Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» MAGA would rather the border stay insecure to continue faulting Biden
  1. Results 91 to 120 of 166
  2. First
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Last
post 1697002933 01-26-2024, 06:34 PM
-
#91
  1. Fang2
  1. Fang2
  2. Join Date: Feb 2013
  3. Posts: 73,545
  4. Subscribers: 2
  5. Rep Power: 1102150
You know the job of a president is to protect the US. The job of a president isn't to prefer illegals over your own American citizens.
RIP Pedro Suarez Vertiz. Te queremos Hermano

If your right leg is Thanksgiving and your left leg is Christmas, can I come and visit you between the holidays?
post 1697003023 01-26-2024, 06:37 PM
-
#92
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By georgeenoob
I know how passing a bill works. The senate already agrees, Biden would agree, the only ones that aren't agreeing are the Republicans in Congress. If Congress agreed as well, then the proposal would take affect.

That's the whole point of the OP. Bipartisan bill from Senate isn't getting through to Congress cause of the Republicans in congress.

You're confused.
FFS, you really don’t give a chit, do you?
Just lol. What a pathetic POS…yes, keep waiting on others to avoid taking responsibility of your own. Typical lib. Why am I not surprised.

Just another dumb gullible inbred they got playing the 2 sided game.
post 1697003493 01-26-2024, 06:47 PM
-
#93
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
FFS, you really don’t give a chit, do you?
Just lol. What a pathetic POS…yes, keep waiting on others to avoid taking responsibility of your own. Typical lib. Why am I not surprised.

Just another dumb gullible inbred they got playing the 2 sided game.
I'm actually trying to fkin learn something here. Looks like there's nothing to learn.
post 1697004063 01-26-2024, 07:01 PM
-
#94
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By georgeenoob
I'm actually trying to fkin learn something here. Looks like there's nothing to learn.
I told you what you are able to do, what you need to do, but keep waiting around for others to make decisions for you. You've been a cuck your entire life, why stop now?
post 1697004313 01-26-2024, 07:08 PM
-
#95
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
I told you what you are able to do, what you need to do, but keep waiting around for others to make decisions for you. You've been a cuck your entire life, why stop now?
You lack clarity bitch.

What I should do means how this country operates? If it passed through Congress, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It's that far-fetched to get through Congress, huh?
post 1697004803 01-26-2024, 07:20 PM
-
#96
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By georgeenoob
You lack clarity bitch.
Only thing lacking is your intelligence and comprehension

What I should do means how this country operates?



If it passed through Congress, we wouldn't be having this conversation. It's that far-fetched to get through Congress, huh?
I stand corrected, looks like your knowledge of history and self-awarness is also lacking


post 1697005053 01-26-2024, 07:26 PM
-
#97
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
Only thing lacking is your intelligence and comprehension













I stand corrected, looks like your knowledge of history and self-awarness is also lacking


Alright man, good talk.
post 1697006303 01-26-2024, 07:58 PM
-
#98
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
Only thing lacking is your intelligence and comprehension













I stand corrected, looks like your knowledge of history and self-awarness is also lacking


Also, I live in Florida dumbass.
post 1697006363 01-26-2024, 07:59 PM
-
#99
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Why does a "deal" need to be made for border security???
post 1697006503 01-26-2024, 08:02 PM
-
#100
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By Jayarbie
That's not going to do chit. Most of the people coming are refugees seeking asylum who are being admitted at actual crossing points, not sneaking across.
Interesting how a border wall works everywhere else in the world, but it wouldn't work in the US......
post 1697007033 01-26-2024, 08:13 PM
-
#101
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
Interesting how a border wall works everywhere else in the world, but it wouldn't work in the US......
It only works if everyone in the U.S. moves to Texas and writes to the governor according to Paul. That's how this country operates apparently.
post 1697007103 01-26-2024, 08:16 PM
-
#102
  1. Seatard
  1. Seatard
  2. Join Date: Sep 2012
  3. Posts: 19,150
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 98570
Originally Posted By Paul
Incorrect as per the Constitution and articles I posted, seems like another dum lib does not understand how this country is operated.
Do yourself..search if states have the constitutional right to secure its borders dum dum.

It’s not an “immigration” problem you absolute fukin retard lol. It’s a border security/invasion problem. Clearly no ripples upon that cranium of yours lol

Negged
It's popular these days, but metaphoric use of invasion (or insurrection, etc) doesn't make for a good argument in context of article I and IV, it's pretty clear it doesn't mean and invasion of asylum seekers, locusts, Taylor Swift fans or whatever else you may feel like applying it to.

States protecting their own borders is plausible, but again, in real life the courts have decided it's the feds job. It's about to be tested again so we'll see...
post 1697007183 01-26-2024, 08:20 PM
-
#103
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By Seatard
It's popular these days, but metaphoric use of invasion (or insurrection, etc) doesn't make for a good argument in context of article I and IV, it's pretty clear it doesn't mean and invasion of asylum seekers, locusts, Taylor Swift fans or whatever else you may feel like applying it to.

States protecting their own borders is plausible, but again, in real life the courts have decided it's the feds job. It's about to be tested again so we'll see...
It's not that "it's plausible". It is a Constitutional Right. The Federal Government has failed to secure the border, as per the Constitution, when the Federal Government fails at protecting it's citizens from invasion and neglect security it is within the the right and responsibility of the State. State USURPS power to the Federal..not the other way around. Do you understand how this country is operated?
post 1697007233 01-26-2024, 08:21 PM
-
#104
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By georgeenoob
It only works if everyone in the U.S. moves to Texas and writes to the governor according to Paul. That's how this country operates apparently.
Member that bit when I stated you display your lack of knowledge 100% of the time?

You just did it again.

Congrats AGAIN dum dum

post 1697007303 01-26-2024, 08:23 PM
-
#105
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
Member that bit when I stated you display your lack of knowledge 100% of the time?

You just did it again.

Congrats again dum dum
Address what you quoted.
post 1697007323 01-26-2024, 08:24 PM
-
#106
  1. Seatard
  1. Seatard
  2. Join Date: Sep 2012
  3. Posts: 19,150
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 98570
Originally Posted By Paul
It's not that "it's plausible". It is a Constitutional Right. The Federal Government has failed to secure the border, as per the Constitution, when the Federal Government fails at protecting it's citizens from invasion and neglect security it is within the the right and responsibility of the State. State USURPS power to the Federal..not the other way around. Do you understand how this country is operated?
I kinda understand how this country is operated and I don't believe it includes you or I deciding for everyone else what constitutes and "invasion".
post 1697007363 01-26-2024, 08:26 PM
-
#107
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By Seatard
I kinda understand how this country is operated and I don't believe it includes you or I deciding for everyone else what constitutes and "invasion".
What do you think is happening then?
post 1697007403 01-26-2024, 08:27 PM
-
#108
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
It's not that "it's plausible". It is a Constitutional Right. The Federal Government has failed to secure the border, as per the Constitution, when the Federal Government fails at protecting it's citizens from invasion and neglect security it is within the the right and responsibility of the State. State USURPS power to the Federal..not the other way around. Do you understand how this country is operated?
Does this mean Texas can now secure the border? You're saying this like it's an easy thing. How's that going?
post 1697007433 01-26-2024, 08:27 PM
-
#109
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By georgeenoob
Address what you quoted.
Quote me where I stated that everyone should move to Texas dum dum...

I'll wait
post 1697007483 01-26-2024, 08:28 PM
-
#110
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By georgeenoob
Does this mean Texas can now secure the border? You're saying this like it's a good thing. How's that going?
Yes, they have a right to secure their border, why is that an issue for you?

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/oper...ure-the-border
post 1697007563 01-26-2024, 08:31 PM
-
#111
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
Yes, they have a right to secure their border, why is that an issue for you?
They don't have the fkin power to do it without the federal government.
Originally Posted By Paul
Quote me where I stated that everyone should move to Texas dum dum...

I'll wait
You said some sht about writing to the governor.
post 1697007703 01-26-2024, 08:34 PM
-
#112
  1. Seatard
  1. Seatard
  2. Join Date: Sep 2012
  3. Posts: 19,150
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 98570
Originally Posted By Paul
What do you think is happening then?
I think hundreds of thousands of foreigners are taking advantage of our weak and outdated asylum laws with the intent to make better lives for themselves. Overall, they are not entering as enemies set on destroying, capturing, and killing Americans.
post 1697007713 01-26-2024, 08:35 PM
-
#113
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By georgeenoob
They don't have the fkin power to do it without the federal government.
INCORRECT. You really are a fuking moron aren't you? Look up if it's legal or not, show me exactly where in the Constitution that states they need Federal authorization dumass

You said some sht about writing to the governor.
That is correct, which your illiterate incompetent ass will never do. I never stated everyone should move to Texas dum dum
post 1697007773 01-26-2024, 08:36 PM
-
#114
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By Seatard
I think hundreds of thousands of foreigners are taking advantage of our weak and outdated asylum laws with the intent to make a better life for themselves. Overall, they are not entering as enemies set on destroying, capturing, and killing Americans.
They don't have to be set on taking out Americans, they simply have to be able to enter without restriction/fail of security...which they are.

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/oper...ure-the-border
post 1697007823 01-26-2024, 08:39 PM
-
#115
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
INCORRECT. You really are a fuking moron aren't you? Look up if it's legal or not, show me exactly where in the Constitution that states they need Federal authorization dumass
Whoa don't get too excited. I meant they don't have the brute force strength without the Federal government backing them.
post 1697007903 01-26-2024, 08:40 PM
-
#116
  1. Seatard
  1. Seatard
  2. Join Date: Sep 2012
  3. Posts: 19,150
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 98570
Originally Posted By Paul
They don't have to be set on taking out Americans, they simply have to be able to enter without restriction/fail of security...which they are.

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/oper...ure-the-border
In context of Article I and IV of the constitution, invasion doesn't just mean entry or trespass, it requires enmity or hostile intent.

Just to add, I appreciate what the governor is doing by standing up for his state and making a show of this as a means to an end.
post 1697007913 01-26-2024, 08:41 PM
-
#117
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By georgeenoob
Whoa don't get too excited. I meant they don't have the brute force strength without the Federal government backing them.
Why do you think the 2nd Amendment was written dumdum?
post 1697008003 01-26-2024, 08:42 PM
-
#118
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
That is correct, which your illiterate incompetent ass will never do. I never stated everyone should move to Texas dum dum
So if we want the border secured can inly be accomplished if every American writes to the Texas governor?
post 1697008083 01-26-2024, 08:44 PM
-
#119
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  1. georgeenoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,226
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
Why do you think the 2nd Amendment was written dumdum?
Wtf does the 2nd Amendment have to do with the border?
post 1697008133 01-26-2024, 08:45 PM
-
#120
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By Seatard
In context of Article I and IV of the constitution, invasion doesn't just mean entry or trespass, it requires enmity or hostile intent.
Which the are..and it is simply not limited to that you realize..right?

Did you read the link..?

"Since the launch of Operation Lone Star, the multi-agency effort has led to over 397,900 illegal immigrant apprehensions and more than 31,800 criminal arrests, with more than 29,300 felony charges reported. In the fight against ********, Texas law enforcement has seized over 422 million lethal doses of ******** during this border mission."


Hostile-https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/hostile
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts