Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum ยป Hot mess milf gets banned as a school volunteer for her OnlyFans page
  1. Results 91 to 112 of 112
  2. Page 4 of 4
  3. First
  5. 2
  6. 3
  7. 4

Thread: Hot mess milf gets banned as a school volunteer for her OnlyFans page

post 1676316633 02-01-2023, 08:50 AM
-
#91
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  1. Barteh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Location: -, -, Netherlands
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 20,781
  7. Rep Power: 125767
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
The one thing about a DUI is that there is no gray area or morality around it -it's simply illegal.It's very black and white, whereas the thing about being an adult model is that it isonlya moral gray area because there is nothing illegal about it. My whole point is that schools can dictate what parents do, say, act, wear, etc.on school grounds. I don't believe they should be a morality police dictating what is and isn't acceptable for them to dooffschool grounds. That's my entire argument. Obviously some people don't agree with that... whatever. But that's my stance on it.
It's illegal and there's a set punishment for it. That punishment doesn't include being denied from doing volunteer work or any paid job in the future. It's quite simple.
post 1676317793 02-01-2023, 09:08 AM
-
#92
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By Barteh⏩
It's illegal and there's a set punishment for it. That punishment doesn't include being denied from doing volunteer work or any paid job in the future. It's quite simple.
Actually that's exactly what it does lol. It does disqualify you from volunteer work and it can disqualify you from certain paid jobs in the future.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676318243 02-01-2023, 09:15 AM
-
#93
  1. ToxMasculinity
  2. Registered Goomba
  1. ToxMasculinity
  2. Registered Goomba
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Posts: 3,748
  5. Rep Power: 27939
When I was 13 I had a teacher that had fake tits and was gorgeous. Every boy used to stare at her and do whatever she said. I would go home and jerk off to the thought of her every day that school year. I couldn't even imagine what the 13 year old me would have done if only fans was a thing. (Super Ded fkn Srs)
Toxic Masculinity

MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN

United States Army Veteran

White Conservative Heterosexual Male who is not a White Supremecist (Ded fkn Srs)
post 1676322683 02-01-2023, 10:17 AM
-
#94
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
In school during school hours I would say yes. The woman in the OP does not take photos on school grounds I am assuming nor is she doing it on the taxpayers dime.
Now my question was actually simple as well. Where do we draw the morality line? Should someone with a DUI be banned from volunteering at their kids school?
How long ago was the DUI?
post 1676322913 02-01-2023, 10:20 AM
-
#95
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Actually that's exactly what it does lol. It does disqualify you from volunteer work and it can disqualify you from certain paid jobs in the future.
So now suddenly you people care about morality?

For example, you do know that after a DUI, after about 6 months, thst person IS allowed to drive again. It's not like their license is suspended forever.

And unless that job is being a bus driver, what jobs should it disqualify you from?
post 1676325993 02-01-2023, 10:58 AM
-
#96
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
No.. so long as those are in line with basic societal norms. Also, those are imposed upon children and in part to further any hindrances on children's lesson plansin the school. Every student or parent should follow those guidelines when they arein the school. But that doesn't mean a school should act as the morality police when it comes to what parents do outside of the school on their own time. If a parent is a stripper then I'd assume they would ban them too... and maybe ban those parents who visit strip clubs. Or drink, smoke weed, etc. Pretty much anything you don't like you can ban them from volunteering. Maybe you think that's a good idea... that's fine... but I don't.
did you say basic societal norms? sounds like morality police to me boyo, not cool.
post 1676326963 02-01-2023, 11:10 AM
-
#97
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2023
  4. Posts: 441
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Actually it was a simple question, a pre-school teacher that showed her tits in the school bathroom, for her Onlyfans account, should she have been fired?
yes in most places, you would be fired for that...

It's actually a violation of employment rules. There was a similar case of some teacher using her classroom for porn, and she was fired.

Also, recording in the bathroom is also illegal.
post 1676329913 02-01-2023, 11:46 AM
-
#98
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
did you say basic societal norms? sounds like morality police to me boyo, not cool.
Not really because it's basically just school codes to enhance the learning for students. And you missed the most important part, which iswithinthe school. They can tell a parent how to dress, talk, act, etc.withinthe school and punish them for any such violation. However, they shouldn't regulate nor punish parents for what they choose to do outside the school.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676330453 02-01-2023, 11:52 AM
-
#99
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Not really because it's basically just school codes to enhance the learning for students. And you missed the most important part, which iswithinthe school. They can tell a parent how to dress, talk, act, etc.withinthe school and punish them for any such violation. However, they shouldn't regulate nor punish parents for what they choose to do outside the school.
banning pornstars its just that schools code to protect students from potential harm from non staff interactions. defining a potential is a subtle thing, burden of proof is low.

point is morality already defines codes and procedures with respect to schools, so you cant reject any argument on the grounds of morality police.
post 1676330503 02-01-2023, 11:53 AM
-
#100
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
So now suddenly you people care about morality?

For example, you do know that after a DUI, after about 6 months, thst person IS allowed to drive again. It's not like their license is suspended forever.

And unless that job is being a bus driver, what jobs should it disqualify you from?
No... misdemeanors and felonies are not moral issues... they are legal ones. If a parent has a criminal record they cannot volunteer at the school - there's no moral ambiguity there. Obviously a DUI will restrict you from any driving position but can also cause you to lose your license for work, whether that is real estate, the securities industry, etc., depending on the severity of it. Obviously if it's a felony DUI, then usually you're out.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676330603 02-01-2023, 11:54 AM
-
#101
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 30,900
  6. Rep Power: 79002
Eh, if she wasn't dressed up like a hoe on school grounds while volunteering, I think it's kind of messed up to tell her to pack her bags. That's the kind of stuff Leftys do. Only reason she got found out is because some dad was undoubtedly jerking off to her and got found out by his wife.
#FreeCryptoBandit
post 1676330793 02-01-2023, 11:58 AM
-
#102
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
banning pornstars its just a school codes to protect students from potential harm from non staff interactions. defining a potential is a subtle thing, burden of proof is low.

point is morality already defines codes and procedures with respect to schools, so you cant reject any argument on the grounds of morality police.
Once again... the school has a code on it and pornstars arenotin it, only people with criminal records are. They're not going to put adult film stars in there for the exact reason why they aren't going to put swingers, strippers, bartenders, etc. in there. They will only discriminate against these people once a parent complains that they don't like that person, otherwise the school is going to require every parent to disclose every source of income for the past 10 years... which is never going to happen. So they leave it alone and only respond once they have to deal with an angered parent.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676330953 02-01-2023, 12:00 PM
-
#103
  1. DomMJr
  2. Registered User
  1. DomMJr
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,380
  6. Rep Power: 23077
15 years ago, I would get this.

Most women will do this in the near future.
post 1676331153 02-01-2023, 12:04 PM
-
#104
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2023
  4. Posts: 441
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Once again... the school has a code on it and pornstars arenotin it, only people with criminal records are. They're not going to put adult film stars in there for the exact reason why they aren't going to put swingers, strippers, bartenders, etc. in there. They will only discriminate against these people once a parent complains that they don't like that person, otherwise the school is going to require every parent to disclose every source of income for the past 10 years... which is never going to happen. So they leave it alone and only respond once they have to deal with an angered parent.
Bartenders? A lot of ppl worked as bartenders. I've never heard of that being frowned upon.

u some kinda a-rab brah?
post 1676331283 02-01-2023, 12:06 PM
-
#105
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By YougotFauched⏩
Bartenders? A lot of ppl worked as bartenders. I've never heard of that being frowned upon.

u some kinda a-rab brah?
Depends where they are a bartender... if it's at a Hooters and a parent complained, then I'm sure they're out.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676331503 02-01-2023, 12:09 PM
-
#106
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2023
  4. Posts: 441
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Depends where they are a bartender... if it's at a Hooters and a parent complained, then I'm sure they're out.
True I guess hooters is considered a bit low brow

but if u worked at applebees or some chit, nobody would give u any crap about it

also nobody will fire a girl for working at hooters...I doubt any parent would complain...that's extremely karen chit
post 1676331833 02-01-2023, 12:16 PM
-
#107
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By YougotFauched⏩
True I guess hooters is considered a bit low brow

but if u worked at applebees or some chit, nobody would give u any crap about it

also nobody will fire a girl for working at hooters...I doubt any parent would complain...that's extremely karen chit
Well it's not even a matter of firing them, it's simply a matter of whether or not they are allowed in the school to volunteer. If it was a teacher who worked at Hooters, I would say there is a very high probability that they would be fired. Let's be honest, it depends on the social status of the person as well. If a parent has an OnlyFans page with nude pics, she is going to likely be banned, but unlikely someone like Chloe Sevigny who had sex on camera for money would be banned because they are of different social standings. You are more likely to discriminate against someone who you feel you can get away with it from rather than someone who has the means, social standing or following to fight back.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676332113 02-01-2023, 12:23 PM
-
#108
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Once again... the school has a code on it and pornstars arenotin it, only people with criminal records are. They're not going to put adult film stars in there for the exact reason why they aren't going to put swingers, strippers, bartenders, etc. in there. They will only discriminate against these people once a parent complains that they don't like that person, otherwise the school is going to require every parent to disclose every source of income for the past 10 years... which is never going to happen. So they leave it alone and only respond once they have to deal with an angered parent.
its called discretion, schools should have plenty of it when it comes to screening volunteers. we might not agree with every decision they make, but ultimately it is beneficial to give it to them, banning a pornstar is not an abuse of discretionary power regardless how you feel or how complicated you need to make this issue.

its like the inverse of that old saying, id rather have 100 guilty go free than 1 innocent person be locked up.

id rather 100 innocent volunteers get banned than have 1 truly foul volunteer admitted.
post 1676332323 02-01-2023, 12:26 PM
-
#109
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  1. YougotFauched
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2023
  4. Posts: 441
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Well it's not even a matter of firing them, it's simply a matter of whether or not they are allowed in the school to volunteer. If it was a teacher who worked at Hooters, I would say there is a very high probability that they would be fired. Let's be honest, it depends on the social status of the person as well. If a parent has an OnlyFans page with nude pics, she is going to likely be banned, but unlikely someone like Chloe Sevigny who had sex on camera for money would be banned because they are of different social standings. You are more likely to discriminate against someone who you feel you can get away with it from rather than someone who has the means, social standing or following to fight back.
Nobody will refuse to hire someone because they worked at hooters. That's ridiculous.
post 1676332553 02-01-2023, 12:30 PM
-
#110
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By gluon⏩
its called discretion, schools should have plenty of it when it comes to screening volunteers. we might not agree with every decision they make, but ultimately it is beneficial to give it to them, banning a pornstar is not an abuse of discretionary power regardless how you feel or how complicated you need to make this issue.

its like the inverse of that old saying, id rather have 100 guilty go free than 1 innocent person be locked up.

id rather 100 innocent volunteers get banned than have 1 truly foul volunteer admitted.
They are not screening them for what they do in their personal lives, nor should they. The only thing they screen them for is whether or not they are criminals - nothing else. She was a volunteer for 5 years, so whatever "screening" you claim they did, they were perfectly content with for 5 years. The only thing that took it over the top is1parent found out and didn't like it - that was the end. I will say, it will be interesting to see how these damages play out with a jury... assuming she wins this case. But it's very possible she can lose too. Should be interesting.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676332853 02-01-2023, 12:35 PM
-
#111
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  1. Audioslave
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2004
  4. Posts: 5,222
  5. Rep Power: 18763
Originally Posted By YougotFauched⏩
Nobody will refuse to hire someone because they worked at hooters. That's ridiculous.
This has already happened. A cheer leading coach was fired because a parent complained that she worked part time at Hooters. If a parent makes a complaint, that seems to be pretty much it nowadays.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
post 1676335283 02-01-2023, 01:10 PM
-
#112
  1. DomMJr
  2. Registered User
  1. DomMJr
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 7,380
  6. Rep Power: 23077
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
This has already happened. A cheer leading coach was fired because a parent complained that she worked part time at Hooters. If a parent makes a complaint, that seems to be pretty much it nowadays.
does not mean it is ideal

Of all the degeneracy in the world, working at hooters is closer to a saint than to the average degen today.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts