Forum
»
Srs Question: Why are so many miscers deluded about what women find attractive?
03-21-2020, 04:24 PM
-
#91
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
-
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Age: 36
- Posts: 21,226
- Rep Power: 73510
-
-
Originally Posted By DM28⏩
LOL at me getting insulted...I fuking OWN people wif muh words ain't got no time to offended. Lemme read exactly what he wrote...Point me where you are right in your comprehension you spoke of earlier.
Also, please tell me how you think he is above average...
Also, please tell me how you think he is above average...
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
1. First he didn't say his own looks he said "nearly every guy". He specifically said 8/10...therefore his self-rating is correct. I don't care if he rated himself a 7.99 or a -1.05...what he said was 8 or below.. Again 7 is indeed ABOVE average but that is NOT what he wrote (again you are extrapolating the meaning of his words read his words in the context that the are written). He very specifically mentioned 8 or above for a reason.It's because they all want a certain phenotype or want 8/10+
So they rate nearly every guy below average
So they rate nearly every guy below average
2. I never said he is above average. I said 'he thinks' he is above-average (which seems to be correct via whatever that rating is above). Lemme see what I wrote...I forgetz as highIQ haves dem racing thoughts....
Originally Posted By andrepmeet⏩
So what I wrote was that he was "better looking" THAN most women NOT most men, .not the same as saying he was above-average/goodlooking. Again you have to refer back to original inquiry.....my point is relative to women's looks and EOD's point is relative to women's preferences. We're both right.And he is better looking than most females...no makeup, fit, clear skin, etc.
But I can't explain forever. You have to find your own way. Good luck.
03-21-2020, 04:28 PM
-
#92
- TypeNirvash
- World Warrior
-
- TypeNirvash
- World Warrior
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 23,195
- Rep Power: 26070
-
-
I'm calling it now, but I hope that I am wrong.
We're going to be in the news in two years.
Judging from the last page of posts, and what I already know.
We're going to be in the news in two years.
Judging from the last page of posts, and what I already know.
03-21-2020, 04:29 PM
-
#93
- trapspot
- Registered Anti-Racist
-
- trapspot
- Registered Anti-Racist
- Join Date: Oct 2019
- Posts: 3,822
- Rep Power: 3743
-
-
Originally Posted By themagister⏩
Lol at an academiacel study before the dating app era, but it seems like the shorter men are winning tbh (less housework, woman isn't super smart, woman is young).Sociologists from NYU combed through data using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) -- which has collected information on the same 4,500 families since 1968.
For the study, researchers analyzed data from 1986 -- the first year height was recorded -- through 2011 to determine if a man's height affected relationship dynamics. Men were classified as short (less than 66” in 1986; less than 67” in 2009), average, or tall (more than 73” in 1986; more than 74” in 2009).
Researchers also measured income, education and the height difference between spouses once the men were actually married. For example, in 1986, 92.7 percent of men were taller than their spouses; in 2009, 92.2 percent were taller.
From the data, researchers found major differences in relationship patterns between short and tall men.
Love lives of short men:
Short men were found to marry later in life than average or tall men, but were 32 percent less likely to divorce. They were also more likely to marry less educated and younger women. Once married, they did less of the housework and earned a much higher income than their spouse.
Why? The researchers hypothesize that because height is related to masculinity, short men may use other aspects of the relationship -- income, housework -- to demonstrate their manliness. "Short men may exchange their breadwinner status for less housework ... because a lower share of housework or a higher share of relative earnings allow short men to enact traditional gender ideals, thereby performing their masculinity in the absence of symbolic anthropomorphic differences," the researchers write in the paper.
Love lives of tall men:
Tall men were found to marry sooner in life, but were more at risk for divorce later on, as shorter men had more stable marriages. However, researchers note that the link between short men and stable marriages could be because they chose to marry later (or didn't have the option until later).
Tall men were also more likely to marry women closer to their age, and who were better-educated.
Why? "From the perspective of relationship exchange models, this indicates that the tallest men exchange their attractive attribute (height) for better-educated spouses, while short men are unable to do so," the researchers write.
It should be noted that this data suggests a trend which occurred from 1986 to 2011, and of course does not apply to all couples. However, it does shed light on an interesting topic.
For the study, researchers analyzed data from 1986 -- the first year height was recorded -- through 2011 to determine if a man's height affected relationship dynamics. Men were classified as short (less than 66” in 1986; less than 67” in 2009), average, or tall (more than 73” in 1986; more than 74” in 2009).
Researchers also measured income, education and the height difference between spouses once the men were actually married. For example, in 1986, 92.7 percent of men were taller than their spouses; in 2009, 92.2 percent were taller.
From the data, researchers found major differences in relationship patterns between short and tall men.
Love lives of short men:
Short men were found to marry later in life than average or tall men, but were 32 percent less likely to divorce. They were also more likely to marry less educated and younger women. Once married, they did less of the housework and earned a much higher income than their spouse.
Why? The researchers hypothesize that because height is related to masculinity, short men may use other aspects of the relationship -- income, housework -- to demonstrate their manliness. "Short men may exchange their breadwinner status for less housework ... because a lower share of housework or a higher share of relative earnings allow short men to enact traditional gender ideals, thereby performing their masculinity in the absence of symbolic anthropomorphic differences," the researchers write in the paper.
Love lives of tall men:
Tall men were found to marry sooner in life, but were more at risk for divorce later on, as shorter men had more stable marriages. However, researchers note that the link between short men and stable marriages could be because they chose to marry later (or didn't have the option until later).
Tall men were also more likely to marry women closer to their age, and who were better-educated.
Why? "From the perspective of relationship exchange models, this indicates that the tallest men exchange their attractive attribute (height) for better-educated spouses, while short men are unable to do so," the researchers write.
It should be noted that this data suggests a trend which occurred from 1986 to 2011, and of course does not apply to all couples. However, it does shed light on an interesting topic.
Average height = GOAT confirmed
NYC crew
BLM and Antifa crew
Defund the police until they reform crew
Islam was right about men crew
03-21-2020, 04:33 PM
-
#94
- trapspot
- Registered Anti-Racist
-
- trapspot
- Registered Anti-Racist
- Join Date: Oct 2019
- Posts: 3,822
- Rep Power: 3743
-
-
Originally Posted By lugoman⏩
I know this is your post, but no one this red should be theorizing this much lolololIn my experience, this seems like the modern attraction/dating in this day and age"
1) Face and height conquers all. I know this isn't what people want to hear. But it's the truth. Being white, tall and having a good face beats everything else and will always make you attractive to women and "boyfriend" material. Even if you had a **** job, or no ambition women will still be attracted to you. I know guys who slay or have girlfriends who are like this. Yes strong anecdotal evidence but it's true. That's life. Just like how a hot girl will be looked after her entire life. But these dudes can have no ambition, career etc and will always have women interested to be their gf (Srs)
2) The relationship guy - This is where i see a lot of people say "My 5 ft 2 deformed indian friend has a hot girlfriend" . I know a tonne of guys i know who are not tall and attractive. They are asian, white, indian etc, however they do make an effort in their appearance so i guess most would be a 6/10. They all have steady jobs, friends etc. Pretty much the average guy. Some are not physically attractive. Some are even fat. But all of them have decent girlfriends you know why - because they do everything for them and treat them like queens. Take all their instagram photos, shower them in love, gifts, treat them like gods. I mean which girl wouldn't want a guy like this? Despite what the misc says "being alpha, don't give them your validation, purpose etc" at the same time - the girl may cheat but if she is getting treated so WELL then why would she want to leave for the time being. I mean she might get bored or leave later but it's like a free ride in her twenties, imagine having a servant and a constant validation/love /gifts/support.
3) Then you have the chad-lites - these are the guys who may or may not be in a relationship, slay occasionally, they be be short, or tall , above average looking but not top tier status that every girl is throwing themselves at them. They are kinda stuck between that relationship guy and that top tier guy. Most men who "looksmax" fall into this category, and because they are not top tier, then their ambition, job and social life probably need to make up the rest of the attraction.
4) All other incels/uglies - then you have the rest of men who never workout, can't even speak to women, nothing going for them.
1) Face and height conquers all. I know this isn't what people want to hear. But it's the truth. Being white, tall and having a good face beats everything else and will always make you attractive to women and "boyfriend" material. Even if you had a **** job, or no ambition women will still be attracted to you. I know guys who slay or have girlfriends who are like this. Yes strong anecdotal evidence but it's true. That's life. Just like how a hot girl will be looked after her entire life. But these dudes can have no ambition, career etc and will always have women interested to be their gf (Srs)
2) The relationship guy - This is where i see a lot of people say "My 5 ft 2 deformed indian friend has a hot girlfriend" . I know a tonne of guys i know who are not tall and attractive. They are asian, white, indian etc, however they do make an effort in their appearance so i guess most would be a 6/10. They all have steady jobs, friends etc. Pretty much the average guy. Some are not physically attractive. Some are even fat. But all of them have decent girlfriends you know why - because they do everything for them and treat them like queens. Take all their instagram photos, shower them in love, gifts, treat them like gods. I mean which girl wouldn't want a guy like this? Despite what the misc says "being alpha, don't give them your validation, purpose etc" at the same time - the girl may cheat but if she is getting treated so WELL then why would she want to leave for the time being. I mean she might get bored or leave later but it's like a free ride in her twenties, imagine having a servant and a constant validation/love /gifts/support.
3) Then you have the chad-lites - these are the guys who may or may not be in a relationship, slay occasionally, they be be short, or tall , above average looking but not top tier status that every girl is throwing themselves at them. They are kinda stuck between that relationship guy and that top tier guy. Most men who "looksmax" fall into this category, and because they are not top tier, then their ambition, job and social life probably need to make up the rest of the attraction.
4) All other incels/uglies - then you have the rest of men who never workout, can't even speak to women, nothing going for them.
edit: actually this isn't your post, so I'm negging you for being red + spewing off looksmaxxing theories
NYC crew
BLM and Antifa crew
Defund the police until they reform crew
Islam was right about men crew
03-21-2020, 04:39 PM
-
#95
Originally Posted By andrepmeet⏩
Goodness, had to speed read through that too tired to be going through BS. No sir, he quoted what I said with my rating as I would rate him (And everyone else did here) He then proceeded to say, anyone not 8-10 to a woman is rated below average which you even took my rating at average, His words "Below Average" & was putting himself as ABOVE average I automatically could comprehend he was rating himself a 7 right there below 8 even a 6 is a bit above average. As my rating was AVERAGE he was unhappy with.LOL at me getting insulted...I fuking OWN people wif muh words ain't got no time to offended. Lemme read exactly what he wrote...
But I can't explain forever. You have to find your own way. Good luck.
But I can't explain forever. You have to find your own way. Good luck.
He proved himself in his next post, he is a self proclaimed 7. You own nothing but confusion. Reading comprehension and perception for the win.
~ Official FANGIRL Crew ~
I <3 you all
Madfury is my Misc Oneitis <3
03-21-2020, 04:44 PM
-
#96
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
-
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Age: 36
- Posts: 21,226
- Rep Power: 73510
-
-
Originally Posted By trapspot⏩
I don't think you are reading that article correctly....Lol at an academiacel study before the dating app era, but it seems like the shorter men are winning tbh (less housework, woman isn't super smart, woman is young).
Average height = GOAT confirmed
Average height = GOAT confirmed
Love lives of short men:
Short men were found to marry later in life than average or tall men, but were 32 percent less likely to divorce. They were also more likely to marry less educated and younger women. Once married, they did less of the housework and earned a much higher income than their spouse.
(I read this as shorter men have to marry later in life because they couldn't skate on their height/looks while younger. Also they are marrying younger because that is a consequence of them not getting married younger, as you get older you are more likely to marry someone younger by default.(a 22yo man almost has to marry around his age-range)
Also it seems to suggest that they are marrying low-value women that is not as educated as taller men's wives. Furthermore their marriage-stability is inherent in getting wed later for numerous reasons...also the women maybe single-mom, overweight, etc. options also diminish with age...she's stuck in the relationship so to speak.)
"Short men may exchange their breadwinner status for less housework ... because a lower share of housework or a higher share of relative earnings allow short men to enact traditional gender ideals, thereby performing their masculinity in the absence of symbolic anthropomorphic differences," the researchers write in the paper.
(self-explanatory tbh)
Tall men were found to marry sooner in life, but were more at risk for divorce later on, as shorter men had more stable marriages. However, researchers note that the link between short men and stable marriages could be because they chose to marry later (or didn't have the option until later (---BINGO! what I wrote above). Tall men were also more likely to marry women closer to their age, and who were better-educated.
(again tall married closer to their own age by default because they married when they were younger! The more interesting aspect is tall men had a greater risk for divorce...you wanna know why?? because tall men were still DESIRABLE to women hence the greater likelihood of breakup. Also they married higher value females when young...less likely to be overweight single-mothers by default vs. older women).
Why? "From the perspective of relationship exchange models, this indicates that the tallest men exchange their attractive attribute (height) for better-educated spouses, while short men are unable to do so,"the researchers write.
(again what I wrote above)
03-21-2020, 04:51 PM
-
#97
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
-
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Age: 36
- Posts: 21,226
- Rep Power: 73510
-
-
Originally Posted By DM28⏩
Strong lack of awareness even after my exhaustive insufferable post.putting himself as ABOVE average
He proved himself in his next post, he is a self proclaimed 7. You own nothing but confusion. Reading comprehension and perception for the win.
He proved himself in his next post, he is a self proclaimed 7. You own nothing but confusion. Reading comprehension and perception for the win.
Read his exact words. He said he is considered average to most women because he is below an 8/10 threshold. Like I said i don't care if he rates himself a 7.99, he is rating himself as being average with regards to women's standards.... not his own whereby he rates himself a 7.
I'm done mayne. Das it.
03-21-2020, 04:51 PM
-
#98
- 300BLK
- Registered User
-
- 300BLK
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2015
- Age: 35
- Posts: 20,309
- Rep Power: 12702
-
-
More like why can't miscers accept that they ALL matter. Looks, money, and personality all matter. The status of your looks, money, and personality is how attractive you are.
***Black Crew***
No Face Crew
03-21-2020, 04:53 PM
-
#99
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I already said any male below an 8/10 will get rated below average on those appsHe is currently averaging 4.7 , you can't make this chit up.
I'm way ahead of the game
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
03-21-2020, 04:54 PM
-
#100
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I wasn't lying. Going to need a scale bigger than 10 with what people are claiming. No way he is 1-3 points only below even some of the guys who spoke in here. Funny thing is most should be happy with an average rating with what is out there.He is currently averaging 4.7 , you can't make this chit up.
~ Official FANGIRL Crew ~
I <3 you all
Madfury is my Misc Oneitis <3
03-21-2020, 04:55 PM
-
#101
- nnodcvcker
- Cope killer
-
- nnodcvcker
- Cope killer
- Join Date: Jul 2017
- Posts: 4,689
- Rep Power: 14584
-
-
Men have a hard time accepting that there are things outside of their control that play a big role in their lives. People can't cope with looks ( face, height, and frame) being the most important thing in sexual attraction because they can't really do much to change it.
I always like to tell copers that the vast majority of teenage girls aren't masturbating to Bill gates or Jay Z.
I always like to tell copers that the vast majority of teenage girls aren't masturbating to Bill gates or Jay Z.
Black Pill crew
Insomniac Crew
HTC
Half body crew
I am not an incel, nor identify as one. I am simply here to have a good time discussing. My posts that may come off as offensive are all satirical and they have no harmful intent.
03-21-2020, 04:57 PM
-
#102
- s1ckpsycho
- hi
-
- s1ckpsycho
- hi
- Join Date: Oct 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 3,882
- Rep Power: 2719
-
-
Originally Posted By DM28⏩
but he's confident and girls only swipe on confidence.I wasn't lying. Going to need a scale bigger than 10 with what people are claiming. No way he is 1-3 points only below even some of the guys who spoke in here. Funny thing is most should be happy with an average rating with what is out there.
strong 2.5/10 facial aesthetics
strong claviclecel
03-21-2020, 04:58 PM
-
#103
JFC you people and all this arguing. EVERYONE finds DIFFERENT things attractive! Most people just want someone that is attracivte to THEM. It's not a one size fits all for either gender. Ugly people have significant others. Fat people have significant others. Average people have significant others. Good looking people have significant others. I also see tons of non looks matched couples when out and about and I people watch a lot. The point is, you don't have to be a 6'3 super model to get an SO. Even weird people find SOs.
Work on yourself. Looksmax. Don't be a slob. Have good hygiene. Be someone that people enjoy talking to. Have goals. There's a lot you can do even if you're not the best looking person in the world.
Work on yourself. Looksmax. Don't be a slob. Have good hygiene. Be someone that people enjoy talking to. Have goals. There's a lot you can do even if you're not the best looking person in the world.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
03-21-2020, 05:00 PM
-
#104
- trapspot
- Registered Anti-Racist
-
- trapspot
- Registered Anti-Racist
- Join Date: Oct 2019
- Posts: 3,822
- Rep Power: 3743
-
-
Originally Posted By nnodcvcker⏩
I feel bad for Hova tbh, all the money in the world and blue ivy is still catching flak for looking "ugly" and looking "like her dad"Men have a hard time accepting that there are things outside of their control that play a big role in their lives. People can't cope with looks ( face, height, and frame) being the most important thing in sexual attraction because they can't really do much to change it.
I always like to tell copers that the vast majority of teenage girls aren't masturbating to Bill gates or Jay Z.
I always like to tell copers that the vast majority of teenage girls aren't masturbating to Bill gates or Jay Z.
NYC crew
BLM and Antifa crew
Defund the police until they reform crew
Islam was right about men crew
03-21-2020, 05:00 PM
-
#105
- sloppyjoe1
- Sry babe no cardio
-
- sloppyjoe1
- Sry babe no cardio
- Join Date: Aug 2008
- Location: California, United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 8,204
- Rep Power: 12195
-
-
It depends what age the girl is. If she's young she just wants a hot dude. If she's late twenties early thirties finding a provider is more important. Men just want a hot girl their entire life we really don't change like women do because we don't give birth.
*Kneedraggers crew*
*I live in a clown state crew*
*MGTOW crew*
*Metalhead crew*
*Never ask for a girls number crew*
*Poop facing the toilet crew*
03-21-2020, 05:02 PM
-
#106
- faketaxidriver
- no avi supremacy
-
- faketaxidriver
- no avi supremacy
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Posts: 8,519
- Rep Power: 20545
-
-
Originally Posted By andrepmeet⏩
I sorta agree with this or at least see what he's sayingMen are overall better looking than women and it's not really close.
That is actually an extremely HighIQ observation. Thing is its one of those things you can't convince people about, they have to see that for themselves. I could explain why its true but like I said its kinda pointless. EOD is absolutely correct though.
And he is better looking than most females...no makeup, fit, clear skin, etc.
p.s. NO HOMO...so don't PM me you fuking homos
your comment conversely proves why I & EOD are correct tbh. don't wanna get into why though.
That is actually an extremely HighIQ observation. Thing is its one of those things you can't convince people about, they have to see that for themselves. I could explain why its true but like I said its kinda pointless. EOD is absolutely correct though.
And he is better looking than most females...no makeup, fit, clear skin, etc.
p.s. NO HOMO...so don't PM me you fuking homos
your comment conversely proves why I & EOD are correct tbh. don't wanna get into why though.
there seem to be more girls with chitty skin for example than guys, more fatties also but they have ways to hide that with make up, filters, camera angles etc
so many girls look like fukin swamp creatures without facepaint lol, might be a hormonal thing or caused by the constant facepaint use. next time you go outside try imagining random girls you see as guys, they male equivalents of lots of semi-attractive girls would be incels
03-21-2020, 05:03 PM
-
#107
- s1ckpsycho
- hi
-
- s1ckpsycho
- hi
- Join Date: Oct 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 3,882
- Rep Power: 2719
-
-
I don't understand how people try to argue looks and attractiveness are subjective, but then place objective measures on someone's attractiveness (e.g. ratings) or say couples are not looks matched (which is implying there's a scale and it's measurable = objective).
stupid.
stupid.
strong 2.5/10 facial aesthetics
strong claviclecel
03-21-2020, 05:05 PM
-
#108
- DizzySmalls
- Fast Misc
-
- DizzySmalls
- Fast Misc
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 23,894
- Rep Power: 82068
-
-
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
I can tell you if somebody is conventionally attractive almost immediately. The vast majority of people have a shared preference rooted in biology when it comes to physical features. They may have no ideawhythey find certain people attractive and others less so, but they are able to process it.JFC you people and all this arguing. EVERYONE finds DIFFERENT things attractive! Most people just want someone that is attracivte to THEM. It's not a one size fits all for either gender. Ugly people have significant others. Fat people have significant others. Average people have significant others. Good looking people have significant others. I also see tons of non looks matched couples when out and about and I people watch a lot. The point is, you don't have to be a 6'3 super model to get an SO. Even weird people find SOs.
Work on yourself. Looksmax. Don't be a slob. Have good hygiene. Be someone that people enjoy talking to. Have goals. There's a lot you can do even if you're not the best looking person in the world.
Work on yourself. Looksmax. Don't be a slob. Have good hygiene. Be someone that people enjoy talking to. Have goals. There's a lot you can do even if you're not the best looking person in the world.
Just as an aside, I think looks are more subjective towards the top of the scale. I find more disagreement with other men on what constitutes the 8/10 (although everyone would recognize they are well above average) and almost no disagreement whatsoever on a man-jawed 3.5/10.
03-21-2020, 05:06 PM
-
#109
Originally Posted By andrepmeet⏩
Read my exact words.Strong lack of awareness even after my exhaustive insufferable post.
Read his exact words. He said he is considered average to most women because he is below an 8/10 threshold. Like I said i don't care if he rates himself a 7.99, he is rating himself as being average with regards to women's standards.... not his own whereby he rates himself a 7.
I'm done mayne. Das it.
Read his exact words. He said he is considered average to most women because he is below an 8/10 threshold. Like I said i don't care if he rates himself a 7.99, he is rating himself as being average with regards to women's standards.... not his own whereby he rates himself a 7.
I'm done mayne. Das it.
He called my rating below average, he did not call it average. He said BELOW because he wasn't an 8-10 so I *woman* was unhappy at him not being an 8-10 must have unfairly judged him since no chad (His accusations by stating anyone not 8-10 gets called below avg).
This implies if they aren't perfect chads we judge them harshly as below average & rated himself above average as implied and easy to comprehend before he even said it so I call BS. He is average maybe a bit less depends on the woman and what she is attracted too.
Done arguing with you as you seem unable to comprehend yourself while accusing everyone else of a lack of comprehension. I'll let Anachron debate now. Thanks for the debate was lovely & fun for a minute. Lol
~ Official FANGIRL Crew ~
I <3 you all
Madfury is my Misc Oneitis <3
03-21-2020, 05:11 PM
-
#110
- DizzySmalls
- Fast Misc
-
- DizzySmalls
- Fast Misc
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 23,894
- Rep Power: 82068
-
-
Originally Posted By DM28⏩
IDK if you are a man or not, but eod is one of the most deluded posters on this entire board. That he thinks he is a 7/10 honestly pains me a little bit.Read my exact words.
He called my rating below average, he did not call it average. He said BELOW because he wasn't an 8-10 so I *woman* was unhappy at him not being an 8-10 must have unfairly judged him since no chad (His accusations by stating anyone not 8-10 gets called below avg).
This implies if they aren't perfect chads we judge them harshly as below average & rated himself above average as implied and easy to comprehend before he even said it so I call BS. He is average maybe a bit less depends on the woman and what she is attracted too.
Done arguing with you as you seem unable to comprehend yourself while accusing everyone else of a lack of comprehension. I'll let Anachron debate now. Thanks for the debate was lovely & fun for a minute. Lol
He called my rating below average, he did not call it average. He said BELOW because he wasn't an 8-10 so I *woman* was unhappy at him not being an 8-10 must have unfairly judged him since no chad (His accusations by stating anyone not 8-10 gets called below avg).
This implies if they aren't perfect chads we judge them harshly as below average & rated himself above average as implied and easy to comprehend before he even said it so I call BS. He is average maybe a bit less depends on the woman and what she is attracted too.
Done arguing with you as you seem unable to comprehend yourself while accusing everyone else of a lack of comprehension. I'll let Anachron debate now. Thanks for the debate was lovely & fun for a minute. Lol
It's one thing to be pathetic, and it's another thing to be pathetic and constantly blaming other people and acting like you are above your lot in life.
03-21-2020, 05:11 PM
-
#111
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
-
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Age: 36
- Posts: 21,226
- Rep Power: 73510
-
-
Originally Posted By DM28⏩
LOL. I was gonna change that to "below-average" but I was too lazy and moreover fundamentally it doesn't matter as his point is correct. I thought "below an 8/10" was sufficient for the reader to grasp its context. He correctly insinuated that women see average-looking guys as lumped in with below-average (which is TRUE!).Read my exact words.
He called my rating below average, he did not call it average. He said BELOW because he
He called my rating below average, he did not call it average. He said BELOW because he
Sorry you couldn't pickup on that that insignificant nuance for yourself tbh.
03-21-2020, 05:11 PM
-
#112
- nnodcvcker
- Cope killer
-
- nnodcvcker
- Cope killer
- Join Date: Jul 2017
- Posts: 4,689
- Rep Power: 14584
-
-
Originally Posted By sloppyjoe1⏩
That's the thing man.It depends what age the girl is. If she's young she just wants a hot dude. If she's late twenties early thirties finding a provider is more important. Men just want a hot girl their entire life we really don't change like women do because we don't give birth.
A woman using you as a beta provider after she fukced hundreds of chads during her twenties is not attraction.
It's something she's doing out of convenience.
Her pooSsee still gets wet when she sees a chad, and she will most likely cheat on you. You will receive bland boring sex.
It's just pathetic. Nothing is more pathetic than being a beta provider. I'd rather be an incel than being a guy whose wife is only with him because of what he can do for her.
It's not genuine attraction
Black Pill crew
Insomniac Crew
HTC
Half body crew
I am not an incel, nor identify as one. I am simply here to have a good time discussing. My posts that may come off as offensive are all satirical and they have no harmful intent.
03-21-2020, 05:14 PM
-
#113
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Well, right. That's a serious problem.Unfortunately, that takes effort, not just sitting in your mom's basement waiting for supermodels to jump on them. Or in EOD's case, playing video games in his GF's place.
Originally Posted By trapspot⏩
Well, I am an old woman soooooo........... lolBro you sound like an old woman giving dating advice that doesn't apply to today. Dating apps + social media + makeup + all the small things (feminism, "toxic masculinity", etc) == women can and do date up like crazy
When they're not dating up, they're looking for a beta bucks
/thread
When they're not dating up, they're looking for a beta bucks
/thread
People need to stop spinning their wheels with the dating apps and learn how to approach IRL. This has been talked about ad nauseam. It's much easier to have your "flaws" overlooked IRL than on a dating app because you're looked at as a whole person rather than just a snapshot that people are looking at for a second and making a decision on. The way people move matters, the way people talk matters, the way they carry themselves matters, their personality matters. You can't see any of that from a picture. Also, since people rarely approach IRL now, you'll stand out.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
03-21-2020, 05:16 PM
-
#114
- Brotatoch1p
- Registered User
-
- Brotatoch1p
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 1,399
- Rep Power: 5836
-
-
Im not deluded, I know how much vanity means to the world as its stated in the bible. Its also painted as a sin and robs people of their spirituality.
If being good looking and being around/banging other good lookin people is your goal then that will be reward (maybe). You will not enter into the kingdom of heaven though.
If being good looking and being around/banging other good lookin people is your goal then that will be reward (maybe). You will not enter into the kingdom of heaven though.
03-21-2020, 05:17 PM
-
#115
Originally Posted By DizzySmalls⏩
I'm a woman but you can call me a unicorn if you want, I was just being honest though.IDK if you are a man or not, but eod is one of the most deluded posters on this entire board. That he thinks he is a 7/10 honestly pains me a little bit.
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I'm now doing the same lol better than ldar with corona rationsI'm not debating because there is no argument. I am just laughing at these "men".
Originally Posted By andrepmeet⏩
As I just pointed out, I wasn't judging him unfairly for not being a chad average is not lumped in with below average as stated he should be happy with an average rating but can improve on his personality & delusions. Last I respond to you honestly because I think it's you who doesn't read.LOL. I was gonna change that to "below-average" but I was too lazy and moreover fundamentally it doesn't matter as his point is correct. I thought "below an 8/10" was sufficient. He correctly insinuated that women see average-looking guys as lumped in with below-average (which is TRUE!).
Sorry you couldn't pickup on that that insignificant nuance for yourself tbh.
Sorry you couldn't pickup on that that insignificant nuance for yourself tbh.
~ Official FANGIRL Crew ~
I <3 you all
Madfury is my Misc Oneitis <3
03-21-2020, 05:17 PM
-
#116
Originally Posted By DizzySmalls⏩
My face was rated between 63-76 onIDK if you are a man or not, but eod is one of the most deluded posters on this entire board. That he thinks he is a 7/10 honestly pains me a little bit.
It's one thing to be pathetic, and it's another thing to be pathetic and constantly blaming other people and acting like you are above your lot in life.
It's one thing to be pathetic, and it's another thing to be pathetic and constantly blaming other people and acting like you are above your lot in life.
https://www.beautyscoretest.com/
Go ahead, anyone talking chit prove you can do better
PC specs
i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''
OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
03-21-2020, 05:18 PM
-
#117
I do agree with eod that we are the superior sex in looks. We are not the ones that have to wear makeup, inject our lips, have fake tits and ass. More of us just look good naturally compared to females. Also females age quicker. They lose their glow faster.
03-21-2020, 05:18 PM
-
#118
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
-
- andrepmeet
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2014
- Age: 36
- Posts: 21,226
- Rep Power: 73510
-
-
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
Just have some balls and cold-approach a woman, maybe after dozens/hundreds of rejections you will find your Ms. Right! (that is if you don't jump off a bridge first)People need to stop spinning their wheels with the dating apps and learn how to approach IRL.
And to add irony to insult...she will have an active Tinder/message guys that she is actually interested in while she is dating-and-waiting with you!
03-21-2020, 05:22 PM
-
#119
- s1ckpsycho
- hi
-
- s1ckpsycho
- hi
- Join Date: Oct 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 3,882
- Rep Power: 2719
-
-
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
have you had to approach someone irl recently? unless you're passing a pretty decent threshold for attractiveness, it's viewed as weird, inappropriate, and many women will make fun of it. i was just at my brother's uni, and they gave a freshman introduction class on NOT approaching girls in class, the dorm, library, or if you see her out and about unless you were already good friends because otherwise it's just bothering and potentially sexual harassment. i graduated not too long ago and even at parties girls would be swiping or waiting to go home for a tinder hookup unless someone fairly attractive came up.Well, right. That's a serious problem.
Well, I am an old woman soooooo........... lol
People need to stop spinning their wheels with the dating apps and learn how to approach IRL. This has been talked about ad nauseam. It's much easier to have your "flaws" overlooked IRL than on a dating app because you're looked at as a whole person rather than just a snapshot that people are looking at for a second and making a decision on. The way people move matters, the way people talk matters, the way they carry themselves matters, their personality matters. You can't see any of that from a picture. Also, since people rarely approach IRL now, you'll stand out.
Well, I am an old woman soooooo........... lol
People need to stop spinning their wheels with the dating apps and learn how to approach IRL. This has been talked about ad nauseam. It's much easier to have your "flaws" overlooked IRL than on a dating app because you're looked at as a whole person rather than just a snapshot that people are looking at for a second and making a decision on. The way people move matters, the way people talk matters, the way they carry themselves matters, their personality matters. You can't see any of that from a picture. Also, since people rarely approach IRL now, you'll stand out.
women prefer dating apps - they can be extremely selective and get what they're after. they're the same women you'll meet in real life anyway. i don't get why people are up in arms against this being very good indication of what women select based off of.
strong 2.5/10 facial aesthetics
strong claviclecel
03-21-2020, 05:22 PM
-
#120
- Caldef
- Registered User
-
- Caldef
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 2,212
- Rep Power: 67216
-
-
Originally Posted By tinysprinkle⏩
Would actually go so far to say, ugly guys have the worst personalities cos they end up bitterSo true, bad looking guys don't have any better of a personality
Attractive men are usually a lot nicer cos they don't have all that pent up resentment
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts