Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Mind Blow at what UK cops have to deal with
  1. Results 91 to 120 of 138
  2. Page 4 of 5
  3. First
  5. 2
  6. 3
  7. 4
  8. 5
  10. Last

Thread: Mind Blow at what UK cops have to deal with

post 1488310071 03-23-2017, 02:26 PM
-
#91
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By DamagedAndDull⏩
Yeah, cause that cop that got stabbed to death outside of Parliament by a car terrorist certainly proves that by the European definition of Alpha. Also, you do have armed cops that protect the elite minority of people such as those in Parliament, those armed guards don't protect everyone cause quite frankly in your country not every citizen deserves equal protection. Equal protection under the law is mandated in the US Constitution.
If the cop had his stab vest on he'd still be alive.
Originally Posted By ND32⏩
You do realize they in fact used a taser instead of going hands on, right?

A taser is a weapon, just FYI.

They ran away

They also encountered a subject who obviously just postured and didn't attempt to cause bodily harm. If that subject would have actually attempted to cause bodily harm he most likely would've done so...to the people who didn't run away.
Erm, if you read my posts you'll see that I aknowledged the use of a tazer.

Of course it's a weapon. A non-lethal weapon used sparingly and to good effect to subdue that menacing gentleman who was brandishing a knife and clearly unstable.

I'm sorry but I don't get your point. The cops in that video delivered a positive result.
fist yourself
post 1488310111 03-23-2017, 02:27 PM
-
#92
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Posts: 47,223
  6. Rep Power: 275363
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
The U.S. is the worst example of policing in the world. Making that comparison is not something you'd even bother to defend.Speak for yourself.US logic. He can't help himself.
Ok let's be srs brah, the WORST in the world? Worse than Mexico, Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, Pakistan, Republic of Congo, Senegal and on and on?
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω
Pre-Med crew
★ NUFC ☆
₪ DEFQON.1 AUSTRALIA 2016 ₪
177 lbs | O: 165 /// B: 275 /// S: 335 /// D: 390
post 1488310181 03-23-2017, 02:28 PM
-
#93
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Cumming, Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 151,489
  6. Rep Power: 564644
Unarmed police...there's no such thing lol, they're just playing make believe
Originally Posted By CaliSuperSport⏩
Ok let's be srs brah, the WORST in the world? Worse than Mexico, Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, Pakistan, Republic of Congo, Senegal and on and on?
He's just a super troll, don't mind him, nothing he says ever makes any sense and is never based in fact, logic, or reality lol
post 1488310231 03-23-2017, 02:28 PM
-
#94
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 4,466
  7. Rep Power: 11079
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
If the cop had his stab vest on he'd still be alive.
Stab vests are mandatory issue and have to be worn. He got stabbed in the neck, which isn't protected by the vest.
post 1488310311 03-23-2017, 02:29 PM
-
#95
  1. ND32
  2. Registered User
  1. ND32
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: North Carolina, United States
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 2,763
  7. Rep Power: 7742
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
If you're trying to make a case for U.S. police tactic you're doing a bad job of it. The last thing any U.S. cop should ever do is give suspect apprehension advice. In my view, you need to study that video and learn from it.
Well if I even find a miscer who read my advice and uses it as counter intelligence in a physical altercation then I'll chalk it up as my time to take an L
6'3" crew checking in
post 1488310711 03-23-2017, 02:32 PM
-
#96
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 4,466
  7. Rep Power: 11079
Originally Posted By Drufeus⏩
Officers get ambushed and may not be able to react. Still a very bad argument and all hypotheticals. There is a man with a knife stabbing people and you have the time to have your baton or gun at the ready. Back up isn't close and he attacks. Would you rather apprehend with a pistol or a baton? I've been in Law Enforcement 13 years in a Virginia city in top 3 most violent Virginia cities last 20 years. I've pulled my gun hundreds of times and have yet to shoot someone. Hope I never do. All about escalation and de-escalation. I draw my gun, doesn't mean you get shot. Drop the knife and listen to commands. Gun gets holstered and you go to jail. Pick knife back up, gun back out. It's not hard to understand. All I know for fact is that a pistol is the second best tool I have other than my ability to talk to people. Some can't be talked too and the fight is on no matter what. So keep thinking the way you do. I'm glad you can see the world that way and live with that mindset. You and I are just wired differently. Don't be shocked when at least LEO'S in major Brit cities are all armed. Times have changed and they deserve to be able to protect themselves and the community properly
It depends what the overall focus of the police force is seen as. If it's to protect its own then you are correct, if it is to overall reduce the amount of death within the country then it won't have a positive effect. I am in no way saying LOTS of police officers would mess up, I am saying all you would need is more than 2-3 in the whole country within a year to do so before you're in the territory of the policy having caused more death than it has prevented.
post 1488310731 03-23-2017, 02:32 PM
-
#97
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,844
  6. Rep Power: 92463
Originally Posted By infinit⏩
If all UK police could be trained to the same standard as the armed police we do have,
I can't comment on that as I don't know the standard. I will tell you US cops are not trained up to the standard they should be, but it ranges a fair amount also. Cops in the US would benefit greatly from better training and on going training in my view and that of the cops I know who take their fire arms training seriously.
Originally Posted By infinit⏩
I'm sure there wouldn't be that much opposition against it. But that's impossible because there is rigorous selection that a decent proportion of the police force would fail and a training level that is impractical to give to every officer. If the rate of UK police deaths would higher, I could see this as an issue. But you'd effectively have to arm the entire police force without causing any increase what so ever to the rate of accidents for the level of death to be decreased.
You can't ever guarantee perfection. Accidents can and would happen. What matters of course is the net impact on overall crime, officer safety, etc. I would have not issue if say the UK had a much higher standard for their officers to be armed, and would like to see that happen in the US too.
BrinkZone, Where Bro-Science Got Rabies and Died!

www.BrinkZone.com

Check out my BrinkZone mini site on BB.com at:

www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink.htm

=> President and Founder of Shaved head with goatee Crew
=> Science over bro science Crew
post 1488310941 03-23-2017, 02:34 PM
-
#98
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,844
  6. Rep Power: 92463
Originally Posted By infinit⏩
Stab vests are mandatory issue and have to be worn. He got stabbed in the neck, which isn't protected by the vest.
My understanding was cops died of being stabbed all too often and the powers that be dragged their a$$ on getting them those stab vests for a long time. I hope they are all now equipped with the proper vests. That may have been before your time, not sure.
BrinkZone, Where Bro-Science Got Rabies and Died!

www.BrinkZone.com

Check out my BrinkZone mini site on BB.com at:

www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink.htm

=> President and Founder of Shaved head with goatee Crew
=> Science over bro science Crew
post 1488310991 03-23-2017, 02:34 PM
-
#99
  1. Love-Feet
  2. Registered User
  1. Love-Feet
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 4,011
  6. Rep Power: 0
I know police officers, they dont give a fukc that they dont have a gun. Its a non issue, its only an issue for you and you dont live or work as a police officer here.
Winners find solutions, Losers find something to blame
post 1488311051 03-23-2017, 02:35 PM
-
#100
  1. cadetduke
  2. Ex Sports Card Shop Owner
  1. cadetduke
  2. Ex Sports Card Shop Owner
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Location: Saint Louis, Missouri, United States
  5. Posts: 13,309
  6. Rep Power: 54109
Originally Posted By WillBrink⏩
Takes 10 cops to deal with one nut with a knife
Hate to be that guy but..

post 1488311111 03-23-2017, 02:35 PM
-
#101
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  3. Join Date: Jul 2005
  4. Posts: 32,552
  5. Rep Power: 35344
Originally Posted By CaliSuperSport⏩
Ok let's be srs brah, the WORST in the world? Worse than Mexico, Brazil, Venezuela, Colombia, Pakistan, Republic of Congo, Senegal and on and on?
Compare apples to apples Jeeves.
Originally Posted By ND32⏩
Well if I even find a miscer who read my advice and uses it as counter intelligence in a physical altercation then I'll chalk it up as my time to take an L
You're living in a mythical world. There are far greater likelihoods of death or injury outside of these scenarios.
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ

**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**

Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!

It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
post 1488311391 03-23-2017, 02:38 PM
-
#102
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By infinit⏩
Stab vests are mandatory issue and have to be worn. He got stabbed in the neck, which isn't protected by the vest.
Stab vests are issued to all police in the UK as standard.

However, standard issue =/= mandatory use in the UK. Police here don't wear them at all times.

Also - reports I heard stated officer Keith Palmer was not wearing a stab vest.
fist yourself
post 1488311511 03-23-2017, 02:39 PM
-
#103
  1. Vukov
  2. Banned
  1. Vukov
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Posts: 3,232
  5. Rep Power: 0
href=https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mzuFzSXeXcU" frameborder="0">" allowfullscreen frameborder="0">
post 1488311521 03-23-2017, 02:39 PM
-
#104
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  3. Join Date: Jul 2005
  4. Posts: 32,552
  5. Rep Power: 35344
Originally Posted By WillBrink⏩
I can't comment on that as I don't know the standard. I will tell you US cops are not trained up to the standard they should be, but it ranges a fair amount also. Cops in the US would benefit greatly from better training and on going training in my view and that of the cops I know who take their fire arms training seriously.



You can't ever guarantee perfection. Accidents can and would happen. What matters of course is the net impact on overall crime, officer safety, etc. I would have not issue if say the UK had a much higher standard for their officers to be armed, and would like to see that happen in the US too.
Because more weapons and violence will fix every thing? Typical American attitude. Stop spreading your violent solutions to the rest of the world.
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ

**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**

Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!

It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
post 1488311561 03-23-2017, 02:39 PM
-
#105
  1. Mobraelite
  2. It wasn't me
  1. Mobraelite
  2. It wasn't me
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 6,853
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Raven2392⏩
there are armed response officers, but they are inside the grounds of parliament / train stations / airports, not on the streets.. although some are
When a crime involving a gun or even someone being shot it can take up to 15 min for the armed cops to respond

How any country can justify having unarmed police in today's world just shows you how corrupt the politicians are
*no crew* crew
post 1488311621 03-23-2017, 02:39 PM
-
#106
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,844
  6. Rep Power: 92463
Originally Posted By cadetduke⏩
Hate to be that guy but..

Ahhhh chit. Well, they're doing the best they can with what they have, which aint much, so that 17:1 ratio is what helped them from getting sliced and diced. At the end, one does use a Taser finally. Hopefully, didn't hurt the guys feelings.
BrinkZone, Where Bro-Science Got Rabies and Died!

www.BrinkZone.com

Check out my BrinkZone mini site on BB.com at:

www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink.htm

=> President and Founder of Shaved head with goatee Crew
=> Science over bro science Crew
post 1488311881 03-23-2017, 02:42 PM
-
#107
  1. Kreuzritter
  2. Banned
  1. Kreuzritter
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Location: Lehigh Acres, Florida, United States
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 7,684
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
Compare apples to apples Jeeves. You're living in a mythical world. There are far greater likelihoods of death or injury outside of these scenarios.
no he was right... russia, china, inda..all over europe... they dont televise NEARLY as much of their law enforcement as we do in the US.. add to that the fact we have over 300 Million people here and it will seem like a lot, which it is.
However in most 3rd world nations there ARE NO REPORTS.... do you know how many thousands of vids ive seen of people that get hacked open by machetes by multiple people and go unreported because the attack is seen as "justified"? or how about MASS muslim rapes? your perspective is off.
post 1488311981 03-23-2017, 02:43 PM
-
#108
  1. TheAmericano
  2. because MERICA that's why
  1. TheAmericano
  2. because MERICA that's why
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 11,802
  6. Rep Power: 12087
When more UK cops lose their lives then they'll prob see that maybe they should carry around guns.

- Countries like UK that don't allow people to own firearms could decrease crime by the thousands if the cops walked around with guns
- I'm sorry; I couldn't hear your complaints over the sound of all this freedom!

~ Merica


- Everybody wants to make it, but nobody wants to put in the work!
post 1488312171 03-23-2017, 02:44 PM
-
#109
  1. Kreuzritter
  2. Banned
  1. Kreuzritter
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Location: Lehigh Acres, Florida, United States
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 7,684
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
Because more weapons and violence will fix every thing? Typical American attitude. Stop spreading your violent solutions to the rest of the world.
more of your horrible limited perspective at work.
how about this for some more great multiculturalism.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...r-****lia.html
Male Norwegian politician raped by asylum seeker says he feels GUILTY that his attacker will now be deported because the man might suffer back in ****lia

Guilt: Left-wing politician Karsten Nordal Hauken was raped by a ****lian asylum seeker, but said the rapists subsequent deportation left him feeling guilty and sorry for his attacker
post 1488312181 03-23-2017, 02:44 PM
-
#110
  1. Vukov
  2. Banned
  1. Vukov
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Posts: 3,232
  5. Rep Power: 0
Police get bullied in UK. They **** up scrawny chavs but Black guys **** all over them. Theres a really famous video from Luton of one 5'10 Black weed man handcuffed to one cop nearly beating 2 of them
post 1488312361 03-23-2017, 02:46 PM
-
#111
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By WillBrink⏩
Ahhhh chit. Well, they're doing the best they can with what they have, which aint much, so that 17:1 ratio is what helped them from getting sliced and diced. At the end, one does use a Taser finally. Hopefully, didn't hurt the guys feelings.
There's plenty of similar incidents like this in the UK where only 1 policeman is on the scene. All depends on resources at the time. I don't understand your pathetic machsimo view of what the police should be. Grow the fuk up.
fist yourself
post 1488312471 03-23-2017, 02:47 PM
-
#112
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,844
  6. Rep Power: 92463
Originally Posted By infinit⏩
It depends what the overall focus of the police force is seen as. If it's to protect its own then you are correct, if it is to overall reduce the amount of death within the country then it won't have a positive effect. I am in no way saying LOTS of police officers would mess up, I am saying all you would need is more than 2-3 in the whole country within a year to do so before you're in the territory of the policy having caused more death than it has prevented.
Of interest, via the Mirror, for and against debate for armed UK cops:

For:

Tony Long, ex Met Police Team firearms

"We put officers in body armour, accepting they may be shot at. To me it shows a lack of trust and respect for our officers that they are not allowed to carry a firearm.

I did around six years unarmed before I trained in firearms. But that was in the 70s, when times were very different.

Now, police are facing teens on BMX bikes with access to automatic weapons.

It is rubbish to suggest more criminals will carry guns if police do. We now train far fewer firearms officers than when I started, yet gun crime has not slowed.

I don’t believe arming our police will reduce the threat of terrorism. But I absolutely believe officers carrying guns could help stop an attack in its tracks more quickly."

More and the Against:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...gainst-9593864
BrinkZone, Where Bro-Science Got Rabies and Died!

www.BrinkZone.com

Check out my BrinkZone mini site on BB.com at:

www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink.htm

=> President and Founder of Shaved head with goatee Crew
=> Science over bro science Crew
post 1488312731 03-23-2017, 02:49 PM
-
#113
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 4,466
  7. Rep Power: 11079
Originally Posted By WillBrink⏩
I can't comment on that as I don't know the standard. I will tell you US cops are not trained up to the standard they should be, but it ranges a fair amount also. Cops in the US would benefit greatly from better training and on going training in my view and that of the cops I know who take their fire arms training seriously.



You can't ever guarantee perfection. Accidents can and would happen. What matters of course is the net impact on overall crime, officer safety, etc. I would have not issue if say the UK had a much higher standard for their officers to be armed, and would like to see that happen in the US too.
To become the most basic form of armed officer, I think the course length varies a bit around the country, but it's typically 11 weeks, and that's for officers who have already trained as police officers and have spent a minimum of 2 years as one and have an excellent record. + The fitness/medical etc requirements are higher.
Originally Posted By BustaCapp⏩
Stab vests are issued to all police in the UK as standard.

Standard issue =/= mandatory use in the UK. Police here don't wear them at all times.

Also - reports I heard stated officer Keith Palmer was not wearing a stab vest.
I was fairly sure it was mandatory for the Met on patrols, or essentially mandatory because officers who decided against it weren't allowed to then turn around to the Met and sue if they got stabbed in an area it would have protected against. But I could be wrong.
post 1488312991 03-23-2017, 02:52 PM
-
#114
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  3. Join Date: Jul 2005
  4. Posts: 32,552
  5. Rep Power: 35344
Originally Posted By TheAmericano⏩
When more UK cops lose their lives then they'll prob see that maybe they should carry around guns.
Because it works so well here in the U.S.
- Countries like UK that don't allow people to own firearms could decrease crime by the thousands if the cops walked around with guns
More guns, bigger guns, armored vehicles, more weapons, etc. Do you even hear yourself. Stop giving terrible advice and learn from what works.

Watch the video, the suspect was apprehended...alive. That's a success. A concept U.S. law enforcement seems to have an issue with.
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ

**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**

Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!

It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
post 1488313131 03-23-2017, 02:53 PM
-
#115
  1. Drufeus
  2. Registered User
  1. Drufeus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Posts: 6,555
  5. Rep Power: 22950
Originally Posted By infinit⏩
It depends what the overall focus of the police force is seen as. If it's to protect its own then you are correct, if it is to overall reduce the amount of death within the country then it won't have a positive effect. I am in no way saying LOTS of police officers would mess up, I am saying all you would need is more than 2-3 in the whole country within a year to do so before you're in the territory of the policy having caused more death than it has prevented.
It's lethal force used in life and death situations. Of course it causes more death. And the officers who arent justified should be held accountable. So lets not protect the thousands of law enforcement for the mistake of 2 or 3. And it only protects the officer? What? Lol, never going to see eye to eye on this. How many officer deaths or civilian deaths will it take to make it statistically acceptable to carry a firearm?
post 1488313821 03-23-2017, 03:00 PM
-
#116
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Posts: 47,223
  6. Rep Power: 275363
Originally Posted By Farley1324⏩
He's just a super troll, don't mind him, nothing he says ever makes any sense and is never based in fact, logic, or reality lol
Thought he was serious
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
Compare apples to apples Jeeves.
What's apples to apples in your mind? US compared to UK? UK doesn't have near the issue of violent crime or drug trade as the US.

I figured you're comparing policing standards to other nations' policing standards. In other nations, cops might take you into an alley and put a bullet in your head if they feel like it.
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω
Pre-Med crew
★ NUFC ☆
₪ DEFQON.1 AUSTRALIA 2016 ₪
177 lbs | O: 165 /// B: 275 /// S: 335 /// D: 390
post 1488314181 03-23-2017, 03:03 PM
-
#117
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Cumming, Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 151,489
  6. Rep Power: 564644
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
Because more weapons and violence will fix every thing? Typical American attitude. Stop spreading your violent solutions to the rest of the world.
Police cause violence you say...yup I believe you are from California all right lol
post 1488314341 03-23-2017, 03:05 PM
-
#118
  1. TheAmericano
  2. because MERICA that's why
  1. TheAmericano
  2. because MERICA that's why
  3. Join Date: May 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 11,802
  6. Rep Power: 12087
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
Because it works so well here in the U.S.More guns, bigger guns, armored vehicles, more weapons, etc. Do you even hear yourself. Stop giving terrible advice and learn from what works.
Don't be an idiot. Read my post carefully

- It doesn't work to well here in the US because people have the right to gun ownership.

- In the UK there isn't any of that, so If the cops are the only one with guns, well there you go
- I'm sorry; I couldn't hear your complaints over the sound of all this freedom!

~ Merica


- Everybody wants to make it, but nobody wants to put in the work!
post 1488314621 03-23-2017, 03:07 PM
-
#119
  1. DamagedAndDull
  2. Registered User
  1. DamagedAndDull
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2017
  4. Age: 29
  5. Posts: 1,492
  6. Rep Power: 1078
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
Because more weapons and violence will fix every thing? Typical American attitude. Stop spreading your violent solutions to the rest of the world.
There is a consistent trend in the US (which I don't consider California to be a part of) that areas with higher gun ownership rates have lower crime than those with less guns around.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe.../#206e1cca3f7c

Harvard study concludes that gun control does not prevent murders, other violent crime

http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/...useronline.pdf

The study, which was conducted by Don B. Kates, an American criminologist and constitutional lawyer, and Gary Mauser, a Canadian criminologist and university professor, offered a stark truth: More guns does not equal more deaths and less guns does not equal less deaths.
post 1488314811 03-23-2017, 03:08 PM
-
#120
  1. ND32
  2. Registered User
  1. ND32
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Location: North Carolina, United States
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 2,763
  7. Rep Power: 7742
Originally Posted By TheAmericano⏩
Don't be an idiot. Read my post carefully

- It doesn't work to well here in the US because people have the right to gun ownership.

- In the UK there isn't any of that, so If the cops are the only one with guns, well there you go
> Krane
> Don't be an idiot


> Krane
> Read carefully

lmao killing me today
6'3" crew checking in
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts