[QUOTE=CuttyUnderleaf post_id=1673460503]This is the legal definition of human trafficking as defined by the DOJ[URL=https://www.justice.gov/humantrafficking]https://www.justice.gov/humantrafficking[/URL]


[b] -Sex trafficking is the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, obtaining, patronizing, or soliciting of a person for the purpose of a commercial sex act in which a commercial sex act is induced by force, fraud, or coercion, or in which the person induced to perform such act has not attained 18 years of age. (22 U.S.C. § 7102(11)(A)).

-Forced labor is the recruitment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for labor or services, through the use of force, fraud, or coercion for the purpose of subjection to involuntary servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery. (22 U.S.C. § 7102(11)(B)).[/b]

How are you claiming that is somehow breach of contract since there was no contract to breach since the girl or girls were under 18?

Anyone under 18 can only sign a contract for necessity items.



I’m assuming your contention is that she agreed at 17 took the initial flight at 17 but signed the contract on her 18th birthday, so CP and the human trafficking charge shouldn’t apply because she may or may not have lied about her age or as far as he knew she was 18. Correct?





[URL=https://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/ztulv2/girlsdoporn_founder_on_fbi_most_wanted_list/j1fy0pn/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3]https://www.reddit.com/r/news/commen...ssmf&context=3[/URL]

—-


Link to AMA below

[URL=https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/e4wni0/i_am_a_victim_of_forced_pornography_by_the/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf]https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/commen...tm_name=iossmf[/URL]



[i] I was lied to, told that I would be flown out to San Diego from Washington over 1000 miles apart from where I resided at the time and back for free, I was given fake but very reassuring female references who claimed to have worked with the same company before, I was given fake website links that supposedly displayed pictures of women they have photoshot before and all for the validation of a supposed "photoshoot". Everything they were attempting to sell out to me seemed all so legit so I figured, what could be the harm?

When I arrived there I was picked up by two men and a woman. They drove me to the hotel where I was then told that I only had one of two options: 1.) Perform a video shoot(s) with them or 2.) Find my own way back home. With little to no money and being alone in an unfamiliar state where I knew no one and being surrounded by persistently intimidating men, I felt obligated to oblige. In other words, I was left with no other choice.

I ended up filming for 4 hours straight with less than a 3-minute water break in between. The man I filmed with was no way near gentle. [b]I cried, screamed, and begged to stop in between sets, and even bled more than once. Every time I told them I wanted to stop they told me I was obligated to comply and if I didn't I would be going against my contract. [/b][/i]


Makes me wonder if they have the raw footage.

So you don’t see any coercion in her account? Like, none at all?

[URL=https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Coercion]https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Coercion[/URL]

[b][i]Coercion -
The intimidation of a victim to compel the individual to do some act against his or her will by the use of psychological pressure, physical force, or threats. The crime of intentionally and unlawfully restraining another's freedom by threatening to commit a crime, accusing the victim of a crime, disclosing any secret that would seriously impair the victim's reputation in the community, or by performing or refusing to perform an official action lawfully requested by the victim, or by causing an official to do so.[i][/b][/QUOTE][img]https://i.imgur.com/o3saePE.gif[/img]

Smh @ me.

lol @ taking those accounts at their word, srs. "I flew to the other side of the country and I had no money with me" who the fuk does that?

Those hos are lying lol

Lol. Some dumb sloots decide to do some porn, regret it, and this guy becomes enemy number 1?

The power of slootismDumb libtard anti semites.

Eh. Not worth the sentence but still exploitative. So, good.

Even if the women aren’t innocent 100%, I hate degenerates like that so I’m glad he was caught.

Im a hypocrite because I’ve watched one of the videos(only the hottest one) but still f it. He’s a scumbag.

So hundreds of women get paid for sex willingly, and now that's called sex trafficking and rape? Wut?

at least one girl said they took her phone & she tried to leave but they had a guy posted at the door and pulled her back in.

So stupid. What crime was committed?
he paid them, no?

they were smiling and drinking cum on camera but now they have regrets cuz they didnt get a good deal?

This all boiled down to GDP had poor contracts. I think I read one of the girls was studying law and realized she could sue the f ck out of them for this reason. Like you need airtight contracts especially in this field and especially with metoo going on.

So they didn't have airtight contracts and they were overly aggressive (I think the actor gave a bunch of them STDs as well so they were just really sloppy overall). Site also started in 2009 so while the girls should've still known better it's not like today where this chit is 100% plastered everywhere immediately. I think Layla London was their only girl to hang around and stay in porn for a bit and become a name.

Why didn't she report that chit immediately?

And prob not have her porn distributed in the process? Did she wait until her porn was distributed to say this?

If that chit actually happened they would have for sure shut it down and her chit might not have been published

they looked very into it for being "trapped in the room."

People behing the site are no doubt scum of the earth dirtbags but lets not pretend these girls are all victims and innocent. The mexican actor who was in most scenes already got 20 years behind bars whilst this degenerate founder will get life in prison

Don’t simp those girls knew what they where getting into

She was traumatized, and visibly shaken....











10 years later..

Insane amount of truth in that post... hell, it's so true, it almost hurts.


Lost it laughing irl at the part about how the sloots couldn't let the truth out in any capacity, not even up to the point where they decided to take the dick for the cash, because then everyone would know they lied about why they went to L.aA. in the first place lol. I swear that stuff happens on a smaller scale to poor unknowing cucks when their gf's/wives are "staying out late for ladies' night, see you tomorrow morning honey <3" types all the time lmao

I don't think I have it anymore, never saved and got it off another forum. That forum thread also got deleted since people kept posting real names which was against their rules.

So a girl turned out to be a lawyer and started backstabbing the GDP dudes.

Moral of the story: Women backstab. Female 102

One of the biggest crimes he actually committed was managing to convince all those too-hot-for-porn babes to do pornos with him, and it was nothing but the worst angles possible. I mean seriously, how does a guy manage to bang hundreds of hot babes for 20 - 30+ minute scenes apiece with a dedicated camera guy/cam crew, and all we got was awful angles porn? Not one proper angle of him banging one of them chicks doggy or with her tits/assss bouncing in front of the camera or whatever, nothing.

What a prick, srs.

An innocent person doesn't flee and assume numerous aliases. **** him.

Yeah the girl that started the lawsuit is actually a recent lawyer. Funny since she admitted she got told it was porn before she even got on a flight, did a second scene, and was the only sloot they had that got doubled penetrated.

Also their contracts were pretty tight, said they could do whatever they wanted with the footage (not just private collector in Australia). But the sloots argued they were verbally lied to, and the judge used that the contracts never mentions "girlsdoporn" as them being shifty. But a lot of modelling release contracts never mention where it will go, they all say something similiar "own all rights and can be used for any purpose".

lol are you not scared the globohomo of america will come after you for making that account ?

The girls probably were lied to but the girls believing the GDP guys show how dumb the girls are.

[QUOTE=CuttyUnderleaf post_id=1673461563]Smh @ me.

[img][URL=https://media0.giphy.com/media/dDhTr3D2Cwg5G/giphy.gif?cid=5e2148867c28998db9c1f65ffa16cf151323d989d34685b6&rid=giphy.gig]]https://media0.giphy.com/media/dDhTr...rid=giphy.gig][/URL][/QUOTE]Looks like you deleted the original comment that Ratfish responded to here but what I see is a very dubious series of events of which I think, had they happened in the way that she suggests, there would be ample documentary evidence.

Her account contradicts itself multiple times for example: "they drove me to the hotel where I was then told that I only had one of two options:[u]1.) Perform a video shoot(s) with them or 2.) Find my own way back home. With little to no money and being alone in an unfamiliar state[/u]where I knew no one and being surrounded by persistently intimidating men, I felt obligated to oblige. In other words, I was left with no other choice."

So which was it? Find her own way back home with no money? Or a little? If they were giving her enough to get back home, or even way less than that, a $300 plane ticket is a worse burden that getting fukt on camera? I'm not sure I understand that thought process. None of it makes any sense.

She could have called her parents and explained what happened easily. I was told it was modeling but it was pron. That's a perfectly sympathetic story. Sorry, not buying it. She agreed to suck a dink on camera, and then when it became public she would have NEVER agreed to suck a dink on camera this was GRAPE!

"I was given fake but very reassuring female references who claimed to have worked with the same company before" So let's get their phone numbers. Who are these broads that are close enough to CP-dealing sex traffickers that they will cover and lie for them. I'd bet they were 100% real references, because 95% of the sloots who film with GDP got exactly what they signed up for-- phucked on camera. Just like this lying hoe.

"I cried, screamed, and begged to stop in between sets, and even bled more than once. Every time I told them I wanted to stop they told me I was obligated to comply and if I didn't I would be going against my contract." This happened just lol. So hang on, just before the shoot they weren't threatening her that she was breaking her contract, only after the phucking began. Also, if she signed a contract to do "modeling" (just lol) then let's see that contract. Because she could have said the exact same thing to them.

Nope she signed a contract to suck a dink and get phuckt on camera. Then, when it became public, she told every lie in the book to make herself seem like a victim and because the government threw these absurd charges like "sex trafficking" at the directors, people like you who BELIEVE ALL WOMEN don't even bother to logically think about the case and just emotionally react to the sob story. Strange that she didn't go to the police right away since this was such a traumatic experience. But that's of course because of the "shame" associated with grape. Her doing an AMA for the entire internet though, that's STUNNING AND BRAVE and she has no shame about doing that right?

Just LMFAO.

They're missing their revenue projections by $100 million this year. They're likely going to go broke. Good riddance to them and the cringe 80-IQcels who think they're edgy for watching Vice's manufactured nonsense

https://www.wsj.com/articles/vice-me...ks-11671487286

In the early days, Vice was lowkey lit, fam. They were sending white western journalists into every far flung chithole they could get into. North Korea, Liberia, Cartel territory, Chernobyl, etc.

Not sure when they decided to change their entire schtick and why.

well, anotherACTUALLYshady thing they did was hire a girl from a club to act like she had done chit with them and that nobody ever found anything out. so, that girl convinced them everything was alright

again, that is def. a shady aspect.

but just lol @ most of this

idk much about the laundering but me thinks must be what most of this is about

they sold large shares of the company to A&E and Disney in 2014 and went woke right along with it. The VICE that existed in the early 2000s simply isn't the VICE that existed after 2014. It's sad how cringe they became

Fucc no I’m the Aussie Chad lol

Dam that shucks ,I’ll probally have to sweet talk to one of those sloots to get that pic, there is one who believes that she can talks to ghosts lol