Are you wrong, simply yes. Everyone knew the strain would mutate and make the vaccine highly ineffective.

You kind of proved my point with your argument, as you stated, we have never seen them create a vaccine in months and push it nationwide with mandates. The previous shortest time was 4yrs and was considered a cure. This was a money grab, why you are pushing it is weird.

Sorry boyo, you're a freaking little educated meter maid. You are far from the correct person to assign labeles for anything other than when to give parking tickets.

Those of us who believe in science evaluate the current risks and benefits. You anti-science folks simply eschew complicated things you don't understand due to nothing but your own ignorance.

LOL, "everyone" knew the strain would mutate and make the vaccine less effective? It's super easy to revise history 3 years after the fact boyo. And no, "everyone" did not know this.

And yes, the vaccine was created very quickly and it saved tens of millions of lives.

A miracle of modern science.

Today our resident weirdo liberal learns that every virus mutates. Little kids know that every virus mutates. Every scientist knows this, especially virologists. Today, and thanks to me, you now know that every virus mutates.

You didn't even get a single booster shot, you're anti-science, which makes no sense, because you are definitely high risk.

Really, it saved "tens of millions," of lives? We're just throwing out numbers here? Of course you can't back any of this up, but we're used to it.

Anti-science means not getting the OG, mega effective vaccine against the OG strain boyo.

Covid is super weak now thanks to those of us vaxxcells so no need to get a booster. Were you dirty unvaxxed to allow a more severe strain to mutate in your dirty bodies and then spread it like rats during the bubonic plague, then yes, I'd consider getting a booster.

You feel me boyo?

So you’re back to demanding proof about an increase in heart related deaths in young people, which is where we started. Which I already showed you at the beginning of the thread. Done going around in circles. Have fun continuing to troll….seems like a cancer survivor in his 50’s would prioritize his time differently, but everyone has to walk their own path in life I guess.

don't forget their god fauci said aids could be caught from standing next to somebody with aids in the 80s. and wouldn't back down on his claims even though other doctors said he was wrong

sounds similar to what is going on now with the average liberal defending the experimental jab/man made covid virus

Pfizer NEVER tested for transmission

average age of COVID death was 83 ....average of UK death is 83

many fully'Vaxxed' people................died 'with' COVID

where are the bodies piling post VAX? 10-15% excess deaths in highly vaxxed countries, 0% excess deaths in lower vaxxed countries with poor health care

excess deaths are disproportinately affecting younger populations and there is a rise in 'Turbo' cancers ........


Pfizer have now invested $5Bn in Cancer treatment........................enjoy being a guinea pig


who knows what the future will bring its still very early days

People aged 24-49 dying at a 39% higher rate than in 2015-2019. That's the data from insurance companies, who have damn good motivation to keep tabs on the data. Tards pretend it's obesity rising by like 1-2% in that period. Riiiiiiiiiiiight. A small % though is legitimately increased fentanyl use and homicides up, but that all only accounts for some of it. Expect the reality that ~50% of the increased deaths being from the Coof jabs to not be denied by governments in about another decade, as the deaths have increased A LOT across the world, not just fat USA.

Cell culture dyes can differentiate between whether the cause was Coof virus or jabs. It's not looking good for the jabs on that front.

Time for me to get stuff done too boyo. And while we obviously don't agree I do appreciate the reasonable discourse with you. I hope you have a good weekend.

Strong and I mean STRONG mental gymnastics by some of you vaxcucks on here

I have the utmost compassion for all of you that got duped into taking it, esp the ones it killed

But the people who are still in denial about things simply show how low IQ they really are and I know some smart retards now

Blows my mind someone could be working a high level job with multiple degrees, masters degrees, doctorates etc AND STILL think they need a booster

The amount of responsibility some of these people hold worries me with their extreme lack of critical thinking, honestly that's fukkking scary

COVID itself kills only the old or compromised but the COVID vaccine kills only the young and healthy

Fuark

when someone will not even contemplate ANY negative impact of something ,then they are not worth debating

maybe the vaccine took the edge off COVID of some already compromised people, very old, sickly and obese and perhaps gave them a bit more to survive the virus......however

there is a thing called risk reward? if you are already fckd you have nothing to lose so the reward outweighs the risk

however if you are not very old and generally healthy , this virus would have little impact on you as the stats have all borne out .........so take an experimental drug that you didnt need is a huge Risk over Reward...................and therefore fckn stupid

one co-worker shared with me about his older brother died from Covid. Okay I says. One glance at his recent photo, and I could guess. Pin and blow. Would-be healthy looking, high income (over half a mil annually), mid 50's.
But too fit to be natural, and red face.

Covid my аss.

It has to do mostly with people over 50 with compromised bodies and the "fear" that in their weakened state or condition, they are more vulnerable due to meds(chemo) or their conditions.
Regular fit healthy people need not apply or worry now that it has mutated to a much weaker type.

So now you're ignoring the fact that the strain was already getting weaker, and had nothing to do with being vaccinated.

Also, you're high risk, if anyone should get the booster shot, it's someone like you, you're anti-science.

I remember when the media was talking about how a teacher in her 20s died from it, she was close to 400lbs......

The way I speculate it, a good chunk of evidence suggests it's 3-20 out of a 1,000 who are having major problems (now at least) w/ CHD, clotting, myocadartis.

Okay, on one level, 0.003% or even 2% are pretty low odds. On the other, out of hundreds of million(s) that's going to be a lot of people. Tens and tens of thousands, maybe considerably more.

Nothing concerte in my mind, but looking more and more that way.

Re-analysis of the Pfizer trial data identified statistically significant increases in serious adverse events (SAEs) in the vaccine group.

Numerous SAEs were identified following the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), including death, cancer, cardiac events, and various autoimmune, hematological, reproductive, and neurological disorders.

Furthermore, these products never underwent adequate safety and toxicological testing in accordance with previously established scientific standards.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10810638/






The study included 303 nonvaccinated patients (mean age, 52.9 years; 157 females) and 700 vaccinated patients (mean age, 56.8 years; 344 females). Vaccinated patients had overall higher myocardial FDG uptake compared to nonvaccinated patients (median SUVmax, 4.8 vs median SUVmax, 3.3 ; P < .0001). Myocardial SUVmax was higher in vaccinated patients regardless of sex (median range, 4.7-4.9 ) or patient age (median range, 4.7-5.6) compared to corresponding nonvaccinated groups (sex median range, 3.2-3.9; age median range, 3.3-3.3; P range, <.001-.015). Furthermore, increased myocardial FDG uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120, and 121-180 days after their second vaccination (median SUVmax range, 4.6-5.1) and increased ipsilateral axillary uptake was observed in patients imaged 1-30, 31-60, 61-120 days after their 2nd vaccination (median SUVmax range, 1.5-2.0) compared to the nonvaccinated patients (P range, <.001-<.001).

When compared with nonvaccinated patients, asymptomatic patients who received their second vaccination 1–180 days prior to imaging showed increased myocardial 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT scans.



https://pubs.rsna.org/doi/10.1148/radiol.230743

Every week we're learning more and more info, and you have those stuck in their ways, believing the lies we were told in 2020, 2021, and 2022....

Christ you are so pathetic.

Everything you state is laced with leftist buzzword terms, "science deniers, anti-science" and such. Anything to take critical thinking away from the individual and force others into lockstep with the narrative.

And you have the audacity to call out others saying they are in a cult. Fuk off.
This world will be a better place once you are dead.

"This world will be a better place once you are dead."
Really?
a guy you don't even know in suburban Baltimore deserves this, from words that you disagree with online?

Its harsh and apathetic but he still makes a point

I wouldn't want any of these people holding any sort of position of power/responsibility let alone have children spreading their genes which lack important intellectual / cognitive / critical thinking components

Yes...now fuk off

LOL at how much of a low test cuck you have to be to still be trying to tell yourself years later that taking a rushed clot shot was a good idea. Weirdly enough there is a lot of crossover in people defending the vax also defending p3dos.

The OP... saidNOTHINGabout vaccines.
Maybe take it up with the irrational anti-vaccine crowd who sees a soapbox in every thread.Just like the conspiracy quack claims
Tens of millions are supposed to dead by now,but it's not actually happening

you are right..it's not a vaccine.

It’s not a “vaccine”, because it meets all the criteria of a genetically engineered product It contains synthetically produced modified mRNA packaged within lipid nanoparticles that have the ability to transfect our cells.

It’s not a “vaccine”, because it circulates in our body and in our cells without being noticed as foreign – unlike the particles of conventional vaccines.

It’s not a “vaccine”, because in 2021, the purpose of vaccination was revised and its definition changed. According to the new “standard”, “vaccines” do not need to create immunity specifically against a disease, but are only required to elicit an immune response, even if this response is non-specific or adverse.

It’s not a “vaccine”, because upon entry into our cells, the modified mRNA hijacks our cells to force them to produce foreign proteins, the nature of which is partially unpredictable .

It’s not a “vaccine”, because after receiving a mRNA-based injection, we are initially still considered “unvaccinated”.

It will take another two weeks before any medical authorities will consider you as “vaccinated”. As a result, reports on adverse events (including hospitalization and death) that may occur within those first two weeks post-vaccination will simply not be counted, if reported at all. Likewise, it is difficult to argue for any claims for compensation.

It’s not a “vaccine”, because you are intended to receive boosters on a regular basis. These repeated injections lead to the non-stop production of the antigen, possibly several antigens . This differs from a natural infection, in which the antigen invades our body occasionally and transiently. This ongoing presentation of the same antigen inevitably weakens our immune system.

Safe and effective