Illogical being does something illogical

'Logical' Folk asses the illogical being in what is actually an illogical way, in that they assume illogical being is acting with logic.
The 'Logical Folk' are being illogical for doing that.

'Logical folk' spas out too and become illogical.



Logic all around is 1/10

I had no idea that you could run the river twice.

Even if you're all in pre and both parties agree you can do the whole run out as many times as you want. As long as the place you're playing at allow it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/poker/comme...the_whole_hand

Checks her hand at 2:20, lifts them for about 10 seconds, then puts a time chip in, you're telling me that she still misread her hand?

At around 4:30, he puts her on something like pocket 5's or has a 3, he asks "do you have a small pair?"

She replies: "You give me that much credit?", which implies she knew she didn't even have a pair...


The reasoning you guys pointed out and the interviews afterwards sounds like somebody committing a crime and then having some time afterwards to put their alibis and stories together.

Also there was a guy playing at that table who staked her? How's that even allowed.

I'm sticking to the anal plug theory signaling somehow she was technically ahead but not knowing full depth and odds of the hand.

I had no idea that you could run the river twice.

Is this not a major tell though? Like if I'm playing someone and they ask to run it again, I just gained some useful info.

Is this not a major tell though? Like if I'm playing someone and they ask to run it again, I just gained some useful info.

Giving the money back = guilty

If she was guilty she knows giving the money back would prove it. Honestly it makes zero sense to give the money back if she cheated. It's always deny deny deny with this crap.

That said I know jack chit about poker and am enjoying the argument lol.

She probably has one of those remote control vibrators in her cooch.

Producer buzzes her whenever she needs to stay in a hand.

LOL.

I literally wouldve told him to go fk himself and git gud.

Nobody and I mean nobody gives back 100k.

what's the chances of playing like a total tard and coming up on top in a situation like this?

poker is as boring as BBing

She probably has one of those remote control vibrators in her cooch.

Producer buzzes her whenever she needs to stay in a hand.

1) She knows what he has
2) She got the signal that her hand was technically ahead at the turn
3) That's enough for this bimbo to make the call

that's basically it.

One time I was playing in a home game. Had 99. There was a raise before me, I call, like 3 other callers. Flop comes 9 6 3. Raiser bets, I raise, folds all the way around to the original raiser. He shoves, I obviously call. He has AA. We agree to run it twice.

He hits A on turn in both runouts. Always wondered if I was cheated on that hand.

Straight flush draw on the flop… I wouldn’t shove with a J 4 off, even if I know his cards. If she knew, it still doesn’t make sense. Why are we discounting she got super lucky?

I don’t know how any of you can think she cheated. When she called she wasn’t even favored to win the hand despite being ahead.

No one is “cheating” on a coin flip situation for $100k. So many cards on the river could have dropped her. Unless you think the dealer is in on the cheating too you’re almost as stupid as her if you think she was cheating.


She’s just dumb as a rock being bankrolled way above her depth.

Man, I wish that was Tony G she was up against. He would have chit talked her laughing all the way until he won, or laughed until he lost then cry about how fuked the game is

She called with a river card to come, which made it a coin flip. Not only that, she ran it twice. She would have better odds betting that money on black jack.

Hellmuth would have been great too

lol at misc becoming pro poker players

Bottom line is this. There is zero, and I do mean zero proof that she cheated. All of this hand analysis, GTO theory, how a pro would play that hand? You can throw it out the window. She is a fairly new player who is trying to make a name for herself and who is also fairly wealthy AND who was being staked in the game. So she called Garret's bluff lol. If any of you have watched Garret play over the years, and I have many times, what he does is put enough money on the table to cover everyone and then bully people. The Hustler casino stream has been an ATM for him. He is the best player there. Has the most money. And the rep to just bank $$$$ almost every time he plays.

So he did his usual all in against a player who he thought would fold. He does this ALL OF THE TIME. And 95% of the time they do fold. Only this lady is a little different and as I said wants to make a name for herself plus I don't think she likes Garret all that much. So she made what seems to be an outlandish call even if she thought he was bluffing. She said she thought she had a J 3 on a 10 9 x 3 board. So she thought she had a pair of 3s (She says) and was trying to bluff catch him as she said she put him on at most an Ace high. Turns out she had J 3 the previous hand and this time had J 4 and mis read her hand.

So she called him. And bear in mind she asked to run it twice. If she was really cheating and knew she would win, why would she ask to run it twice? Makes no sense.

She is just a crazy lady with money and a backer and she wanted to get Garret. It really is as simple as that.

As for Garret. IMO he looks like an idiot. And I like Garret. But first making a big scene like he did, and then sort of asking for the money back and then actually taking it. How does that look? So anytime he loses he is going to cry cheating and ask for the money back?

The fact is he is not used to losing on HCL, he did, on a crazy hand, and he went into monkey tilt and cried.

He will never live this down and at the very least should return the money she gave back to him.