All the time, never seen a miscer cope so hard

Not having kids is more selfish. At least when you have kids other people are benefiting, including society

Op is right. I'm gonna knock up a random.
I'll be a champion of nature, spreading my seed.

The thing is people assume they'll be exactly the same physically (especially re.energy levels) at 40+ as they were at 25. It's a normal thing to do and even I thought that. I figured "hell 10 or so years shouldn't really make much difference to how I feel."

Lmao I couldn't even imagine doing the "newborn" routine at 40+.

Exactly, I have a boy turning 2 in two weeks a girl 3 months old. at 40+ I would be drained only benefit I see I might be more patient or understanding but again my point if I was 50+ and my kid turned 10 I could not physically keep up. I want to out play my kids until they move out and I won't even be 50 at that point.

Grade A troll thread.

The original plan was 'survival of the fittest' with nature. Now, technology has made nature's original motives obsolete, allowing those who are weaker or dumber to live just as long as those with superior genes, in many cases out-numbering them and reproducing more, not the way nature intended, but by the government-enforced wealth redistribution and government protection.

Unfortunately, we're far past the age where nature sorts out the weak and the strong, Thanks Obama!

No thanks.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeands...e_iOSApp_Other

The only purpose in life is to pass your genes forward. It's what every living being fights for.

LMAO @ u childless ****s. You're literally losing at life.

Not everyone is a slave to their mindless ape impulses, boyo.

LOL Newton, Tesla... ok buddy

I'm 32 as of Jan 1st and haven't had a child.. the misc is making me feel like I need one soon or I'll be too old and decrepit to raise one properly.

I'd rather not have a child, than to have one with a woman I don't see as a long term commitment.

Realistically, what % of modern women make good wives and mothers? 2%-3%? Maybe.

Wayy more than that.. at least I believe.. Little backstory.. in my 20's I had two longish term relationships. One of 3 1/2 years and the other of 4. Both of which I lived with them for a couple years (Both of which I was loyal and have no reason to believe they weren't). They wanted me, marriage, kids, whatever I wanted they would be on board for. I ended it with both of them. I was easily bored and also struggling with multiple addictions, so my emotions were even less on par with that direction than my sober mind may have been.. I guess my point is, even being as much of a "loser" as I objectively was, I still had cute, loving, empathetic, and fantastic females in my life who cared about me tremendously.


I suggest the number is higher than 2-3% because I think the biggest factor is who you choose to let into your life.

They say you choose woman like your mother, my mother is the best/strongest ****ing woman I know.. so maybe I'm just blessed.

I'm not sure if I made a point or if I'm even still on topic and I'm not proof reading this ****, so here's my post.

Made u green bro.

Fuk these barren wastes of skin, stealing our kids resources.

People who never have kids should forfeit their organs to child transplant candidates by default. At least then they can give something back.