http://www.hackerfactor.com/GenderGuesser.php

The gender guesser says "weak female (weak emphasis could indicate european)". So not written by a man, but possibly a twink, or closet homo, or european. Most likely just a hideous feminist whale though.

Just LMAO at her thinking the hot guys are still going to want her used up body when she hops off the cawk carousel 15 minutes before her last egg expires and decides it's time to start a family. Men get better with age and women get worse. So the hot guys she used to bang will now be banging girls 10 years younger than her.

That's generally guys getting pusy in their own league though. You'll see ugly guys pulling ugly girls, average looking guys pulling average looking girls, hot guys pulling hot girls, etc. You're not gonna see an ugly or average looking guy pulling a super hot girl unless the guy is rich and the girl is a gold digger.

You think this is news?

Moon landed on man

Def a fat whale wrote that...or a dude. Either way, men will always be more visual than women. Women are driven by emotion...just the way it is. No game or smoothness will make a chubby woman attractive to fit men.

seems to me like a guy wrote that for some reason

Hate to break it to you but these ugly sloots are making moves because they see you as an equal.

Ayy lmaoo

If only ugly chicks checked me out I'd accept being ugly

But I get checked out by cute girls on the regular so I know I'm not
Still get mad when an uggo reaches though

Stay mad facecel

Illiteracy is strong

servicies
than so be it

all pretty much common sense stuff

all she really said was stick the girls in your own league, everyone knows that, some are a little deluded about it.

it works both ways too. if an ugly girl tries in on with you it makes you think wtf is she thinking

I have no doubt legit hot girls think like that partly because they're rare (just lmao if you think a skinny girl with a good looking face is easy to come by these days) and they can pretty much get whoever they want because of their looks. That's life son

my experience is exactly the opposite

the hotter girls hate not being taken seriously. since theyve always been hot theyve always been used for their beauty

so they go looking for something else.

not all, just the vast majority

this "girl" if it is a girl just sounds like a bish heavily indoctrinated into her social circle

Or more likely, just wait 5-10 years. This is how you end up with bitter single older women.

I'm going to make a YouTube video calling this girl out, you guys are going to watch right?

That's the exact impression I got within the first 2 paragraphs. I think we're onto something.

Having said that the 'it's not creepy if he's handsome' concept is a pretty logical unwritten rule among women's psyche. I think it's fair to say that's a pretty axiomatic assumption to make. C'est la vie, it is what it is, I guess.

LMFAO no woman has EVER checked you out you mushroom-headed framecel.

You have the build of an 11 year old boy. Your mom's is the only vagina you'll ever touch.

reason why its a revelation is because we're a generation of men raised by pussy yielding humans. Zero masculinity in mainstream media. This **** should be common knowledge but disney culture has had men/women tiptoe-ing around the truth for decades. We're experience the great re-awakening. Trump and more alpha like figures will start popping up all over.

why do i have a feeling she's a strong 5/10

Reality is this.

When it comes to women it is not all about looks for all women. Women however, tend to focus on 3 very basic things when evaluating a man. These are:

1. Looks (Height and face)
2. money
3. Social status

Now think of men like highschool students applying for college. Women are the college with these 3 requirements (looks, money, status) as 3 separate papers, whose combine total will determine whether you are worth her time (aka get in).These 3 areas are weighed different from woman to woman ( EACH WOMAN WILL CARE MORE ABOUT ONE TRAIT MORE SO THAN ANOTHER). If you meet their minimum requirement they give you a chance at dating them. if you really exceed their minimum threshold they might sleep with you with no string attach sex (equivalent of a kid getting scholarship for a university).

For example - Sloots who are gold diggers, might care more about your money and it will have more weight than looks or status. So for such a sloot, you might find money has a total of 1500, looks 500 and status 400.



With her minimum score you need to get into a relationship with her is 1500/2400, while for ONS a she will have a much higher scoring system and in such a case looks might be the more dominant deciding factor. So in such a case the scoring system for ONS might be something like 1200 looks, 900 money and 300 status with a minimum score of 2000/2400 for her to drop her panties.

Now some of you might be wondering what is status? Well status is basically how well known and/or liked/respected you are by people. In highschool and college setting this often goes towards the guys who socialises the most and are outgoing. While outside of school, this will fall more in line with the guys with high status jobs and/or high on food chain in their respective field department. Women constantly do something test and monkey branching trying to be with the highest status male they can get.



Lastly, going back to my analogy of women being colleges and men being students. As women get older they often get less attention (less applicants wanting to enter their college) and thus will lower their minimum requirement for relationships and possibly sex. You will also notice that at around age 28-29 many women are in a rush to settle down and by late 20's a good chunk (possibly majority) care more about money and security over looks as they are looking for provider males.

We've had many stories on misc in which members here have spoken about a friend or ex-gf who tried to give them ultimatum to put a ring on it and when they did not, ended up going for a much less attractive guy who was willing to commit within a year.

Lmao I agree with her and condone her for writing this srs. Doesn't apply to all but I think for the most part they hide that they are hugely visual. Honestly should be man lands on moon at this point though.


With that said like another miscer pointed out, after that initial impression - you're value can go up or down and I firmly believe that's why I'm successful as a 6/10. (personality, local social status, etc)


Except for the perpetuating patriarchy and rape culture part - she went a little off the deep end there.

LOL recieved huge neg for this post ^ agreeing that many girls are visual creatures and what 'she' was saying was mostly true.


U wot? Fukkin misc never disappoints.


Ok so what - they are completely non shallow and are expected to pander to "good personalities" compeltely while men go straight for ass and titties? GTFO

Wait u know ur not ugly because "cute girls check you out"? Lol you ever fuk any of them? That is all that matters.. also being mad at some non attractive sloot for checking you out is not normal.

Not mad *******. I get pusy pretty much every time i go clubbing, office party or work as a bouncer. Its lonely at the top brah. You aint on my level

How could you prove or disprove looks don't tie into social status?

I actually think that's largely the case, it's more so that a desirable man (as proclaimed by peers) desires them; therefore validating that they're attractive, than it is the figure of a jutting jaw literally gets them wet.

I'm pretty sure there have been studies in the past where women don't get off to pictures. That's why chicks love erotic/ romance novels and the story behind it. Whereas a dude can whack it to a porno magazine

There was a study done which states that men who are tall married women around their age and tended to get mates early on. Tall in this study was 6'1 and up. While men who were deemed short (5'9 and under) would marry later, but to younger woman. They found shorter men had much stable marriages and used their higher income to have dominant role in household. The conclusion by researchers was that tall men were able to use their positive attribute height to get early mates. While short men use their positive attribute "earning power" to attract mates.

Another study done in the UK stated that a large percentage of women compared to men would actively avoid a person that they did not find attractive but who they suspected had interest in them. In addition, while personality was top 3 of things men looked for in a partner, it was found that a man's smile and body frame were top 2 things women looked for in men.

Yep yep this is indeed how women think. Also why she has no value if she's slept with more than two men and/or had ANY one night stands.

A sloot has no value as much as she'd like to believe she does because of her hereditary genetics. Girls like these are the ones who wonder why they can't get the perfect chad to stay with them
yet actually believe they deserve one. Always looking to trade up.

The circle of life will not be kind to her. Sloots like this end up at college bars getting ignored by Chad 2.0.

I'm continually convinced more and more that most of you guys dont ever go outside. Like Jeezus, life isnt this simple.

its the misc, 90% of them dont go outside.

I scimmed and scammed.. But ugly dudes who get mad when hot chicks want a good looking guy are the biggest bunch of ****s i've ever encountered

She probably looks like Shamu