Forum
»
Elon Musk getting ready to post the Hunter Biden cover up story
Elon Musk getting ready to post the Hunter Biden cover up story
12-05-2022, 05:47 PM
-
#151
- Audioslave
- Registered User
-
- Audioslave
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 5,222
- Rep Power: 18763
-
-
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
How do you know they lied? They made an extremely blanket statement that foreign actors might drop some hacked materials - that's not a lie.LOL Wut?
FBI lied to them about the nature of the laptop!!!
LIED!!
How is this an insane conspiracy theory?
You are fuсking nuts!
FBI lied to them about the nature of the laptop!!!
LIED!!
How is this an insane conspiracy theory?
You are fuсking nuts!
Did they specify foreign actors hacked Hunter Biden's laptop? No.
Did they warn them not to disseminate any articles related to his laptop? No.
Would there be repercussions if they did disseminate the NY Post article even if the information was hacked by a foreign government? No.
Even other Twitter personnel admitted that it had nothing to do with the material being hacked or any meeting with the FBI. It was a conscious effort done internally by Twitter... likely with the thought of swaying the election. But the rest is a CT.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
12-05-2022, 05:57 PM
-
#152
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
He should go work at Twitter so they can finally get the correct story out there lol.OP still a massive retard I see. Fukin lol at how frantic he sounds ITT. The midterms and Trump’s campaign already falling apart has caused him to totally lose it.
12-05-2022, 06:16 PM
-
#153
- yabbayabba
- Join Date: Jun 2005
- Location: Burning down the belt warehouse
- Posts: 19,040
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 157908
-
-
Amazing how the 68 IQ crew "doesn't care because Hunter isn't president" but goes to great lengths to defend him. That p3do defending p3do group think in action.
12-05-2022, 06:28 PM
-
#154
- gwg77
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,584
- Subscribers: 20
- Rep Power: 1103815
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Of course they lied. They knew the laptop story was coming out in October, they had Rudy G under surveillance. Do I need to remind you that the FBI had a copy of the laptop since 2019? They knew exactly what would be released and the origins of where it came from.How do you know they lied? They made an extremely blanket statement that foreign actors might drop some hacked materials - that's not a lie.
Is Rudy G a foreign actor? No
Did Rudy G obtain the laptop from a foreign actor? No
Was the laptop hacked?No
Did the FBI know all this?Yes
Did the FBI lie?Yes
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Yes, they indeed specified that it would be a state (foreign) actor that would be involved in a "hacked-and-leaked operation related to Hunter Biden. Did you want the FBI to share with Twitter that they knew it was specifically a laptop because they had Rudy G under surveillance? Just Lol.Did they specify foreign actors hacked Hunter Biden's laptop? No.
Read again:
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
That is the entire point of them meeting weekly, not to disseminate foreign "hacked-and-leaked operations."Did they warn them not to disseminate any articles related to his laptop? No.
And yes, they did warn them that there would a Hunter Biden "hacked-and-leaked operation" by state actors - which was a lie.
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Do you need no repercussions from the FBI to absolve the FBI from any involvement?NoWould there be repercussions if they did disseminate the NY Post article even if the information was hacked by a foreign government? No.
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Wut? The sole basis for it being censored was for being "hacked materials" and violating their hacked materials policy.Even other Twitter personnel admitted that it had nothing to do with the material being hacked or any meeting with the FBI.It was a conscious effort done internally by Twitter... likely with the thought of swaying the election. But the rest is a CT.
Furthermore, no one has ever said it had nothing to do with meeting with the FBI.
Initially, I had made the mistake of misinterpreting this Taibbi tweet # 22 below. It is a poorly worded tweet. As you can see, Taibbi was talking about no evidence of government involvement in obtaining the laptop, or no foreign hacking of the laptop. NOT no government involvement of twitter censoring the laptop story.
12-05-2022, 06:43 PM
-
#155
- Phil9
- Registered User
-
- Phil9
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Age: 39
- Posts: 27,396
- Rep Power: 35470
-
-
Originally Posted By yabbayabba⏩
Shut up, fatty.Amazing how the 68 IQ crew "doesn't care because Hunter isn't president" but goes to great lengths to defend him. That p3do defending p3do group think in action.
12-05-2022, 06:54 PM
-
#156
- XterraRob
- Pattern Recognizer
-
- XterraRob
- Pattern Recognizer
- Join Date: Jun 2008
- Location: Tempe, Arizona, United States
- Posts: 40,898
- Rep Power: 400768
-
-
How much bleach do I need to drink to be as stupid as a Liberal?
The Era of Great Noticing has begun.
Modern liberalism is morally bankrupt and demonic.
Right wing politics is the new counter-culture.
Wincel: "I'm saying even the govt of China, while brutal at times, is NOT our enemy. Period."
Has Beowulf10 ever experienced true love? Where did he go?
Education is humanity's key to salvation.
The 2nd Cold War has begun.
12-05-2022, 07:03 PM
-
#157
- whogotmuhbeers
- Registered User
-
- whogotmuhbeers
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Age: 56
- Posts: 9,466
- Rep Power: 34430
-
-
Originally Posted By XterraRob⏩
Gallon of bleach and 2/3s bag of tide pods should do it.How much bleach do I need to drink to be as stupid as a Liberal?
12-05-2022, 07:38 PM
-
#158
- gwg77
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,584
- Subscribers: 20
- Rep Power: 1103815
-
-
@Audioslave
And if you think it's a conspiracy theory that the feds were spying on Rudy G, here is an August 2021 article that says they were spying on his iCloud since 2019 with a covert warrant, without his knowledge.
And if you think it's a conspiracy theory that the feds were spying on Rudy G, here is an August 2021 article that says they were spying on his iCloud since 2019 with a covert warrant, without his knowledge.
A lawyer for former New York City mayor and Donald Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said the Justice Department revealed on a Thursday conference call that the feds had penetrated Giuliani’s iCloud long before Wednesday’s search warrants were executed.
“I was told about it today in a conference call with the [U.S.] Attorney’s office,” attorney Robert Costello, a longtime friend of Giuliani’s, told The Daily Beast on Thursday night. “They told me they obtained a ‘covert warrant’ for Giuliani’s iCloud account in ‘late 2019.’ They have reviewed this information for a year and a half without telling us or [fellow Trump-aligned attorney] Victoria Toensing.”
...
Such accounts can store photos, text messages, emails, and a range of data from an Apple device’s applications, depending on the user’s settings.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/feds-g...19-lawyer-says“I was told about it today in a conference call with the [U.S.] Attorney’s office,” attorney Robert Costello, a longtime friend of Giuliani’s, told The Daily Beast on Thursday night. “They told me they obtained a ‘covert warrant’ for Giuliani’s iCloud account in ‘late 2019.’ They have reviewed this information for a year and a half without telling us or [fellow Trump-aligned attorney] Victoria Toensing.”
...
Such accounts can store photos, text messages, emails, and a range of data from an Apple device’s applications, depending on the user’s settings.
12-05-2022, 07:50 PM
-
#159
- gwg77
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,584
- Subscribers: 20
- Rep Power: 1103815
-
-
@Audioslave
Perfect timing, NY post just released this story:
FBI’s fake ‘warnings’ about our Hunter story were clearly a coverup to aid Joe Biden
Perfect timing, NY post just released this story:
FBI’s fake ‘warnings’ about our Hunter story were clearly a coverup to aid Joe Biden
Talk about spreading “disinfo”! As The Post’s Miranda Devine reports, the FBI specifically warned Twitter to expect a “hack-and-leak” operation by “state actors” involving Hunter Biden, likely in October 2020, a key Twitter official says in a sworn declaration — even though the agency knew very well that info floating around about him was 100% legitimate.
Could evidence of an FBI coverup be any stronger?
The information came from Hunter’s laptop, which the agency itself had in its possession since 2019, a year before it issued its warnings.
And the FBI knew the laptop was legit, because in December 2019 it visited the owner of the repair shop where Hunter had abandoned it and verified its authenticity. (It even reportedly got its hands on a second Hunter laptop later, though as part of an unrelated investigation.)
Why were agents suggesting that info involving Hunter might be the work of “state actors” when the FBI knew darn well it wasn’t? Clearly, the goal was to nudge Twitter and others to squelch news that might damage Joe Biden’s election chances.
In a December 2020 sworn declaration, Twitter’s former head of site integrity Yoel Roth told the Federal Election Commission that agents warned him “individuals associated with political campaigns” were “subject to hacking attacks” and culprits would likely try to disseminate hacked info “over social media platforms.” Roth said they noted rumors that “a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden.”
Sure enough, when The Post ran its Oct. 14, 2020, scoop about Hunter’s laptop, Twitter immediately censored it, citing its “hacked materials” policy. The Post’s story revealed emails exposing Hunter’s shady foreign deals, including millions that went to Bidens.
Agents might’ve even known The Post was about to publish its scoop, since the FBI had been spying on Rudy Giuliani and had access to his emails. Some of them mentioned the laptop material and a discussion with Devine about when the paper would run the story.The (fake) warnings clearly had the desired effect.
This was the second time in four years that FBI agents spread disinfo in an apparent attempt to meddle in a presidential election: Recall that in 2016, they used the Clinton-campaign-funded Steele dossier, which they’d already discredited, as the basis for surveillance to probe supposed Trump campaign-Russia collusion.
And it turns out some of the people who got the media to suppress our Hunter story have ties to Russiagate names: Supervisory Special Agent Elvis Chan, for example, admits that before the 2020 election he organized weekly meetings with ********, which also limited access to our story. Chan was an acquaintance of Twitter counsel James Baker, who before that was a top FBI lawyer involved in the Russia-collusion plots, and also worked with fiercely anti-Trump FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
https://nypost.com/2022/12/05/fbis-f...aid-joe-biden/Could evidence of an FBI coverup be any stronger?
The information came from Hunter’s laptop, which the agency itself had in its possession since 2019, a year before it issued its warnings.
And the FBI knew the laptop was legit, because in December 2019 it visited the owner of the repair shop where Hunter had abandoned it and verified its authenticity. (It even reportedly got its hands on a second Hunter laptop later, though as part of an unrelated investigation.)
Why were agents suggesting that info involving Hunter might be the work of “state actors” when the FBI knew darn well it wasn’t? Clearly, the goal was to nudge Twitter and others to squelch news that might damage Joe Biden’s election chances.
In a December 2020 sworn declaration, Twitter’s former head of site integrity Yoel Roth told the Federal Election Commission that agents warned him “individuals associated with political campaigns” were “subject to hacking attacks” and culprits would likely try to disseminate hacked info “over social media platforms.” Roth said they noted rumors that “a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden.”
Sure enough, when The Post ran its Oct. 14, 2020, scoop about Hunter’s laptop, Twitter immediately censored it, citing its “hacked materials” policy. The Post’s story revealed emails exposing Hunter’s shady foreign deals, including millions that went to Bidens.
Agents might’ve even known The Post was about to publish its scoop, since the FBI had been spying on Rudy Giuliani and had access to his emails. Some of them mentioned the laptop material and a discussion with Devine about when the paper would run the story.The (fake) warnings clearly had the desired effect.
This was the second time in four years that FBI agents spread disinfo in an apparent attempt to meddle in a presidential election: Recall that in 2016, they used the Clinton-campaign-funded Steele dossier, which they’d already discredited, as the basis for surveillance to probe supposed Trump campaign-Russia collusion.
And it turns out some of the people who got the media to suppress our Hunter story have ties to Russiagate names: Supervisory Special Agent Elvis Chan, for example, admits that before the 2020 election he organized weekly meetings with ********, which also limited access to our story. Chan was an acquaintance of Twitter counsel James Baker, who before that was a top FBI lawyer involved in the Russia-collusion plots, and also worked with fiercely anti-Trump FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.
12-05-2022, 08:36 PM
-
#160
- vickissick07
- Registered User
-
- vickissick07
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2008
- Age: 42
- Posts: 7,713
- Rep Power: 59099
-
-
In the last 4 years the terms conspiracy theorist and racist have lost absolutely all meaning.
12-05-2022, 08:49 PM
-
#161
- NitrogenWidget
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 43,261
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 349299
-
-
12-05-2022, 09:29 PM
-
#162
- gwg77
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,584
- Subscribers: 20
- Rep Power: 1103815
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
They could have actively disseminated it as much as they wanted and they made a conscious effort not to. Was it to affect the election? Yes, of course I believe that. Because they met with the FBI? No that just seems like another insane conspiracy theory with no substance.
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Excerpt from letter sent by Twitter's attorney to the FEC.Even other Twitter personnel admitted that it had nothing to do with the material being hacked or any meeting with the FBI.It was a conscious effort done internally by Twitter... likely with the thought of swaying the election. But the rest is a CT.
Brutal.
https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7821/7821_07.pdf
12-05-2022, 09:36 PM
-
#163
12-05-2022, 10:26 PM
-
#164
- yabbayabba
- Join Date: Jun 2005
- Location: Burning down the belt warehouse
- Posts: 19,040
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 157908
-
-
Originally Posted By XterraRob⏩
Stupid enough to think that Philtard is a good poster.How much bleach do I need to drink to be as stupid as a Liberal?
12-05-2022, 10:47 PM
-
#165
12-05-2022, 11:27 PM
-
#166
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Omg, the forums obsession with Biden's laptop is beyond unhealthy.
Like I said back in 2020 to anyone who brings up the laptop:
1. What role does Hunter have in the government? What role is he doing?
2. Does he go to meetings on behalf of the US government?
3. Have the Trump kids done all the same chit too?
WRT to the last one, yes, they have. Trump put his family in paid positions on cabinet. He put Ivanka and Jared in key positions with no experience. Ivanka used her position to get rich. And of course we hear nothing from the hypocritical right.
Twitter blocked the stupid NYPost story because of their policy regarding hacked materials, despite them being unsure if the materials were hacked.
Ro Khanna doesn't understand how free speech works and claims that Twitters decision is a violation of the First Amendment. End of story.
Why you guys can't read between the lines with this chit is a testament to your stupidity and gullibility. Musk wants to get engagement on Twitter and ensure DeSantis gets into office, and this is his way of swaying public opinion. The tools were available democrats and republicans. So why not share what Trump's administration asked to be removed?
Like I said back in 2020 to anyone who brings up the laptop:
1. What role does Hunter have in the government? What role is he doing?
2. Does he go to meetings on behalf of the US government?
3. Have the Trump kids done all the same chit too?
WRT to the last one, yes, they have. Trump put his family in paid positions on cabinet. He put Ivanka and Jared in key positions with no experience. Ivanka used her position to get rich. And of course we hear nothing from the hypocritical right.
Twitter blocked the stupid NYPost story because of their policy regarding hacked materials, despite them being unsure if the materials were hacked.
Ro Khanna doesn't understand how free speech works and claims that Twitters decision is a violation of the First Amendment. End of story.
Why you guys can't read between the lines with this chit is a testament to your stupidity and gullibility. Musk wants to get engagement on Twitter and ensure DeSantis gets into office, and this is his way of swaying public opinion. The tools were available democrats and republicans. So why not share what Trump's administration asked to be removed?
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
12-06-2022, 12:18 AM
-
#167
- pondus_levo
- mic dropper
-
- pondus_levo
- mic dropper
- Join Date: Oct 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 24,811
- Rep Power: 163138
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Did you even read the story? Twitter exes were warned that it was a 1st amendment issue. They KNEW it wasn't hacked, but PRETENDED like they didn't know.Omg, the forums obsession with Biden's laptop is beyond unhealthy.
Like I said back in 2020 to anyone who brings up the laptop:
1. What role does Hunter have in the government? What role is he doing?
2. Does he go to meetings on behalf of the US government?
3. Have the Trump kids done all the same chit too?
WRT to the last one, yes, they have. Trump put his family in paid positions on cabinet. He put Ivanka and Jared in key positions with no experience. Ivanka used her position to get rich. And of course we hear nothing from the hypocritical right.
Twitter blocked the stupid NYPost story because of their policy regarding hacked materials, despite them being unsure if the materials were hacked.
Ro Khanna doesn't understand how free speech works and claims that Twitters decision is a violation of the First Amendment. End of story.
Why you guys can't read between the lines with this chit is a testament to your stupidity and gullibility. Musk wants to get engagement on Twitter and ensure DeSantis gets into office, and this is his way of swaying public opinion. The tools were available democrats and republicans. So why not share what Trump's administration asked to be removed?
Like I said back in 2020 to anyone who brings up the laptop:
1. What role does Hunter have in the government? What role is he doing?
2. Does he go to meetings on behalf of the US government?
3. Have the Trump kids done all the same chit too?
WRT to the last one, yes, they have. Trump put his family in paid positions on cabinet. He put Ivanka and Jared in key positions with no experience. Ivanka used her position to get rich. And of course we hear nothing from the hypocritical right.
Twitter blocked the stupid NYPost story because of their policy regarding hacked materials, despite them being unsure if the materials were hacked.
Ro Khanna doesn't understand how free speech works and claims that Twitters decision is a violation of the First Amendment. End of story.
Why you guys can't read between the lines with this chit is a testament to your stupidity and gullibility. Musk wants to get engagement on Twitter and ensure DeSantis gets into office, and this is his way of swaying public opinion. The tools were available democrats and republicans. So why not share what Trump's administration asked to be removed?
Has nothing to do with the laptop itself. It's sad that you libs don't care that our government is corrupt.
Forever alone? Attraction and keeping the girl chasing you - http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=131498033
You will never know your limits, unless you push yourself past the imaginary lines you have drawn in the sand.
Knee Dragger - '06 GSX-R750
12-06-2022, 04:55 AM
-
#168
- NitrogenWidget
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 43,261
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 349299
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
racist foreign chit smearer tries to tell Americans what they should and shouldn't care about?Omg, the forums obsession with Biden's laptop is beyond unhealthy.
Like I said back in 2020 to anyone who brings up the laptop:
1. What role does Hunter have in the government? What role is he doing?
2. Does he go to meetings on behalf of the US government?
3. Have the Trump kids done all the same chit too?
WRT to the last one, yes, they have. Trump put his family in paid positions on cabinet. He put Ivanka and Jared in key positions with no experience. Ivanka used her position to get rich. And of course we hear nothing from the hypocritical right.
Twitter blocked the stupid NYPost story because of their policy regarding hacked materials, despite them being unsure if the materials were hacked.
Ro Khanna doesn't understand how free speech works and claims that Twitters decision is a violation of the First Amendment. End of story.
Why you guys can't read between the lines with this chit is a testament to your stupidity and gullibility. Musk wants to get engagement on Twitter and ensure DeSantis gets into office, and this is his way of swaying public opinion. The tools were available democrats and republicans. So why not share what Trump's administration asked to be removed?
Like I said back in 2020 to anyone who brings up the laptop:
1. What role does Hunter have in the government? What role is he doing?
2. Does he go to meetings on behalf of the US government?
3. Have the Trump kids done all the same chit too?
WRT to the last one, yes, they have. Trump put his family in paid positions on cabinet. He put Ivanka and Jared in key positions with no experience. Ivanka used her position to get rich. And of course we hear nothing from the hypocritical right.
Twitter blocked the stupid NYPost story because of their policy regarding hacked materials, despite them being unsure if the materials were hacked.
Ro Khanna doesn't understand how free speech works and claims that Twitters decision is a violation of the First Amendment. End of story.
Why you guys can't read between the lines with this chit is a testament to your stupidity and gullibility. Musk wants to get engagement on Twitter and ensure DeSantis gets into office, and this is his way of swaying public opinion. The tools were available democrats and republicans. So why not share what Trump's administration asked to be removed?
go wash your hands.
degenerate.
12-06-2022, 05:37 AM
-
#169
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By yabbayabba⏩
LMAO!!! Fuking this lololol.Amazing how the 68 IQ crew "doesn't care because Hunter isn't president" but goes to great lengths to defend him. That p3do defending p3do group think in action.
For two years now.. "I don't care about Hunter Biden! He's not president or running for any political office so why should I?"
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
12-06-2022, 05:51 AM
-
#170
12-06-2022, 06:07 AM
-
#171
12-06-2022, 06:20 AM
-
#172
- Audioslave
- Registered User
-
- Audioslave
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 5,222
- Rep Power: 18763
-
-
[QUOTE=gwg77 post_id=1672298803]Of course they lied. They knew the laptop story was coming out in October, they had Rudy G under surveillance. Do I need to remind you that the FBI had a copy of the laptop since 2019? They knew exactly what would be released and the origins of where it came from.
Is Rudy G a foreign actor?[b] No[/b]
Did Rudy G obtain the laptop from a foreign actor?[b] No[/b]
Was the laptop hacked?[b]No[/b]
Did the FBI know all this?[b]Yes[/b]
Did the FBI lie?[b]Yes[/b]
Yes, they indeed specified that it would be a state (foreign) actor that would be involved in a "hacked-and-leaked operation related to Hunter Biden. Did you want the FBI to share with Twitter that they knew it was specifically a laptop because they had Rudy G under surveillance? Just Lol.
Read again:
[img]https://i.imgur.com/mvjMTHg.jpg[/img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/wcOs152.jpg[/img]
That is the entire point of them meeting weekly, not to disseminate foreign "hacked-and-leaked operations."
And yes, they did warn them that there would a Hunter Biden "hacked-and-leaked operation" by state actors - which was a lie.
Do you need no repercussions from the FBI to absolve the FBI from any involvement?[b]No[/b]
Wut? The sole basis for it being censored was for being "hacked materials" and violating their hacked materials policy.
Furthermore, no one has ever said it had nothing to do with meeting with the FBI.
Initially, I had made the mistake of misinterpreting this Taibbi tweet # 22 below. It is a poorly worded tweet. As you can see, Taibbi was talking about no evidence of government involvement in obtaining the laptop, or no foreign hacking of the laptop. NOT no government involvement of twitter censoring the laptop story.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/vEBucfB.png[/img][/QUOTE]Even Twitter never said, even Yoel Roth never said the FBI warned them about Hunter Biden's laptop - so that part we can pretty much immediately disregard. Now, that doesn't mean they didn't say the candidates children could be targets - that's fair. But forget the laptop because they never mentioned the laptop or disseminating information related to it. A blanket statement of "candidates and their families can be targets of hacks" is a lot different than "don't allow users to disseminate articles on HB's laptop."
Also, Twitter could allow their users to disseminate the NY Post article regardless... even if it was hacked. Supposedly Twitter employees said they internally made a conscious effort to not allow dissemination of it - and they said it wasn't because of it being "hacked" materials or the FBI.
Now you can say that you[i]believe[/i]that the FBI used broad wording to warn Twitter that information could come to light that[i]could[/i]be hacked by a foreign actor, and that led them not allow dissemination because it violates [I]their own[/] new rules... but good luck proving that when the people working there don't believe that's the truth.
Is Rudy G a foreign actor?[b] No[/b]
Did Rudy G obtain the laptop from a foreign actor?[b] No[/b]
Was the laptop hacked?[b]No[/b]
Did the FBI know all this?[b]Yes[/b]
Did the FBI lie?[b]Yes[/b]
Yes, they indeed specified that it would be a state (foreign) actor that would be involved in a "hacked-and-leaked operation related to Hunter Biden. Did you want the FBI to share with Twitter that they knew it was specifically a laptop because they had Rudy G under surveillance? Just Lol.
Read again:
[img]https://i.imgur.com/mvjMTHg.jpg[/img]
[img]https://i.imgur.com/wcOs152.jpg[/img]
That is the entire point of them meeting weekly, not to disseminate foreign "hacked-and-leaked operations."
And yes, they did warn them that there would a Hunter Biden "hacked-and-leaked operation" by state actors - which was a lie.
Do you need no repercussions from the FBI to absolve the FBI from any involvement?[b]No[/b]
Wut? The sole basis for it being censored was for being "hacked materials" and violating their hacked materials policy.
Furthermore, no one has ever said it had nothing to do with meeting with the FBI.
Initially, I had made the mistake of misinterpreting this Taibbi tweet # 22 below. It is a poorly worded tweet. As you can see, Taibbi was talking about no evidence of government involvement in obtaining the laptop, or no foreign hacking of the laptop. NOT no government involvement of twitter censoring the laptop story.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/vEBucfB.png[/img][/QUOTE]Even Twitter never said, even Yoel Roth never said the FBI warned them about Hunter Biden's laptop - so that part we can pretty much immediately disregard. Now, that doesn't mean they didn't say the candidates children could be targets - that's fair. But forget the laptop because they never mentioned the laptop or disseminating information related to it. A blanket statement of "candidates and their families can be targets of hacks" is a lot different than "don't allow users to disseminate articles on HB's laptop."
Also, Twitter could allow their users to disseminate the NY Post article regardless... even if it was hacked. Supposedly Twitter employees said they internally made a conscious effort to not allow dissemination of it - and they said it wasn't because of it being "hacked" materials or the FBI.
Now you can say that you[i]believe[/i]that the FBI used broad wording to warn Twitter that information could come to light that[i]could[/i]be hacked by a foreign actor, and that led them not allow dissemination because it violates [I]their own[/] new rules... but good luck proving that when the people working there don't believe that's the truth.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
12-06-2022, 06:33 AM
-
#173
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Roth said exactly that the FBI warned him about the laptop.Even Twitter never said, even Yoel Roth never said the FBI warned them about Hunter Biden's laptop - so that part we can pretty much immediately disregard. Now, that doesn't mean they didn't say the candidates children could be targets - that's fair. But forget the laptop because they never mentioned the laptop or disseminating information related to it.A blanket statement of "candidates and their families can be targets of hacks" is a lot different than "don't allow users to disseminate articles on HB's laptop."
Also, Twitter could allow their users to disseminate the NY Post article regardless... even if it was hacked. Supposedly Twitter employees said they internally made a conscious effort to not allow dissemination of it - and they said it wasn't because of it being "hacked" materials or the FBI.
Also, Twitter could allow their users to disseminate the NY Post article regardless... even if it was hacked. Supposedly Twitter employees said they internally made a conscious effort to not allow dissemination of it - and they said it wasn't because of it being "hacked" materials or the FBI.
“I was told in these meetings that the intelligence community expected that individuals associated with political campaigns would be subject to hacking attacks and that material obtained through those hacking attacks would likely be disseminated over social media platforms, including Twitter,” said Roth in a Dec. 21, 2020, declaration to the Federal Election Commission.
“I also learned in these meetings that there were rumors that a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden.”
https://nypost.com/2022/12/04/fbi-wa...ring-the-post/
“I also learned in these meetings that there were rumors that a hack-and-leak operation would involve Hunter Biden.”
https://nypost.com/2022/12/04/fbi-wa...ring-the-post/
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
12-06-2022, 06:37 AM
-
#174
- gwg77
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,584
- Subscribers: 20
- Rep Power: 1103815
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
My point is, if Twitter went ahead and didn't censor it, they knew there were no repercussions for the company, soit really had nothing to do with the government or FBI... it was simply a decision by Twitter to suppress the story... which, let's face it... we all already knew.
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
They could have actively disseminated it as much as they wanted and they made a conscious effort not to. Was it to affect the election? Yes, of course I believe that. Because they met with the FBI? No that just seems like another insane conspiracy theory with no substance.
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Excerpt from letter sent by Twitter's attorney to the FEC.Even other Twitter personnel admitted that it had nothing to do with the material being hacked or any meeting with the FBI.It was a conscious effort done internally by Twitter... likely with the thought of swaying the election. But the rest is a CT.
Brutal.
https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7821/7821_07.pdf
12-06-2022, 07:16 AM
-
#175
- gwg77
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,584
- Subscribers: 20
- Rep Power: 1103815
-
-
[QUOTE=Audioslave post_id=1672326173]Even Twitter never said, even Yoel Roth never said the FBI warned them about Hunter Biden's laptop - so that part we can pretty much immediately disregard. Now, that doesn't mean they didn't say the candidates children could be targets - that's fair. But forget the laptop because they never mentioned the laptop or disseminating information related to it. A blanket statement of "candidates and their families can be targets of hacks" is a lot different than "don't allow users to disseminate articles on HB's laptop."[/QUOTE]Just LOL @ trying to minimize the FBI's warning as a blanket statement of "candidates and their families can be targets of hacks," when Yoel Roth specifically said he was warned that Hunter Biden would be the target of a hack-and-leak operation.
Yes, Yoel Roth said in sworn testimony that specifically Hunter Biden would be targeted.
[QUOTE=Audioslave post_id=1672326173]Also, Twitter could allow their users to disseminate the NY Post article regardless... even if it was hacked. Supposedly Twitter employees said they internally made a conscious effort to not allow dissemination of it - and they said it wasn't because of it being "hacked" materials or the FBI.[/QUOTE]The reason stated for censorship of NY Post article is for violating Hacked Materials Policy and Private Information Policy, and it directly had to do with the warning they received from the FBI, per Twitter's Attorney.
[QUOTE=Audioslave post_id=1672326173]Now you can say that you[i]believe[/i]that the FBI used broad wording to warn Twitter that information could come to light that[i]could[/i]be hacked by a foreign actor, and that led them not allow dissemination because it violates [I]their own[/] new rules... but good luck proving that when the people working there don't believe that's the truth.[/QUOTE]FBI didn't use broad wording, they specifically warned about Hunter Biden being involved in a hack-and-leak operation by a foreign actor.
Between the FBI's warning and their Hacked Materials Policy, they decided to not allow dissemination of the NY Post story.
This is a letter from Twitter's attorney, sent to the FEC, which also included the sworn testimony of Yoel Roth. It clearly states that the FBI's warning of hack-and-leak operation targeted against Hunter Biden was reason to censor the story.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/sMu4CDX.jpg[/img]
[URL=https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7821/7821_07.pdf]https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7821/7821_07.pdf[/URL]
Yes, Yoel Roth said in sworn testimony that specifically Hunter Biden would be targeted.
[QUOTE=Audioslave post_id=1672326173]Also, Twitter could allow their users to disseminate the NY Post article regardless... even if it was hacked. Supposedly Twitter employees said they internally made a conscious effort to not allow dissemination of it - and they said it wasn't because of it being "hacked" materials or the FBI.[/QUOTE]The reason stated for censorship of NY Post article is for violating Hacked Materials Policy and Private Information Policy, and it directly had to do with the warning they received from the FBI, per Twitter's Attorney.
[QUOTE=Audioslave post_id=1672326173]Now you can say that you[i]believe[/i]that the FBI used broad wording to warn Twitter that information could come to light that[i]could[/i]be hacked by a foreign actor, and that led them not allow dissemination because it violates [I]their own[/] new rules... but good luck proving that when the people working there don't believe that's the truth.[/QUOTE]FBI didn't use broad wording, they specifically warned about Hunter Biden being involved in a hack-and-leak operation by a foreign actor.
Between the FBI's warning and their Hacked Materials Policy, they decided to not allow dissemination of the NY Post story.
This is a letter from Twitter's attorney, sent to the FEC, which also included the sworn testimony of Yoel Roth. It clearly states that the FBI's warning of hack-and-leak operation targeted against Hunter Biden was reason to censor the story.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/sMu4CDX.jpg[/img]
[URL=https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7821/7821_07.pdf]https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7821/7821_07.pdf[/URL]
12-06-2022, 07:17 AM
-
#176
- Audioslave
- Registered User
-
- Audioslave
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 5,222
- Rep Power: 18763
-
-
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
Once again, that is a generic statement. This is literally the same exact thing that was discussed several months back as the FBI also had discussions with ******** and Mark Zuckerberg said that the FBI told them there could be hacked information by foreign actors - but he said the warning was very vague and doesn't recall anything about Hunter Biden. When discussed internally at Twitter, even the employees said it doesn't hold water to stop from disseminating the article.Excerpt from letter sent by Twitter's attorney to the FEC.
Brutal.
https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7821/7821_07.pdf
Brutal.
https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7821/7821_07.pdf
I am not saying that Twitter and ******** didn't stop dissemination to affect the outcome of the election - very possible they did. Given Yoel Roth's extreme left stance, it wouldn't surprise me. It's possible that they were trying to take extra precautions since the 2016 election fiasco they were involved in and thought that this was their opportunity to enforce their new rules. And yes, it's also possible they took a "vague" statement from the FBI and either opportunisticallyusedthat as part of the internal reasoning to suppress dissemination of the article for their own political purposes. There are many "could be" scenarios here. My guess is that Twitter is a leftist platform and they made a conscious effort to stop dissemination for their own political agenda... maybe I'm wrong... maybe they were scared by a vague statement by the FBI, which still had zero legal repercussions if they didn't adhere to it... not impossible, although I don't put much weight into that.
This is starting to sound like 2016 again except the Democrats are now the Republicans and looking for ways to blame the FBI for the outcome of the election. One year they're swinging it D and then next it's R. It's an easy scapegoat. But I haven't even heard a statement from Twitter or ******** that the FBI had in any way pressured them to not disseminate the NY Post story. If there is a statement or proof of that, I would definitely welcome it.
YOU ARE NOT A SLAVE
12-06-2022, 07:20 AM
-
#177
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
-
- ImpressiveGainz
- Registered Troll, PhD
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: New Braunfels, TX
- Posts: 16,745
- Rep Power: 183851
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Besides the obvious grift with the Big Guy, why does his being "in the government" matter? Shouldn't the fact the dude has kiddie pr0n and a mountain of evidence he molested and was molested by family members be reason enough to consider this a pretty big deal?1. What role does Hunter have in the government? What role is he doing?
I had been away from the misc for a while, but in the week I've been back I am reading crap I never thought I'd ever see...actively defending a pee-dough because of whose son he is. This is outright communist propaganda.
Best thread: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=168274783
***Black Crew*** (emeritus)
12-06-2022, 07:26 AM
-
#178
- gwg77
- Join Date: Oct 2017
- Location: United States
- Posts: 20,584
- Subscribers: 20
- Rep Power: 1103815
-
-
Originally Posted By Audioslave⏩
Are you on drugs bro?Once again, that is a generic statement. This is literally the same exact thing that was discussed several months back as the FBI also had discussions with ******** and Mark Zuckerberg said that the FBI told them there could be hacked information by foreign actors - but he said the warning was very vague and doesn't recall anything about Hunter Biden. When discussed internally at Twitter, even the employees said it doesn't hold water to stop from disseminating the article.
It was in Yoel Roth's sworn testimony that the warning was specifically about Hunter Biden.
Read Yoel's sworn testimony on page 19 & 20.
https://www.fec.gov/files/legal/murs/7821/7821_07.pdf
12-06-2022, 07:45 AM
-
#179
12-06-2022, 07:47 AM
-
#180
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By ImpressiveGainz⏩
Shiit, you ain't seen nuthin' yet lol.. Take a walk through this discussion.Besides the obvious grift with the Big Guy, why does his being "in the government" matter? Shouldn't the fact the dude has kiddie pr0n and a mountain of evidence he molested and was molested by family members be reason enough to consider this a pretty big deal?
I had been away from the misc for a while, but in the week I've been back I am reading crap I never thought I'd ever see...actively defending a pee-dough because of whose son he is. This is outright communist propaganda.
I had been away from the misc for a while, but in the week I've been back I am reading crap I never thought I'd ever see...actively defending a pee-dough because of whose son he is. This is outright communist propaganda.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=182007113
Right Jay?
Originally Posted By Jayarbie⏩
Why did he move his hand? How the fukk would I know, but only an actual p3do would think that there is anything sexual about it.
Why did she shrug away? Because little kids are naturally shy and don't like to be touched by anyone they don't know. You obviously don't have kids. LOL.Do you think SHE actually felt like that was a sexual thing he was doing? She's like 6.Only an actual p3do would think that she thought he was groping her, too.
Why did she shrug away? Because little kids are naturally shy and don't like to be touched by anyone they don't know. You obviously don't have kids. LOL.Do you think SHE actually felt like that was a sexual thing he was doing? She's like 6.Only an actual p3do would think that she thought he was groping her, too.
Originally Posted By Jayarbie⏩
Not that it's impossible to touch a minor inappropriately,but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognize someone putting a hand on their chest as groping, whether it is inappropriate or not.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts