Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Tucker Carlson: Media was not allowed to ask what happened to Building 7
  1. Results 121 to 146 of 146
  2. First
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
post 1681877193 05-02-2023, 12:38 AM
-
#121
  1. YungSodomy
  2. Registered User
  1. YungSodomy
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 1,819
  6. Rep Power: 5081
You tinfoilbrahs seriously can't be that dense.

http://lineofdeparturearchive.blogsp...-by-jamie.html

Yes, there are coverups in the history. That doesn't mean every single national tragedy is some covert lie.
post 1681877313 05-02-2023, 12:46 AM
-
#122
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2023
  4. Posts: 8,063
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Sal29
LMFAO, your STRAWMAN ARGUMENT is 100% irrelevant. I saw YELLOW HOT molten steel pouring from the towers EXACTLY LIKE IN A FOUNDRY with my own eyes LIVE on tv on 9/11 so none of these distractions will ever work on me.



deformation stress heating + heat from fuel bro

post 1681877353 05-02-2023, 12:47 AM
-
#123
  1. hackerwacker
  2. Registered User
  1. hackerwacker
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 11,669
  6. Rep Power: 62380
Originally Posted By YungSodomy
You tinfoilbrahs seriously can't be that dense.

http://lineofdeparturearchive.blogsp...-by-jamie.html

Yes, there are coverups in the history. That doesn't mean every single national tragedy is some covert lie.
All i see is a building with a huge fukoff hole in it, and no airplane wreckage in sight
post 1681877393 05-02-2023, 12:51 AM
-
#124
  1. YungSodomy
  2. Registered User
  1. YungSodomy
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 1,819
  6. Rep Power: 5081
Originally Posted By hackerwacker
All i see is a building with a huge fukoff hole in it, and no airplane wreckage in sight
You probably can't see and/or have cataracts, brah. There are multiple pictures of the plane wreckage from an independent journalist in that link that substantiate the fbi's released photos of debris also released to the public.
post 1681877443 05-02-2023, 12:52 AM
-
#125
  1. Sal29
  2. Registered User
  1. Sal29
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2004
  4. Posts: 16,458
  5. Rep Power: 32050
Originally Posted By Banderistan
deformation stress heating + heat from fuel bro

LMFAO, again, theFACTnot opinion that there wasLIQUID MOLTEN STEELpouring from the towers and in the rubble is not up for debate as it's aPROVEN FACTnot an opinion. You have to use straw man arguments or change the subject because it's a fact that can't be successfully challenged. Posting another video of anotherSTRAWMAN ARGUMENTproves nothing.


post 1681877503 05-02-2023, 12:55 AM
-
#126
  1. RW2
  2. In and out real quick
  1. RW2
  2. In and out real quick
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: Washington, United States
  5. Posts: 3,980
  6. Rep Power: 50568
Originally Posted By naich
Farenheit. Similar to a house fire temperature as the fuel is identical.
Not taking sides, but the heat in house fires often well exceeds 600°F.
post 1681877693 05-02-2023, 01:05 AM
-
#127
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2023
  4. Posts: 8,063
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Sal29
LMFAO, again, theFACTnot opinion that there wasLIQUID MOLTEN STEELpouring from the towers and in the rubble is not up for debate as it's aPROVEN FACTnot an opinion. You have to use straw man arguments or change the subject because it's a fact that can't be successfully challenged. Posting another video of anotherSTRAWMAN ARGUMENTproves nothing.


Look at what was dripping off the beam...
post 1681877953 05-02-2023, 01:23 AM
-
#128
  1. hackerwacker
  2. Registered User
  1. hackerwacker
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2011
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 11,669
  6. Rep Power: 62380
Originally Posted By YungSodomy
You probably can't see and/or have cataracts, brah. There are multiple pictures of the plane wreckage from an independent journalist in that link that substantiate the fbi's released photos of debris also released to the public.
there are pictures of random pieces of scrap laying on grass. there are zero pictures that have both wreckage and the pentagon in frame.
post 1681879623 05-02-2023, 02:54 AM
-
#129
  1. multiplemiggs
  2. P E R V E R T
  1. multiplemiggs
  2. P E R V E R T
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 57,385
  5. Rep Power: 568972
Originally Posted By hackerwacker
there are pictures of random pieces of scrap laying on grass. there are zero pictures that have both wreckage and the pentagon in frame.
The other part of the Pentagon that's a joke is the lack of decent surveillance footage. The only released video is from 2 cameras at pretty much the same angle with one camera being placed further back. The recording is also lacking even by 2001 standards being multiplexed down to 1 FPS. At 1 FPS there would be another 29 cameras recording on that multiplexer before it went into the recorder. 15 cameras on the multiplexer would speed the frame rate to 2 frames per second. And when there was motion detection or alarm triggers priority would be given to those video lines that were triggered it the unit was properly set up. There was no changes to the frame rate after impact and it continued to at the same frame rate.

By 2001 a Walmart or a 7 Eleven would have better surveillance than what the Penagon made public.
SPOT SOLD TO FROGTECH - 100% NATURAL GENETIC FROG FIBRES

see Krackerjacked's sig

never underestimate the slootiness of a sloot
-DrugsToGetBig

ratchet girls love the ebt flex
-havoc00
post 1681880613 05-02-2023, 03:40 AM
-
#130
  1. Islandboyo
  2. Registered User
  1. Islandboyo
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 9,979
  6. Rep Power: 16023
The SHEEP will never acknowledge that their government and greatest ally allowed those attacks to happen, no matter how much evidence and common sense you bring to them. They're not masculine and alpha enough to have a free thinking brain that can reach conclusions that go against the narrative.

These people will believe everything the government and media tell them, because otherwise it would mean that their whole worldview and idea of this great freedom loving government they have will come crashing down, and that is a scary thought to cowards.

5 Israelis caught filming the twin tower attacks in NJ and dancing once the planes hit/building collapsed. Still waiting on a explanation on how they knew there would be an attack on that day, and at that time? Even better, why did they celebrate the attacks? You'd think they be devastated by their greatest ally being attacked like that.
post 1681882163 05-02-2023, 05:07 AM
-
#131
  1. The357magnum
  2. Registered User
  1. The357magnum
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2021
  4. Posts: 837
  5. Rep Power: 3538
Tucker is one of the biggest con man in the country right now. Wake up, this focus on wild conspiracies instead of real policies is destroying the right.
post 1681882493 05-02-2023, 05:20 AM
-
#132
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 15,406
  5. Rep Power: 77939
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet
This is almost 22 years old.

None of this information is new.
I remember years ago talking to you in a 9/11 thread, and you vehemently defended the official story.
post 1681882733 05-02-2023, 05:28 AM
-
#133
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 15,406
  5. Rep Power: 77939
Imagine if the only oddity in the 9/11 saga was building 7.
post 1681882903 05-02-2023, 05:33 AM
-
#134
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  3. Join Date: Feb 2009
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 73,524
  6. Rep Power: 348838
Originally Posted By umop3pisdn
Imagine if the only oddity in the 9/11 saga was building 7.
Building 7 is the one thing that that has legitimately zero explanation.

You can say about the other stuff, "well there's no footage of that..." etc etc.... But building 7 you have footage, you have examples of other sky scrapers that have had WAYYYY worse fires and didn't fall... I mean hell, you have other buildings near the 9/11 site that didn't fall down in much closer proximity to the twin towers lmao.

Every time I write off the CT of 9/11, I'm forced to come back to building 7.

If the official story was that they are heavily investigating the faulty construction of building 7 which led to it's collapse.... That would be one thing. But the official story is that it's collapse makes sense lol.

That is a 47 story building.... It doesn't just collapse in on itself ENTIRELY.... like wtf.
post 1681883143 05-02-2023, 05:40 AM
-
#135
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 15,406
  5. Rep Power: 77939
Originally Posted By HMFIC_BROWSIN
Building 7 is the one thing that that has legitimately zero explanation.

You can say about the other stuff, "well there's no footage of that..." etc etc.... But building 7 you have footage, you have examples of other sky scrapers that have had WAYYYY worse fires and didn't fall... I mean hell, you have other buildings near the 9/11 site that didn't fall down in much closer proximity to the twin towers lmao.

Every time I write off the CT of 9/11, I'm forced to come back to building 7.

If the official story was that they are heavily investigating the faulty construction of building 7 which led to it's collapse.... That would be one thing. But the official story is that it's collapse makes sense lol.

That is a 47 story building.... It doesn't just collapse in on itself ENTIRELY.... like wtf.
I've got an explanation for Building 7; it was a controlled demolition.
post 1681883373 05-02-2023, 05:46 AM
-
#136
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  1. umop3pisdn
  2. Registered Muser
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 15,406
  5. Rep Power: 77939
post 1681883573 05-02-2023, 05:53 AM
-
#137
  1. naich
  1. naich
  2. Join Date: Nov 2011
  3. Posts: 17,217
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 128871
Originally Posted By YungSodomy
You tinfoilbrahs seriously can't be that dense.

http://lineofdeparturearchive.blogsp...-by-jamie.html

Yes, there are coverups in the history. That doesn't mean every single national tragedy is some covert lie.
Looked through that website. Here is the thing. He is taking strawman arguments and "debunking" them with minimal evidence. If he went after the real arguments hed be at a loss. "A plane never flew into the pentagon" is the claim, he disproves it by photos of plane scrap. Ok, great, but the argument isnt that no plane went into the pentagon. The argument is what kind of plane. Was it a missle ment to look like a plane? Was it a small private plane like many eye witness claim. Whatever it was it was wide enough to clip telephone poles and leave a whole that wide. Obviouslly the skeleton of a plane. Look up the flight path of the supposed pilot Hani Hanjur and let me know if you any problems with that. If he wanted to prove that the plane reported hit the pentagon...lets see a part number, lets see rolls royce motors, lets see anything proving that debris belongs to that specific plane and include it all in one frame. That website is no better than a website full of people claiming planes never hit the twin towers and its all cgi. There is a scientific method to come to conclusions, that author threw that out the window and claimed moral superiority while doing it because hes on the "right side of history". Low IQ clown chit.
Originally Posted By Banderistan
deformation stress heating + heat from fuel bro

This, plus I have heard that it could be aluminum or glass. ANother interesting situation is that there are thermal records from post collapse where the temps do indeed reach steel warping and or melting temps. Not sure why that would be, thermite brahs might get hard over that.
Originally Posted By hackerwacker
All i see is a building with a huge fukoff hole in it, and no airplane wreckage in sight
Originally Posted By YungSodomy
You probably can't see and/or have cataracts, brah. There are multiple pictures of the plane wreckage from an independent journalist in that link that substantiate the fbi's released photos of debris also released to the public.
Well thank god the FBI would never corrupt independent journalism.
Originally Posted By RW2
Not taking sides, but the heat in house fires often well exceeds 600°F.
Fair, but remeber those fires burned for an hour. An hour of fire that had to climb multiple stories to reach those supports. The contact time on those steel beams with 600 F is minutes. This is 2ft wide steel we are talking about boyos, even if it was hotter, 2ft wide steel takes more than a few minutes to warp.
Originally Posted By multiplemiggs
The other part of the Pentagon that's a joke is the lack of decent surveillance footage. The only released video is from 2 cameras at pretty much the same angle with one camera being placed further back. The recording is also lacking even by 2001 standards being multiplexed down to 1 FPS. At 1 FPS there would be another 29 cameras recording on that multiplexer before it went into the recorder. 15 cameras on the multiplexer would speed the frame rate to 2 frames per second. And when there was motion detection or alarm triggers priority would be given to those video lines that were triggered it the unit was properly set up. There was no changes to the frame rate after impact and it continued to at the same frame rate.

By 2001 a Walmart or a 7 Eleven would have better surveillance than what the Penagon made public.
Hani flew over downtown washington DC, and thats the footage we get. LMAO get fuked FBI.
Originally Posted By umop3pisdn
I remember years ago talking to you in a 9/11 thread, and you vehemently defended the official story.
People in ther military have the hardest time with stuff like this. See medical professionals with the covid vaxx too. Because they wear the uniform, they assume they are involved. Hard to wrap their heads around their boss's, boss's, boss is a deep state rouge agent with alternative goals then what the whiteboard in the office says. People in the military should know first hand how secretive and comparmentalized all the big time stuff is. Look at the space program. Thousands of different contractors building screws, panels and wiring from across the country. Easy to not leak intel as no one knows anything beyond their task, but easy to then go rouge and dip into a little conspiracy taking advantage of the fact that no one knows.
**Florida Crew**
**Waiting for National Guard Bus Ride to Labor Camp Crew**
post 1681897143 05-02-2023, 10:32 AM
-
#138
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By naich
Farenheit. Similar to a house fire temperature as the fuel is identical.
House fires can reach as much as 1500 degrees Fahrenheit at the ceiling.

Those 500 C marks were likely hit. Particularly because ALL of the fuel was on fire at once instead of at a local area.

And SAL the strength of steel chart is DIRECTLY relevant to the claim that fires don't burn hot enough to impact the structural integrity of steel. They do.
post 1681897933 05-02-2023, 10:45 AM
-
#139
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
Interview footage of General Wesley Clark re: a post 9/11 memo from the Secretary of Defense-







INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1681898023 05-02-2023, 10:47 AM
-
#140
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  1. Banderistan
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2023
  4. Posts: 8,063
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By katya422
Interview footage of General Wesley Clark re: a post 9/11 memo from the Secretary of Defense-







yep

and he wasn't just some rando

that was the supreme commander of allied forces in Europe lmfaooooo
post 1681898123 05-02-2023, 10:49 AM
-
#141
  1. Zere0wn
  1. Zere0wn
  2. Join Date: Jun 2006
  3. Posts: 11,666
  4. Rep Power: 44071
tucker is going to shoot himself in the back of the head if he's not careful
My ALT is elevated. 75.
post 1681898263 05-02-2023, 10:51 AM
-
#142
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Posts: 39,767
  5. Rep Power: 166638
I wonder what happens if/when the next 9/11 type event happens?

I would assume there will be TONS of "civil unrest".
The billionaire and the beggar both have 24 hours in a day.

That's why grandma's apple pie rocks and yours sucks.
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
At least it will thunderstorm tonight, and we know how they feel about water. :)
^^^Racist police officer who also cries about how racism doesn't exist, also cries reverse racism and typifies the stupidity of the racist right, referring to black people as "they" and regurgitating racist stereotypes.
post 1681898423 05-02-2023, 10:53 AM
-
#143
  1. ralphlaurenbrah
  2. Registered User
  1. ralphlaurenbrah
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 10,357
  6. Rep Power: 31773
Look at the actual damage to building 7 and youll see it had a ton of structural damage but conspiracy documentaries conveniently ignore those pics. Seriously, look up the pics.
post 1681903463 05-02-2023, 12:04 PM
-
#144
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By ralphlaurenbrah
Look at the actual damage to building 7 and youll see it had a ton of structural damage but conspiracy documentaries conveniently ignore those pics. Seriously, look up the pics.
To be fair it is hard to find the video that is the most damning. If you do a quick search almost all videos show the backside of the building.

You can see the outer supports bending and warping for several minutes before it collapsed.
post 1681903573 05-02-2023, 12:05 PM
-
#145
  1. multiplemiggs
  2. P E R V E R T
  1. multiplemiggs
  2. P E R V E R T
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 57,385
  5. Rep Power: 568972
Originally Posted By ralphlaurenbrah
Look at the actual damage to building 7 and youll see it had a ton of structural damage but conspiracy documentaries conveniently ignore those pics. Seriously, look up the pics.
So much damage and heat that most of the glass is intact, but enough damage internally that it collapsed at free fall.

Even in 2001 where the only video you might have seen on controlled demolition was when they'd take an old casino down in Vegas on TLC, Discovery Channel or a 30 second clip on the news, 9/11 still looked like a demolition.
SPOT SOLD TO FROGTECH - 100% NATURAL GENETIC FROG FIBRES

see Krackerjacked's sig

never underestimate the slootiness of a sloot
-DrugsToGetBig

ratchet girls love the ebt flex
-havoc00
post 1681903893 05-02-2023, 12:09 PM
-
#146
  1. FinBra
  2. Registered User
  1. FinBra
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 6,666
  7. Rep Power: 46532
Originally Posted By ralphlaurenbrah
Look at the actual damage to building 7 and youll see it had a ton of structural damage but conspiracy documentaries conveniently ignore those pics. Seriously, look up the pics.
Low iq post. Check my earlier postings for the testimony of the two doods in building 7 before it dropped.

This one:https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...post1681829893
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts