I linked the data. Look at it

I did. Now go ahead & post where you think it states what you claim again.

Your claim is not supported.

Wrong. Again.

-According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen, despite the fact that over 80% of deaths after the vaccines occur in this window. How convenient
Anyone who dies within the first 14 days post-injection is counted as an unvaccinated death. Not only does this inaccurately inflate the unvaccinated death toll, but it also hides the real dangers of the COVID shots, as the vast majority of deaths from these shots occur within the first two weeks.

The CDC also has two different sets of testing guidelines — one for vaccinated patients and another for the unvaccinated. If you’re unvaccinated, CDC guidance says to use a cycle threshold (CT) of 40, known to result in false positives. If you’re vaccinated, they recommend using a CT of 28 or less, which minimizes the risk of false positives.

The CDC also hides vaccine failures and props up the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” narrative by only counting breakthrough cases that result in hospitalization or death
Hospitals are still also reporting non-COVID related illnesses as COVID-19

The rest can be found at this link.

https://undercurrents723949620.wordp...ated-is-a-lie/

The attempted gotcha is unrelated to the data used in this study.

*In addition, as vaccination in the UK did not begin until late 2020, a large proportion of the cohort were vaccine naïve at initial hospital admission and at the five-month follow-up."

This study used the vaccine naive participants. In my opinion, the authors designed the study that way on purpose.

Your study does not address the fact that one is not considered vaccinated till 14 days after injection…so your study does not actually give a true assessment of control group

Not my study. But if you're this committed, I doubt there's any chance of moving forward.

"Vaccine naive"

UK not CDC.

“According to the CDC,6 you’re not counted as fully vaccinated until a full 14 days have passed since your second injection in the case of Pfizer or Moderna, or 14 days after your first dose of Janssen. This is how the CDC defines a vaccine breakthrough case:

“… a vaccine breakthrough infection is defined as the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen in a respiratory specimen collected from a person ≥14 days after they have completed all recommended doses of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-authorized COVID-19 vaccine.”

In other words, if you’ve received one dose of Pfizer or Moderna and develop symptomatic COVID-19, get admitted to the hospital and/or die from COVID, you’re counted as an unvaccinated case. If you’ve received two doses and get ill within 14 days, you’re still counted as an unvaccinated case.
The problem with this is that over 80% of hospitalizations and deaths appear to be occurring among those who have received the jabs, but this reality is hidden by the way cases are defined and counted.”

What does the CDC, or the US for that matter, have to do with the PHOSP-COVID data set?

-In Scotland, official data on hospitalizations and deaths show 87% of those who have died from COVID-19 in the third wave that began in early July were vaccinated.

In Gibraltar, which has a 99% COVID jab compliance rate, COVID cases have risen by 2,500% since June 1, 2021,27 and in Iceland, where over 82% have received the shots, 77% of new COVID cases are among the fully vaccinated.

Data from the U.K. show a similar trend among those over the age of 50. In this age group, partially and fully “vaccinated” people account for 68% of hospitalizations and 70% of COVID deaths“

Cool

Look at the details of the PHOSP data

Here have some booster.

.

Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2023

8,330 deaths were Vaccinated 95%

436 deaths were Unvaccinated 5%

It's a registered and available data set.

It's a registered and available data set. Ignoring those facts doesn't make them go away.

I posted the facts though

eng scot wales n ireland vaxx rate is over 90% (one dose)

Cool.

This study used the PHOSP data set.

Cool, I posted relevant data

Not relevant to the study or your claims

Claims are backed by links posted. It’s a sure loss for the jabbed it seems.

Sorry, no refunds.

You are claiming either the authors are lying or the data set is inaccurate/fake with nothing at all to support it.

I understand why people want covid to be inert and vaccines to be bad. But this is another study that refutes the former. It does not address the latter, but controls for it by design

I made a statement regarding vaccination status after injection, nothing in your study or anything you have posted disproves this fact.

No refunds

I posted links to the data set, which reports vaccine receipt of participants.

You haven't looked at them and that's okay. But, your claims are unsupported.

Wrong. Again.
Every claim I posted is linked. Try again

You need or want the results of this study to be vaccine related. I get it.

How many of the 1,837 people included in this study received a vaccine at any point before or during the study period?

We wouldn’t know..they could have been vaccinated and still been classified as unvaccinated if within the 14 day period.


Meanwhile..

New research published in the journal Frontiers in Immunology shows that children who got "vaccinated" for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) now suffer from a form of AIDS that has left their weakened immune systems prone to catching not just COVID but also all sorts of other viruses and bacteria.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-09-...r-viruses.html

No

It's all in the data set.

How many?

We wouldn’t know..they could have been vaccinated and still been classified as unvaccinated if within the 14 day period.