Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Roe v wade may have just been overturned
  1. Results 91 to 120 of 448
  2. Page 4 of 15
  3. First
  5. 2
  6. 3
  7. 4
  8. 5
  9. 6
  11. Last

Thread: Roe v wade may have just been overturned

post 1660643823 05-03-2022, 06:06 AM
-
#91
  1. Foxmulder0
  2. Registered User
  1. Foxmulder0
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2016
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 9,406
  6. Rep Power: 64242
Originally Posted By Imthebestmayne⏩
Great now the most privileged women can act like the biggest victims for the next 6 months

Lmfao I love when they cry like this.
Truth is out there
post 1660644013 05-03-2022, 06:13 AM
-
#92
  1. leafs43
  2. Registered User
  1. leafs43
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 45
  5. Posts: 45,367
  6. Rep Power: 153657
Libs 2 days ago: Men can have babies

Libs yesterday: Men cannot make choices about preganancy
post 1660644143 05-03-2022, 06:15 AM
-
#93
  1. Skezo
  2. Registered User
  1. Skezo
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 3,177
  6. Rep Power: 8947
Originally Posted By monty097⏩
Sloots mad they actually might have to be responsible for their actions instead of just killing it off if they get pregnant from fuking around.

"Hurr durr muh women's rights". Lol @ thinking it has anything to do with that.
Sloots responsible? They still get to decide if they gey custody and the man has to pay regardless.

Republican but I support abortion - this will impact the people we don't really want reproducing the most.
post 1660644273 05-03-2022, 06:19 AM
-
#94
  1. Foxmulder0
  2. Registered User
  1. Foxmulder0
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2016
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 9,406
  6. Rep Power: 64242
Originally Posted By plsmire⏩
What brought this on? Seems to have come from nowhere, I thought this was a long lost and gone battle.

And as much as I am against abortion logically, I don’t think preventing crazy blue-haired sloots from aborting does anyone favours. It won’t do the sloots favours, won’t do the men who used them as a semen deposit any good and def won’t do the reps any good.

The tears would be fun to watch though.

It’ll also be amazing if the media on the R side starts a campaign for mass awareness on what actually happens during an abortion (this is purposely hidden from the mother). E.g the tearing of limb to limb, the fact the baby has a bearing heart, the fact that it can feel pain as early as 8 weeks and apparently has full pain receptors equivalent to a fully developed human at 18 weeks. So these people can reflect on what they’ve done and supported and hopefully it haunts them for the rest of their days.

Literal murderers in my eyes (at least anything mid-late term). Earlier is a bit more nuanced.
Imagine being passionate about a right to kill something like a baby. They’re absolute lunatics. Abortions are disgusting and yes there are exceptions, but the frothing from the mouth obsession they have for killing something is absolute insanity.
Truth is out there
post 1660644673 05-03-2022, 06:30 AM
-
#95
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Weightaholic⏩
Always framed around "the sloots"... I'm no doctor, but I believe current medical opinion is pretty unanimous in its stance that it takes both a maleanda female to cause a pregnancy.

The more you know!
Only one person can get pregnant, and it's not a man.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1660644793 05-03-2022, 06:33 AM
-
#96
  1. Underwrought
  2. Banned
  1. Underwrought
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,731
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By LeftistGent⏩
Yep - as far as I'm concerned, conservatives are finished for a long time after this. What a complete 180, I am genuinely shocked at how stupid they played this. Their midterm success was going to be an absolute landslide before this, jesus
Im wondering if this is a big brain move, they know this would kick the hornets nest. They will reverse course letting libtards think they won, so they wont come to the polls.
post 1660644873 05-03-2022, 06:36 AM
-
#97
  1. Procta
  1. Procta
  3. Join Date: Feb 2006
  4. Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 132,669
  6. Subscribers: 8
  7. Rep Power: 1748886
Subscribe for extra premium content (no noodz sorry guys)
post 1660645393 05-03-2022, 06:54 AM
-
#98
  1. WHChampion
  1. WHChampion
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Location: Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 9,616
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 60006
Originally Posted By Procta⏩
ded
post 1660645453 05-03-2022, 06:55 AM
-
#99
  1. Foxmulder0
  2. Registered User
  1. Foxmulder0
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2016
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 9,406
  6. Rep Power: 64242
Originally Posted By procta⏩
lol!!!
Truth is out there
post 1660645543 05-03-2022, 06:58 AM
-
#100
  1. RIKTER
  2. Registered User
  1. RIKTER
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 31,602
  6. Rep Power: 241807
Originally Posted By sfgiants13⏩
Unfortunate thing is this will probably mobilize a lot of dem voters in the midterm
I guess now we know why the timing of it.

(D) would love nothing more than to have RvW overturned etc right before the mid terms....theyve been running on that happening since it became law 50 years ago.

Good night sweet (R)
post 1660645703 05-03-2022, 07:01 AM
-
#101
  1. Azrairc
  2. TwinkMAXXing
  1. Azrairc
  2. TwinkMAXXing
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Posts: 18,933
  5. Rep Power: 64988
Politics aside no part of the constitution gives you a right to abortion it should be overturned

You could make the argument that all abortions should be illegal based of the right to life in

“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Abortion is literally depriving a person of life

This won’t ban abortion btw. It just allows the states to make their own laws on it. Hopefully it’s overturned and further challenged until all abortions become illegal with strict medical exemptions
post 1660645893 05-03-2022, 07:05 AM
-
#102
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Posts: 24,727
  5. Rep Power: 349124
________

MFC

________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
post 1660646293 05-03-2022, 07:18 AM
-
#103
  1. Procta
  1. Procta
  3. Join Date: Feb 2006
  4. Location: Jacksonville, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 132,669
  6. Subscribers: 8
  7. Rep Power: 1748886
rage riot ... is totally not an insurrection

Subscribe for extra premium content (no noodz sorry guys)
post 1660646393 05-03-2022, 07:20 AM
-
#104
  1. LurkoLantern
  2. Registered User
  1. LurkoLantern
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Posts: 8,607
  5. Rep Power: 55368
Honestly it's a genius move by the liberals as a means to mobilize & fundraise, as well as take attention off Biden's economy & other blunders.


From a legal perspective, Roe v Wade should never have happened anyway. The argument was that the 4th Amendment guarantees the right to privacy, and therefore no medical procedure should be restricted by the government since it'd be a violation of one's medical privacy. But the ruling has then remained constrained to only abortion because once you apply it to any other procedure you can see how ridiculous the logic is. IE, the government can't restrict me from surgically inserting ivory as my dental caps, or replacing my heart with a panda's heart. Or swallowing bags of ******* or hash, which would be a drug trafficker's dream. My body my choice after all.


The leaked document calls out the inherent logic flaws associated with RvW and merely assigns rule-making back to the peoples' elected legislature, rather than judges just inventing policies at their own discretion.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glow, glow, glow your boat
post 1660646533 05-03-2022, 07:23 AM
-
#105
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Age: 55
  5. Posts: 22,214
  6. Rep Power: 133991
As a libertarian, my feelings on Roe are mixed. I am staunchly pro-choice. What other people want to do is none of anyone's fukking business if it doesn't violate your own rights. On the other hand, Roe was a bad decision. There's nothing in the Constitution about federal government regulating abortion or healthcare one way or the other. In the end, most people support abortion rights and this is a lightning rod issue, so it's going to cost the Republicans in the midterms. What should be an (R) landslide isn't going to be because of this (unless this leak is wrong).
post 1660646633 05-03-2022, 07:25 AM
-
#106
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Age: 55
  5. Posts: 22,214
  6. Rep Power: 133991
Originally Posted By Procta⏩
rage riot ... is totally not an insurrection

Anyone rioting should be arrested, and if they are breaking into a secured area of the Supreme Court as part of a rioting mob, they are opening themselves up to being shot.
post 1660646723 05-03-2022, 07:26 AM
-
#107
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  1. Jayarbie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Age: 55
  5. Posts: 22,214
  6. Rep Power: 133991
Originally Posted By LurkoLantern⏩
Honestly it's a genius move by the liberals as a means to mobilize & fundraise, as well as take attention off Biden's economy & other blunders.


From a legal perspective, Roe v Wade should never have happened anyway. The argument was that the 4th Amendment guarantees the right to privacy, and therefore no medical procedure should be restricted by the government since it'd be a violation of one's medical privacy. But the ruling has then remained constrained to only abortion because once you apply it to any other procedure you can see how ridiculous the logic is. IE, the government can't restrict me from surgically inserting ivory as my dental caps, or replacing my heart with a panda's heart. Or swallowing bags of ******* or hash, which would be a drug trafficker's dream. My body my choice after all.


The leaked document calls out the inherent logic flaws associated with RvW and merely assigns rule-making back to the peoples' elected legislature, rather than judges just inventing policies at their own discretion.
"Liberal" move? Conservatives control the court. Liberals aren't making this decision.
post 1660646753 05-03-2022, 07:27 AM
-
#108
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: New Mexico, United States
  5. Posts: 58,400
  6. Rep Power: 203698
Originally Posted By plsmire⏩
It’ll also be amazing if the media on the R side starts a campaign for mass awareness on what actually happens during an abortion (this is purposely hidden from the mother). E.g the tearing of limb to limb, the fact the baby has a bearing heart, the fact that it can feel pain as early as 8 weeks and apparently has full pain receptors equivalent to a fully developed human at 18 weeks. So these people can reflect on what they’ve done and supported and hopefully it haunts them for the rest of their days.

Literal murderers in my eyes (at least anything mid-late term). Earlier is a bit more nuanced.
A few years ago I worked with a lady that got pregnant (purposefully) and a month later was diagnosed with cervical cancer. To remove the cancer its essentially guaranteed to disrupt the placenta and kill her fetus. She elected to have an abortion to save her live, and she is still alive today because of it. If she was in a state that outlawed abortion (Texas/tennessee/Mississippi) she would have been forced to carry the child full term which also meant allowing a malignant cancer to grow an additional 8 months. This would have undoubtedly killed her but also the fetus in the process

I truly don't understand how people that are not healthcare professionals are allowed to make and pass laws pertaining to health care when they don't even understand all the implications.
post 1660647023 05-03-2022, 07:31 AM
-
#109
  1. leafs43
  2. Registered User
  1. leafs43
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 45
  5. Posts: 45,367
  6. Rep Power: 153657
Originally Posted By Maestro⏩
A few years ago I worked with a lady that got pregnant (purposefully) and a month later was diagnosed with cervical cancer. To remove the cancer its essentially guaranteed to disrupt the placenta and kill her fetus. She elected to have an abortion to save her live, and she is still alive today because of it. If she was in a state that outlawed abortion (Texas/tennessee/Mississippi) she would have been forced to carry the child full term which also meant allowing a malignant cancer to grow an additional 8 months. This would have undoubtedly killed her but also the fetus in the process

I truly don't understand how people that are not healthcare professionals are allowed to make and pass laws pertaining to health care when they don't even understand all the implications.
Only the extreme religious types think there should be no abortion.

Heatlh and well being of the woman should almost always be considered.


Getting an abortion after 5 months of carrying cuz baby daddy skipped out is not a good reason and should be outlawed.
post 1660647033 05-03-2022, 07:32 AM
-
#110
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,354
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 698086
Originally Posted By BadMonkeyFunker⏩
big government conservicucks... telling ppl what to do with their bodies or how to live their lives, who to love , who to fuk...

congrats ..you just lost the midterms.

LMFAO!

white taliban fuks... HAHAAHAHAHAH
Wait... is big government bad again? Because it was literally just a couple of days ago that you all in Lib-Land were celebrating the government's new Disinformation Governance Board.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1660647073 05-03-2022, 07:32 AM
-
#111
  1. John L
  2. Make that coffee to go
  1. John L
  2. Make that coffee to go
  3. Join Date: May 2006
  4. Location: Brookhaven, New York, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 39,750
  7. Subscribers: 3
  8. Rep Power: 232651
Originally Posted By Maestro⏩
A few years ago I worked with a lady that got pregnant (purposefully) and a month later was diagnosed with cervical cancer. To remove the cancer its essentially guaranteed to disrupt the placenta and kill her fetus. She elected to have an abortion to save her live, and she is still alive today because of it. If she was in a state that outlawed abortion (Texas/tennessee/Mississippi) she would have been forced to carry the child full term which also meant allowing a malignant cancer to grow an additional 8 months. This would have undoubtedly killed her but also the fetus in the process

I truly don't understand how people that are not healthcare professionals are allowed to make and pass laws pertaining to health care when they don't even understand all the implications.
The abortion restriction laws have exemptions which allow abortions to take place if the life of the mother is in danger.
post 1660647153 05-03-2022, 07:34 AM
-
#112
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,747
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384419
How fiery will the mostly peaceful protests from the baby killers be?
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1660647283 05-03-2022, 07:36 AM
-
#113
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: New Mexico, United States
  5. Posts: 58,400
  6. Rep Power: 203698
Originally Posted By LeftistGent⏩
This is THE best thing that could have happened to democrats. Holy chit social conservatives are fuking retarded - literally blowing the midterms and 2024 presidency LOL. Do they not realize how many dems this will mobilize to vote? Man I love social conservatives
pretty much this.

Repealing RvW wont stop abortions it will just stop safe abortions. So this is all for nothing at the potential detriment to republicans this November. Its perfect timing too, I believe this officially gets repealed in late June/early July, so it will be very fresh in the heads of democratic politicians campaigning and their constituents who are going to vote.

Hell this may even have a bit of a "Trump affect", and by that I mean, women who are normally conservativesilentlyvoting democrat because they're against this one ruling.
post 1660647353 05-03-2022, 07:37 AM
-
#114
  1. LurkoLantern
  2. Registered User
  1. LurkoLantern
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Posts: 8,607
  5. Rep Power: 55368
Originally Posted By Jayarbie⏩
"Liberal" move? Conservatives control the court. Liberals aren't making this decision.
The "move" I'm referencing is the leaking of the document to Politico
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glow, glow, glow your boat
post 1660647423 05-03-2022, 07:38 AM
-
#115
  1. DeshaunWatson
  2. Verified
  1. DeshaunWatson
  2. Verified
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Posts: 19,647
  5. Rep Power: 135286
Originally Posted By Procta⏩
I dont care, not really a fed gov decision if you ask me

these melts downs on the other hand.... glorious




Those women haveneverbeen touched.
post 1660647503 05-03-2022, 07:40 AM
-
#116
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: New Mexico, United States
  5. Posts: 58,400
  6. Rep Power: 203698
Originally Posted By John
The abortion restriction laws have exemptions which allow abortions to take place if the life of the mother is in danger.
I'm referring to nonsense measures like this. People making laws that have no idea what the hell they're doing;

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/03/...consideration/

TLDR
Missouri abortion bill will make it illegal to remove an ectopic pregnancy.
post 1660647533 05-03-2022, 07:41 AM
-
#117
  1. RamataKahn
  2. Registered User
  1. RamataKahn
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Posts: 2,425
  5. Rep Power: 23446
Originally Posted By LeftistGent⏩
Yep - as far as I'm concerned, conservatives are finished for a long time after this. What a complete 180, I am genuinely shocked at how stupid they played this. Their midterm success was going to be an absolute landslide before this, jesus
lol at armchair political analysts, you have no clue what you are talking about.
post 1660647583 05-03-2022, 07:42 AM
-
#118
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Posts: 24,727
  5. Rep Power: 349124
Originally Posted By Maestro⏩
pretty much this.

Repealing RvW wont stop abortions it will just stop safe abortions. So this is all for nothing at the potential detriment to republicans this November. Its perfect timing too, I believe this officially gets repealed in late June/early July, so it will be very fresh in the heads of democratic politicians campaigning and their constituents who are going to vote.

Hell this may even have a bit of a "Trump affect", and by that I mean, women who are normally conservativesilentlyvoting democrat because they're against this one ruling.
You have horrible political takes.
________

MFC

________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
post 1660647833 05-03-2022, 07:46 AM
-
#119
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  3. Join Date: Mar 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 64,672
  6. Rep Power: 351111
I hope this is framed as retribution for the left forgetting "my body my right" when they forced vaccinations
post 1660647873 05-03-2022, 07:47 AM
-
#120
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: New Mexico, United States
  5. Posts: 58,400
  6. Rep Power: 203698
Originally Posted By RamataKahn⏩
lol at armchair political analysts, you have no clue what you are talking about.
saying conservatives are "finished" may be a bit strong, but do you think this helps republicans for the midterms?

I really don't know what Republicans are going to do at this point. Much like liberals have the looming desire to get rid of the 2A the Republicans proverbial carrot on the stick was Roe v Wade.

Now that the neocon voters finally grabbed and ate the carrot, what other issue do republicans have to keep their base? Don't get me wrong, the boomers and evangelicals will eat this stuff up and be content, but once they're gone, I don't know how they're going to grow their base....or at least grow it at a rate to compete with the growth of liberal ideologies in this country.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts