Thread: Moon Landing 1969 Real or Fake?
12-07-2020, 06:29 AM
-
#91
12-07-2020, 07:05 AM
-
#92
- Merovingian11
- Registered User
-
- Merovingian11
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Age: 39
- Posts: 6,533
- Rep Power: 34288
-
-
Get a high powered laser, big ass telescope, find the coords of the mirror, shine it then get back to us.
Til then stfu.
Til then stfu.
I have sampled every language and French is my favorite to curse in.
Kryptonite Crew
12-07-2020, 07:14 AM
-
#93
- Merovingian11
- Registered User
-
- Merovingian11
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Age: 39
- Posts: 6,533
- Rep Power: 34288
-
-
Regardless if it was real or not...
Were you not entertained?
Also, when will we go back?
Were you not entertained?
Also, when will we go back?
I have sampled every language and French is my favorite to curse in.
Kryptonite Crew
12-07-2020, 07:20 AM
-
#94
- Merovingian11
- Registered User
-
- Merovingian11
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Age: 39
- Posts: 6,533
- Rep Power: 34288
-
-
Originally Posted By LtGoose⏩
Akshually it's made of barbecue spare ribs. The cheese is melted and used as a dipping sauce.So many low IQtards ITT
The moon is made of cheese and the moon landing video doesn't even show a single hole in the cheese.
The moon is made of cheese and the moon landing video doesn't even show a single hole in the cheese.
HEY!
Furthermore not only would I eat it but I'd polish it off with a tall cool Budweiser!
Would you eat the moon if it was made of spare ribs? It's a simple question.
HEY!
I have sampled every language and French is my favorite to curse in.
Kryptonite Crew
12-07-2020, 07:25 AM
-
#95
- JStrez
- Breaker of Gains
-
- JStrez
- Breaker of Gains
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 9,748
- Rep Power: 54369
-
-
Originally Posted By brumbleman⏩
The reality is that it our rocket tech hasn't really progressed at all. Sure our math and calculations have increased, and materials have changed but from a basic standpoint our rocket technology is largely the same. It's the same propulsion, same trajectorys, same speed, same this and same that. It's not a matter of rockets or math to get to the moon, it's money. It would cost roughly $30 Billion to send astronauts back to the moon, and likely that number is probably much much higher. There's also no reason to go back to the moon either, as I had mentioned before. We wouldn't learn anything new and it would purely be an ego boost just to go back. We went to the moon using slide rulers and 3 significant digits, which is a joke honestly.This. Going on 50 years now. Meanwhile, other countries are crashing landers onto it with great success.
American infrastructure came together and did it it 6 years, then after that a handful of times more. Yet, here we are, 2020 and they say they are shooting to do it again by 2024.
Has our rocket tech not progressed one bit in 5 decades? Did America really have tech 5 decades ahead of other 1st world countries who keep failing with rovers and satelites?
We're being lied to.
American infrastructure came together and did it it 6 years, then after that a handful of times more. Yet, here we are, 2020 and they say they are shooting to do it again by 2024.
Has our rocket tech not progressed one bit in 5 decades? Did America really have tech 5 decades ahead of other 1st world countries who keep failing with rovers and satelites?
We're being lied to.
The only real thing you could really do on the Moon is set up a basecamp similar to the ISS. However, it would be incredibly difficult to do so because you'd have to build a base in place and be able to constantly supply it with food and supplies, and again it would be for what? The ISS is hard enough as it is, and then to have to go to the Moon where a single failed landing would likely cause the death of all astronauts on the moon from starvation, let alone all the potential pathogens living on the moon, and yes, potentially aliens. It's just way too much money and risk for something that's not really worth it. We've sent more missions back to the Moon, and no one else has landed a man on the moon so who really cares anymore. The next big mission would honestly be "First Woman on the Moon".
One of my favorite stories, and something you'll learn in every engineering course, is when the US crashed a $100 Million+ Probe on Mars when they fukked up the units. Essentially one lab used English, and the other used Metric. They fukked up by never putting units on their calculations and they both thought they were using the same units. It resulted in the crashing and burning of the probe in Mars' orbit. So even though we know all this chit, there's still inherent dangers associated with space travel. Throw in the Colombia and Challenger disasters, and there's a lot of bad press about it. When you succeed it's like great, but when you fukk up, it's really really bad.
*Mechanical Engineering Crew*
*6'3" Master Race Crew*
*6 Figs Crew*
"Because the thing about repairing, maintaining, and cleaning is it’s not an adventure. There’s no way to do it so wrong you might die. It’s just work. And the bottom line is, some people are okay going to work, and some people … well, some people would rather die. Each of us gets to choose.”
12-07-2020, 07:39 AM
-
#96
12-07-2020, 08:03 AM
-
#97
- brumbleman
- Registered User
-
- brumbleman
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 835
- Rep Power: 2967
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Is this sufficient?Source of the bolded please.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-n...56F5MK20090716
Or, maybe, you could have just Googled it.
Mesomorph, large frame, natty trainer.
12-07-2020, 08:22 AM
-
#98
- brumbleman
- Registered User
-
- brumbleman
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 835
- Rep Power: 2967
-
-
Originally Posted By JStrez⏩
So why are we trying to go back by 2024 if nothing is there? Are the trace amounts of water there, nothing? Why are there so many other nations pursuing nothing?The reality is that it our rocket tech hasn't really progressed at all. Sure our math and calculations have increased, and materials have changed but from a basic standpoint our rocket technology is largely the same. It's the same propulsion, same trajectorys, same speed, same this and same that. It's not a matter of rockets or math to get to the moon, it's money. It would cost roughly $30 Billion to send astronauts back to the moon, and likely that number is probably much much higher. There's also no reason to go back to the moon either, as I had mentioned before. We wouldn't learn anything new and it would purely be an ego boost just to go back. We went to the moon using slide rulers and 3 significant digits, which is a joke honestly.
The only real thing you could really do on the Moon is set up a basecamp similar to the ISS. However, it would be incredibly difficult to do so because you'd have to build a base in place and be able to constantly supply it with food and supplies, and again it would be for what? The ISS is hard enough as it is, and then to have to go to the Moon where a single failed landing would likely cause the death of all astronauts on the moon from starvation, let alone all the potential pathogens living on the moon, and yes, potentially aliens. It's just way too much money and risk for something that's not really worth it. We've sent more missions back to the Moon, and no one else has landed a man on the moon so who really cares anymore. The next big mission would honestly be "First Woman on the Moon".
One of my favorite stories, and something you'll learn in every engineering course, is when the US crashed a $100 Million+ Probe on Mars when they fukked up the units. Essentially one lab used English, and the other used Metric. They fukked up by never putting units on their calculations and they both thought they were using the same units. It resulted in the crashing and burning of the probe in Mars' orbit. So even though we know all this chit, there's still inherent dangers associated with space travel. Throw in the Colombia and Challenger disasters, and there's a lot of bad press about it. When you succeed it's like great, but when you fukk up, it's really really bad.
The only real thing you could really do on the Moon is set up a basecamp similar to the ISS. However, it would be incredibly difficult to do so because you'd have to build a base in place and be able to constantly supply it with food and supplies, and again it would be for what? The ISS is hard enough as it is, and then to have to go to the Moon where a single failed landing would likely cause the death of all astronauts on the moon from starvation, let alone all the potential pathogens living on the moon, and yes, potentially aliens. It's just way too much money and risk for something that's not really worth it. We've sent more missions back to the Moon, and no one else has landed a man on the moon so who really cares anymore. The next big mission would honestly be "First Woman on the Moon".
One of my favorite stories, and something you'll learn in every engineering course, is when the US crashed a $100 Million+ Probe on Mars when they fukked up the units. Essentially one lab used English, and the other used Metric. They fukked up by never putting units on their calculations and they both thought they were using the same units. It resulted in the crashing and burning of the probe in Mars' orbit. So even though we know all this chit, there's still inherent dangers associated with space travel. Throw in the Colombia and Challenger disasters, and there's a lot of bad press about it. When you succeed it's like great, but when you fukk up, it's really really bad.
Appreciate the actual response, btw.
People should openly be able to discuss things, no matter how uncomfortable it makes one party feel.
Mesomorph, large frame, natty trainer.
12-07-2020, 08:22 AM
-
#99
- letshavebabies
- Registered User
-
- letshavebabies
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Age: 41
- Posts: 5,424
- Rep Power: 5224
-
-
Originally Posted By NoScrubz⏩
because the USA were the first to claim it. Russia didn't have the capabilities yet to prove that the USA was wrongIf it was fake how come Russia hasn't debunked it?
go no contact NOW
12-07-2020, 08:30 AM
-
#100
- Briisk
- EDM since way back when
-
- Briisk
- EDM since way back when
- Join Date: Mar 2008
- Location: United States
- Posts: 16,110
- Rep Power: 35877
-
-
Originally Posted By brumbleman⏩
The moon can be base camp for missions to mars. From what I remember, its easier to launch from it towards Mars.So why are we trying to go back by 2024 if nothing is there? Are the trace amounts of water there, nothing? Why are there so many other nations pursuing nothing?
Appreciate the actual response, btw.
People should openly be able to discuss things, no matter how uncomfortable it makes one party feel.
Appreciate the actual response, btw.
People should openly be able to discuss things, no matter how uncomfortable it makes one party feel.
14-9 total correct guesses (1st place), 61% accurate - Lyon Gaultier Presents Euro 2012 Contest ||| 45-33 total correct guesses (4th place), 58% accurate - 2014 World Cup Pick Em' Giveaway by Lyon Gaultier
2015-2016 NFL Football Pick-em Trinity: 3rd place, 163 points, 163-93.
12-07-2020, 08:34 AM
-
#101
- Weezy32
- Registered User
-
- Weezy32
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Age: 39
- Posts: 14,375
- Rep Power: 68868
-
-
I havent done alot of research on this but If i had to put my money on it id put my money on it being fake.
Brb USA sending man to moon one of the greatest achievements ever ....brb lets record over the footage and "destroy" the technology that got us there.
YOU FUKKIN WHAT MATE
Also the technology we got now is about 1000 times better than what we had before yet no country bothers to go there.
Brb USA sending man to moon one of the greatest achievements ever ....brb lets record over the footage and "destroy" the technology that got us there.
YOU FUKKIN WHAT MATE
Also the technology we got now is about 1000 times better than what we had before yet no country bothers to go there.
Atlanta Falcons!!!
12-07-2020, 08:37 AM
-
#102
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By darkninja67⏩
I mean, there are answers to this if you're willing to put the 30 seconds into a google search....This right here.
Think about how cold space is. -440F at the least. Do you think that craft kept the astronauts alive in that type of cold?? We did not have Gore Tex or any super materials back then. The best insulator is still gray goose down and I do not believe they used that at all.
Think about how cold space is. -440F at the least. Do you think that craft kept the astronauts alive in that type of cold?? We did not have Gore Tex or any super materials back then. The best insulator is still gray goose down and I do not believe they used that at all.
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...e-temperatures
https://space.stackexchange.com/ques...ssion-capsules
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
12-07-2020, 08:39 AM
-
#103
- akmerle
- Registered User
-
- akmerle
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Age: 48
- Posts: 2,142
- Rep Power: 19376
-
-
The reason we haven’t been back is probably simple economics and cost / benefit.
The cost to send manned spacecraft to the moon compared to controlled rover is surely the driving factor.
Why spend the money to do manned landings (and surely MUCH more risk to the astronauts) when we already have done it, and with lunar rovers we can not only collect more data but better data as well?
The moon landing was a grandiose dink measuring contest to see if the first person on the moon would be a cosmonaut or an astronaut. Once that was settled, from a scientific and strategic standpoint, there was no need to spend the money / risk the assets on sending relatively fragile humans to the moon instead of lunar rovers.
The cost to send manned spacecraft to the moon compared to controlled rover is surely the driving factor.
Why spend the money to do manned landings (and surely MUCH more risk to the astronauts) when we already have done it, and with lunar rovers we can not only collect more data but better data as well?
The moon landing was a grandiose dink measuring contest to see if the first person on the moon would be a cosmonaut or an astronaut. Once that was settled, from a scientific and strategic standpoint, there was no need to spend the money / risk the assets on sending relatively fragile humans to the moon instead of lunar rovers.
12-07-2020, 09:08 AM
-
#104
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
-
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 606
- Rep Power: 1607
-
-
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
Pro moon landing people are the same type who align themselves with Democrats because society tells them that's what smart people do, so if they do it then people will think they're educated too. (Not saying anything about Republicans being superior here, just pointing out a fact). They're typically the type to virtue signal, wear masks because "I trust the scientists". Reddit is full of these types, and it makes for a never ending pseudo-intellectual circle jerk.This. I'd love to see some evidence though. I can't even find any moon conspiracy stuff on Reddit anymore 99% of the responses are pro moon landing.
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it’s time to pause and reflect." - Mark Twain
U aware?
12-07-2020, 09:10 AM
-
#105
- Lunatic
- The Cripple
-
- Lunatic
- The Cripple
- Join Date: Nov 2002
- Location: United States
- Posts: 57,101
- Rep Power: 494160
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Saturn Vs are ****ing insane. The cost from build to launch is ridiculous.And still nothing.
Source of what I bolded, please.
Or go sit in the corner.
Please tell me of a current lift vehicle that can handle just half the payload that a Saturn V could put into orbit.
I'll wait... never mind I won't, because it doesn't exist.
Source of what I bolded, please.
Or go sit in the corner.
Please tell me of a current lift vehicle that can handle just half the payload that a Saturn V could put into orbit.
I'll wait... never mind I won't, because it doesn't exist.
Originally Posted By BroIncorporated⏩
Funny how I know the moon landing happened, wear and understand the importance of masks, and am a Republican.Pro moon landing people are the same type who align themselves with Democrats because society tells them that's what smart people do, so if they do it then people will think they're educated too. (Not saying anything about Republicans being superior here, just pointing out a fact). They're typically the type to virtue signal, wear masks because "I trust the scientists". Reddit is full of these types, and it makes for a never ending pseudo-intellectual circle jerk.
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it’s time to pause and reflect." - Mark Twain
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it’s time to pause and reflect." - Mark Twain
Moon landing deniers are the same type of people that say Earth is flat.
AcetylCoA gets reps
"God your dunce." - Swept
LSU Tigers/Washington Nationals
12-07-2020, 09:11 AM
-
#106
12-07-2020, 09:12 AM
-
#107
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
-
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 606
- Rep Power: 1607
-
-
I've always thought how silly it was that the "moon rocks" they brought back were discovered to be nothing more than petrified wood. It's so much easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled.
U aware?
12-07-2020, 09:14 AM
-
#108
- eatmycrackers
- lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
-
- eatmycrackers
- lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 8,772
- Rep Power: 37689
-
-
Lol @ brainlet idiots here using gov't generated propaganda to prove we went to the moon... during the height of the Cold War with tech less advanced than a TI-32 calculator
Brb fake moon rocks given to other countries as gifts
Brb easier to fake it than to actually go there
Brb never gone further than 600 miles past Earth's surface since
If you have an outlandish claim it requires outlandish evidence. The fact that the evidence has been destroyed sort of puts the issue to bed for me.
If they had to fake/recreate some of the footage why wouldn't they fake all of the footage and the whole thing?
^above is my unscientific opinion, I am truly open to the possibility of it being real but in the face of evidence I have seen thus far I'm still not convinced.
Brb fake moon rocks given to other countries as gifts
Brb easier to fake it than to actually go there
Brb never gone further than 600 miles past Earth's surface since
If you have an outlandish claim it requires outlandish evidence. The fact that the evidence has been destroyed sort of puts the issue to bed for me.
If they had to fake/recreate some of the footage why wouldn't they fake all of the footage and the whole thing?
^above is my unscientific opinion, I am truly open to the possibility of it being real but in the face of evidence I have seen thus far I'm still not convinced.
Posts are for fun, not to be taken seriously or as truth.
Angie Varona Appreciation Club Founder
12-07-2020, 09:16 AM
-
#109
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By brumbleman⏩
This kind of stuff is just so bizarre.Is this sufficient?
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-n...56F5MK20090716
Or, maybe, you could have just Googled it.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-n...56F5MK20090716
Or, maybe, you could have just Googled it.
As I mentioned previously, we have documents from the 1700s, we have huge FBI transcripts of wiretapping and spying on celebrities, but people just casually erased moon landing footage?
They just left tapes around and people accidentally used them for other things?
I am reminded of the lame childish lies the media promotes about corona, and they forget about them, changes the story, etc. It has the same childish type of "BRB" sound to it.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
12-07-2020, 09:17 AM
-
#110
- numberguy12
- Registered User
-
- numberguy12
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 6,938
- Rep Power: 51915
-
-
Originally Posted By BroIncorporated⏩
The irony here is you yourself are being fooled by a known sham- jumping onto this debunked "petrified wood" non-point, while ignoring the vast evidence out there with whatever bias you are bringing to the table.I've always thought how silly it was that the "moon rocks" they brought back were discovered to be nothing more than petrified wood. It's so much easier to fool people than to convince them that they've been fooled.
^^^
sign of someone who put almost no research or thought into any of this. Google is a helpful starting point.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑
♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮
Nullius in verba
12-07-2020, 09:19 AM
-
#111
- dupaloop3611
- Registered User
-
- dupaloop3611
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2011
- Age: 40
- Posts: 6,642
- Rep Power: 23020
-
-
This is sweet. Camera crews are setting up, and I'm lookin' totally ripped. Beefcake. Beefcake.
insta: dupaloop3611
12-07-2020, 09:21 AM
-
#112
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By eatmycrackers⏩
The moon rocks are really weird to me.Lol @ brainlet idiots here using gov't generated propaganda to prove we went to the moon... during the height of the Cold War with tech less advanced than a TI-32 calculator
Brb fake moon rocks given to other countries as gifts
Brb easier to fake it than to actually go there
Brb never gone further than 600 miles past Earth's surface since
If you have an outlandish claim it requires outlandish evidence. The fact that the evidence has been destroyed sort of puts the issue to bed for me.
If they had to fake/recreate some of the footage why wouldn't they fake all of the footage and the whole thing?
^above is my unscientific opinion, I am truly open to the possibility of it being real but in the face of evidence I have seen thus far I'm still not convinced.
Brb fake moon rocks given to other countries as gifts
Brb easier to fake it than to actually go there
Brb never gone further than 600 miles past Earth's surface since
If you have an outlandish claim it requires outlandish evidence. The fact that the evidence has been destroyed sort of puts the issue to bed for me.
If they had to fake/recreate some of the footage why wouldn't they fake all of the footage and the whole thing?
^above is my unscientific opinion, I am truly open to the possibility of it being real but in the face of evidence I have seen thus far I'm still not convinced.
People who have seen them said they appeared to be rocks placed in some kind of kiln to change the overall appearance.
Then, as a mentioned in a previous post, it turns out "moon rocks" are "Earth rocks" and that changed the whole theory of ONLY how our moon was formed. Before it was all planets/moons were condensed matter trapped by the sun. Then, it was that Earth was fully formed, something crashed into it, turned it into molten blob, then the moon broke off, then Earth went right back to being normal again after it cooled down.
However, all other moons in the solar system have the old model explanation.
That sounds like some bullsh!t!
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
12-07-2020, 09:21 AM
-
#113
- JStrez
- Breaker of Gains
-
- JStrez
- Breaker of Gains
- Join Date: May 2010
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 9,748
- Rep Power: 54369
-
-
Originally Posted By brumbleman⏩
When you think about it, going to the Moon back in the 50's and 60's was considered to be the next big thing. You had countries cutting corners and putting all of their money into their moon landing operations. I think at the time we reached the Moon, 5% of our nations budget was being used for it. But once the US got to the Moon, everyone else was defeated, and then the Vietnam War hit, and then pandemics hit, and then the social interest in going back to the Moon largely fated. For example right now, why would anyone want to spend tens of billions of dollars going to the moon when people are dying of COVID? Why not use the money elsewhere when there's other chit going on?So why are we trying to go back by 2024 if nothing is there? Are the trace amounts of water there, nothing? Why are there so many other nations pursuing nothing?
Appreciate the actual response, btw.
People should openly be able to discuss things, no matter how uncomfortable it makes one party feel.
Appreciate the actual response, btw.
People should openly be able to discuss things, no matter how uncomfortable it makes one party feel.
Then interest only starts to pick up once other people start to take an interest too. This applies to everyday life in everything we do. No one gives a chit about the new thing until one popular person promotes it, and then suddenly everyone else is like fukk I need that. So when one country is established but has no "big" endeavour, they say fukk it, we'll drop a new rover or satellite onto the Moon. Then other countries are like chit then we need to go to the Moon first to make it seem like we're way better than them, and then suddenly you have loads of countries in the mix starting to do all this crap for new reason other than to again, flop their dicks around. I could see the next big thing again being "First Woman on the Moon", or first black, minority, LGBTQ, etc. on the Moon, nothing more than a gimmick honestly and just to have bragging rights.
BUT something similar could be used that we use everyday. No one developed nuclear weapons until word got out that they were being worked on. No one started exploring the oceans until someone started. No one traveled to the South Pole until someone started, etc. So the only real thing you could do on the Moon anymore is to establish a lunar colony. So when nations start taking an interest to probe the Moon, most people assume it's to send the first woman or to set up grounds for a space colony. Then all the major superpowers start throwing out money to start more missions to get the latest data (unchanged really) and give the illusion to everyone else that they have a stake in the game. NASA's budget has been decimated, as has other super powers space programs, but I bet they already researched and designed a livable habitat for the moon, now all that's left is for someone to say they plan to go, and suddenly all the major superpowers will dust off their plans, throw money into the budget, and race to be the first.
*Mechanical Engineering Crew*
*6'3" Master Race Crew*
*6 Figs Crew*
"Because the thing about repairing, maintaining, and cleaning is it’s not an adventure. There’s no way to do it so wrong you might die. It’s just work. And the bottom line is, some people are okay going to work, and some people … well, some people would rather die. Each of us gets to choose.”
12-07-2020, 09:24 AM
-
#114
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
-
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 606
- Rep Power: 1607
-
-
Originally Posted By Lunatic⏩
Brother, you don't KNOW anything for certain. Neither do I.Saturn Vs are ****ing insane. The cost from build to launch is ridiculous.
Funny how I know the moon landing happened, wear and understand the importance of masks, and am a Republican.
Moon landing deniers are the same type of people that say Earth is flat.
Funny how I know the moon landing happened, wear and understand the importance of masks, and am a Republican.
Moon landing deniers are the same type of people that say Earth is flat.
Idiots are the type of people who say the Earth is flat. People who question the overwhelming amount of evidence against the moon landing are just inquisitive and trying to understand how so many discrepancies can't be explained.
All conspiracies are not equal, you know that.
U aware?
12-07-2020, 09:26 AM
-
#115
- kingmanaverage
- Terrible poster
-
- kingmanaverage
- Terrible poster
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Posts: 15,250
- Rep Power: 107906
-
-
Real, but of course misc is full of CTers who will tell me it's fake.
“Steroids is now just a word that the lazy and ignorant use to describe any guy that has more muscle and dedication than them”– Mike O'Hearn
"I am like getting the feeling of cumming in the gym; I'm getting the feeling of cumming at home; I'm getting the feeling of cumming backstage; when I pump up, when I pose out in front of 5000 people I get the same feeling, so I am cumming day and night. It's terrific, right? So you know, I am in heaven."
12-07-2020, 09:31 AM
-
#116
- Lunatic
- The Cripple
-
- Lunatic
- The Cripple
- Join Date: Nov 2002
- Location: United States
- Posts: 57,101
- Rep Power: 494160
-
-
Originally Posted By Scottybby⏩
You shut your whore mouth.Loony pls
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
I'm always reminded of your lame, childish lies whenever I see a post of yours.This kind of stuff is just so bizarre.
As I mentioned previously, we have documents from the 1700s, we have huge FBI transcripts of wiretapping and spying on celebrities, but people just casually erased moon landing footage?
They just left tapes around and people accidentally used them for other things?
I am reminded of the lame childish liesthe media promotes about corona, and they forgets about them, changes the story, etc. It has the same childish type of "BRB" sound to it.
As I mentioned previously, we have documents from the 1700s, we have huge FBI transcripts of wiretapping and spying on celebrities, but people just casually erased moon landing footage?
They just left tapes around and people accidentally used them for other things?
I am reminded of the lame childish liesthe media promotes about corona, and they forgets about them, changes the story, etc. It has the same childish type of "BRB" sound to it.
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
Landing deniers could be given legitimate proof that it was real and they'd still deny it.The irony here is you yourself are being fooled by a known sham- jumping onto this debunked "petrified wood" non-point, while ignoring the vast evidence out there with whatever bias you are bringing to the table.
^^^
sign of someone who put almost no research or thought into any of this. Google is a helpful starting point.
^^^
sign of someone who put almost no research or thought into any of this. Google is a helpful starting point.
AcetylCoA gets reps
"God your dunce." - Swept
LSU Tigers/Washington Nationals
12-07-2020, 09:32 AM
-
#117
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By JStrez⏩
You have to step back a second.When you think about it, going to the Moon back in the 50's and 60's was considered to be the next big thing. You had countries cutting corners and putting all of their money into their moon landing operations. I think at the time we reached the Moon, 5% of our nations budget was being used for it. But once the US got to the Moon, everyone else was defeated, and then the Vietnam War hit, and then pandemics hit, and then the social interest in going back to the Moon largely fated. For example right now, why would anyone want to spend tens of billions of dollars going to the moon when people are dying of COVID? Why not use the money elsewhere when there's other chit going on?
Then interest only starts to pick up once other people start to take an interest too. This applies to everyday life in everything we do. No one gives a chit about the new thing until one popular person promotes it, and then suddenly everyone else is like fukk I need that. So when one country is established but has no "big" endeavour, they say fukk it, we'll drop a new rover or satellite onto the Moon. Then other countries are like chit then we need to go to the Moon first to make it seem like we're way better than them, and then suddenly you have loads of countries in the mix starting to do all this crap for new reason other than to again, flop their dicks around. I could see the next big thing again being "First Woman on the Moon", or first black, minority, LGBTQ, etc. on the Moon, nothing more than a gimmick honestly and just to have bragging rights.
BUT something similar could be used that we use everyday. No one developed nuclear weapons until word got out that they were being worked on. No one started exploring the oceans until someone started. No one traveled to the South Pole until someone started, etc. So the only real thing you could do on the Moon anymore is to establish a lunar colony. So when nations start taking an interest to probe the Moon, most people assume it's to send the first woman or to set up grounds for a space colony. Then all the major superpowers start throwing out money to start more missions to get the latest data (unchanged really) and give the illusion to everyone else that they have a stake in the game. NASA's budget has been decimated, as has other super powers space programs, but I bet they already researched and designed a livable habitat for the moon, now all that's left is for someone to say they plan to go, and suddenly all the major superpowers will dust off their plans, throw money into the budget, and race to be the first.
Then interest only starts to pick up once other people start to take an interest too. This applies to everyday life in everything we do. No one gives a chit about the new thing until one popular person promotes it, and then suddenly everyone else is like fukk I need that. So when one country is established but has no "big" endeavour, they say fukk it, we'll drop a new rover or satellite onto the Moon. Then other countries are like chit then we need to go to the Moon first to make it seem like we're way better than them, and then suddenly you have loads of countries in the mix starting to do all this crap for new reason other than to again, flop their dicks around. I could see the next big thing again being "First Woman on the Moon", or first black, minority, LGBTQ, etc. on the Moon, nothing more than a gimmick honestly and just to have bragging rights.
BUT something similar could be used that we use everyday. No one developed nuclear weapons until word got out that they were being worked on. No one started exploring the oceans until someone started. No one traveled to the South Pole until someone started, etc. So the only real thing you could do on the Moon anymore is to establish a lunar colony. So when nations start taking an interest to probe the Moon, most people assume it's to send the first woman or to set up grounds for a space colony. Then all the major superpowers start throwing out money to start more missions to get the latest data (unchanged really) and give the illusion to everyone else that they have a stake in the game. NASA's budget has been decimated, as has other super powers space programs, but I bet they already researched and designed a livable habitat for the moon, now all that's left is for someone to say they plan to go, and suddenly all the major superpowers will dust off their plans, throw money into the budget, and race to be the first.
Firstly, NASA said it lost the plans to how the rockets work.
As I have mentioned before, the US has extensive records on what Elvis was doing, lol, but it had no one copying and saving files for ROCKET PLANS? I mean the CIA and everyone would have been all over this stuff and everyone who worked in the project. They aren't going to lose anything.
Also, it is JUST A ROCKET and there's no science fiction hyperdrive or anything in it. There are only so many ways something like that is going to work, due to the limitations of science. So, the US spent a lot of money making it, but that was due to the companies making it. It didn't need "Tritanium" to work, because it was just a rocket.
In addition, there would only be so many ways to navigated and so forth.
All of that means it should not have been a mystery then how it worked and it certainly shouldn't be now.
There was no way that NASA, while basically going to another planet, lost stuff, erased tapes, accidently threw out major plans for the whole project, and so forth. It's absurd and it say that someone is lying about the topic.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
12-07-2020, 09:32 AM
-
#118
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By Lunatic⏩
You are the most amusingly butthurt person on the forum!I'm always reminded of your lame, childish lies whenever I see a post of yours.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
12-07-2020, 09:35 AM
-
#119
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
-
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 16,745
- Rep Power: 183851
-
-
There's a video somewhere of the original broadcast before they land where Neil Armstrong talks about seeing structures on the Moon.
Pretty sure the Nazis had a base on the dark side in the 30s, documented in a movie called Iron Sky.
Pretty sure the Nazis had a base on the dark side in the 30s, documented in a movie called Iron Sky.
Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
12-07-2020, 09:36 AM
-
#120
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
-
- BroIncorporated
- OG Miscer
- Join Date: May 2011
- Posts: 606
- Rep Power: 1607
-
-
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
We're just having a conversation here, no need to get angry. I'm not trying to bring any more "bias" to the table than you are.The irony here is you yourself are being fooled by a known sham- jumping onto this debunked "petrified wood" non-point, while ignoring the vast evidence out there with whatever bias you are bringing to the table.
^^^
sign of someone who put almost no research or thought into any of this. Google is a helpful starting point.
^^^
sign of someone who put almost no research or thought into any of this. Google is a helpful starting point.
The "moon rock" material is of earth origin. That's not been "debunked", it's the truth. That's a pretty big point, it's very important. To say otherwise is silly.
I've done plenty of research on this, otherwise I wouldn't bother spending my time on this thread and discussing it if I hadn't. I don't claim to know it all, I'm here with an open mind and open ears. I want to be proved wrong so I can be one step closer to knowing what's true.
With that said, so far I haven't seen anyone post anything to debunk any of the discrepancies, just people calling others names and claiming they're ill informed while not providing any reasonable counter evidence.
U aware?
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts