Forum
»
When you're 30 and fully red-pilled about how useless women are.
When you're 30 and fully red-pilled about how useless women are.
04-05-2019, 08:06 AM
-
#151
- Jaybrahh
- Registered User
-
- Jaybrahh
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Age: 36
- Posts: 1,553
- Rep Power: 5356
-
-
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
I could be 50 for all you know. So in general "why would should a 30 year old be..."29
So when is your life actually going to start then?
So when is your life actually going to start then?
You didn't answer my question.
My life started when I was born, how about you or rather what does "starting your life" mean to you?
☆☆☆MISC BOXING CREW☆☆☆
☆☆Scandinavian Misc Crew☆☆
3
04-05-2019, 08:12 AM
-
#152
- orangetide
- Registered User
-
- orangetide
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Posts: 10,691
- Rep Power: 35630
-
-
Women arent useless in society.
But they have no place in government or grand decision making.
But they have no place in government or grand decision making.
04-05-2019, 08:16 AM
-
#153
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
That is because men have forged honor, respect, and loyalty through centuries of war bonding and building civilization................while females were 'giving' themselves over to the conquerors on top of the corpses of their slain husbands, brothers, and sonsIf you are in fact female, you wouldn't know.
In psych studies, women tend to be "fake supportive" of their "friends" while disagreeing with them or making fun of them behind their backs. In addition, women tend to make friends with similar types, like everyone will look the same.
On a personal note, I have seen this countless times. Women in a group will all have the same breast size, looks range, and so forth. Men will have friends of all shapes and sizes.
Men are usually actually supportive of their friends because they will disagree with them and problem solve. Also, men tend to have a variety of friend types and like other guys based on personality.
Men have enduring friendships and women have fake conditional ones.
In psych studies, women tend to be "fake supportive" of their "friends" while disagreeing with them or making fun of them behind their backs. In addition, women tend to make friends with similar types, like everyone will look the same.
On a personal note, I have seen this countless times. Women in a group will all have the same breast size, looks range, and so forth. Men will have friends of all shapes and sizes.
Men are usually actually supportive of their friends because they will disagree with them and problem solve. Also, men tend to have a variety of friend types and like other guys based on personality.
Men have enduring friendships and women have fake conditional ones.
04-05-2019, 08:39 AM
-
#154
- SoutheastBeast1
- Join Date: Mar 2013
- Age: 39
- Posts: 63,763
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 258895
-
-
Originally Posted By Dirtylocks⏩
Disagree. It’s 4 C’sI mean seriously, what are they good for other than smashing your dink and taking care of your kids?
My friend from high school who realized how much of a joke life really is killed himself sadly...but he had it right in my book when he said women are pretty much only good for the 3 Cs...
Cooking.
Cleaning.
Cocksucking/****ing.
Agree? Disagree? Discuss.
My friend from high school who realized how much of a joke life really is killed himself sadly...but he had it right in my book when he said women are pretty much only good for the 3 Cs...
Cooking.
Cleaning.
Cocksucking/****ing.
Agree? Disagree? Discuss.
Childcare
Have some respect god dammit
"One day I won't be able to lift any more. Not I won't want to lift. I mean physically unable. That day could be decades from now or it could be tomorrow. All I know is that's the day I'll wish I could lift more than ever. The day I'd give anything for one more workout, one more set, or one more cardio session. So go hard and enjoy every workout, every set, every rep. Because one day you will wake up and you will never get it back."
-SoutheastBeast1
04-05-2019, 08:43 AM
-
#155
Originally Posted By orangetide⏩
except they literally areWomen arent useless in society.
But they have no place in government or grand decision making.
But they have no place in government or grand decision making.
women were historically relegated to household duties because men of those times knew that women are a NET NEGATIVE for productivity, they are literally a burden to have in the workforce so better to have them away at home so they cause as little damage as possible to society
i mean an example of how useless women are is just look at cooking which is supposedly a female's domain and yet all the best chefs in the world are men lmfao
04-05-2019, 08:49 AM
-
#156
04-05-2019, 09:08 AM
-
#157
04-05-2019, 09:30 AM
-
#158
- Jimmehhh
- Registered User
-
- Jimmehhh
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2015
- Age: 37
- Posts: 6,669
- Rep Power: 37547
-
-
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
lolI am in fact female, and let me tell you.
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
brb reading the survivor/naked and afraid post about how resourceful and useful women tend to be.Men have a tendency to want to fix problems by talking and offering solutions, women roll up their sleeves and pitch in unasked. They also have the ability to listen and empathise until you reach your own solution
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
Yeah women are known for their wit. Women are great at empathizing.... with other women or with men whose well being directly impacts themselves.Women areuproariously funny, and yeah we laugh about men and your various incompetences amongst other things, supportive, stimulating and life enhancing.
Women are inherently selfish. It had to be this way for the human race to survive and thrive. There is a reason why 80% women managed to procreate vs only 40% of men, women are hardwired to ignore men's issues and act in women's best interests. Women are cut throat af and that's ok. It is what it is, and men throughout human history knew this and women were treated accordingly.
What's not ok is society lying to us and telling us otherwise, telling us women are "better" or more "virtuous" than men or that women's issues are super important and warrant chit loads of air time whilst men's issues are ignored or ridiculed.
The "hatred" for women doesn't come from a place of sexism, it comes from a place of being sick and tired of the MSM and society constantly telling you how difficult women have it and how much better they are than you whilst they live life on easy mode as they slowly destroy our civilization with their solipsism.
....Atlas.....
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
"It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers-out of unorthodoxy." - George Orwell, 1984
LTC is the only heterosexual way.
04-05-2019, 09:36 AM
-
#159
- Jaybrahh
- Registered User
-
- Jaybrahh
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Age: 36
- Posts: 1,553
- Rep Power: 5356
-
-
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
Why do you keep quoting a random number and ignoring the questions?age:29
If you haven’t laid the foundations for a succesful middle adulthood by now at the end of your early adulthood when do you think you’re going to start?
Lmao at ever adolescent
If you haven’t laid the foundations for a succesful middle adulthood by now at the end of your early adulthood when do you think you’re going to start?
Lmao at ever adolescent
Seems like you don't have any arguments to back up what you're saying which essentially means it's just garbage that should be ignored.
☆☆☆MISC BOXING CREW☆☆☆
☆☆Scandinavian Misc Crew☆☆
3
04-05-2019, 09:37 AM
-
#160
- TBO1313
- Never Registered
-
- TBO1313
- Never Registered
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Posts: 28,898
- Rep Power: 342064
-
-
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
The best thought out post in the whole thread.Women as a whole are fine. Saying they are trash is wrong just as putting them on pedestals as precious wonderful pure things is wrong.
The problem with this Red Pill narrative is it’s an overreaction. It’s some cuck who previously went overboard treating women as Godessess and got treated like chit for it, so they “wake up” and blame all women for their own stupidity.
Women are people. Treat them as such and you’ll be fine.
The problem with this Red Pill narrative is it’s an overreaction. It’s some cuck who previously went overboard treating women as Godessess and got treated like chit for it, so they “wake up” and blame all women for their own stupidity.
Women are people. Treat them as such and you’ll be fine.
6'2"
OMAD results: 2/15/19-235, 10/13/19-190
OHP-205 Bench- 245 Squat - 405 C&J - 245
2021 Spring cut: 195lbs starting weight
04-05-2019, 09:42 AM
-
#161
- TBO1313
- Never Registered
-
- TBO1313
- Never Registered
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Posts: 28,898
- Rep Power: 342064
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Funny you bring up the bell curve with regards to intelligence because the graph looks different for both women and men. Men have a much flatter curve with more outliers at both ends and women tend to of more average intelligence. In simpler terms there are a lot more geniuses and retards that are menHumans are on a bell curve of intelligence and that determines who you will find in life.
6'2"
OMAD results: 2/15/19-235, 10/13/19-190
OHP-205 Bench- 245 Squat - 405 C&J - 245
2021 Spring cut: 195lbs starting weight
04-05-2019, 09:48 AM
-
#162
- severagee
- Registered User
-
- severagee
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2018
- Age: 56
- Posts: 1,529
- Rep Power: 16879
-
-
Hm.
I'd disagree. It means you haven't found the right women, and if you honestly believe what you said then I do feel sorry for you.
I 100% agree that many women (especially in college) say absolutely nothing of substance and seem to have no hobbies apart from drinking and partying and getting attention, but I've also met and talked to a few really intelligent women who have completely changed my worldview about things. Also in general, conversations I've had with close female friends/girlfriends are considerably deeper than the ones I've had with my male friends. They've helped me mature a lot, in a more grounded way than dudes have. Most of my closest friends are dudes, but we're generally just talking about relatively superficial things and insulting each other/trying to make each other laugh.
I'd disagree. It means you haven't found the right women, and if you honestly believe what you said then I do feel sorry for you.
I 100% agree that many women (especially in college) say absolutely nothing of substance and seem to have no hobbies apart from drinking and partying and getting attention, but I've also met and talked to a few really intelligent women who have completely changed my worldview about things. Also in general, conversations I've had with close female friends/girlfriends are considerably deeper than the ones I've had with my male friends. They've helped me mature a lot, in a more grounded way than dudes have. Most of my closest friends are dudes, but we're generally just talking about relatively superficial things and insulting each other/trying to make each other laugh.
Dental Student crew
04-05-2019, 09:51 AM
-
#163
- Brozart
- dunno
-
- Brozart
- dunno
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Posts: 27,524
- Rep Power: 313692
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
first semi-intelligent and intelligible thing i've seen you post.Women don't think very well in my opinion but they think they're smart. That makes them chaotic and dangerous, like adult children.
I believe that's why women have been "oppressed" over huge periods of time in many places. They are semi-insane.
No one oppressed or tries to kill cute animals on any scale. No one says babies must be locked in rooms. People only attack that which is dangerous and scary.
However, if you have an actually nice woman who is smart, they are good at seeing details men don't typically see. An okay women will help round you out in life making your relationship a team. I know at least one girl like that and she's awesome to have around, but has insane side issues, so there you go!
I believe that's why women have been "oppressed" over huge periods of time in many places. They are semi-insane.
No one oppressed or tries to kill cute animals on any scale. No one says babies must be locked in rooms. People only attack that which is dangerous and scary.
However, if you have an actually nice woman who is smart, they are good at seeing details men don't typically see. An okay women will help round you out in life making your relationship a team. I know at least one girl like that and she's awesome to have around, but has insane side issues, so there you go!
not saying that everything in the post makes sense or that i agree entirely, but it's somewhat reasonable.
fukn Brozart
I'm a hugger
04-05-2019, 09:57 AM
-
#164
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By Cass40⏩
Exceptions don't disprove a rule.My best friend has done so much for me. When I went back to Finland, she had arranged a place for me to stay. She had asked around her friends who were taking vacations that time and were able to rent me a cheap place. Also, she did tons of stuff for me when my parents died. Actually could never name all the things.
Haha, it reminds me of something. When I was about 19, I loved the show "Dallas", and when they showed the final episode, she had a party for me, and had baked 2 cakes. So big things and little things.
Edit: life would be worthless without female friends.
Haha, it reminds me of something. When I was about 19, I loved the show "Dallas", and when they showed the final episode, she had a party for me, and had baked 2 cakes. So big things and little things.
Edit: life would be worthless without female friends.
I have done lots of things to help people and have gone out of my way many times. Lots of these times they were for strangers.
There's lots of nice people but they don't represent the majority who tend to display "traits" and trends in behavior.
When having discussions about life, that's what we're talking about, not that "one person you know" who doesn't fit.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
04-05-2019, 09:59 AM
-
#165
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By TBO1313⏩
I was referring to all of humanity, but that's still interesting and speaks to my point.Funny you bring up the bell curve with regards to intelligence because the graph looks different for both women and men. Men have a much flatter curve with more outliers at both ends and women tend to of more average intelligence. In simpler terms there are a lot more geniuses and retards that are men
If there tend to be many below and above average men both groups will have trouble with average women. So, there will be a lot of frustration.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
04-05-2019, 10:01 AM
-
#166
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
I'd outmatch you any day.LOL you're such a pseudo intellectual I can't even read your posts
there are significant amounts of psych papers on the gender differences around emotional support. none of whixh support your oft repeated crap
how on earth do you figure you have more life experience than me? LMFAO no
wanna match education, careers and professional success, travel and relationships?
bitch please
there are significant amounts of psych papers on the gender differences around emotional support. none of whixh support your oft repeated crap
how on earth do you figure you have more life experience than me? LMFAO no
wanna match education, careers and professional success, travel and relationships?
bitch please
That's not always a good thing either.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
04-05-2019, 10:03 AM
-
#167
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By alltrapbrah⏩
Thanks buddy, but a handshake will do.TheAdlerian is legit the most interesting poster to ever grace the misc.
Will fully admit i'm a nut huggin' *******, but he deserves it.
Will fully admit i'm a nut huggin' *******, but he deserves it.
No need to go near the nuts.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
04-05-2019, 10:12 AM
-
#168
- ChristianMR
- domo arigato
-
- ChristianMR
- domo arigato
- Join Date: Nov 2015
- Posts: 8,187
- Rep Power: 95385
-
-
Originally Posted By Brozart⏩
first semi-intelligent and intelligible thing i've seen you post.
not saying that everything in the post makes sense or that i agree entirely, but it's somewhat reasonable.
not saying that everything in the post makes sense or that i agree entirely, but it's somewhat reasonable.
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Lol'ing at the juxtoposition of these two posts. (Not that I even remotely agree with TheAdlerian's post).Exceptions don't disprove a rule.
Take it easy Christian
04-05-2019, 10:39 AM
-
#169
04-05-2019, 10:48 AM
-
#170
- maverickTT1
- strong arms brah
-
- maverickTT1
- strong arms brah
- Join Date: Apr 2009
- Posts: 5,155
- Rep Power: 11343
-
-
Originally Posted By Jimmehhh⏩
Repped on recharge👏Yeah women are known for their wit. Women are great at empathizing.... with other women or with men whose well being directly impacts themselves.
Women are inherently selfish. It had to be this way for the human race to survive and thrive. There is a reason why 80% women managed to procreate vs only 40% of men, women are hardwired to ignore men's issues and act in women's best interests. Women are cut throat af and that's ok. It is what it is, and men throughout human history knew this and women were treated accordingly.
What's not ok is society lying to us and telling us otherwise, telling us women are "better" or more "virtuous" than men or that women's issues are super important and warrant chit loads of air time whilst men's issues are ignored or ridiculed.
The "hatred" for women doesn't come from a place of sexism, it comes from a place of being sick and tired of the MSM and society constantly telling you how difficult women have it and how much better they are than you whilst they live life on easy mode as they slowly destroy our civilization with their solipsism.
Women are inherently selfish. It had to be this way for the human race to survive and thrive. There is a reason why 80% women managed to procreate vs only 40% of men, women are hardwired to ignore men's issues and act in women's best interests. Women are cut throat af and that's ok. It is what it is, and men throughout human history knew this and women were treated accordingly.
What's not ok is society lying to us and telling us otherwise, telling us women are "better" or more "virtuous" than men or that women's issues are super important and warrant chit loads of air time whilst men's issues are ignored or ridiculed.
The "hatred" for women doesn't come from a place of sexism, it comes from a place of being sick and tired of the MSM and society constantly telling you how difficult women have it and how much better they are than you whilst they live life on easy mode as they slowly destroy our civilization with their solipsism.
04-05-2019, 11:08 AM
-
#171
- nosirrahx
- Registered User
-
- nosirrahx
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2013
- Location: United States
- Age: 51
- Posts: 14,623
- Rep Power: 106507
-
-
The uselessness of the ones that are useless is getting worse which makes that part look like its growing faster than it is.
Eat in a deficit to lose weight.
Hit your protein and fat minimums to stay healthy and keep your gainz.
Lift heavy and do HIIT to look and feel awesome.
Use the internet to learn why you should do these things and how to do these things.
04-05-2019, 11:16 AM
-
#172
04-05-2019, 11:32 AM
-
#173
- Brozart
- dunno
-
- Brozart
- dunno
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Posts: 27,524
- Rep Power: 313692
-
-
Originally Posted By ChristianMR⏩
LmaoLol'ing at the juxtoposition of these two posts. (Not that I even remotely agree with TheAdlerian's post).
I am so bewildered by how some people seem to think he's some kind of intellectual - half the time he can't even write a sentence that makes sense. I'm curious about what the "novel" in his signature is like.
fukn Brozart
I'm a hugger
04-05-2019, 11:41 AM
-
#174
- Scarrdbutsmartr
- Registered User
-
- Scarrdbutsmartr
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Posts: 20,492
- Rep Power: 93529
-
-
Originally Posted By Jimmehhh⏩
^^^This is the root of the problem to me and I mentioned it in an earlier thread. I think you made a solid point when you referenced survival. I think women had to implement a philosophy of selfishness and manipulation to survive in an environment that looks nothing like the current time.Women are inherently selfish.
My challenge is that men have been expected to change with the times and women are still afforded the luxury of their survival instincts.
...at the end of the day I dont enjoy hanging out with anyone that seeks to put themselves first.
04-05-2019, 11:44 AM
-
#175
In the 100,000s + years of evolution, women are the probably the most affected by genetic bottle necking. Far too many variables affect their outcome.
Women are more evolved than men. Everything they do and surrounds them affects the proliferation of their tribe. Many men could fail their genetic bloodlines, but, women need to always perform at least to an average in every generation. While being average seems like nothing, it is an extreme check, force and pressure put onto women. This is why women are more average based, and men are more diverse in intelligence/stupidity.
Stratification in biology, is where you take 1000s of seeds, put them all in a naturally hostile environment that kills 80% of them, and then let them all grow. After they sprout, you kill another 80% of them, until you have only a few sprouts to work with. Men's reproductive nature is stratified in alot of ways, and makes it seemingly impossible to reach that max reproductive performance(ie ghengis khan)... but, its easier on the mind of men, since they are not really aware of what is going on... until they're too old to see what is happening across generations. Women need that stratification when times are tough, and are entirely unable to function naturally without it in harsh conditions.
There is this thing in biology called apoptosis. It means programmed cell-death, for the benefit of the whole or host. Every ovulated egg, is a potential expansion for their tribe, which in turn is more potential protection for the species. When the majority of ovulations fail to reproduce, it is a waste of resources(which would of been used 1,000s of years ago). It is an uncompetitive nature when the there is the ample supply to produce offspring, yet, fail to do even basic self-replacement. Women, world wide, have never in history had something like this ever happen to them.
So, almost all women these days are going through some of the most intense selective pressure that has ever existed for the human species. Where the vast majority of their eggs are being forced into the state apoptosis. It's almost as if women are bleeding into the evolutionary plane of Men, and being forced into the extreme state of reproductive stratification... when they're most adapted and evolved to meet a basic attributes of survival. What is worse for them, is that, the farther up that one sees themselves in our hierarchies... the more exponential this pressure becomes. Whereas the higher up for men, the less extreme this pressure becomes.
I don't see how anyone can see women enduring such an extreme state/process, and can label them as useless... it doesn't make any sense. I know for a fact that women can; find things better, organize better, stronger ability to stay focused on the mundane, stronger focus on necessities, adapt for survival better, strong reflective support of the tribe and most importantly linked to... cultivating social-capital at much greater potential than males can... which is an extremely useful tool for males on the higher-intellect/individualist side. Anyone who thinks that this is useless, is either an unthinking animal or a dead end.
Women are more evolved than men. Everything they do and surrounds them affects the proliferation of their tribe. Many men could fail their genetic bloodlines, but, women need to always perform at least to an average in every generation. While being average seems like nothing, it is an extreme check, force and pressure put onto women. This is why women are more average based, and men are more diverse in intelligence/stupidity.
Stratification in biology, is where you take 1000s of seeds, put them all in a naturally hostile environment that kills 80% of them, and then let them all grow. After they sprout, you kill another 80% of them, until you have only a few sprouts to work with. Men's reproductive nature is stratified in alot of ways, and makes it seemingly impossible to reach that max reproductive performance(ie ghengis khan)... but, its easier on the mind of men, since they are not really aware of what is going on... until they're too old to see what is happening across generations. Women need that stratification when times are tough, and are entirely unable to function naturally without it in harsh conditions.
There is this thing in biology called apoptosis. It means programmed cell-death, for the benefit of the whole or host. Every ovulated egg, is a potential expansion for their tribe, which in turn is more potential protection for the species. When the majority of ovulations fail to reproduce, it is a waste of resources(which would of been used 1,000s of years ago). It is an uncompetitive nature when the there is the ample supply to produce offspring, yet, fail to do even basic self-replacement. Women, world wide, have never in history had something like this ever happen to them.
So, almost all women these days are going through some of the most intense selective pressure that has ever existed for the human species. Where the vast majority of their eggs are being forced into the state apoptosis. It's almost as if women are bleeding into the evolutionary plane of Men, and being forced into the extreme state of reproductive stratification... when they're most adapted and evolved to meet a basic attributes of survival. What is worse for them, is that, the farther up that one sees themselves in our hierarchies... the more exponential this pressure becomes. Whereas the higher up for men, the less extreme this pressure becomes.
I don't see how anyone can see women enduring such an extreme state/process, and can label them as useless... it doesn't make any sense. I know for a fact that women can; find things better, organize better, stronger ability to stay focused on the mundane, stronger focus on necessities, adapt for survival better, strong reflective support of the tribe and most importantly linked to... cultivating social-capital at much greater potential than males can... which is an extremely useful tool for males on the higher-intellect/individualist side. Anyone who thinks that this is useless, is either an unthinking animal or a dead end.
04-05-2019, 12:57 PM
-
#176
- irmocool
- oderint dum metuant
-
- irmocool
- oderint dum metuant
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Posts: 10,673
- Rep Power: 43294
-
-
Originally Posted By PaulG⏩
Women are more evolved then men, gtfo. Women are inherently more primitive then men because of everything you stated. They are willing to throw anything and anyone under the bus in order to get the best "genes". Dont ever say something so stupid againIn the 100,000s + years of evolution, women are the probably the most affected by genetic bottle necking. Far too many variables affect their outcome.
Women are more evolved than men. Everything they do and surrounds them affects the proliferation of their tribe. Many men could fail their genetic bloodlines, but, women need to always perform at least to an average in every generation. While being average seems like nothing, it is an extreme check, force and pressure put onto women. This is why women are more average based, and men are more diverse in intelligence/stupidity.
Stratification in biology, is where you take 1000s of seeds, put them all in a naturally hostile environment that kills 80% of them, and then let them all grow. After they sprout, you kill another 80% of them, until you have only a few sprouts to work with. Men's reproductive nature is stratified in alot of ways, and makes it seemingly impossible to reach that max reproductive performance(ie ghengis khan)... but, its easier on the mind of men, since they are not really aware of what is going on... until they're too old to see what is happening across generations. Women need that stratification when times are tough, and are entirely unable to function naturally without it in harsh conditions.
There is this thing in biology called apoptosis. It means programmed cell-death, for the benefit of the whole or host. Every ovulated egg, is a potential expansion for their tribe, which in turn is more potential protection for the species. When the majority of ovulations fail to reproduce, it is a waste of resources(which would of been used 1,000s of years ago). It is an uncompetitive nature when the there is the ample supply to produce offspring, yet, fail to do even basic self-replacement. Women, world wide, have never in history had something like this ever happen to them.
So, almost all women these days are going through some of the most intense selective pressure that has ever existed for the human species. Where the vast majority of their eggs are being forced into the state apoptosis. It's almost as if women are bleeding into the evolutionary plane of Men, and being forced into the extreme state of reproductive stratification... when they're most adapted and evolved to meet a basic attributes of survival. What is worse for them, is that, the farther up that one sees themselves in our hierarchies... the more exponential this pressure becomes. Whereas the higher up for men, the less extreme this pressure becomes.
I don't see how anyone can see women enduring such an extreme state/process, and can label them as useless... it doesn't make any sense. I know for a fact that women can; find things better, organize better, stronger ability to stay focused on the mundane, stronger focus on necessities, adapt for survival better, strong reflective support of the tribe and most importantly linked to... cultivating social-capital at much greater potential than males can... which is an extremely useful tool for males on the higher-intellect/individualist side. Anyone who thinks that this is useless, is either an unthinking animal or a dead end.
Women are more evolved than men. Everything they do and surrounds them affects the proliferation of their tribe. Many men could fail their genetic bloodlines, but, women need to always perform at least to an average in every generation. While being average seems like nothing, it is an extreme check, force and pressure put onto women. This is why women are more average based, and men are more diverse in intelligence/stupidity.
Stratification in biology, is where you take 1000s of seeds, put them all in a naturally hostile environment that kills 80% of them, and then let them all grow. After they sprout, you kill another 80% of them, until you have only a few sprouts to work with. Men's reproductive nature is stratified in alot of ways, and makes it seemingly impossible to reach that max reproductive performance(ie ghengis khan)... but, its easier on the mind of men, since they are not really aware of what is going on... until they're too old to see what is happening across generations. Women need that stratification when times are tough, and are entirely unable to function naturally without it in harsh conditions.
There is this thing in biology called apoptosis. It means programmed cell-death, for the benefit of the whole or host. Every ovulated egg, is a potential expansion for their tribe, which in turn is more potential protection for the species. When the majority of ovulations fail to reproduce, it is a waste of resources(which would of been used 1,000s of years ago). It is an uncompetitive nature when the there is the ample supply to produce offspring, yet, fail to do even basic self-replacement. Women, world wide, have never in history had something like this ever happen to them.
So, almost all women these days are going through some of the most intense selective pressure that has ever existed for the human species. Where the vast majority of their eggs are being forced into the state apoptosis. It's almost as if women are bleeding into the evolutionary plane of Men, and being forced into the extreme state of reproductive stratification... when they're most adapted and evolved to meet a basic attributes of survival. What is worse for them, is that, the farther up that one sees themselves in our hierarchies... the more exponential this pressure becomes. Whereas the higher up for men, the less extreme this pressure becomes.
I don't see how anyone can see women enduring such an extreme state/process, and can label them as useless... it doesn't make any sense. I know for a fact that women can; find things better, organize better, stronger ability to stay focused on the mundane, stronger focus on necessities, adapt for survival better, strong reflective support of the tribe and most importantly linked to... cultivating social-capital at much greater potential than males can... which is an extremely useful tool for males on the higher-intellect/individualist side. Anyone who thinks that this is useless, is either an unthinking animal or a dead end.
Why lift when it's all about the jawline ©
04-05-2019, 01:13 PM
-
#177
- Destor
- Registered User
-
- Destor
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2012
- Location: Alberta, Canada
- Age: 41
- Posts: 43,481
- Rep Power: 254906
-
-
Originally Posted By irmocool⏩
There obviously needs to be balance. But if you’re not looking out for #1, you’re doing it wrong. You think any of this chit matters in a century when we’re all dead and everything is riding on the next generation?Women are more evolved then men, gtfo. Women are inherently more primitive then men because of everything you stated. They are willing to throw anything and anyone under the bus in order to get the best "genes". Dont ever say something so stupid again
This is one of many things men can learn from women
04-05-2019, 01:20 PM
-
#178
- x420SwagScopex
- NOT a virgin
-
- x420SwagScopex
- NOT a virgin
- Join Date: Nov 2017
- Posts: 7,833
- Rep Power: 54147
-
-
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
Stop telling men how to be menBeing 30 and acting like an insufferable pubescent is “super lame”
“well on your way” =/= “should have”
“well on your way” =/= “should have”
Smack City crew
04-05-2019, 01:22 PM
-
#179
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
-
- TheAdlerian
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2007
- Posts: 44,596
- Rep Power: 96349
-
-
Originally Posted By irmocool⏩
The evolutionary psychology explanation of women is that they look like and sound like children because men choose "cute" women because it triggers their protective instinct toward kids. So, after millions of years we end up with women who basically stop growing early, look and sound like kids, but have sexual characteristics that indicate they are adults ready to mate.Women are more evolved then men, gtfo. Women are inherently more primitive then men because of everything you stated. They are willing to throw anything and anyone under the bus in order to get the best "genes". Dont ever say something so stupid again
All the guys on here that complain about women should note that the subjects you complain about are the same characteristics people complain about in children.
Kids are noted to be:
1. Cruel.
2. Shallow.
3. Easily impressed by flash.
4. Unreliable.
5. Are changeable and not dedicated.
6. Lack vision.
7. Dangerous.
And, there's lots more.
Regarding white people, they have the biggest difference in the appearance between the sexes. White males are fully adult, on average, meaning they don't have childlike bodily proportions while white females tend to have very childlike qualities.
Blacks tend to to have the most adult bodily proportions. Asians tend to have the most childlike bodily proportions between the sexes. Asians frequently have no, or few, sweat glands, like kids.
This is all due to selective breeding between these groups of people over a huge amount of time. So, if bodies are affected by mating choices, then the whole package between the sexes will be affected and that means behavior. It's certainly not PC to say it but the above seems true to me and so women aren't more evolved they are actually stunted in growth and development.
I believe this is why many cultures oppress women. The same thing is done to women as is done to children. They're kept at home, not allowed to make complex choices, contracts, voting, etc. This of course is terrible for advanced intelligent women.
In the US we are strongly influenced by the philosopher, Kant, who believe that since nothing really matters, we must pretend it does. All people aren't created equal, and we know it, but we pretend like they are. This creates chaos because there are stupid groups of people, inbred groups, and so forth but we pretend there aren't.
If you want to ask me a question:
Ask: TheAdlerian
http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043
Read my science fiction novel:
http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
04-05-2019, 01:35 PM
-
#180
- ChristianMR
- domo arigato
-
- ChristianMR
- domo arigato
- Join Date: Nov 2015
- Posts: 8,187
- Rep Power: 95385
-
-
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Neoteny can't affect women without also affecting men, dummy. Women aren't a seperate species.Stupid pseudoscience from the misc's most irritating pseudointellectual.
Take it easy Christian
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts