Forum
»
How is communism not better than capitalism?
06-08-2016, 03:26 PM
-
#121
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By JewishSuperHero⏩
Makeup may be a social construct, but gender in general is not. That's why babies only weeks old can be shown to have certain predilections towards certain types of toys. Boys gravitate towards building blocks, toy trucks, etc. Girls go for the dolls. I'm pretty sure that wasn't socialized into them.100 years ago wearing makeup was considered masculine. What's considered masculine and feminine changes all the time. Gender is most definitely a social construct.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
06-08-2016, 03:27 PM
-
#122
- LikeAMachine
- Known Browns Fan
-
- LikeAMachine
- Known Browns Fan
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: Columbus, Ohio, United States
- Posts: 24,099
- Rep Power: 52838
-
-
Originally Posted By ~Hades~⏩
9 hour wait for those ingredients bruh, no gains waiting 9 hours for some eggs.gotta break a few eggs to make a bacon egg and cheese sandwich on sourdough nomsain
(っ◕‿◕)っ
06-08-2016, 03:35 PM
-
#123
- Spill512
- Registered User
-
- Spill512
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: United States
- Posts: 14,873
- Rep Power: 15557
-
-
Originally Posted By Ultimate
I prefer communism as a model but implementation is too difficult. In the future, the more we can increase efficiency, production, and decrease human error, which we're headed towards, communism becomes a more and more viable possibility. I'm with capitalism now but I can see that shifting in the future when we get further a long.There is no answer to this question, because like you posted earlier, it has never been implemented correctly. Communism at its core is simply sharing things rather then trading things. I think it could work if you had a democratically elected, term serving meritocratic councils which coordinate the beast. BUT you would also have to have veritably all the resources on Earth at your disposal. If those 2 criteria could be met, I think communism would be immensely better for our species, and despite what everyone here is saying (that we would be equally poor), quite the opposite would be true because we DO have the resources for it to be true. It's just a matter of proper implementation, structure, and execution. Going further, if the entire globe were united we could make government completely transparent (no state secrets to protect), and thus avoid corruption entirely.
06-08-2016, 03:42 PM
-
#124
Originally Posted By Spill512⏩
That could have been an argument 100 years ago but not today.I prefer communism as a model but implementation is too difficult. In the future, the more we can increase efficiency, production, and decrease human error, which we're headed towards, communism becomes a more and more viable possibility. I'm with capitalism now but I can see that shifting in the future when we get further a long.
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ
**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**
Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!
It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
06-08-2016, 03:54 PM
-
#125
- Spill512
- Registered User
-
- Spill512
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2011
- Location: United States
- Posts: 14,873
- Rep Power: 15557
-
-
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
We still waste a third of the food we produce. We waste trillions of gallons of water due in large part to problems in technology (leaks, etc). There's still a bunch of problems in government, corruption, and we need to find ways to delegate certain responsibilities to AI or else it'll always be that way. There's still huge limitations with distribution. Obviously energy consumption and getting the most out of our resources there is still something we've barely tackled.That could have been an argument 100 years ago but not today.
There's still a long way to go with increasing efficiency. Right now I don't trust the infrastructure we have to implement a communist government effectively. I think it's stupid that someone can have a billion dollars, throwing away food, and another person can be desperate and starving. That doesn't make sense to me. But I don't trust the alternative at the moment.
06-08-2016, 03:56 PM
-
#126
- DoWorkSon515
- Message Board King
-
- DoWorkSon515
- Message Board King
- Join Date: May 2012
- Posts: 4,104
- Rep Power: 2001
-
-
Originally Posted By Spill512⏩
We produce enough food for the entire world to eat a caloric surplus. Yet two billion people are malnourished. Capitalism at work.We still waste a third of the food we produce. We waste trillions of gallons of water due in large part to problems in technology (leaks, etc). There's still a bunch of problems in government, corruption, and we need to find ways to delegate certain responsibilities to AI or else it'll always be that way. There's still huge limitations with distribution. Obviously energy consumption and getting the most out of our resources there is still something we've barely tackled.
There's still a long way to go with increasing efficiency. Right now I don't trust the infrastructure we have to implement a communist government effectively. I think it's stupid that someone can have a billion dollars, throwing away food, and another person can be desperate and starving. That doesn't make sense to me. But I don't trust the alternative at the moment.
There's still a long way to go with increasing efficiency. Right now I don't trust the infrastructure we have to implement a communist government effectively. I think it's stupid that someone can have a billion dollars, throwing away food, and another person can be desperate and starving. That doesn't make sense to me. But I don't trust the alternative at the moment.
*got windows tinted to pick nose while driving crew*
*waits in car until jacked guys leave the gym crew*
*spends 2 hours on hair before getting a haircut crew*
*scared to buy protein powder in person crew*
*curls more than he benches crew*
06-08-2016, 03:57 PM
-
#127
- WillBrink
- INDUSTRY INSIDER
-
- WillBrink
- INDUSTRY INSIDER
- Join Date: Oct 2002
- Location: United States
- Posts: 14,844
- Rep Power: 92463
-
-
Originally Posted By freekid2002⏩
That's abundantly obvious son.I don't understand
BrinkZone, Where Bro-Science Got Rabies and Died!
www.BrinkZone.com
Check out my BrinkZone mini site on BB.com at:
www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink.htm
=> President and Founder of Shaved head with goatee Crew
=> Science over bro science Crew
06-08-2016, 04:01 PM
-
#128
06-08-2016, 04:08 PM
-
#129
- Nomadbrah
- Registered User
-
- Nomadbrah
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2015
- Age: 37
- Posts: 273
- Rep Power: 290
-
-
Communism is very close to an economic and ideological system that might save this gay earth. Just close but not quite there.
In any case, it was too early to attempt any kind of communist economic theory in the 1930s, and then the cold war diverted more precious resources from that goal until the late 80s.
Now is a better time with all the production automation technologies available to attempt anything resembling communism.
In any case, it was too early to attempt any kind of communist economic theory in the 1930s, and then the cold war diverted more precious resources from that goal until the late 80s.
Now is a better time with all the production automation technologies available to attempt anything resembling communism.
At 50% Glow. No recharger.
06-08-2016, 04:08 PM
-
#130
- CaseyJamess
- Lurking since '09
-
- CaseyJamess
- Lurking since '09
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 33
- Posts: 4,585
- Rep Power: 8662
-
-
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
I wouldn't bother with him...Makeup may be a social construct, but gender in general is not. That's why babies only weeks old can be shown to have certain predilections towards certain types of toys. Boys gravitate towards building blocks, toy trucks, etc. Girls go for the dolls. I'm pretty sure that wasn't socialized into them.
Gender IS NOT a social construct
If you are born with a penor, have xy chromosomes then you are a male,
or, if you are born with a vagina, have xx chromosomes then you are a female!
(not including abnormalities, like Turner syndrome, etc)
~Misc BJJ crew~
~Electronic Engineer master race~
06-08-2016, 04:14 PM
-
#131
Originally Posted By Nomadbrah⏩
has to be a troll or a nimrod.Communism is very close to an economic and ideological system that might save this gay earth. Just close but not quite there.
In any case, it was too early to attempt any kind of communist economic theory in the 1930s, and then the cold war diverted more precious resources from that goal until the late 80s.
Now is a better time with all the production automation technologies available to attempt anything resembling communism.
In any case, it was too early to attempt any kind of communist economic theory in the 1930s, and then the cold war diverted more precious resources from that goal until the late 80s.
Now is a better time with all the production automation technologies available to attempt anything resembling communism.
06-08-2016, 04:14 PM
-
#132
Originally Posted By DoWorkSon515⏩
You want true evil? Look no further than the pharmaceutical industry. Why cure anything when we can make countless billions selling you stuff that only masks the symptoms. That's the beauty of capitalism.We produce enough food for the entire world to eat a caloric surplus. Yet two billion people are malnourished. Capitalism at work.
Originally Posted By CaseyJamess⏩
Enter the 21 Century? For social and scientific reason the above no longer applies.I wouldn't bother with him...
Gender IS NOT a social construct
If you are born with a penor, have xy chromosomes then you are a male,
or, if you are born with a vagina, have xx chromosomes then you are a female!
(not including abnormalities, like Turner syndrome, etc)
Gender IS NOT a social construct
If you are born with a penor, have xy chromosomes then you are a male,
or, if you are born with a vagina, have xx chromosomes then you are a female!
(not including abnormalities, like Turner syndrome, etc)
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ
**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**
Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!
It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
06-08-2016, 04:26 PM
-
#133
- sknot1454
- Registered User
-
- sknot1454
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 9,817
- Rep Power: 50370
-
-
It comes down to this simple truth.
Private ownership is one of mankind's basic fundamental rights.
Communism on small scales will work, sure. If you and others want to enter into a social contract to share your property without coercion, then fine. Do it. Share your ****.
However, as a system of government, Communism blows because a person is coerced, though the threat of violence, to give up his or her private property by the state.
Private ownership is one of mankind's basic fundamental rights.
Communism on small scales will work, sure. If you and others want to enter into a social contract to share your property without coercion, then fine. Do it. Share your ****.
However, as a system of government, Communism blows because a person is coerced, though the threat of violence, to give up his or her private property by the state.
06-08-2016, 04:32 PM
-
#134
- sknot1454
- Registered User
-
- sknot1454
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 9,817
- Rep Power: 50370
-
-
Originally Posted By CaseyJamess⏩
Gender IS a social construct.I wouldn't bother with him...
Gender IS NOT a social construct
If you are born with a penor, have xy chromosomes then you are a male,
or, if you are born with a vagina, have xx chromosomes then you are a female!
(not including abnormalities, like Turner syndrome, etc)
Gender IS NOT a social construct
If you are born with a penor, have xy chromosomes then you are a male,
or, if you are born with a vagina, have xx chromosomes then you are a female!
(not including abnormalities, like Turner syndrome, etc)
You're thinking of sex. Sex is biological.
Gender is what mankind has deemed as appropriate social behavior for biological boys and girls.
If you raised a biological male and biological female in a socially sterile environment, they won't the first clue as how to act if they were released into the world. They wouldn't know what to wear. They wouldn't know what hobbies to enjoy or professions to pursue.
They would be completely gender neutral until they were smart enough to figure how that society is more accepting of you if you act a certain way depending on your biological sex.
Haircut preference, clothing preference, toy preference, etc aren't provided by nature. They're created by people.
06-08-2016, 04:41 PM
-
#135
- CaseyJamess
- Lurking since '09
-
- CaseyJamess
- Lurking since '09
- Join Date: Sep 2011
- Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Age: 33
- Posts: 4,585
- Rep Power: 8662
-
-
Originally Posted By KRANE⏩
Enter the 21 Century? For social and scientific reason the above no longer applies.
Originally Posted By sknot1454⏩
Ok, I admittedly misread what I was initially quoting and acted like a potato.Gender IS a social construct.
You're thinking of sex. Sex is biological.
Gender is what mankind has deemed as appropriate social behavior for biological boys and girls.
If you raised a biological male and biological female in a socially sterile environment, they won't the first clue as how to act if they were released into the world. They wouldn't know what to wear. They wouldn't know what hobbies to enjoy or professions to pursue.
They would be completely gender neutral until they were smart enough to figure how that society is more accepting of you if you act a certain way depending on your biological sex.
You're thinking of sex. Sex is biological.
Gender is what mankind has deemed as appropriate social behavior for biological boys and girls.
If you raised a biological male and biological female in a socially sterile environment, they won't the first clue as how to act if they were released into the world. They wouldn't know what to wear. They wouldn't know what hobbies to enjoy or professions to pursue.
They would be completely gender neutral until they were smart enough to figure how that society is more accepting of you if you act a certain way depending on your biological sex.
My bad
Surely though, 'gender' as it is today came because of our sex?! No?
Males being more suited for hunting, being breadwinners etc down the line this 'naturally' evolved to men being ones going out to work etc?
If there is no hard science about it and it's just pseudo science from psychology I'm not gunna buy into that **** at all.
~Misc BJJ crew~
~Electronic Engineer master race~
06-08-2016, 04:52 PM
-
#136
Originally Posted By sknot1454⏩
I suspect there may be a bit of predisposition baked in.Gender IS a social construct.
You're thinking of sex. Sex is biological.
Gender is what mankind has deemed as appropriate social behavior for biological boys and girls.
If you raised a biological male and biological female in a socially sterile environment, they won't the first clue as how to act if they were released into the world. They wouldn't know what to wear. They wouldn't know what hobbies to enjoy or professions to pursue.
They would be completely gender neutral until they were smart enough to figure how that society is more accepting of you if you act a certain way depending on your biological sex.
Haircut preference, clothing preference, toy preference, etc aren't provided by nature. They're created by people.
You're thinking of sex. Sex is biological.
Gender is what mankind has deemed as appropriate social behavior for biological boys and girls.
If you raised a biological male and biological female in a socially sterile environment, they won't the first clue as how to act if they were released into the world. They wouldn't know what to wear. They wouldn't know what hobbies to enjoy or professions to pursue.
They would be completely gender neutral until they were smart enough to figure how that society is more accepting of you if you act a certain way depending on your biological sex.
Haircut preference, clothing preference, toy preference, etc aren't provided by nature. They're created by people.
Originally Posted By CaseyJamess⏩
I wouldn't discard psychology completely. There's still many good things to be learned once we become a bit more advanced with how to use and analyze it.Ok, I admittedly misread what I was initially quoting and acted like a potato.
My bad
Surely though, 'gender' as it is today came because of our sex?! No?
Males being more suited for hunting, being breadwinners etc down the line this 'naturally' evolved to men being ones going out to work etc?
If there is no hard science about it and it's just pseudo science from psychology I'm not gunna buy into that **** at all.
My bad
Surely though, 'gender' as it is today came because of our sex?! No?
Males being more suited for hunting, being breadwinners etc down the line this 'naturally' evolved to men being ones going out to work etc?
If there is no hard science about it and it's just pseudo science from psychology I'm not gunna buy into that **** at all.
In the mean time, I'm stanch believer in the division of sexes. Nature usually does it right for a reason. We just sometimes need to catch up. But were' getting off topic a bit aren't we?
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ
**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**
Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!
It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
06-08-2016, 04:59 PM
-
#137
06-08-2016, 05:06 PM
-
#138
- Aircommander91
- Psalm 115:1
-
- Aircommander91
- Psalm 115:1
- Join Date: Oct 2012
- Age: 34
- Posts: 8,097
- Rep Power: 18745
-
-
read sign op.
socialists want to control your money.
communists want to control your birth/thought/life and death.
it just screams ignorance when a idiot defend this kind of regime. it's usually the first people that get wiped out on this type of rule.
just shows you how retarded they are.
they don't know history, much less economy. they advocate for their own death, poverty and misery.
socialists want to control your money.
communists want to control your birth/thought/life and death.
it just screams ignorance when a idiot defend this kind of regime. it's usually the first people that get wiped out on this type of rule.
just shows you how retarded they are.
they don't know history, much less economy. they advocate for their own death, poverty and misery.
“Sometimes when I'm faced with an atheist, I am tempted to invite him to the greatest gourmet dinner that one could ever serve, and when we have finished eating that magnificent dinner, to ask him if he believes there's a cook.”
― Ronald Reagan
† Acts 4:12 †
There's salvation only in Christ
† II Corinthians 12:7-10 †
Suffering humbles us, it's truly a bless in disguise
06-08-2016, 05:07 PM
-
#139
- sknot1454
- Registered User
-
- sknot1454
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 9,817
- Rep Power: 50370
-
-
Originally Posted By CaseyJamess⏩
What is the #2 thing we associate with gender today other than their actual sex? Appearance, right? We truly have no idea what's in someone's pants, but their outside appearances are generally indicators of their sex. Males dress like males. Females dress like females.Ok, I admittedly misread what I was initially quoting and acted like a potato.
My bad
Surely though, 'gender' as it is today came because of our sex?! No?
Males being more suited for hunting, being breadwinners etc down the line this 'naturally' evolved to men being ones going out to work etc?
If there is no hard science about it and it's just pseudo science from psychology I'm not gunna buy into that **** at all.
My bad
Surely though, 'gender' as it is today came because of our sex?! No?
Males being more suited for hunting, being breadwinners etc down the line this 'naturally' evolved to men being ones going out to work etc?
If there is no hard science about it and it's just pseudo science from psychology I'm not gunna buy into that **** at all.
That's entirely social. That's not biological.
I have set to see scientific evidence that traditional preferred gender appearances are provided by nature, not by nurture. Maybe one can argue that the way females dress accentuates their breasts/hips thus making males more likely to find a mate, but that hasn't been proven to my knowledge. Also, this forum, filled with guys who would cut a nut off just to **** a 5/10 in a burlap sack, kind of validates the point in a whimsical way.
The only studies I've seen are done with male/female primates who gravitate towards certain toys. I wouldn't say the preferred toy choice in non-humans is valid enough evidence that "gender" is indeed biological.
06-08-2016, 05:09 PM
-
#140
- ANumber1
- Duke of New York
-
- ANumber1
- Duke of New York
- Join Date: Jul 2013
- Location: New York, United States
- Posts: 18,570
- Rep Power: 128694
-
-
Under capitalism, some people are rich and powerful and some people are poor and powerless.
Under communism, the wealth is destroyed and misery is distributed equally to nearly everyone.
Under communism, the wealth is destroyed and misery is distributed equally to nearly everyone.
Nah, fukk that. I’m not doing that.
06-08-2016, 05:13 PM
-
#141
Originally Posted By ANumber1⏩
Except someone inevitably has to be in charge. What do you call them?Under capitalism, some people are rich and powerful and some people are poor and powerless.
Under communism, the wealth is destroyed and misery is distributed equally to nearly everyone.
Under communism, the wealth is destroyed and misery is distributed equally to nearly everyone.
◄FILMM∆KER CRW►
◄PHOTOGRAPHY CRW►
**Official Bicycle Crew** Ờờ
**Official No Cell Phone Zombie Crew**
Muscle Memory is Real!
Old Man Strength is Real!
It's been a long time coming but I know A Change Is Gonna Come
06-08-2016, 05:14 PM
-
#142
- GrizzlyBig
- Registered User
-
- GrizzlyBig
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 873
- Rep Power: 553
-
-
we have big appetite and greed as part of human nature
its in our DNA to want more and more
thats why communism can never work
thats why equality will never exist
its in our DNA to want more and more
thats why communism can never work
thats why equality will never exist
06-08-2016, 05:15 PM
-
#143
- majorkey
- Registered User
-
- majorkey
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Location: Norway
- Age: 33
- Posts: 180
- Rep Power: 181
-
-
Because capitalism enforces incentives to work/production.
That's it really. Communism doesn't have this effect. Why strive to create? Why strive to get an education? The society wouldn't grow.
That's it really. Communism doesn't have this effect. Why strive to create? Why strive to get an education? The society wouldn't grow.
*** OVO Crew ***
*** big dink crew ***
06-08-2016, 05:20 PM
-
#144
communism is unethical, brb forcing everyone to work for me because I am alive. Capitalism allows people to do what they want and is mutally agreeable.
ex.
communist: kid becomes doctor, has to treat everyone based on fact that he understands medicine, one is happy, doctor is pissed because he has 0 economic libido and wants to go home.
Capitalism: engineer designs circuit in exchange for your gf and food coupons, agreed upon, has freedom, both happy.
ex.
communist: kid becomes doctor, has to treat everyone based on fact that he understands medicine, one is happy, doctor is pissed because he has 0 economic libido and wants to go home.
Capitalism: engineer designs circuit in exchange for your gf and food coupons, agreed upon, has freedom, both happy.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts