Deception.

Strong.

Any facts to back up that theory?Hey, maybe if men were somehow all stripped from the planet and took all the modern technology with them you *might* have a point - like some male rapture.

Would it be a hard slog since there are many fields that do not have many women which would mean a distinct shortage of trained workers? Sure. There would be fewer workers in all areas, but then again fewer mouths to feed.

At least until the oil runs out I think women could make it. Don't need a penis to drive a tractor or a combine.

See: the U.S. during World War II when women were drafted into traditionally male roles as part of the war effort.

Not that I want to get rid of you. I think both sexes have their good and bad points, or strengths and weaknesses if your prefer.

You aren't wrong.

Just an adaptation though.

Modern technology was all invented, created, andmaintainedby men! If all the men disappeared who is going to maintain civilization? Look at all the engineers who fix the machines, who maintains the buildings from crumbling, who do you see on the side of the road fixing the pot holes so the semi trucks can deliver the products you use, who maintains the engines of those semi trucks? When that farm tractor breaks down how is she going to fix it? Who maintains the utility grid, the plumbing, the electricity? Women don't do those jobs. Maybe like 4% of women in the world are capable of doing the jobs men do. Women do jobs in air conditioned offices. They do bureaucracy work, admin stuff. HR, secretary, school teacher, nurse, social worker. Society can survive without these jobs. Society cannot survive without the jobs men do. If all the men disappeared overnight, women are just magically going to know how to do all this stuff? Without men to nag at to do it for them, they are incapable of doing it themselves.

Yes, the fact that women are weaklings.

Pointing out the men are at the top of what would traditionally be seen as female roles is an inherent quality in men that has already been mentioned in this thread several times

Men are more aggressive and obsessive over success in their field. We're willing to make any and every sacrifice to be the best

It doesn't necessarily mean that men are inherently better at that particular field

It does mean that. Where does mens aggression and obsession come from? It comes from testosterone. The hormone of the Gods.

At the beginning there was only woman, then the gods said:"We're injecting half the species with test, so they can advance faster(or at all)"

Women were given the responsibility of birth, men, of everything else

Edit: ^ god damn wizard lol

almost any type of comedy females are horrible at... females have chit sense of humor.

one of the times in recent history when women stepped up and worked mens jobs building planes, welding, working heavy dangerous equipment.
All while still having to go home and raise a family, take care of the house and all the normal female duties of the time... those were real feminists and strong women.
todays "feminists" think they are being strong by just opposing everything and screaming like children.

Socializing, networking, making friends and forming relationships.

don't overlook the importance of this in the year 2018. #1 factor in being "successful". And by that I'm using societies definition in having a good job, having a relationship. it's why the average girl is more "succesfull" today. your daughter is statistically more likely to be "successful" than a son. i'd like to see the statistics on how many young socially isolated NEET males there are vs females.

If women were really as good or better than men at those jobs they would have already been filling those jobs with women, instead of waiting until there was literally not enough men in the economy to work. Women didn't truly enter the workforce en masse until after post war prosperity and our economy became service based.

Men and women can be better at different things, but this comment reminds me of the racists and slave holders in the South who would point to all of the achievements of American whites and then use that as a measure of innate biological superiority instead of as an indicator of historical social inequality. Women were, historically, shut out of many of the avenues available for wealth generation, education, and professional training, thus it's natural that there would be some catching up to do.

That said, if we're talking general intelligence, then there is more variance for men at the tail ends of the distribution, which partially accounts for many of the accomplishments that have been noted, but it's also important to remember that IQ is the product of genetics and environment.


Btw, it's blatantly obvious that the guy on the Dr. Phil show is some forty year old incel.

Men are biologically, innately superior to women. Both physically, mentally, and emotionally. Physically men can run faster, jump higher, better at endurance and strength events, more athletic, better hand eye coordination, can handle stress better. Mentally men have bigger brains and higher IQ's. Not only are there virtually no women on the extreme high end of the bell curve, but the mean IQ is 5 points higher for men than women. Your entire "history women were oppressed reeeee" argument is destroyed considering that in the past 50+ years women have had every opportunity to innovate, produce, discover and they have done nothing. Today women have hundreds of systemic institutionalized privileges over men, including affirmative action. Women today are more educated than men, graduate college more, and yet still produce and innovate far less. Women are not capable of innovating, building, discovering the way men are. And it's because of innate biological differences. A lower IQ and lack of testosterone being the main reason. This is objective observable reality. Humans are typical of mammals, with the exception of the hyena, almost all mammals have a superior male of the species. In primates it is true in all species. The female is the one that carries the baby, cares for the baby. The male uses his superiority to protect and provide for the female. It's simple biology.

An embaressing statement coming from a 27y old. Are you here to build your body or to train your misogyny?

Social media
Using tablets/smart phones

They probably eat Pussy better because a lot of you don’t put in the effort to be great at it

They’re really good at catching catfish

Being triggered by things that have nothing to do with them

Triple filter layers

Not all women are the above except for catfishing

Embarrassing*. Theres nothing embarrassing about a fact, or the truth. One's personal feelings have no bearing on what the truth is. Women have lower IQs than men, that is a fact. Men produce 10 times more testosterone than women, another fact. Your denial of facts because it hurts your feelings is what is embarrassing.

I know biology is a tool of the patriarchy though, right?

Slipping and falling off ledges.

Agree . There’s a few exceptions,but not many

Smart people dont actually believe in IQ tests. Women also dont work in work fields that generates tasks equal to that of IQ tests. Mathematicians, engineers or architects obviously score well on iq tests whicha re basically puzzles and math they do everyday. and i think you believe me when i say more men work in these or similar workfields than women.
also i dont get the testosterone argument, is it supposed to be a harmone which makes you go full albert einstein when you collect enough during your weekly fitness training? I am as proud as a man as it gets, but talking woman bad just shows how badly you percieve the world. noone with a clear mind would insult half of the people of the world. Men are better at every sport, i agree, but when it comes to emotions or multitasking i think woman trump us

Lol at *******s like this throwing tantrums and negging over political disagreements. At least ThorPowers took the time to write a response to my post.
Acting pretty feminine and irrational for someone who hates women.

Definately not being women. Welcome to the downfall of weatern civilization.

being annoying when men are engaging in fisticuffs

Believe IQ tests? An IQ test is an objective, unbiased measure of intelligence, what is there to "believe"?? An IQ test isn't like asking if you believe in God or not, it is empirical. To deny it is to deny observable reality.Stating facts is not bad talking anyone. All things are not equal, and to pretend they are isn't "insulting" others if it it reflects reality. Truth does not change simply because it hurts your feelings or goes against your perceived world view of 'equality'. If all the evidence suggest women are less intelligent, then that's what I will believe. My worldview is based off the evidence not my feelings.By your own logic, you are "hating on women and misogynistic" by saying men are superior at sports. Why do you admit men are superior athletically but not mentally?

And when it comes to emotions women trump men? What does that even mean? That women are more emotional? Is that a good thing?

Fisting themselves

multitasking

Lmao. How is this a response to my post? Men have more muscle mass and less fat. Body composition is one of the key things affecting metabolism. Muscle burns more energy at rest so men have faster metabolisms than women. This only further supports the fact men are superior. Men burn fat even while resting. Or is a slow metabolism now considered a good thing?

they are better at finding someone else to pay their way