiful in some way shape or form.

However, in most of the world Caucasoid features are promoted as beautiful, the one group who scientifically on average have more masculine facial features.

So no matter if the face of African women is scientifically more feminine looking, it makes little difference in people's minds.
What's been ingrained in their mind is the white women is more beautiful. And since sex and reproduction deals in large part with the brain,
Now in a biological sense, many men despite claims they wouldn't, would have sex with Pryce. Despite being ingrained to think that Pryce is not viable as a mate, one's natural urges would eventually take over given enough time.

It's why despite Europeans believing African slaves were inferior, were beast, were ugly,etc.. that didn't stop them from reproducing with African slave women. Rape, in a sense is a form of control. But is also largely based on biological drive to reproduce and dominate.

Africans in a large part have very feminine features. Despite the larger muscle mass and broad shoulders, facially the smaller skull, fuller lips, rounder oval faces, and weight gain in the thigh and buttocks and on the hips, contributes to their very scientifically feminine look.

It's been proven that through time women developed the attraction to men with feminine faces.

Also men developed an attraction to women with masculine faces.

Races of women rate black men as most attractive, and similarly different races of men rate black women as least attractive in conjugation to their inclination to look for long term relationships with women who have more masculine features as well as the European ideal of beauty that has been ingrained in their brains since birth.

I'm sorry this is long, but i love watching and observing nature vs. nurture.

Nah, don't find her attractive at all.

and make babies with GOAT genetics?

Schiffer's looks more masculine than Prime Arnold.

She must be tight af srs.

Do you reason this simply because she's black or because of her athleticism?

WTF man. You really expect somebody to read that in a "would you bang" thread?
Stick to the question people.

IN for vote results.

It's really just me ranting and observing nature vs. nurture in this case in the form of sexual attraction and reproduction.