Not sure is srs or troling.......

Correlation doesn't equal causation yo.

Women as a whole tend to shy away from STEM fields because they have a predisposition to other fields. It's not some vast conspiracy to keep women out of science. Why are there so many more female teachers and nurses than male? Is that because of some hidden conspiracy? Sorry bro, men and women are different and gravitate toward different things. And that's perfectly ok.

Women run western society brah. Men are disposable and have been for decades.

these people live in a fantasy land where if you tell someone not to do something, they dont do it and everything is good and everybody smiles.

Whenever a feminist responds to this with a "CIS male scum blaming the woman for rape" i use the robber analogy. 99% of young people are taught that stealing is bad, but for some reason people still do it. So even though we're taught not to steal as young kids, we still take preventative measures to acknowledge that there are some bad people that will take the opportunity to steal if its given to them. Thats why we lock our doors at night and when we arent home. And rape should be treated similar, where women should take precautions to limit opportunities. I forget the politician who wanted to legalize women carrying pepper spray at night for use in self defense, which IMO is a step in the right direction... of course feminazis didnt like it, something about teach men not to approach blah blah blah... thats like saying dont use locks, teach people not to steal

i actually pointed this out to a feminazi and got the response " did you just equate raping a woman and inantimate objects you CIS white scum?"

theres no helping those people.

You left out our privilege of getting rejected over and over again while dating.

FA Cases
100% Male
0% Female

Men have it better because we aren't functionally retarded, know how to apply logic and reason, and are significantly stronger.

Im all about a strong woman that wants to do things on her own and earn but fukin hell...women arent equal to men, its just how nature, god, or whatever built us. Men will have the edge on women 99% of the time.

Women have it easier, men have it better.

No way I'd ever want life handed to me on a plate the way women have it. Rather work my ass off and hustle for everything, because that's how you earn respect.

That right there is one of the biggest differences between men and women. All these feminists expecting to be respected the same way as a hard working man, without doing what it takes to be one.

10/10 thread gj OP

Women hold themselves to low standards. It's really an issue created by them. Its pretty ironic.

Just look how women are so quick to throw around words like empowering, heros, beautiful etc. Its like giving everyone a participation prize just for being. Its diminishes the actual value of the word, and it turn, diminishes women altogether.

Its an issue they will have to sort out themselves. Men have nothing to do with it. We as men hold high expectations to these words and dont toss them around to inflate our egos. Its earned.

Heres an example, the video posted earlier today about the rutsack march. Ppl were calling her a "hero" in the YT comment section. What about the male in the first 4 seconds of the video completing the march like it was a breeze? Nah, not a hero. And you know what? He knows that. He isnt deserving of the title and holds himself to a higher standard. If he wants to be a hero, there will be a time and place when he will be ready to challenge that word.

dont you guys get tired of bitching about the exact same every single day?

bro saying yes to sex on a third date is super empowering bro!! 😂 Two dates is demeaning though

The trick is to increase your value as a man.

lol. That is so strange males make up 80% suicides and all you ever hear about are HBB's in the news doing it.

Wow. I seriously thought female suicides were like 100x more than males.

Women attempt it more often. Just shows they can't even do that right.. lol.

I visited a feminist website once. On the same front page they had two articles

1) An article complaining that female animals being raised for meat/milk/eggs etc while the males were saved a life of servitude by being killed at birth was sexist.

2) An article complaining that the cultural practice of aborting female babies because males were preferred since they'd be more productive for the family was sexist.

For feminists it's heads I win, tails I win.

Men attempt suicide in ways that don't appear to be suicides which if added up would mean men probably attempt it just as much as women do. A woman might overdose on pills, a man might get drunk and purposefully crash his car. If he lives he's not going to tell anyone that he intended to kill himself because it's shameful. It he manages to kill himself it's recorded as a drunken accident.

I wrote this post for my stats class and I'm going to post a part of it here. Just because there isn't a 50/50 split in a particular field doesn't mean anyone is being oppressed. We also haven't had as many Jewish or tranny presidents in the USA as cis male presidents. Does that mean jews or trannies are oppressed? No. Please read this essay and educate yourself. This does not apply only to stem but applies to anything you will ever post in the future about "hurdur but muh equal representation."

someone out there who is willing to take a deeper look into this "statistical discrepancy" (about a STEM field not being represented by men and women equally) instead of jumping to a conclusion that there just has to be something wrong because one field is dominated by men more than women - as if there is something inherently wrong with not having a 50/50 split in a field.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From my own personal perspective, I for one, do not think we should encourage more women to enroll in STEM based fields or in any field where there is a "shortage" of women. I see men and women as equals and it does not concern me in the slightest if a particular field has more men or more women. If I have an issue with a particular field, I'd much rather take a look into that rather than the demographic make-up of the people who represent the field. Additionally, what are people who state statistical discrepancies such as: "there are more men than women in x field" trying to say? I imagine they want more women in the field to make the playing field more "equal." Well here I am going to use that same logic and extend it to an idealistic extreme in an effort to help make people with such opinions happier. Assuming there is something wrong with there not being an equal number of men and women in every particular field, we should have an equal split of men and women in each field. Like most sexual species, the male:female ratio is not that far off from 1:1. If there are more men in STEM based fields, this simply has to mean there are more women in another field. If I say men are "oppressed" in the fields where there are more women I'd be seen as a lunatic who's making a very strong assumption based on very little information. Anyway, for the sake of making people who think there's something wrong with not having a 50/50 split in a particular field, I'm going to set up a model. Let's assume there are 10 careers in the world. We can label them A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J. Let's also assume there are a 200 people in this world: 100 of which are male, and a 100 of which are female. Extending the logic of people who quote statistical discrepancies, we MUST have 20 people in each career. 10 of them have to be male, and 10 of them have to be female in EACH field.

A = 10 males, 10 females
B = 10 males, 9 females
C,D,E, & F = 10 males, 10 females
J = 9 males, 10 females

Now let's say we have Sally and John who are both in high school and are the remaining 2 people in the world without a career yet. They want to enroll in career J and B respectively. However, their guidance counsellors force Sally to enroll in post-secondary studies that will lead to career B and force John to enroll in studies that will lead to career J. John is pressured his whole life to enroll in J being told rhetoric like: "there aren't enough men in J!" and they pressure Sally equally letting her know: "there aren't enough women in B!" They both end up choosing their career for the purpose of furthering this agenda instead of doing what they like. Guidance counsellors act accordingly with this agenda and pressure students as needed. At this point, humans aren't humans anymore; they are just robots choosing a career to further an agenda being pushed by people who don't want to think beyond: "There is a correlation between men and this field. There has to be something wrong." This is why I don't think we should encourage more women to enroll in STEM or encourage more men to enroll in veterinary studies for that matter. I think, if anything, we should encourage people to do whatever they want to do and I believe that in a first world country like Canada people are granted this right so long as it's within legal parameters and will continue to believe this until proven otherwise. I am not against analyzing demographic make-ups of a field and what they may suggest. Neither do I have an issue with people who think there may be some inherent bias or discrimination in a particular field so long as they do a better job to argue their point than regurgitating a statistic that doesn't say "50/50." Where do we draw the line though? Does a career having a 51/49 split mean one group is being oppressed? Is it too small of a discrepancy to mean anything? How about 55/45? Or 60/40? Is there a particular ratio of gender representation in a field where we just have to assume a gender is being discriminated against? Who sets this number and why does this assumption exist?

I'm interested to hear constructive criticism from anyone who's interested in this topic. This is a topic that I always found intriguing and one I found myself thinking about often during various discussions in STATS class which is why I posted this article and shared my feedback. I think as we can all agree, simply stating a statistic isn't enough to form an argument without looking deeper into the statistic. We discussed the issue of why a correlation does not prove correlation among the first few classes and I thought that mindset was relevant to this particular discussion of people's opinions on gender demographics in STEM-based fields. Thanks for reading. "

This guy gets it.

Lmaoooo as if the Misc, PUA forums, 4chan, Red Pill Reddit are any better.

I've been in the misc for 15 minutes today and I've already seen 4 threads about how men in 2016 have it worse than slaves in Early America. Fukin LOL. It's time to stop watching Milo Yiannopolis YouTube videos, that meninist movement is more delusional than 3rd wave femanists

I won't bother with the majority of your drivel, but this is beyond retarded.

A boys varsity high school team would beat them. That's why they don't make any money. Their skill level sucks, and nobody cares about their sport.

Age 20

You are the biggest retard I have ever seen in the misc. And that's saying a lot boyo.

wtf lol

9.5 times out of 10 you put a man and woman in a cage and the man is the one coming out alive. feels good to be a man.

the more you *******s overreact



the more dick you will eventually suck

damn bro, maybe if you'd stop being brainwashed by angry bitter males on the misc, and step outside the box, you'd see how stupid most threads degrading women on the misc are. Rather sickening tbh.

trust me, like I said, you don't need to be a WK Feminazi Tumblr Queen to agree that Males have more power therefore more privileged than females. And no, just because women have infinite options in the "dating game" doesn't mean they have more priviledge

so?? I don't see any fukin correlation about how a boys highschool team beating a US Women's Soccer team have to do with Equal pay.



USA Women's Soccer team = wins championships nearly every year (4 years idk I dont watch soccer)

USA Men's Soccer team = sucks ass and loses to 3rd world countries every time


guess who still gets paid more? Mens. It's called Male Priviledge brah, look it up. No shame in admitting it, and it doesn't make you WK.

Unlike most people here, I do agree that women have it harder than men in a lot of regards (but not to the extent the media claims), and male privilege does exist, it has nothing to do with why women's sports (in general) aren't as popular as mens' sports. Female athletes get paid less because less people watch them and they bring in less money. That simple.