Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
ยป Justy LMFAO if this is not your goal physique
  1. Results 91 to 94 of 94
  2. First
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
post 1638057223 05-08-2021, 08:13 AM
-
#91
  1. teodorkanev1
  2. Registered User
  1. teodorkanev1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 2,043
  6. Rep Power: 17847
Originally Posted By Coal
Yeah those dudes are really short and stocky mane. Tiny dudes like that can fill out their frames easily. Steve Reeves would dwarf them.
I don't want to be rude SRS but - do you have a complex because you took steroids at one point in the past and you want to justify your decision by claiming it's impossible to look good otherwise? Or do you have a chitty physique and all this celtech talk is cope? There are plenty of great looking natural bodybuilders. I mean you claim they're all liars with 0 evidence. And that might as well be true OR you are coping out of your mind because you're jealous? Again sorry, but you absolutely disregard everything with complete certainty and all you have is an eyeball test and ''experience''. No thanks, Jeff, not buying this anti-natty narrative.

Is Bobby Hull cellteched?





He grew up on a farm and played hockey in a time where they smoked cigarettes between periods
Pittsburgh Penguins 5x Stanley Cup Champions

AMG Petronas 9x Drivers' Championships, 7x Constructors' Championship
post 1638057453 05-08-2021, 08:17 AM
-
#92
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  1. Nonsense916
  2. worst poster on the misc
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 54,085
  5. Rep Power: 321216
Originally Posted By Coal
Neither his body.
Was this necessary?
Losers let it happen, winners make it happen.

Nonsense Army Crew.
post 1638058163 05-08-2021, 08:33 AM
-
#93
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  1. atgbrahsrs
  2. ToningWasTooHarshForMe
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 16,298
  5. Rep Power: 67825
Originally Posted By Coal
Yeah those dudes are really short and stocky mane. Tiny dudes like that can fill out their frames easily. Steve Reeves would dwarf them.
OK, so you confirm bone structure makes the difference here. Exactly my point. I dont care how much lbs of pure muscle fibres each of them has. All I care about is the visual appeal of a physique.
communist until you get rich
rightwing until financially secure
atheist until the plane starts falling
slootist until you get married
muslim after you get married
post 1638059503 05-08-2021, 09:04 AM
-
#94
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By merb0
Some serious upper body muscle for a natural lifter
Yeah, looks great. Also about 15% bodyfat and not 6% with bursting veins and able to see every muscle striation. I imagine if that bloke were to cut down nearly 10% bodyfat, a lot of that lean mass would go bye-bye, never mind at those low levels of bf% his performance would tank.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts