Forum
ยป
One of my brother's friends found out 2 of his 3 kids are not his lol
09-22-2018, 07:08 AM
-
#181
- RainingBlood
- Daniel Larson 2024
-
- RainingBlood
- Daniel Larson 2024
- Join Date: Aug 2010
- Posts: 34,890
- Rep Power: 106497
-
-
Anyone ever notice how stories like these are always from "someone who knows someone who knows someone etc."?
I don't buy this story at all.
I don't buy this story at all.
09-22-2018, 07:12 AM
-
#182
- TheRougarou646
- Banned
-
- TheRougarou646
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 3,866
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By atgbrahsrs⏩
It's not alimony it's child support. Also he's not worried one of the girls will spill the beans? I can't imagine kids that age keeping the fact that their Dad took the out for a DNA test a secretLol'd hard and then got sad realizing how ****ed this is for a man's psyche:
- Friend of brother is 45yo, has a son 12yo, daughter 7yo, daughter 4yo
- Got suspicious and did DNA tests for the daughters ...both are not his...and are fromdifferentmen. Brutal!
- He is awaiting results for the 12yo son.
- Everything kept from sloot so he can know what he is dealing with to know what to do.
- Law for his situation (in the country this is happening in) is that since he has not protested that the kids are not his 3 years after their birth he has to payalimonyfor each kid until that kid is 18. This is because he is their father by law hence he could do the DNA without sloot/mother permission.
My brother is super worried how he is going to take it if it turns out that the guy is childless after thinking he is not for 12 years.
get them DNA samples going boyos.
- Friend of brother is 45yo, has a son 12yo, daughter 7yo, daughter 4yo
- Got suspicious and did DNA tests for the daughters ...both are not his...and are fromdifferentmen. Brutal!
- He is awaiting results for the 12yo son.
- Everything kept from sloot so he can know what he is dealing with to know what to do.
- Law for his situation (in the country this is happening in) is that since he has not protested that the kids are not his 3 years after their birth he has to payalimonyfor each kid until that kid is 18. This is because he is their father by law hence he could do the DNA without sloot/mother permission.
My brother is super worried how he is going to take it if it turns out that the guy is childless after thinking he is not for 12 years.
get them DNA samples going boyos.
09-22-2018, 07:39 AM
-
#183
09-22-2018, 07:57 AM
-
#184
09-22-2018, 08:12 AM
-
#185
- Serenadium
- Registered User
-
- Serenadium
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2011
- Age: 36
- Posts: 3,700
- Rep Power: 14808
-
-
Originally Posted By betaasphuck⏩
cucked:paternity fraud is not the majority, but it's more common than most people think.
I honestly think there should be a law, where you can only put a man's name on the birth certificate, if there is a dna test proving fatherhood.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/paternity_fraud
if 1000 average dudes took paternity tests, there likely would be a handful of devastating results. However, women tend to get away with it because men are generally trusting.
I had a friend that it happened to, the dude became suicidally depressed.
I honestly think there should be a law, where you can only put a man's name on the birth certificate, if there is a dna test proving fatherhood.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/paternity_fraud
if 1000 average dudes took paternity tests, there likely would be a handful of devastating results. However, women tend to get away with it because men are generally trusting.
I had a friend that it happened to, the dude became suicidally depressed.
the victorian county court in 2002 awarded mr. Magill $70,000 compensation for damages and economic loss against his ex-wife as a result of dna testing in 2000 that showed only one of three children he was paying support for were genetically his.[7] that ruling was later overturned in 2005 by the victorian court of appeal finding that "intent to deceive" by the ex-wife had not been proven regarding misrepresentations made by ms. Magill in birth forms about the children's paternity.[8] this ruling was in turn then appealed with the high court of australia.[9]
in 2006 australia's high court struck down the appeal, upholding the 2005 victorian court of appeal ruling.[10] chief justice murray gleeson in the 94 page high court ruling opined, "without doubt the appellant's wife deceived him but the hurtful deception was in her infidelity, not in her failure to admit it."[11] mr. Magill as part of the ruling was also ordered to pay the child support agency's legal fees during the previous 18 months of litigation.[12]
in 2006 australia's high court struck down the appeal, upholding the 2005 victorian court of appeal ruling.[10] chief justice murray gleeson in the 94 page high court ruling opined, "without doubt the appellant's wife deceived him but the hurtful deception was in her infidelity, not in her failure to admit it."[11] mr. Magill as part of the ruling was also ordered to pay the child support agency's legal fees during the previous 18 months of litigation.[12]
09-22-2018, 06:05 PM
-
#186
- soaponarope1
- 6'2" 227
-
- soaponarope1
- 6'2" 227
- Join Date: Jun 2016
- Location: Florida, United States
- Age: 40
- Posts: 13,552
- Rep Power: 63078
-
-
Lol at all the *******s itt saying they would keep taking care of the kids because it isn't the kids fault. Of course it isn't, but any bad outcome here is a consequence of the woman's actions, no reason for you to feel bad leaving.
Fuk her, I'd move to a third world chithole and live off subsistence fishing before giving them a dime. She can explain why dad is gone. Or not, that's on her conscience, not mine
Fuk her, I'd move to a third world chithole and live off subsistence fishing before giving them a dime. She can explain why dad is gone. Or not, that's on her conscience, not mine
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts