Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Female height filter settings on Bumble
  1. Results 121 to 150 of 150
  2. First
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
post 1657554273 03-08-2022, 09:57 AM
-
#121
  1. GordonXXX
  2. Generation X Capitalist
  1. GordonXXX
  2. Generation X Capitalist
  3. Join Date: Feb 2019
  4. Posts: 34,525
  5. Subscribers: 5
  6. Rep Power: 282301
post 1657554363 03-08-2022, 09:59 AM
-
#122
  1. Sandmang27
  2. Registered User
  1. Sandmang27
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 2,063
  7. Rep Power: 20520
Originally Posted By eternalnoob
Lol. What percent of men is over 6'4? Like 1%?
15% of the male population in the US is over 6' and only 4% are over 6'2 so probably around 1% is over 6'4.

Lmao I'm just under 6'1 and put 6' in my profile just in case I match with an amazon woman who is 6'1 and slightly taller but I'm going to put 6'2 now and get that over 20% boost in matches.

The drop from 6'2 to 6' is almost as much as 6' to 5'11...
Liverpool FC. YNWA.

Toronto Crew

Ooooo I'm a ghost
post 1657554473 03-08-2022, 10:01 AM
-
#123
  1. superman704
  2. Registered User
  1. superman704
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 16,891
  6. Rep Power: 17137
Originally Posted By eternalnoob
Lol. What percent of men is over 6'4? Like 1%?
More like 0.001 %, srs
John 3:16

Natty for life
Red for life
I'm not really 50, I'm 47, idk how to change the age
Autism crew (Asperger's syndrome)
High test crew
Bald crew
MAGA crew
Guys stop making me green! I actually enjoy being red! It's more alpha!
Born again Christian crew
Heavy metal crew
Sometimes the stuff I say is just ''trolling''
post 1657554653 03-08-2022, 10:04 AM
-
#124
  1. GordonXXX
  2. Generation X Capitalist
  1. GordonXXX
  2. Generation X Capitalist
  3. Join Date: Feb 2019
  4. Posts: 34,525
  5. Subscribers: 5
  6. Rep Power: 282301
i didn't read the whole thread so maybe someone mentioned this but isn't it hypocritical that guys can't filter women by weight? and weight is something that can be controlled, height is not. also, throw race in there. why waste everyone's time? i don't want to see big fat obese black women (or big fat obese ANY women). although it's sad in 2022 that most guys will f**k anything including obese pig women.
post 1657554733 03-08-2022, 10:05 AM
-
#125
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  1. kingmanaverage
  2. Terrible poster
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 15,250
  5. Rep Power: 107906
Should add a weight filter too...
“Steroids is now just a word that the lazy and ignorant use to describe any guy that has more muscle and dedication than them”– Mike O'Hearn


"I am like getting the feeling of cumming in the gym; I'm getting the feeling of cumming at home; I'm getting the feeling of cumming backstage; when I pump up, when I pose out in front of 5000 people I get the same feeling, so I am cumming day and night. It's terrific, right? So you know, I am in heaven."
post 1657554913 03-08-2022, 10:09 AM
-
#126
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  1. Smithers115
  2. 6'4 crew
  3. Join Date: Sep 2008
  4. Location: Alberta Brah, Canada
  5. Posts: 24,851
  6. Rep Power: 81884
Originally Posted By notbadnotbrad
I used to get like 10+ girls a day liking my profile but now I get like 1 and they are usually awful. So decided to get premium. Not sure what happened as my pics and everything are exactly the same.

Gotta pay to play in my case I guess.
man a couple years ago i would absolutely mog on hinge with likes, now its like 1 a day and i blow through my daily likes in 30 seconds

I yolo'd and got tinder plat this month on some 20 dollar special they offered

I really wish the algorithm was like what it was in like 2016 tinder, had like 3k matches
Great MAGA King status

Bing Chilling
post 1657555143 03-08-2022, 10:13 AM
-
#127
  1. Goat_187
  2. Registered User
  1. Goat_187
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: Miami, Florida, United States
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 26,316
  7. Rep Power: 93130
Girls don't know what 5 inches is (unless they been with me lol) let alone have precise height desires.


Ask a girl what size is the biggest ideal penis in inches, then ask her to demonstrate visually with two index fingers. Then lold.
post 1657555163 03-08-2022, 10:14 AM
-
#128
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 35,726
  6. Rep Power: 48512
Originally Posted By bfdehewdbyywhn
exactly

hinge has a race filter too lmaoo



cant wait till the data is released on that. will likely be the same as OKcupid
Atomic race pill incoming
post 1657555413 03-08-2022, 10:17 AM
-
#129
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 35,726
  6. Rep Power: 48512
Originally Posted By sooby
not really the same thing, women don't even know what they want and exaggerate measurements, and once the novelty time period wears out then that's that. they can brag to their friends now.

at least with being fat that can be changed. being fat comes along with a lot of other undesirable baggage. although im starting to doubt that with the HTC membership that is on the misc.

i will agree though it sucks being a turbo manlet (5'6 and below)
Strong cope. Women like tall guys because that's what they're attracted to. The same way most men aren't attracted to fatties, most women aren't attracted to manlets. Denial of this is pure cope
post 1657556003 03-08-2022, 10:29 AM
-
#130
  1. legbroke
  1. legbroke
  2. Join Date: Jan 2020
  3. Height: 5'8"
  4. Weight: 190 lbs
  5. Posts: 8,658
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 101123
Originally Posted By BigBallsMcgee
Strong cope. Women like tall guys because that's what they're attracted to. The same way most men aren't attracted to fatties, most women aren't attracted to manlets. Denial of this is pure cope
Brah, I'm also a frustrated manlet, but there are definitely other components that compound the issue, especially on the apps. A few off the top of my head:

1) can't judge personality easily/quickly on apps, so they encourage filtering by physical attributes
2) the social status associated with height/dating a tall guy
3) the measurement system - if all of humanity shrunk 4 inches, I doubt there'd be as big a desire for 5'8" as there is for someone 6 feet. 6 feet is just an easy target for a cutoff since it's a nice number.
4) women not being able to gauge height well/men frauding on apps but then being encouraged to pick specific numbers. I doubt men who are 6'1" do much differently from those who are 6'3" irl.

Theres more to it than "it's just the way they are."
post 1657556223 03-08-2022, 10:34 AM
-
#131
  1. AWSbruh
  2. Registered User
  1. AWSbruh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,330
  6. Rep Power: 54725
The data is inaccurate AF anyway. You can only filter when you pay for Bumble. What female pays for bumble Lmao
post 1657556253 03-08-2022, 10:34 AM
-
#132
  1. solidus2k3
  2. Registered User
  1. solidus2k3
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2003
  4. Location: rofl land
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 41,584
  7. Rep Power: 123781
brutal height pill
<HTC>
post 1657556373 03-08-2022, 10:38 AM
-
#133
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 46,748
  6. Rep Power: 174067
Originally Posted By sooby
not really the same thing, women don't even know what they want and exaggerate measurements, and once the novelty time period wears out then that's that. they can brag to their friends now.

at least with being fat that can be changed. being fat comes along with a lot of other undesirable baggage. although im starting to doubt that with the HTC membership that is on the misc.

i will agree though it sucks being a turbo manlet (5'6 and below)
cope/10

6'3 Master Race
GOATCal Crew
No Pillow Crew
Pureblood Crew
post 1657556453 03-08-2022, 10:39 AM
-
#134
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By AWSbruh
The data is inaccurate AF anyway. You can only filter when you pay for Bumble. What female pays for bumble Lmao
Ones who don't want to be bothered by subhuman manlets
post 1657558623 03-08-2022, 11:07 AM
-
#135
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 35,726
  6. Rep Power: 48512
Originally Posted By StrongFella
It's anecdotal, my guy. I can't really invalidate your opinion, but I've seen shorter guys pull pretty easy irl. I myself am 'only 5'10" and never had a problem even if giraffe men were around
5'10 isnt short at all lol. And yes shorter guys CAN pull, just like fat chicks CAN get married. That doesnt change the odds.
post 1657558873 03-08-2022, 11:11 AM
-
#136
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  1. BigBallsMcgee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 35,726
  6. Rep Power: 48512
Originally Posted By legbroke
Brah, I'm also a frustrated manlet, but there are definitely other components that compound the issue, especially on the apps. A few off the top of my head:

1) can't judge personality easily/quickly on apps, so they encourage filtering by physical attributes
2) the social status associated with height/dating a tall guy
3) the measurement system - if all of humanity shrunk 4 inches, I doubt there'd be as big a desire for 5'8" as there is for someone 6 feet. 6 feet is just an easy target for a cutoff since it's a nice number.
4) women not being able to gauge height well/men frauding on apps but then being encouraged to pick specific numbers. I doubt men who are 6'1" do much differently from those who are 6'3" irl.

Theres more to it than "it's just the way they are."
Height is valued in remote african villages with no apps or status or anything. Its inherently ingrained in biology to just be more attracted to that for women.
post 1657561393 03-08-2022, 11:47 AM
-
#137
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  1. Destor
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Alberta, Canada
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 43,481
  7. Rep Power: 254906
Originally Posted By AWSbruh
The data is inaccurate AF anyway. You can only filter when you pay for Bumble. What female pays for bumble Lmao
The tall sloots whose height limits their selection of guys and thus are more likely to be single and on dating apps looking for the small minority of guys who are tall enough for them and single
post 1657561553 03-08-2022, 11:48 AM
-
#138
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 46,748
  6. Rep Power: 174067
Originally Posted By BigBallsMcgee
5'10 isnt short at all lol.
6'3 Master Race
GOATCal Crew
No Pillow Crew
Pureblood Crew
post 1657562303 03-08-2022, 11:59 AM
-
#139
  1. ChunkBuster
  2. Registered User
  1. ChunkBuster
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 10,272
  6. Rep Power: 63230
7” is more desirable than 5’11” 🤦‍♂️💀

Looks like I’ll need some Putin aka Tom cruise shoes then
post 1657567283 03-08-2022, 01:04 PM
-
#140
  1. legbroke
  1. legbroke
  2. Join Date: Jan 2020
  3. Height: 5'8"
  4. Weight: 190 lbs
  5. Posts: 8,658
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 101123
Originally Posted By BigBallsMcgee
Height is valued in remote african villages with no apps or status or anything. Its inherently ingrained in biology to just be more attracted to that for women.
Never said there wasn't an inherent component to it, just that isn't *only* inherent components.
post 1657567833 03-08-2022, 01:14 PM
-
#141
  1. StrongFella
  2. Pointy Nips Of Peace
  1. StrongFella
  2. Pointy Nips Of Peace
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Location: Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 9,111
  6. Rep Power: 75685
Originally Posted By BigBallsMcgee
5'10 isnt short at all lol. And yes shorter guys CAN pull, just like fat chicks CAN get married. That doesnt change the odds.
It is apparently by today's standards.

I think you are honing in too much on one attribute. There are umpteen factors that go into attractiveness. Any given individual's combination of said attributes will affect their odd's. An no one is just perfect all around, so every dude will be deficient somewhere in a woman's eyes.

A tall dude who looks like Shrek is not gonna pull more than a short guy that looks like Tom Cruise, for example.
NPC Bodybuilder, former U.S. Navy
***Muay Thai Crew***
***Wrestling Crew***
***Black Crew***
post 1657569003 03-08-2022, 01:34 PM
-
#142
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Posts: 14,997
  5. Rep Power: 62013
So this graph is just showing the MAX Height (The percentage of inclusion) as in any taller is filtered out. Where is the graph that shows the MIN height?

I'm 5'11", no fukcs given. So the graph is saying a little over 30% of women is filtering out guys any taller than 5'11". I want to see the min graph, the ones that filter out guys not at least my height. It'd be interesting.
☆☆☆USA �яєω☆☆☆


Not Casca Berserk. Casca The Eternal Soldier



☆☆☆Perfectly Imperfect �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆What is the point of doing a bunch of reps if every rep you do is CRAP? �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆SuperStraight �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆snailsrus �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆High Five �яєω☆☆☆
post 1657569133 03-08-2022, 01:35 PM
-
#143
  1. deltakappabrah
  2. Registered Phago
  1. deltakappabrah
  2. Registered Phago
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Posts: 2,506
  5. Rep Power: 12479
Originally Posted By Casca
So this graph is just showing the MAX Height (The percentage of inclusion) as in any taller is filtered out. Where is the graph that shows the MIN height?
No it shows both minimum-maximum heights; percentage of y-axis (height) that is included in the range of acceptable heights for women
*AP5 crew*
*ex-flipphone crew*
*we're all gonna make it brahs crew*
*neg all reddit posts on sight crew*
*super straight crew*
post 1657569513 03-08-2022, 01:41 PM
-
#144
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Posts: 14,997
  5. Rep Power: 62013
Originally Posted By deltakappabrah
No it shows both minimum-maximum heights; percentage of y-axis (height) that is included in the range of acceptable heights for women
Show me the proof. Makes no sense. 90% of women filtering out any guy not at least 6'6". Also, on the graph itself it says "Percentage ofinclusionin filters set". I take that to mean you can't be any taller than this.
☆☆☆USA �яєω☆☆☆


Not Casca Berserk. Casca The Eternal Soldier



☆☆☆Perfectly Imperfect �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆What is the point of doing a bunch of reps if every rep you do is CRAP? �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆SuperStraight �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆snailsrus �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆High Five �яєω☆☆☆
post 1657569983 03-08-2022, 01:47 PM
-
#145
  1. Archheretic
  2. Registered User
  1. Archheretic
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2007
  4. Location: Norway
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 3,790
  7. Rep Power: 11495
Dang, poor 6'5" reporting in. Only an inch away from being masterrace.
Former no-avi anonymous
post 1657570033 03-08-2022, 01:47 PM
-
#146
  1. Voidgaze
  2. Real Azz Misca'
  1. Voidgaze
  2. Real Azz Misca'
  3. Join Date: Feb 2018
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 54,578
  6. Rep Power: 603960
Originally Posted By TaeBoNinja
It isn't.
post 1657570143 03-08-2022, 01:50 PM
-
#147
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 28,898
  5. Rep Power: 342064
Originally Posted By notbadnotbrad
lmao no it isn't

6'2-6'3 is srs
Pure cope brah. 6'4" to 6'6" is better. It's not that 6'2" or 6'3" are bad they just aren't as good
6'2"

OMAD results: 2/15/19-235, 10/13/19-190

OHP-205 Bench- 245 Squat - 405 C&J - 245

2021 Spring cut: 195lbs starting weight
post 1657570333 03-08-2022, 01:53 PM
-
#148
  1. TappingTheZen
  2. Everettian
  1. TappingTheZen
  2. Everettian
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 12,774
  6. Rep Power: 173816
6'4 feelsgoodman

truthfully though females know nothing about heights and lots of men fraud (ESPECIALLY on dating apps), the height are probably all shifted by 2-3 inches making 6-1/2-6'4/5 the 'ideal real height'
post 1657570803 03-08-2022, 01:59 PM
-
#149
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Posts: 14,997
  5. Rep Power: 62013
Originally Posted By Archheretic
Dang, poor 6'5" reporting in. Only an inch away from being masterrace.
You're going to have to be at least 6'6" before most bumble girls even see your profile.
☆☆☆USA �яєω☆☆☆


Not Casca Berserk. Casca The Eternal Soldier



☆☆☆Perfectly Imperfect �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆What is the point of doing a bunch of reps if every rep you do is CRAP? �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆SuperStraight �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆snailsrus �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆High Five �яєω☆☆☆
post 1657602053 03-08-2022, 11:05 PM
-
#150
  1. 8pieces
  2. Make The Misc Great Again
  1. 8pieces
  2. Make The Misc Great Again
  3. Join Date: Jan 2020
  4. Posts: 32,196
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 118685
Originally Posted By notbadnotbrad
My hinge filters


image hosting services
why can't you put weight preference?????
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts