your links show chit about covid

I don't know if its different for you or not but the articles are rotating in subject matter

word salad? Just say you only have a 6th grade education and I will try to distill it down for you bro.

And who redefined peer reviewed? Just because you don't understand how something works doesn't mean it changed. And yes, they changed the definition of vaccine. I don't get why this is so distressing to you. It went from providing immunity to providing protection, which is merely a linguistic issue. Perhaps it would have been better to come up with a new word other than vaccine to solve that challenge. Does something that provides protection have no value? Of course not. The only question is whether the protection is worth the trade-offs...

Nah, that poster made a claim, I asked for some support for that claim, then others joined in with other unsupported claims and ad hominems.

https://www.webmd.com/pain-managemen...rt-attack-risk

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...t-attack-study

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...trokes-n705901

You can't see those? Check the dates of the articles.
You can prove yourself wrong with just 1 minute of effort but are choosing not to. There's nothing left to discuss in that case.

I barely know anyone that was vaxed and haven't heard of anyone I know irl who's had a heart attack

Only people who've been obese or in pretty bad health with some other issue like pneumonia or something

Utterly ahumourous twat.

Psychopathic, nonce Eugenicists engineered a virus to wipe out the old and weak, so they could force a vaccine to wipe out the young and strong, because the whole point is to cull the population.
If it ever comes out what they did, they'll feign ignorance and pretend the "silver lining" was "Saving the environment." Because regular people, apparently, have such a massive effect on it but rich billionaires who fund genocides and wars don't have any effect on the environment, whatsoever.

Next will be engineered shortages, digital attacks. So many parallels to the Great Leap Forward on various fronts, and some people still can't see it. And that started before COVID.

Is that a no?

The scientists have shown the following cause heart attacks in young people -

climate change
meat
white people
guns
cash
two parent family
religion
love
freedom

The scientists have shown that government prevents heart attacks.

Any links?

Yeah hold on brb.

Jabbies' hearts are exploding everywhere


Purebloods don't forget your umbrellas around jabbies

IDK OP. OneLegSquats has a point about "causes heart attacks" being a common title. See it as a new warning on product labels and being able to pin it down to a recent date might mean something; still...I thought it must be the Babylon Bee.The value of the comparison becomes questionable right there- due to lack of testing, false results, and poor/incomplete reporting by the major media regarding symptoms and severity there is no way to be certain that the people in that group were not infected with the virus.Then on top of that your number is restricted to people who were in ICU *with* COVID. We don't know if COVID was the reason they were in ICU. We don't know if they spent time on a ventilator. We don't know if they were treated with remesdivir- one nurse testified that receiving 2 [or more] doses of remesdivir reduced her patients odds of survival to 25%

- was the primary cause for ICU treatment COVID, or some heart related issue?
- was their risk of heart attack increased because of COVID or because of being on a ventilator or being treated with a new experimental drug?

If there were several studies that came to a similar conclusion it might signal something.Maybe. He still strikes me more as professional media opposition.

Not really. Real experts weighed in on the topic and were smeared and/or ignored.With a leaky vaccine [a vaccine that does not stop infection or transmission] full or partial immunization isn't the issue. It is that those who have had the injections, can still be infected and given that they have reduced symptoms are more likely to go about their normal routine and to infect a larger number of other people with the variant of the virus that has infected them [IOW a version that is more vaccine resistant].

Also I'm personally skeptical that "huge numbers of lives were saved". I've come across too many accounts stating that the virus has mostly been killing the same people as before [the most vulnerable]. Possibly related to the protection given by the shots falling fairly quickly.That comment was about JLC more than it was about the peer review process.Omicron was discovered in South Africa, a country with a low vaccination rate. And I'm not even sure that the mrna injections are available there or if they have been using something from another country [Russia, China].It is distressing because it is a LIE. The injections are a therapeutic treatment to improve immune response. I can't even say how many times I encountered a person who was not wearing a mask or encouraging people that they were meeting with that they did not need to wear a mask saying "it's okay, I'm fully vaccinated". The worthlessness of the masks aside, the spread could have been LESS if people had been told clearly at the very start that the shots would NOT stop them from getting the virus or spreading the virus and that the study for EUA approval did not even try to calculate those things.

Of course then they would not have had any reason to force people to get the shots.

it's been accepted that smoking increases risks of cardiac issues. also, i believe heart attacks happen often in the morning after you wake up.

TLDR, everything causes cancer and heart attacks.