ehhh, if someone had said that re. NYC I wouldn't question it. Don't know too much about Norway but it's feasible, especially if he was boosting. Some of the '7s' might be 6s though


Yes, and alot of the girls on there are also on Tinder or IG. If you can't afford $99 to test the waters then you really can't afford to see girls off there. You might be able to hook up with them once, or run a scam on them (if you do that you're probably breaking the law though here in Oz), but keeping them around is a different matter.

It's also a different type of game. I'd only recommend it if you REALLY know what you're doing and can handle women with A+++ game, while you still get plenty of regular girls on there, some of them are absolute sharks, especially the hottest ones. I can't stress this enough, seeing some of these girls is like playing with fire, you really, really, really need to know what you're doing otherwise you might end up in a world of chit.

If you're in the same city as me then there's a good chance I've hooked up with them too.


You get it... Something alot of guys don't think about either is all the time spent, hitting on girls that go nowhere, getting flaked, getting ghosted, some dates go nowhere, girls showing up and looking nothing like their pics, time spent texting girls, organizing logistics, spending money on the date, and the list goes on...

So many guys will factor in the monetary cost of the date but completely forget about the time cost of dating girls, which if you're time is valuable and you earn good money could be astronomically high per lay. From a purely mathematical standpoint (so ignoring the ego trip of bedding a girl without 'paying' directly) there's no place on earth where phucking a woman once for free is cheaper than phucking a pro. Where the solid ROI occurs is when you see a girl ongoing for several months and have lots of sex, then you're getting better value vs the pro. However a guy who's just interested in phucking as many women as possible once, is almost always better off just phucking pro's exclusively, again, from purely mathematical standpoint.


I had 21,000+ at one point, but that was spread over 3 accounts and they'd been spoofed around the world including places like Manila and that was auto-liking everything back when tinder was completely free. All the photo's were me, and although I'm considered a good looking guy to many women, I'm no male model. So it show's what was possible back then...


At the same time I was able to get 4000+ matches in London in 2 days. So a male model probably could have gotten 8000+ in the same time frame. It would have been impossible to go to a big city back then and not get laid from Tinder. Anyone could get laid with 4000 matches in 2 days to burn through.

Now even with 10 boosts + autoliking I'd be lucky to get a few hundred a week.

At the end of the day 'number of matches' is meaningless as a stand alone measure of anything. Some guy autoliking every whale within a 160km radius in NYC with $300 worth of boosts is still going to get ALOT of matches, but what does that prove? It's a bit of a dick measuring contest really if you're going to compare match numbers to stroke your ego. However as a measure of showing that Tinder isn't what it used to be it works quite well, and I think the numbers pretty much speak for themselves.

You're not gonna get unmatched unless you go full creeper brah, they'll keep your headshot in their match queue as a trophy to show their gal pals and themselves how desirable they are. Why were you talking for a month and not smashing? The longest I'll go without arranging a meet is like a week unless they're out of town or whatever. Probably she got bored cause you didn't make a move and Chad swooped in.

How the phuck do you get so many matches if you are not a chad looking dude (which, according to your own statements I believe you are not correct?) - There is simply no fakken way you could get that many matches with a normal account. Close friend of mine also aussie dude with facial aesthetics 10/10 did some spoofing couple of weeks ago to London, yes his matches were over the roof but nowhere near 4000 matches, 500-700 tops.

what do brahs?

We met up once but our schedules didn't work out. I was gone pretty much every weekend during the summer. She went on a trip for about a week after our first meet. Of course as soon as I have more time to see her she ghosts me.

Keep in mind he is talking old school tinder when it was free and people used auto liking bot deals

I had 21,000+ at one point, but that was spread over 3 accounts and they'd been spoofed around the world including places like Manila and that was auto-liking everything back when tinder was completely free. All the photo's were me, and although I'm considered a good looking guy to many women, I'm no male model. So it show's what was possible back then...


At the same time I was able to get 4000+ matches in London in 2 days. So a male model probably could have gotten 8000+ in the same time frame. It would have been impossible to go to a big city back then and not get laid from Tinder. Anyone could get laid with 4000 matches in 2 days to burn through.

Now even with 10 boosts + autoliking I'd be lucky to get a few hundred a week.

At the end of the day 'number of matches' is meaningless as a stand alone measure of anything. Some guy autoliking every whale within a 160km radius in NYC with $300 worth of boosts is still going to get ALOT of matches, but what does that prove? It's a bit of a dick measuring contest really if you're going to compare match numbers to stroke your ego. However as a measure of showing that Tinder isn't what it used to be it works quite well, and I think the numbers pretty much speak for themselves.

Props on the info.

My suspension has been lifted, I'm back in the game currently at 1535 matches!

cheesy?

Icing?


mirin potato game brah - got dat number ayyyy

take a look at this...

take a look at this...

Hoooooooly LORD! That is awesome man. Pls smash her that would be epic xD

I am pretty positive she would be totally into it. Maybe even a 3some with them brothers as welldont have a brother myself but mirin

My man haha. I want that for you.

Is Tinder Plus a must if you're not Chad?

can you post pics etc

Traps are getting more and more sophisticated by the day stay safe.

Traps are getting more and more sophisticated by the day stay safe.

Nothing gay about getting your dik sukced

If you're in a Queensland mining town then Tinder Platinum plus plus plus for $300 a month still won't help you. 5 guys for every girl LOL. Get to Brissy, that's easily the best area in Australia for dating for men.

Traps are getting more and more sophisticated by the day stay safe.

A couple of you willing to critique my profile via pm?

Beam it up to me scotty. Nomsayn