Update scheduled for 17:05 MT (01:05 CEST). Update is expected to take a few minutes. Please save your work beforehand.

Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Does youthful glow always decrease with age? (pics)
  1. Results 121 to 141 of 141
  2. First
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
post 1444334511 05-26-2016, 03:25 PM
-
#121
  1. Azn00Superman
  2. Registered User
  1. Azn00Superman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 6,965
  6. Rep Power: 32638
Originally Posted By chroneos
This is due to epigenetic factors which up-regulate glowton production transcription factors. Normally, cawks + booze + drugs suppresses the synthesis of these transcription factors leading to swift decrease in glowtons/glow,but the absence of cawks + booze + drugs the transcription factors remain active and glow levels increase during development.
The absence of cawks might hinder the re-invigoration of glowtons, however. A 2013 study done by the Melbourne University of Glowology suggests that consumption of cawks (orally or as suppositories) within a permittable range might indeed assist in strengthening anti-LDAR particles. However, this is limited to the same cawk being consumed multiple times, and not different cawks.
*Misc Zombie Response Team*

MISC WRITING CHALLENGE:
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=151602103
MISC MUAY THAI CREW
MISC WRITER CREW
post 1444334981 05-26-2016, 03:27 PM
-
#122
  1. datboigene
  2. God's got my back (srs)
  1. datboigene
  2. God's got my back (srs)
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 15,104
  6. Rep Power: 20546
I have never laughed as hard as I have during this thread

this is amazing!

go on gentlemen, books will be written about a select few of you ITT
Originally Posted By tinfoilpotato
I'd like to expound on this point. Females are capable of producing LDAR particles in trace amounts, with a positive relation to the decay of GLOW. The presence of Glowtons has a pronounced effect on inhibiting LDAR particles. Once GLOW has been lost however, LDAR particles increase exponentially.

Women still exhibit lower levels of LDAR particles due to the activity of WKs. WKs act as LDARabsorbers, severely depressing the level of LDAR particles found in women, while increasing their own levels of LDAR particles at the same time.

The real question is, what happens to the LDAR particles if a woman engages in slooting with a WK? We've established that slooting decreases GLOW in theory. I posit that the process of slootmosis represents a significant transfer of LDAR particles. If she sloots with a Chad then the LDAR transfer is minimal, and LDAR levels are quickly reduced through either Glowtons or WK activity. HOWEVER, if she sloots with a WK, a rare occurence in nature, then the amount of LDAR particles transferred is statistically significant and may be a sign of an already severely decreased level of glowtons. Whether the WK remains a WK after the transfer depends on how many LDAR particles remain in his system.

I submit my solution to the LDAR Paradox for peer review.
absolutely lost it

will rep off recharge
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. - Justin Beiber



~VA Crew~

*Scared to put crews in my sig because i might be the only member crew*
*Put it in my sig anyway crew*
*Nervous crew*
*Might delete crews to save face crew*
*got turned down by guy whom I offered threesome to crew*
post 1444343561 05-26-2016, 04:32 PM
-
#123
  1. JustABeginner10
  2. Registered User
  1. JustABeginner10
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2015
  4. Age: 30
  5. Posts: 735
  6. Rep Power: 159
Lool
post 1444343961 05-26-2016, 04:35 PM
-
#124
  1. ineedadrink
  2. Banned
  1. ineedadrink
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 3,877
  6. Rep Power: 0
Yes.

There are cases in which a woman can get more attractive with age, but this almost always has to do with getting in shape. Even if she becomes more attractive the glow will be gone.
post 1444349491 05-26-2016, 05:20 PM
-
#125
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 34,642
  6. Rep Power: 110906
Originally Posted By datboigene
I have never laughed as hard as I have during this thread

this is amazing!

go on gentlemen, books will be written about a select few of you ITT




absolutely lost it

will rep off recharge
the best part its hat this is all 100% accurate
PM me for workout advice Ladies
* Conservative Crew *
❤King Brady Bearer of the 6 Rings Crew❤
BvB
*Bigger chest than female miscers Crew*
*Team Putin*
post 1444356081 05-26-2016, 06:12 PM
-
#126
  1. jizzfarmer
  1. jizzfarmer
  2. Join Date: Mar 2015
  3. Posts: 11,395
  4. Rep Power: 51859
Need some glow professors to clarify something. I just want to be clear on the differentiation between TGP and glowton count. It was said that newborn babies posses the highest TGP at that state, so does that mean they just have an extremely high glowton count in reserve that is to be distributed throughout their life? Or are they actually emitting glow at that state and the glowton count is decreasing from there on?

Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems to be the former, and perhaps a third variable could be added. I propose initial glow, or "IG" for short. This is the glow that is present within babies when they are born, but is a constant variable in the baby stage and doesn't affect the organism's TGP or decay of glowton count.

I theorize that the IG may be a remnant of the mother's glow, absorbed when inside the womb and emitted once outside. Perhaps the extremely high glowton count present in the baby while in the womb, is strong enough to not only give the mother the pregnancy glow, but to re-awaken some of her youthful glow which is passed on as IG once the baby is born.

This re-awakening may also be contributing to glow that is apparent later in life with exceptional specimens such as the Kate Beckinsales and Jessica Albas of the world. I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this hypothesis fellow glow professors.
Yellow Fever Crew -- https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=176364181
whoremaxxing crew
ooohh I'm a ghost crew
show me your credentials crew
mod negged X 5 crew
banned camp X 22 crew
dead by 40 crew, pussied out of dead by 30 crew
post 1444356361 05-26-2016, 06:14 PM
-
#127
  1. BokaChele
  2. Illuminatty
  1. BokaChele
  2. Illuminatty
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Posts: 2,272
  5. Rep Power: 4984
Originally Posted By second2noneBrah
I think you all are mistaking glow with attractiveness. Glow always declines. You can look better then you did in your late teens in your late 20s or 30s but there's no glow there
not sheriff serious...
post 1444367331 05-26-2016, 07:27 PM
-
#128
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 34,642
  6. Rep Power: 110906
Originally Posted By jizzfarmer
Need some glow professors to clarify something. I just want to be clear on the differentiation between TGP and glowton count. It was said that newborn babies posses the highest TGP at that state, so does that mean they just have an extremely high glowton count in reserve that is to be distributed throughout their life? Or are they actually emitting glow at that state and the glowton count is decreasing from there on?

Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems to be the former, and perhaps a third variable could be added. I propose initial glow, or "IG" for short. This is the glow that is present within babies when they are born, but is a constant variable in the baby stage and doesn't affect the organism's TGP or decay of glowton count.

I theorize that the IG may be a remnant of the mother's glow, absorbed when inside the womb and emitted once outside. Perhaps the extremely high glowton count present in the baby while in the womb, is strong enough to not only give the mother the pregnancy glow, but to re-awaken some of her youthful glow which is passed on as IG once the baby is born.

This re-awakening may also be contributing to glow that is apparent later in life with exceptional specimens such as the Kate Beckinsales and Jessica Albas of the world. I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this hypothesis fellow glow professors.
this sounds right
PM me for workout advice Ladies
* Conservative Crew *
❤King Brady Bearer of the 6 Rings Crew❤
BvB
*Bigger chest than female miscers Crew*
*Team Putin*
post 1444383641 05-26-2016, 09:07 PM
-
#129
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Posts: 5,263
  5. Rep Power: 8887
Colleagues and intrigues, pardon my leave but due to a rise in very important breakthroughs in our understanding of the glow i would like to expound, confirm, and correct a few key pieces of research literature i see in this thread:
Originally Posted By TheAmazon
I have to politely disagree with the other young man's assertion that babies do not have glow. I posit that since the child and the mother obviously share similar glowton genetics (TGP Transference, Bad Lasagna 2016), that others who are not genetically related to the child do not see the potential glowton levels present.

Also , gentelmen, we should pause and consider the potential bio ethical implications on the horizon now that faux glow technology has increased greatley in it's ability to mimic and pro-long glowton half life. Should we not mark these individuals in society or should we let this push towards trans humanism -glowing continue?
Few babies emit glow upon entry to the world, though wholly independent of their TGP as you postulate. it has been determined (to the best of our knowledge thus far) that while TGP is exists from conception, the time at which it matures (during puberty) and radiates outward is wholly dependent on latent glowgenics and varies from subject to subject.

upon your second point, fauxglow technology is only a temporary augmentation to total percieved glow and is not a permanent glow modifier. eventually the fauxglow media will have to be reapplied when the effects wear off in order to maintain the desired glow level.
Originally Posted By tinfoilpotato
I'd like to expound on this point. Females are capable of producing LDAR particles in trace amounts, with a positive relation to the decay of GLOW. The presence of Glowtons has a pronounced effect on inhibiting LDAR particles. Once GLOW has been lost however, LDAR particles increase exponentially.

Women still exhibit lower levels of LDAR particles due to the activity of WKs. WKs act as LDARabsorbers, severely depressing the level of LDAR particles found in women, while increasing their own levels of LDAR particles at the same time.

The real question is, what happens to the LDAR particles if a woman engages in slooting with a WK? We've established that slooting decreases GLOW in theory. I posit that the process of slootmosis represents a significant transfer of LDAR particles. If she sloots with a Chad then the LDAR transfer is minimal, and LDAR levels are quickly reduced through either Glowtons or WK activity. HOWEVER, if she sloots with a WK, a rare occurence in nature, then the amount of LDAR particles transferred is statistically significant and may be a sign of an already severely decreased level of glowtons. Whether the WK remains a WK after the transfer depends on how many LDAR particles remain in his system.

I submit my solution to the LDAR Paradox for peer review.
i would like to concur with your first observation on the relationship between glowton/LDAR particle decay, as it makes perfect sense. it clearly explains why women who've depleted their glow reserves are increasingly lonely and stagnant.

your second statement is dead accurate. by acting as WKs, they inhibit the host glower's LDAR particle production while increasing their LDAR particle production and overall count. this is a self destructive byproduct of WK practice.

On the topic of slooting with a WK. decay of glow as a result of slooting will occur as per previous observation but the to the detriment of the host sloot the negative effects will be twofold, as she then increases her production of LDAR particles (in conjunction with the absorption of WK LDAR Particles, point to be clarified) I predict that the higher the LDAR particles of the WK, the higher volume of LDAR particle transferrence to the sloot but without an acceleration to total glow decay overall. If the sloot has sufficient high levels of glowtons, it would be possible to greatly reduce the LDAR particle count in the WK subject.
Originally Posted By jizzfarmer
Need some glow professors to clarify something. I just want to be clear on the differentiation between TGP and glowton count. It was said that newborn babies posses the highest TGP at that state, so does that mean they just have an extremely high glowton count in reserve that is to be distributed throughout their life? Or are they actually emitting glow at that state and the glowton count is decreasing from there on?

Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems to be the former, and perhaps a third variable could be added. I propose initial glow, or "IG" for short. This is the glow that is present within babies when they are born, but is a constant variable in the baby stage and doesn't affect the organism's TGP or decay of glowton count.

I theorize that the IG may be a remnant of the mother's glow, absorbed when inside the womb and emitted once outside. Perhaps the extremely high glowton count present in the baby while in the womb, is strong enough to not only give the mother the pregnancy glow, but to re-awaken some of her youthful glow which is passed on as IG once the baby is born.

This re-awakening may also be contributing to glow that is apparent later in life with exceptional specimens such as the Kate Beckinsales and Jessica Albas of the world. I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this hypothesis fellow glow professors.
TGP is a function of glowton count. higher the glowton count, the higher the TGP of the subject in question. 1 glowton has a fixed TGP *to be determined* it may be genetically determined and not a constant. that is to say, glowtons of different people may have different TGP values. how to measure an individuals TGP per glowton has not yet been determined.

you may be on to something, as there does appear to be an observable "glow reawakening" in a select few recent mothers. such claims have not yet been substantiated with science largely based on the small sample size and lack of academic consensus.
{ Thomas Sowell - Milton Friedman - William Buckley, Jr. - Peter Hitchens }
post 1444384151 05-26-2016, 09:10 PM
-
#130
  1. Azn00Superman
  2. Registered User
  1. Azn00Superman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 6,965
  6. Rep Power: 32638
Originally Posted By jizzfarmer
Need some glow professors to clarify something. I just want to be clear on the differentiation between TGP and glowton count. It was said that newborn babies posses the highest TGP at that state, so does that mean they just have an extremely high glowton count in reserve that is to be distributed throughout their life? Or are they actually emitting glow at that state and the glowton count is decreasing from there on?

Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems to be the former, and perhaps a third variable could be added. I propose initial glow, or "IG" for short. This is the glow that is present within babies when they are born, but is a constant variable in the baby stage and doesn't affect the organism's TGP or decay of glowton count.

I theorize that the IG may be a remnant of the mother's glow, absorbed when inside the womb and emitted once outside. Perhaps the extremely high glowton count present in the baby while in the womb, is strong enough to not only give the mother the pregnancy glow, but to re-awaken some of her youthful glow which is passed on as IG once the baby is born.

This re-awakening may also be contributing to glow that is apparent later in life with exceptional specimens such as the Kate Beckinsales and Jessica Albas of the world. I'm curious to hear your thoughts on this hypothesis fellow glow professors.
A very astute assessment of the pre-adolescent Glow phenomenon. But according to my recent research at the Academy of Eugenic Research and Ethnic Organ Development, infants do not get their glowton count from birth. Infants are usually dark and prune-skinned, and will only develop glow upon breastfeeding. This is a glowton transfer process between mother to child, evident in the fact that women who have children glow significantly less.

This mother's glow you speak of isn't the reawakening of a woman's glow, but a side effect of Glowton reduction, for the remaining glowton will be pushed to the woman's face in an attempt to heighten her attractiveness. This is a biological defense for single mothers, for these few glowtons are responsible for making her look artificially more youthful, giving her the last chance to trap a beta male before the glows are gone for good.

In some rare cases, i.e Kate Beckinsale, women have the ability to control their glow transfer. With these irregularities, women became selfish of their glowtons and throttle glow transfer in order to prevent aging and at the same time deprive their offspring of glow. Diagram below shows this phenomenon:



In this diagram, the slootling in the left is young, but utterly lacking in glowton. This will decrease the slootling's ability to attain cawk. Meanwhile, the mature sloot on the right is still running strong with her glowton reservoir, and will therefore remain hnnnngggg for the foreseeable duration.
*Misc Zombie Response Team*

MISC WRITING CHALLENGE:
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=151602103
MISC MUAY THAI CREW
MISC WRITER CREW
post 1444439761 05-27-2016, 07:37 AM
-
#131
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  1. badlasagna
  2. Suh dude aha
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Posts: 5,263
  5. Rep Power: 8887
Originally Posted By Azn00Superman
A very astute assessment of the pre-adolescent Glow phenomenon. But according to my recent research at the Academy of Eugenic Research and Ethnic Organ Development, infants do not get their glowton count from birth. Infants are usually dark and prune-skinned, and will only develop glow upon breastfeeding. This is a glowton transfer process between mother to child, evident in the fact that women who have children glow significantly less.

This mother's glow you speak of isn't the reawakening of a woman's glow, but a side effect of Glowton reduction, for the remaining glowton will be pushed to the woman's face in an attempt to heighten her attractiveness. This is a biological defense for single mothers, for these few glowtons are responsible for making her look artificially more youthful, giving her the last chance to trap a beta male before the glows are gone for good.

In some rare cases, i.e Kate Beckinsale, women have the ability to control their glow transfer. With these irregularities, women became selfish of their glowtons and throttle glow transfer in order to prevent aging and at the same time deprive their offspring of glow. Diagram below shows this phenomenon:



In this diagram, the slootling in the left is young, but utterly lacking in glowton. This will decrease the slootling's ability to attain cawk. Meanwhile, the mature sloot on the right is still running strong with her glowton reservoir, and will therefore remain hnnnngggg for the foreseeable duration.
wrong, you are born with all the glow you will have in your lifetime. the glow is not activated until a chemical trigger during puberty. not all babies breastfeed and they still have glow when they grow up.
{ Thomas Sowell - Milton Friedman - William Buckley, Jr. - Peter Hitchens }
post 1444482051 05-27-2016, 12:22 PM
-
#132
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 34,642
  6. Rep Power: 110906
Glowcebo: perception. Of greater glow than exists in glowtons.

Ex cheerleader effect
PM me for workout advice Ladies
* Conservative Crew *
❤King Brady Bearer of the 6 Rings Crew❤
BvB
*Bigger chest than female miscers Crew*
*Team Putin*
post 1444483771 05-27-2016, 12:33 PM
-
#133
  1. Jacobcapra
  2. AAS Free since '93
  1. Jacobcapra
  2. AAS Free since '93
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 15,933
  7. Rep Power: 174320
Misc I was trolling through an old Advanced Calculus book and stumbled upon Newton's lost Fourth Law:



G = Glow
A_p = Perceived 'prime age'
A = current age
G_f = glow factor
D = number of dicks taken


Newton's fourth law, the law of glow, states that A woman's glow, G is equal to the definite integral from zero to the perceived 'prime age' A_p of 19 minus her current age, A, plus her glow factor, G_f all over the number of dicks taken, D.

As far as I know, this is as reliable as the theory of gravity, when adjusted for the presence of glowtons, of course.
**Georgia Crew**
**Mechanical Engineering Crew**
**2018 Aesthetics Crew**

01/02/2018 - 202.2 lb.
Current - 181.4 lb. (1/23/18)
post 1444485953 05-27-2016, 12:51 PM
-
#134
  1. raframon
  2. Registered User
  1. raframon
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 220
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By pWally
it depends on what they take care of themselves.

But even if they do, the glow will still slowly fade
https://web.********.com/Gurgaon-Mas...1531453727286/
post 1444488703 05-27-2016, 01:13 PM
-
#135
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  1. jbball92
  2. 281-330-8004
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 34,642
  6. Rep Power: 110906
Originally Posted By Jacobcapra
Misc I was trolling through an old Advanced Calculus book and stumbled upon Newton's lost Fourth Law:



G = Glow
A_p = Perceived 'prime age'
A = current age
G_f = glow factor
D = number of dicks taken


Newton's fourth law, the law of glow, states that A woman's glow, G is equal to the definite integral from zero to the perceived 'prime age' A_p of 19 minus her current age, A, plus her glow factor, G_f all over the number of dicks taken, D.

As far as I know, this is as reliable as the theory of gravity, when adjusted for the presence of glowtons, of course.
holy ****. This is a breakthrough
PM me for workout advice Ladies
* Conservative Crew *
❤King Brady Bearer of the 6 Rings Crew❤
BvB
*Bigger chest than female miscers Crew*
*Team Putin*
post 1444489573 05-27-2016, 01:20 PM
-
#136
  1. HoustonMiscer
  2. Registered User
  1. HoustonMiscer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 47,690
  6. Rep Power: 253714
Inside every glowcel there is a hole of darkness
Houston Sign Stealers
DEMECO RYANS HC CREW
Ugly Ass Mf Crew
Manlet Crew
Texas Crew
just be yourself
just have confidence

XOTWOD CREW
post 1444490123 05-27-2016, 01:24 PM
-
#137
  1. Azmine
  2. Mrs. Black Jesus
  1. Azmine
  2. Mrs. Black Jesus
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Posts: 4,238
  5. Rep Power: 24372
Originally Posted By badlasagna
wrong, you are born with all the glow you will have in your lifetime. the glow is not activated until a chemical trigger during puberty. not all babies breastfeed and they still have glow when they grow up.
Is the amount of glow affected by male parent donor?

Cause in that picture, it looks like Kate's daughter inherited her father's looks and and lack of her mother's, including glowtons?
I want to forget mistakes they've helped me make
It's better to be broken than to break
post 1444498383 05-27-2016, 02:30 PM
-
#138
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: ON, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 3,159
  7. Rep Power: 10769
Originally Posted By Azmine
Is the amount of glow affected by male parent donor?

Cause in that picture, it looks like Kate's daughter inherited her father's looks and and lack of her mother's, including glowtons?
Male determines the amount of LDAR particles
*Would give it all up to be a monk crew*

PRs
DL: 565
S: 495
B: 405
post 1444597643 05-28-2016, 06:52 AM
-
#139
  1. Tresiel
  2. Diamond Member
  1. Tresiel
  2. Diamond Member
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 3,440
  7. Rep Power: 4011
Originally Posted By Retoaded
pretty good except I'd add a 4th line titled "Christie Brinkley"
Originally Posted By badlasagna
in the absence of a donor, physically repulsive or low-desirability females are capable of producing small amounts of the LDAR particle on their own.

though this is EXTREMELY rare since there is no shortage of WKs who act as artificial LDAR-blockers, by preventing LDAR levels in women from rising by giving them false desirability.what the WK does not know is he's increasing his LDAR particle count every time he WKs.
I think many WKs know.
post 1444601843 05-28-2016, 07:47 AM
-
#140
  1. ifisthole
  2. Registered User
  1. ifisthole
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 2,101
  6. Rep Power: 6517
I'd say it follows a log-normal curve
post 1444602133 05-28-2016, 07:51 AM
-
#141
  1. Mullahz218
  2. ששש בלי דמעות, רק חלומות
  1. Mullahz218
  2. ששש בלי דמעות, רק חלומות
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Location: Israel
  5. Age: 30
  6. Posts: 4,125
  7. Rep Power: 4792
the youthful glow formula:

glow factor =


if factor is greater than 5, then sloot has no glow
"Better to run than curse the road"
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts