Barbara Palvin - Sports Illustrated 2019 - Page 5

05-10-2019, 09:22 AM

-

#121

Potatolifter
Frogtech survivor

Potatolifter
Frogtech survivor

Join Date: Feb 2015

Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)

Age: 41

Posts: 3,150

Rep Power: 22709

Originally Posted By Highwind7⏩

chipmunk face and even I got a better ass and tits than her (deadly srs)

100% this, my tits are much better.

05-10-2019, 09:23 AM

-

#122

Aristotelian
Positive Mental Attitude

Aristotelian
Positive Mental Attitude

Join Date: Jun 2017

Posts: 12,849

Rep Power: 263689

Originally Posted By Destor⏩

I don't think there's much polarization about that aspect specifically brah. If internet incels spent as much time researching female attractiveness as they do breaking down what makes their own gender attractive, childlike features are what they'd be espousing for females. There's no shortage of academic research suggesting that childlike features (and maintaining those features into maturity) are the universal ideal for female attractiveness

See:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans

And not surprisingly, retaining those features has been tied to things like superior ovarian function w/ age and other biological traits you'd expect to drive attractiveness

You're talking past my point but perhaps I wasnt specific enough. Neoteny as you cite can be tracked. So, the HBBs I have met in my life have never even had to shave - the ultra thin hairs that may grow (not in pubic areas) resemble tiny cilia. That's one example.

But you're conflating that with Palvin's "little girl" face and that isn't neoteny. That is something I'd call "sick" because Men ought to be attracted to Women. Not childlike faces staring back at them in an "adult" female body like Palvin's.

On your "incel" point - I haven't seen much of that in this thread. And I really hope you're not implying that I'm one (lol) since I'm the one dismissing Palvin as a child face hype byproduct.

05-10-2019, 09:30 AM

-

#123

Destor
Registered User

Destor
Registered User

Join Date: Apr 2012

Location: Alberta, Canada

Age: 41

Posts: 43,481

Rep Power: 254906

Originally Posted By Aristotelian⏩

You're talking past my point but perhaps I wasnt specific enough. Neoteny as you cite can be tracked. So, the HBBs I have met in my life have never even had to shave - the ultra thin hairs that may grow (not in pubic areas) resemble tiny cilia. That's one example.

But you're conflating that with Palvin's "little girl" face and that isn't neoteny. That is something I'd call "sick" because Men ought to be attracted to Women. Not childlike faces staring back at them in an "adult" female body like Palvin's.

On your "incel" point - I haven't seen much of that in this thread. And I really hope you're not implying that I'm one (lol) since I'm the one dismissing Palvin as a child face hype byproduct.

Not at all calling you incel or referring to anything in this thread, I'm just talking about how internet incels dig into research about FWHR, canthal tilt, neck size, and all that chit that makes men attractive. If they did the same for females, it would be childlike features they're going on about

Palvin's "little girl" face is totally neoteny, her face is like the apex of childlike features on a woman and there's legit research showing it's universally attractive