11-16-2018, 03:40 PM
-
#151
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
Originally Posted By MyBaddBrah⏩
Whats funny is women actually want you to be protective over them. But youve fallen for their bs. Of course, control can go too far..but im just curious where else in life you generally arent protective of things?The same thing should be carried onto relationships, it just takes a higher level dude to carry the mindset over, because the stakes are a bit higher. The reward is higher quality women.
With marriage its a different story, as both parties signed a contract.
With marriage its a different story, as both parties signed a contract.
Like in the money example i just gave you. Your car..is it ok for any random to get in play?
Youve tried to attach pseudo value to someone youve explicitly stated you want to be with.. And then fall back and let them parade around on the grounds you made (or didnt). Being ok with it doesnt make you high value, it makes you weak/ you dont stand for anything
This type of stuff is precisely why women are able to get away with it. The added bonus is that youre afraid to speak you because you dont want to look undesirable
11-16-2018, 03:50 PM
-
#152
- MyBaddBrah
- u wot m8
-
- MyBaddBrah
- u wot m8
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Posts: 19,318
- Rep Power: 61930
-
-
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
You're conflating all kinds of chit, dude. This is very easy. The top dudes literally give 0 phuks, period. You're conflating all kinds of chit into "having no boundaries". I mentioned a few specifically in the first post I made ITT today.Whats funny is women actually want you to be protective over them.But youve fallen for their bs. Of course, control can go too far..but im just curious where else in life you generally arent protective of things?
Like in the money example i just gave you. Your car..is it ok for any random to get in play?
Youve tried to attach pseudo value to someone youve explicitly stated you want to be with.. And then fall back and let them parade around on the grounds you made (or didnt). Being ok with it doesnt make you high value, it makes you weak/ you dont stand for anything
This type of stuff is precisely why women are able to get away with it. The added bonus is that youre afraid to speak you because you dont want to look undesirable
Like in the money example i just gave you. Your car..is it ok for any random to get in play?
Youve tried to attach pseudo value to someone youve explicitly stated you want to be with.. And then fall back and let them parade around on the grounds you made (or didnt). Being ok with it doesnt make you high value, it makes you weak/ you dont stand for anything
This type of stuff is precisely why women are able to get away with it. The added bonus is that youre afraid to speak you because you dont want to look undesirable
You're also conflating things to actual human beings. Very different.
*Hole is Life Crew*
*Meditation Crew*
11-16-2018, 04:00 PM
-
#153
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
Originally Posted By MyBaddBrah⏩
if i came into your house would you be ok with whatever i did or nah?You're conflating all kinds of chit, dude. This is very easy. The top dudes literally give 0 phuks, period. You're conflating all kinds of chit into "having no boundaries". I mentioned a few specifically in the first post I made ITT today.
You're also conflating things to actual human beings. Very different.
You're also conflating things to actual human beings. Very different.
i understand what youre saying. youre trying to imply you have so much value you dont care. but im telling you its weak. its passive
if i came in and you let me do whatever, that's weak.
but idgaf. you think you what you want
11-16-2018, 04:13 PM
-
#154
- MyBaddBrah
- u wot m8
-
- MyBaddBrah
- u wot m8
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Posts: 19,318
- Rep Power: 61930
-
-
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
real life results > propreffered7's internet redpill theories. Dude, I don't think we're on the same page here. Ideas are being conflated left and right. Most people know what really goes down, even if they deny it.i understand what youre saying. youre trying to imply you have so much value you dont care. but im telling you its weak. its passive
if i came in and you let me do whatever, that's weak.
but idgaf. you think you what you want
if i came in and you let me do whatever, that's weak.
but idgaf. you think you what you want
*Hole is Life Crew*
*Meditation Crew*
11-16-2018, 04:20 PM
-
#155
- hackfunnigans
- Registered User
-
- hackfunnigans
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Posts: 1,112
- Rep Power: 1640
-
-
Originally Posted By Muzzlrpress⏩
Lol so true. Used to never give a **** unless it was a “new” friend. Then dated a girl and found out she had slept with EVERY guy friend she had. Like someone said above, it’s programmed in their DNA.The moment you're in a relationship is the moment male friends cease to exist. Call it insecure, but I don't give a fuk.
11-16-2018, 04:26 PM
-
#156
- hackfunnigans
- Registered User
-
- hackfunnigans
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Posts: 1,112
- Rep Power: 1640
-
-
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
Good convo. I think it’s about being unpredictable. It’s the only thing I had success with. Keeps them on their toes and in line, and if they aren’t sure what exactly triggers you then it’s even better. 80/20 rule usually. Give freedom 80% of the time, but also have the ability to turn on a dime and assert your ownership.if i came into your house would you be ok with whatever i did or nah?
i understand what youre saying. youre trying to imply you have so much value you dont care. but im telling you its weak. its passive
if i came in and you let me do whatever, that's weak.
but idgaf. you think you what you want
i understand what youre saying. youre trying to imply you have so much value you dont care. but im telling you its weak. its passive
if i came in and you let me do whatever, that's weak.
but idgaf. you think you what you want
On the flip side, top dogs can also give no ****s sometimes when they’re planning on replacing her anyways. Unless a girl irritates the piss out of me, I’ll usually keep her around as bait for the next slam piece. Girls are ****s, they see you’re in demand and they want in.
11-17-2018, 08:56 AM
-
#157
- fcnz32
- Registered User
-
- fcnz32
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 37
- Posts: 589
- Rep Power: 6355
-
-
Originally Posted By MyBaddBrah⏩
Invalid. Strawman argument.Do you boyos think top tier males, say:
"Listen baby, I don't want you having male friends."
"Don't talk to him."
"Don't go there"
"You can't do this"
etc
etc
Honestly?I mean phucking honestly? ?





lol'd at the betas. Out.
"Listen baby, I don't want you having male friends."
"Don't talk to him."
"Don't go there"
"You can't do this"
etc
etc
Honestly?I mean phucking honestly? ?





lol'd at the betas. Out.
Yes, if youre having to say those things to your gf then it is "beta".
What you're not understanding is that there are hetero men and women who arent naive and understand how the real world works and VOLUNTARILY limit/eliminate opposite gender "friends"/ acquaintances/orbiters once theyre in a relationship. They do it out of respect, not cause they were told to do it.
Not everyone automatically does this right off the bat. Many try to justify to themselves that they can be just friends or that its not a big deal. This is normal, especially for younger more inexperienced people. But once the more mature partner brings it up for discussion, sensible people have no choice but to agree and admit to themselves that there's no real reason they should be continuing to entertain certain relationships. Once this is learned, it then becomes automatic in their next relationship to do the same.
Boundaries are set and understood by both sides. It's a strategic play to eliminate what to mature and respectful people is an obvious and unnecessary source of risk/drama to a serious relationship. Smart men who expect respect only have relationships with women who are able to share this mindset. Betas and naive "alphas" are the ones that let their gf have lots of guy "friends" and spend every weekend at the club. But apparently, having mutual boundaries in a relationship is "insecure" and being "alpha" is when you never care about anything LOL.
The rebuttals ive seen to this are all strawman arguments like yours about being obsessive over it or being controlling which is taking it to an extreme and missing the whole point.
11-17-2018, 09:12 AM
-
#158
11-17-2018, 09:13 AM
-
#159
- Manletbolic
- The shawma of manlets
-
- Manletbolic
- The shawma of manlets
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Age: 38
- Posts: 9,335
- Rep Power: 17337
-
-
Originally Posted By fcnz32⏩
ThatThis.
Only weak/naive dudes let their gf have male friends. The 43% in the study are with these kinds of dudes.
Real alphas indirectly or directly let their gf know (if she doesn't already) what the expectation is. And not from a place of insecurity or with a controlling attitude. But from an "I'm aware how the real world works and you can either respect the relationship or leave" attitude. If they don't agree, you don't beg them, or try to control them. You just move on to the next.
Social circle will obviously include males (99% of said males should either be your friends or her girlfriend's bfs). But LOL if your gf is engaging in regular or even semi-regular one-on-one contact with ANY of them.
And no double standard. Same applies to guys.
Only weak/naive dudes let their gf have male friends. The 43% in the study are with these kinds of dudes.
Real alphas indirectly or directly let their gf know (if she doesn't already) what the expectation is. And not from a place of insecurity or with a controlling attitude. But from an "I'm aware how the real world works and you can either respect the relationship or leave" attitude. If they don't agree, you don't beg them, or try to control them. You just move on to the next.
Social circle will obviously include males (99% of said males should either be your friends or her girlfriend's bfs). But LOL if your gf is engaging in regular or even semi-regular one-on-one contact with ANY of them.
And no double standard. Same applies to guys.
Regular engagement is a no no, theres a reason why I would do the same, its just human nature for both attractive opposite sex to catch feelings and bond.
You see this in office jobs all the time
The coming of the Manlet saviour
Wants a pair of chuck norris jeans crew
11-17-2018, 09:21 AM
-
#160
- Manletbolic
- The shawma of manlets
-
- Manletbolic
- The shawma of manlets
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Age: 38
- Posts: 9,335
- Rep Power: 17337
-
-
Originally Posted By fcnz32⏩
This is true for those that want to consider building a life together and want that long term. Boundaries are set in respect for the relationship and should be made clear right from the get go.Invalid. Strawman argument.
Yes, if youre having to say those things to your gf then it is "beta".
What you're not understanding is that there are hetero men and women who arent naive and understand how the real world works and VOLUNTARILY limit/eliminate opposite gender "friends"/ acquaintances/orbiters once theyre in a relationship. They do it out of respect, not cause they were told to do it.
Not everyone automatically does this right off the bat. Many try to justify to themselves that they can be just friends or that its not a big deal. This is normal, especially for younger more inexperienced people. But once the more mature partner brings it up for discussion, sensible people have no choice but to agree and admit to themselves that there's no real reason they should be continuing to entertain certain relationships. Once this is learned, it then becomes automatic in their next relationship to do the same.
Boundaries are set and understood by both sides. It's a strategic play to eliminate what to mature and respectful people is an obvious and unnecessary source of risk/drama to a serious relationship. Smart men who expect respect only have relationships with women who are able to share this mindset. Betas and naive "alphas" are the ones that let their gf have lots of guy "friends" and spend every weekend at the club. But apparently, having mutual boundaries in a relationship is "insecure" and being "alpha" is when you never care about anything LOL.
The rebuttals ive seen to this are all strawman arguments like yours about being obsessive over it or being controlling which is taking it to an extreme and missing the whole point.
Yes, if youre having to say those things to your gf then it is "beta".
What you're not understanding is that there are hetero men and women who arent naive and understand how the real world works and VOLUNTARILY limit/eliminate opposite gender "friends"/ acquaintances/orbiters once theyre in a relationship. They do it out of respect, not cause they were told to do it.
Not everyone automatically does this right off the bat. Many try to justify to themselves that they can be just friends or that its not a big deal. This is normal, especially for younger more inexperienced people. But once the more mature partner brings it up for discussion, sensible people have no choice but to agree and admit to themselves that there's no real reason they should be continuing to entertain certain relationships. Once this is learned, it then becomes automatic in their next relationship to do the same.
Boundaries are set and understood by both sides. It's a strategic play to eliminate what to mature and respectful people is an obvious and unnecessary source of risk/drama to a serious relationship. Smart men who expect respect only have relationships with women who are able to share this mindset. Betas and naive "alphas" are the ones that let their gf have lots of guy "friends" and spend every weekend at the club. But apparently, having mutual boundaries in a relationship is "insecure" and being "alpha" is when you never care about anything LOL.
The rebuttals ive seen to this are all strawman arguments like yours about being obsessive over it or being controlling which is taking it to an extreme and missing the whole point.
For short term, casual, open relationships obviously it isnt a problem.
The coming of the Manlet saviour
Wants a pair of chuck norris jeans crew
11-17-2018, 09:42 AM
-
#161
- ssilv
- Anti-State
-
- ssilv
- Anti-State
- Join Date: Oct 2016
- Location: United States
- Posts: 3,092
- Rep Power: 36485
-
-
Originally Posted By MyBaddBrah⏩
In case you haven’t been reading the thread, I earlier said I wasn’t scared of any other man out there. However, I don’t allow my gf to have male friends because SHE DOESNT FUKN NEED THEM.I think the better question is, what are you scared of? Got some inadequacies, bud? Bros, this is very apparent to women, dead srs. They WILL act out in other ways when they see this behavior from you. Do you think she's just going to swallow it and forget it? LMAOOOO.

That might work for 5.5/10s and below, only srs. You're just going to have to step your game up, srs. Don't be attached toCHIT
That might work for 5.5/10s and below, only srs. You're just going to have to step your game up, srs. Don't be attached toCHIT
I give her more than enough dic.king and attention and some nights she’s lucky to even be able to walk out of my house. On a side note i am open to her feelings and communication is huge to me.
Also, I’ve been stepping my game up for years. These fukn betas can’t compete and I’ll 1v1anyonewho wants to try
6'2" | 257lbs
Progress, Not Perfection.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts