Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Abortion nonsense
  1. Results 121 to 125 of 125
  2. First
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
post 1646628103 09-08-2021, 01:06 PM
-
#121
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  1. TomWanks
  2. vocaroo.com/18BduFIdv7YR
  3. Join Date: Sep 2020
  4. Posts: 21,621
  5. Rep Power: 202087
Originally Posted By Luc1fer
I dated a girl like this once, she acted as if I was paranoid and trying to control her body - that "my body, my choice" reflexive feminist response.

All I did was mention it was concerning to me that she wasn't more disciplined about taking the pill on time.

It is indeed her choice to be irresponsible, but it's also my choice to judge her for it and end it.
It amazes me how weak men and sloots have managed to frame the entire "reproductive rights" conversation around the interests at this precise moment of the woman closest to the situation. And most guys (not you obviously) just nod their stupid heads and go along with it like it's phucking common sense.

BRB a 16 year old sloot who gets knocked up has daddy gubment sending her money every month in the form of welfare and every year in the form of tax credits. She has the dude, regardless of age or resources, sending her a check each month for child support-- with the threat of unironic imprisonment if he can't come up with the dough. She has social services that will cover her medical costs for the entire pregnancy (and social security if she has no insurance), low-cost and flexible rate childcare (that the dude probably pays for anyway, on top of CS) so she can keep going to school or work (JFL as if that's what she is interested in doing though), public education that will tell her bastard spawn that her mother is stunning and brave for raising the kid alone, an entire society that will applaud her for getting the sugar walls painted white, low income stipends once the kid gets to uni, and on and on and on, the list is literally endless.

And almost no one steps back and say, okay bish, it seems like you're pretty much taken care of for all of your material needs on the chance you decide to shirk your responsibility to take a phucking pill around the same time each day, use a different form of birth control like the patch, or abstain from penetrative intercourse. Is it okay if we let the men back into the room so we can write some phucking laws that might actually benefit our society now instead of just constantly expanding the bottomless resource net we provide to stupid sloots like yourself?

Absolutely blows my mind.
post 1646629513 09-08-2021, 01:26 PM
-
#122
  1. pondus_levo
  2. mic dropper
  1. pondus_levo
  2. mic dropper
  3. Join Date: Oct 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 24,811
  6. Rep Power: 163138
Originally Posted By TomWanks
It amazes me how weak men and sloots have managed to frame the entire "reproductive rights" conversation around the interests at this precise moment of the woman closest to the situation. And most guys (not you obviously) just nod their stupid heads and go along with it like it's phucking common sense.

BRB a 16 year old sloot who gets knocked up has daddy gubment sending her money every month in the form of welfare and every year in the form of tax credits. She has the dude, regardless of age or resources, sending her a check each month for child support-- with the threat of unironic imprisonment if he can't come up with the dough. She has social services that will cover her medical costs for the entire pregnancy (and social security if she has no insurance), low-cost and flexible rate childcare (that the dude probably pays for anyway, on top of CS) so she can keep going to school or work (JFL as if that's what she is interested in doing though), public education that will tell her bastard spawn that her mother is stunning and brave for raising the kid alone, an entire society that will applaud her for getting the sugar walls painted white, low income stipends once the kid gets to uni, and on and on and on, the list is literally endless.

And almost no one steps back and say, okay bish, it seems like you're pretty much taken care of for all of your material needs on the chance you decide to shirk your responsibility to take a phucking pill around the same time each day, use a different form of birth control like the patch, or abstain from penetrative intercourse. Is it okay if we let the men back into the room so we can write some phucking laws that might actually benefit our society now instead of just constantly expanding the bottomless resource net we provide to stupid sloots like yourself?

Absolutely blows my mind.
Like I said, this world enables bad behavior, why would anyone want to take personal responsibility when daddy government will take care of them or daddy doctor will shove a clothes hanger up they're pussy.

I say them/they're instead of her because apparently men can have pussies too.

****ing clown world.
Forever alone? Attraction and keeping the girl chasing you - http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=131498033

You will never know your limits, unless you push yourself past the imaginary lines you have drawn in the sand.

Knee Dragger - '06 GSX-R750
post 1646637283 09-08-2021, 03:13 PM
-
#123
  1. DolphinPilot
  1. DolphinPilot
  2. Join Date: May 2015
  3. Posts: 49,469
  4. Rep Power: 367822
Originally Posted By menseks
so...only have sex for procreation? because there's no way to have sex without risking pregnancy.
There's a dozen or so birth control options available. Abortion shouldn't be one of them.
post 1646774093 09-10-2021, 02:18 PM
-
#124
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 15,250
  5. Rep Power: 107906
On the one hand, I morally dislike the idea of using abortions as a form of contraception and think people should only use them in exceptional circumstances, however, if my only options are banning them completely or clogging up society with unwanted and neglected children who grow up to be criminals and lowlives, then I think allowing abortions is the lesser evil.
“Steroids is now just a word that the lazy and ignorant use to describe any guy that has more muscle and dedication than them”– Mike O'Hearn


"I am like getting the feeling of cumming in the gym; I'm getting the feeling of cumming at home; I'm getting the feeling of cumming backstage; when I pump up, when I pose out in front of 5000 people I get the same feeling, so I am cumming day and night. It's terrific, right? So you know, I am in heaven."
post 1646777053 09-10-2021, 03:04 PM
-
#125
  1. fitnessislife
  2. Registered User
  1. fitnessislife
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 27,183
  7. Rep Power: 223047
Don't care about abortions since there are way too many undesirables who should never be allowed to breed....but the fact that it has the estrogen-filled "males" and the blue-haired hippo brigades (most of whom who are so hideous they'll never need to worry about needing an abortion) so up in arms is absolutely hilarious.
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."

- PJ O'Rourke
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts