This is the problem with conspiracy theories though, things that have been very clearly debunked continue to have life breathed into them.

Jet fuel won't melt steal beams no. But it sure as **** is hot enough to cause steel to weaken. And Aluminium, which is what people see burning white hot in the 9/11 vids and confuse for steel, will be melted by jet fuel.

As for WTC7, it very clearly had quite significant damage on the side conspiracy videos don't like to show...

Significant, lmao. Is that the best pic of your "significant" claim?

The other buildings in WTC complex had damage as well.

Funny, though, because they didn't collpase within their own footprint, nearly spontaneously.

Keep trying.

All 3 buildings fell free fall speed, just like controlled demolitions, even the WTC7 which wasn't hit. U mad?

what bodies, I never saw a single one.

I saw a bunch of videos recently, I think it was bitchute.

You're changing your points as you go now. Have you ever heard a controlled demolition? Please explain how you have a controlled demolition of structures of that scale without the noise of the charges detonating or the clear debris they'd create. Please explain how you'd drill these charges into the structual supports without everyone in the building and anyone going past it hearing.

Also please explain how this looks anything like a controlled demolition.

Bush did 9/11

On the first video, Wolfgang is uniquely qualified but UNFORTUNATELY many of his assumptions about his police profession turned out to be wrong. For example, there have been MULTIPLE instances of of police WAITING for schools shooters to finish before going in. They will not assume the risk, even to save children. The issue with Wolfgang's suspicion is that his assumption of honor is strongly misplaced. For reference, see parkland.

I'm neither surprised or doubt the absolute incompetence witnessed at sandy hook.

For the second, that looks absolutely nothing like adam lanza.

I guess I just don't understand the conspiracy theory. What's the conspiracy, exactly?

I'm not changing my point. You zeroed in on one detail of my post, I added stuff to it lol. Jet fuel may weaken steel beams, but what are the odds every building that collapsed would fall at freefall speed? The pic you posted means nothing, the top was structurally compromised because it got hit by a plane. If the building was imploded from the bottom, that top part would be first to give out due to the prior damage (As it did).

You also neglected all of the witness reports of hearing what sounded like explosions before the collapse. You can google it because I'm too lazy. I don't think you have the full picture, you're merely arguing on behalf of the MSM narrative without being fully aware of the other side.

AJ was a COWARD for caving on this.

Brb only photo of alleged shooter is grainy as f*ck, brb we're 1950's camera technology.
Brb no ballistics investigation was done.
Brb there needs to be a federal law that requires a DEAD accused criminal to be proven guilty unanimously via jury JUST AS IF they were still alive. THis would make getting away with FALSE FLAGS a lot harder, cuz a bunch of feds can't say: "this guy was the shooter BECAUSE WE SAID SO, NOW STFU!!"
Brb NO PROOF that "Adam Lanza" even existed, i.e. was even a REAL PERSON, period.
Brb school worker reported DEAD, later same person interviewed. Brb we world of Warcraft now rezzing players irl.
Brb "Adam Lanza" bizzarely GAVE A F*CK about being seen on a security camera WHEN HE KNEW HE WOULD BE DEAD SHORTLY THEREAFTER.
Brb alleged shooter "borrows his brother's drivers license" (how f*cking conveneint - thats one loose end you terrorist feds/military industrial complex don't have to tie up heh you f*cks?).
Brb unanimous: "We dont wanna see the dead bodies of our own children, way too traumatic!!!"--Yup PERFECTLY f*cking believable that every single family feels the same way. Get completely the f*ck off.'
Brb multiple narrative changes regarding what weapons were allegedly used/found: "hey sheep JUST SHUT THE F*CK UP, YOU DONT NEED TO KNOW WHAT KIND OF GUNS WERE USED, CUZ **ALL GUNS ARE BAD** MMKAAY?"

shut up man the government wants whats good for me and they wouldn't ever lie to me.

Also this.

in. This one has always kinda interested me

Narrativecels on suicidewatch ITT right now

Yeah......people sue for dumb chit all the time right? Right?

Its just coffee........You need to see this and so does everyone else who's too stupid to use google and learn what the word facts means......This is her legs at the emergency room.....


https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/attac...3&d=1630822527

I kinda dig the irony......first image of this "movie" is a FBI warning lol

Gotta love it.



Edit: uh, crazy conspiracy uh, and uh uh....uh well this kid uh, went and killed uh, thats uh Christ can this man speak normally?

If you're a real person, which I really hope you're not.......you should seek some counseling.


Wanna know my own conspircy?

70% of misc is Russian trolls to test me, and to condition others.....before their take over 2027

Russian trolls lol. I remember when I used to watch the news and believe it..

So what you're saying is, you only believe what others tell you.......on the ........internet? Instead of a tv?



riooooooght, k den

When you start doing your own investigative work, and put boots on the ground, lmk brah......until then keep the tin foil hat warm for me.


Edit: Opposite of watching the news and believing it, is to become a conspiracy theorist? k bruh

I don't believe people on the internet unless I can validate what they say with legit sources/empirical evidence srs. You have to read between the lines and look at hard data and stats when getting information, not just listen to emotional appeals and opinions. Even so-called experts can have biases and agendas.

The thing I find kind of interesting is the fact that Sandy Hook and the Vegas shooting are the ones picked by CTers to focus on. Not Columbine, not Parkland, not VT, not Santee, not Pulse nightclub. There may be CTers on all of them, many are blamed on the meds the shooter was on, but the attention seems focused on those two shootings. Perhaps it's because of the size of the deaths, but there are some interesting details that are difficult to shake off regarding those two.

>Facts
>Reading between the lines


Pick one......

Ascertain the truth through all the bullchit thrown at you. 95% of news information is b.s./irrelevant

Why do you insist on deflecting me with the media/news? When did I even mention them?


Obviously you have no real answers here, you just see something, and if it sticks to your "walls" then you run with it. Confirmation bias, dunning kruger effect......whatever you wanna call it......

-You have no hard facts to back up any conspiracy you believe
-You deflect by saying but muh corrupt medias
-Still have yet to state a fact of any kind ITT


You show me facts, and I will walk with you.

What are you even talking about? I've posted countless facts itt and this post chain only started when you got offended I called out people who believe the MSM blindly itt. Some of the facts are already itt. read between the lines

The gun performed as designed, it shot bullets which are intended to kill living things.

It is absurd that you can sue a manufacturer for a product because it operated as designed.

Meanwhile they are coercing and want to mandate you take a vaccine and you have NO RIGHT TO SUE if big pharma harms you and does not perform as designed.

Insane

libtards really believe this.

I entered a politics section on a tech forum that I hadnt frequented in a while. Because I didnt parrot the latest shariablue talking points, everyone on there started to claim I was a russian spy and they all patted each other on the back for that amazing "discovery". Libtards are brainwashed sheep.

Its proof that if you keep repeating something, people will eventually believe it. They said russian collusion/russian interference for 3+ years despite no proof, now anything non-MSM certified and libs say "Russians" lol.

I lmao at them from my Moscow office

Here’s a question nobody seems to ask but me.

If WTC building 7 was some kind of controlled demolition, why wouldn’t they have another plane crash into it to justify its collapse? What were “the powers that be” thinking during the planning of all this? “Alright, we’re gonna let these two planes hit both towers and rig them up with a controlled demolition to finish the job. And then we’re gonna make WTC building 7 collapse with a controlled demolition as well, but tell the people it was somehow damaged enough to fall at free-fall speed.” Surely they could think of a better plan than that bullsh!t. Also, what’s so special about building 7 that they would want it to collapse? Surely the two towers collapsing was enough. Why throw building 7 into the mix?

bruh just ignore that loser. All they can do is do whatever "TV MAN" says.

They literally cannot fathom the government and MSM would ever lie to them despite thousands of examples over the decades of them doing just so.

Libs are just brainwashed.

Seemed like an open and shut case to me tbh