Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» How is communism not better than capitalism?
  1. Results 121 to 144 of 144
  2. First
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
post 1446603023 06-08-2016, 03:26 PM
-
#121
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Originally Posted By JewishSuperHero
100 years ago wearing makeup was considered masculine. What's considered masculine and feminine changes all the time. Gender is most definitely a social construct.
Makeup may be a social construct, but gender in general is not. That's why babies only weeks old can be shown to have certain predilections towards certain types of toys. Boys gravitate towards building blocks, toy trucks, etc. Girls go for the dolls. I'm pretty sure that wasn't socialized into them.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
post 1446603223 06-08-2016, 03:27 PM
-
#122
  1. LikeAMachine
  2. Known Browns Fan
  1. LikeAMachine
  2. Known Browns Fan
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: Columbus, Ohio, United States
  5. Posts: 24,099
  6. Rep Power: 52838
Originally Posted By ~Hades~
gotta break a few eggs to make a bacon egg and cheese sandwich on sourdough nomsain
9 hour wait for those ingredients bruh, no gains waiting 9 hours for some eggs.
(っ◕‿◕)っ
post 1446604363 06-08-2016, 03:35 PM
-
#123
  1. Spill512
  2. Registered User
  1. Spill512
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,873
  6. Rep Power: 15557
Originally Posted By Ultimate
There is no answer to this question, because like you posted earlier, it has never been implemented correctly. Communism at its core is simply sharing things rather then trading things. I think it could work if you had a democratically elected, term serving meritocratic councils which coordinate the beast. BUT you would also have to have veritably all the resources on Earth at your disposal. If those 2 criteria could be met, I think communism would be immensely better for our species, and despite what everyone here is saying (that we would be equally poor), quite the opposite would be true because we DO have the resources for it to be true. It's just a matter of proper implementation, structure, and execution. Going further, if the entire globe were united we could make government completely transparent (no state secrets to protect), and thus avoid corruption entirely.
I prefer communism as a model but implementation is too difficult. In the future, the more we can increase efficiency, production, and decrease human error, which we're headed towards, communism becomes a more and more viable possibility. I'm with capitalism now but I can see that shifting in the future when we get further a long.
post 1446605283 06-08-2016, 03:42 PM
-
#124
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  3. Join Date: Jul 2005
  4. Posts: 32,552
  5. Rep Power: 35344
Originally Posted By Spill512
I prefer communism as a model but implementation is too difficult. In the future, the more we can increase efficiency, production, and decrease human error, which we're headed towards, communism becomes a more and more viable possibility. I'm with capitalism now but I can see that shifting in the future when we get further a long.
That could have been an argument 100 years ago but not today.
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ

**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**

Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!

It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
post 1446606833 06-08-2016, 03:54 PM
-
#125
  1. Spill512
  2. Registered User
  1. Spill512
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,873
  6. Rep Power: 15557
Originally Posted By KRANE
That could have been an argument 100 years ago but not today.
We still waste a third of the food we produce. We waste trillions of gallons of water due in large part to problems in technology (leaks, etc). There's still a bunch of problems in government, corruption, and we need to find ways to delegate certain responsibilities to AI or else it'll always be that way. There's still huge limitations with distribution. Obviously energy consumption and getting the most out of our resources there is still something we've barely tackled.

There's still a long way to go with increasing efficiency. Right now I don't trust the infrastructure we have to implement a communist government effectively. I think it's stupid that someone can have a billion dollars, throwing away food, and another person can be desperate and starving. That doesn't make sense to me. But I don't trust the alternative at the moment.
post 1446607043 06-08-2016, 03:56 PM
-
#126
  1. DoWorkSon515
  2. Message Board King
  1. DoWorkSon515
  2. Message Board King
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Posts: 4,104
  5. Rep Power: 2001
Originally Posted By Spill512
We still waste a third of the food we produce. We waste trillions of gallons of water due in large part to problems in technology (leaks, etc). There's still a bunch of problems in government, corruption, and we need to find ways to delegate certain responsibilities to AI or else it'll always be that way. There's still huge limitations with distribution. Obviously energy consumption and getting the most out of our resources there is still something we've barely tackled.

There's still a long way to go with increasing efficiency. Right now I don't trust the infrastructure we have to implement a communist government effectively. I think it's stupid that someone can have a billion dollars, throwing away food, and another person can be desperate and starving. That doesn't make sense to me. But I don't trust the alternative at the moment.
We produce enough food for the entire world to eat a caloric surplus. Yet two billion people are malnourished. Capitalism at work.
*got windows tinted to pick nose while driving crew*
*waits in car until jacked guys leave the gym crew*
*spends 2 hours on hair before getting a haircut crew*
*scared to buy protein powder in person crew*
*curls more than he benches crew*
post 1446607183 06-08-2016, 03:57 PM
-
#127
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,844
  6. Rep Power: 92463
Originally Posted By freekid2002
I don't understand
That's abundantly obvious son.
BrinkZone, Where Bro-Science Got Rabies and Died!

www.BrinkZone.com

Check out my BrinkZone mini site on BB.com at:

www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink.htm

=> President and Founder of Shaved head with goatee Crew
=> Science over bro science Crew
post 1446607693 06-08-2016, 04:01 PM
-
#128
  1. ~Hades~
  2. True Patriot Crew
  1. ~Hades~
  2. True Patriot Crew
  3. Join Date: Dec 2007
  4. Posts: 26,187
  5. Rep Power: 695527
Originally Posted By WillBrink
That's abundantly obvious son.
constructive
Royal Crew
Chiefs Crew
Festivus Cew
post 1446608613 06-08-2016, 04:08 PM
-
#129
  1. Nomadbrah
  2. Registered User
  1. Nomadbrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 273
  6. Rep Power: 290
Communism is very close to an economic and ideological system that might save this gay earth. Just close but not quite there.
In any case, it was too early to attempt any kind of communist economic theory in the 1930s, and then the cold war diverted more precious resources from that goal until the late 80s.
Now is a better time with all the production automation technologies available to attempt anything resembling communism.
At 50% Glow. No recharger.
post 1446608653 06-08-2016, 04:08 PM
-
#130
  1. CaseyJamess
  2. Lurking since '09
  1. CaseyJamess
  2. Lurking since '09
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 4,585
  7. Rep Power: 8662
Originally Posted By InstantLoser
Makeup may be a social construct, but gender in general is not. That's why babies only weeks old can be shown to have certain predilections towards certain types of toys. Boys gravitate towards building blocks, toy trucks, etc. Girls go for the dolls. I'm pretty sure that wasn't socialized into them.
I wouldn't bother with him...

Gender IS NOT a social construct

If you are born with a penor, have xy chromosomes then you are a male,

or, if you are born with a vagina, have xx chromosomes then you are a female!

(not including abnormalities, like Turner syndrome, etc)
~Misc BJJ crew~
~Electronic Engineer master race~
post 1446609213 06-08-2016, 04:14 PM
-
#131
  1. kusok
  2. Registered User
  1. kusok
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Posts: 47,722
  5. Rep Power: 231370
Originally Posted By Nomadbrah
Communism is very close to an economic and ideological system that might save this gay earth. Just close but not quite there.
In any case, it was too early to attempt any kind of communist economic theory in the 1930s, and then the cold war diverted more precious resources from that goal until the late 80s.
Now is a better time with all the production automation technologies available to attempt anything resembling communism.
has to be a troll or a nimrod.
post 1446609243 06-08-2016, 04:14 PM
-
#132
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  3. Join Date: Jul 2005
  4. Posts: 32,552
  5. Rep Power: 35344
Originally Posted By DoWorkSon515
We produce enough food for the entire world to eat a caloric surplus. Yet two billion people are malnourished. Capitalism at work.
You want true evil? Look no further than the pharmaceutical industry. Why cure anything when we can make countless billions selling you stuff that only masks the symptoms. That's the beauty of capitalism.
Originally Posted By CaseyJamess
I wouldn't bother with him...

Gender IS NOT a social construct

If you are born with a penor, have xy chromosomes then you are a male,

or, if you are born with a vagina, have xx chromosomes then you are a female!

(not including abnormalities, like Turner syndrome, etc)
Enter the 21 Century? For social and scientific reason the above no longer applies.
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ

**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**

Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!

It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
post 1446611313 06-08-2016, 04:26 PM
-
#133
  1. sknot1454
  2. Registered User
  1. sknot1454
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 9,817
  6. Rep Power: 50370
It comes down to this simple truth.

Private ownership is one of mankind's basic fundamental rights.

Communism on small scales will work, sure. If you and others want to enter into a social contract to share your property without coercion, then fine. Do it. Share your ****.

However, as a system of government, Communism blows because a person is coerced, though the threat of violence, to give up his or her private property by the state.
post 1446612143 06-08-2016, 04:32 PM
-
#134
  1. sknot1454
  2. Registered User
  1. sknot1454
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 9,817
  6. Rep Power: 50370
Originally Posted By CaseyJamess
I wouldn't bother with him...

Gender IS NOT a social construct

If you are born with a penor, have xy chromosomes then you are a male,

or, if you are born with a vagina, have xx chromosomes then you are a female!

(not including abnormalities, like Turner syndrome, etc)
Gender IS a social construct.

You're thinking of sex. Sex is biological.

Gender is what mankind has deemed as appropriate social behavior for biological boys and girls.

If you raised a biological male and biological female in a socially sterile environment, they won't the first clue as how to act if they were released into the world. They wouldn't know what to wear. They wouldn't know what hobbies to enjoy or professions to pursue.

They would be completely gender neutral until they were smart enough to figure how that society is more accepting of you if you act a certain way depending on your biological sex.

Haircut preference, clothing preference, toy preference, etc aren't provided by nature. They're created by people.
post 1446613373 06-08-2016, 04:41 PM
-
#135
  1. CaseyJamess
  2. Lurking since '09
  1. CaseyJamess
  2. Lurking since '09
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 4,585
  7. Rep Power: 8662
Originally Posted By KRANE
Enter the 21 Century? For social and scientific reason the above no longer applies.
Originally Posted By sknot1454
Gender IS a social construct.

You're thinking of sex. Sex is biological.

Gender is what mankind has deemed as appropriate social behavior for biological boys and girls.

If you raised a biological male and biological female in a socially sterile environment, they won't the first clue as how to act if they were released into the world. They wouldn't know what to wear. They wouldn't know what hobbies to enjoy or professions to pursue.

They would be completely gender neutral until they were smart enough to figure how that society is more accepting of you if you act a certain way depending on your biological sex.
Ok, I admittedly misread what I was initially quoting and acted like a potato.

My bad

Surely though, 'gender' as it is today came because of our sex?! No?

Males being more suited for hunting, being breadwinners etc down the line this 'naturally' evolved to men being ones going out to work etc?

If there is no hard science about it and it's just pseudo science from psychology I'm not gunna buy into that **** at all.
~Misc BJJ crew~
~Electronic Engineer master race~
post 1446614893 06-08-2016, 04:52 PM
-
#136
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  3. Join Date: Jul 2005
  4. Posts: 32,552
  5. Rep Power: 35344
Originally Posted By sknot1454
Gender IS a social construct.

You're thinking of sex. Sex is biological.

Gender is what mankind has deemed as appropriate social behavior for biological boys and girls.

If you raised a biological male and biological female in a socially sterile environment, they won't the first clue as how to act if they were released into the world. They wouldn't know what to wear. They wouldn't know what hobbies to enjoy or professions to pursue.

They would be completely gender neutral until they were smart enough to figure how that society is more accepting of you if you act a certain way depending on your biological sex.

Haircut preference, clothing preference, toy preference, etc aren't provided by nature. They're created by people.
I suspect there may be a bit of predisposition baked in.
Originally Posted By CaseyJamess
Ok, I admittedly misread what I was initially quoting and acted like a potato.

My bad

Surely though, 'gender' as it is today came because of our sex?! No?

Males being more suited for hunting, being breadwinners etc down the line this 'naturally' evolved to men being ones going out to work etc?

If there is no hard science about it and it's just pseudo science from psychology I'm not gunna buy into that **** at all.
I wouldn't discard psychology completely. There's still many good things to be learned once we become a bit more advanced with how to use and analyze it.

In the mean time, I'm stanch believer in the division of sexes. Nature usually does it right for a reason. We just sometimes need to catch up. But were' getting off topic a bit aren't we?
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ

**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**

Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!

It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
post 1446616003 06-08-2016, 04:59 PM
-
#137
  1. BroMart88
  2. Registered User
  1. BroMart88
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Tamakautoga, Niue
  5. Posts: 1,452
  6. Rep Power: 7877
Don't know if this was posted already. Look up Milton Friedman. He'll answer your question.
post 1446616983 06-08-2016, 05:06 PM
-
#138
  1. Aircommander91
  2. Psalm 115:1
  1. Aircommander91
  2. Psalm 115:1
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 8,097
  6. Rep Power: 18745
read sign op.


socialists want to control your money.

communists want to control your birth/thought/life and death.


it just screams ignorance when a idiot defend this kind of regime. it's usually the first people that get wiped out on this type of rule.

just shows you how retarded they are.

they don't know history, much less economy. they advocate for their own death, poverty and misery.
“Sometimes when I'm faced with an atheist, I am tempted to invite him to the greatest gourmet dinner that one could ever serve, and when we have finished eating that magnificent dinner, to ask him if he believes there's a cook.”
― Ronald Reagan

† Acts 4:12 †
There's salvation only in Christ

† II Corinthians 12:7-10 †
Suffering humbles us, it's truly a bless in disguise
post 1446617183 06-08-2016, 05:07 PM
-
#139
  1. sknot1454
  2. Registered User
  1. sknot1454
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 9,817
  6. Rep Power: 50370
Originally Posted By CaseyJamess
Ok, I admittedly misread what I was initially quoting and acted like a potato.

My bad

Surely though, 'gender' as it is today came because of our sex?! No?

Males being more suited for hunting, being breadwinners etc down the line this 'naturally' evolved to men being ones going out to work etc?

If there is no hard science about it and it's just pseudo science from psychology I'm not gunna buy into that **** at all.
What is the #2 thing we associate with gender today other than their actual sex? Appearance, right? We truly have no idea what's in someone's pants, but their outside appearances are generally indicators of their sex. Males dress like males. Females dress like females.

That's entirely social. That's not biological.

I have set to see scientific evidence that traditional preferred gender appearances are provided by nature, not by nurture. Maybe one can argue that the way females dress accentuates their breasts/hips thus making males more likely to find a mate, but that hasn't been proven to my knowledge. Also, this forum, filled with guys who would cut a nut off just to **** a 5/10 in a burlap sack, kind of validates the point in a whimsical way.

The only studies I've seen are done with male/female primates who gravitate towards certain toys. I wouldn't say the preferred toy choice in non-humans is valid enough evidence that "gender" is indeed biological.
post 1446617493 06-08-2016, 05:09 PM
-
#140
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 18,570
  6. Rep Power: 128694
Under capitalism, some people are rich and powerful and some people are poor and powerless.

Under communism, the wealth is destroyed and misery is distributed equally to nearly everyone.
Nah, fukk that. I’m not doing that.
post 1446618023 06-08-2016, 05:13 PM
-
#141
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  1. KRANE
  2. Be the Vanguard
  3. Join Date: Jul 2005
  4. Posts: 32,552
  5. Rep Power: 35344
Originally Posted By ANumber1
Under capitalism, some people are rich and powerful and some people are poor and powerless.

Under communism, the wealth is destroyed and misery is distributed equally to nearly everyone.
Except someone inevitably has to be in charge. What do you call them?
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ

**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**

Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!

It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
post 1446618263 06-08-2016, 05:14 PM
-
#142
  1. GrizzlyBig
  2. Registered User
  1. GrizzlyBig
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 873
  5. Rep Power: 553
we have big appetite and greed as part of human nature
its in our DNA to want more and more
thats why communism can never work
thats why equality will never exist
post 1446618463 06-08-2016, 05:15 PM
-
#143
  1. majorkey
  2. Registered User
  1. majorkey
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Location: Norway
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 180
  7. Rep Power: 181
Because capitalism enforces incentives to work/production.

That's it really. Communism doesn't have this effect. Why strive to create? Why strive to get an education? The society wouldn't grow.
*** OVO Crew ***
*** big dink crew ***
post 1446619343 06-08-2016, 05:20 PM
-
#144
  1. Atycho15
  2. Registered Wanker
  1. Atycho15
  2. Registered Wanker
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Posts: 200
  5. Rep Power: 433
communism is unethical, brb forcing everyone to work for me because I am alive. Capitalism allows people to do what they want and is mutally agreeable.

ex.
communist: kid becomes doctor, has to treat everyone based on fact that he understands medicine, one is happy, doctor is pissed because he has 0 economic libido and wants to go home.
Capitalism: engineer designs circuit in exchange for your gf and food coupons, agreed upon, has freedom, both happy.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts