Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
ยป Sloth Thread Part XII: No Sway13 Club
  1. Results 211 to 240 of 9407
  2. First
  3. 6
  4. 7
  5. 8
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. Last
post 1464754851 10-02-2016, 12:53 PM
-
#211
  1. luntao1
  2. Registered User
  1. luntao1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 940
  6. Rep Power: 1118
Originally Posted By spadelexus
Whats LMS? Right now all my pics are selfies (one with a selfie stick doesn't look like a selfie) and the main pic goes against pretty much all the best practices outlined in the link posted a page or two back.
Looks, Money, Status - I'm assuming you don't look like a typical 40+ white dude. Balding, wrinkling, dad bod, etc..
Originally Posted By BRBMakingMoney
Nah brah, it was solid next level game.
Lol.. shiet only works if you're that aussie model..
Originally Posted By pancakemouse
He's being facetious. The point is when your profile is good enough and the girl is DTF enough you don't need game, you just spit lines and invite hundreds of girls over and ignore the ones who give you resistance. This only works in markets where you have somewhat of an advantage (e.g. decent-looking guy in NYC, white guy in Colombia/Philippines/Vietnam).
NYC is easier but it's not that easy. Hell, I can get some good matches and DTF with my matches. But I still have to drop lines.


....

I just need to up my pics again. Shiet is hard for an asian brah. I need to make myself look like some ****ing movie star/model to just to compete with a 6/10 white dude.
post 1464754901 10-02-2016, 12:53 PM
-
#212
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 985
  5. Rep Power: 314
Originally Posted By Twice11
I'm actually unsure how girls perceive my face
I don't know what there is to be unsure about, it's very clear. Tinder is a face validator app.

Hotter girls + more matches = good face. That's all there is to it.

Your observation of "brahs complaining about getting no Tinder action" are guys with average or below average faces.
Tinder Science Crew
post 1464755721 10-02-2016, 01:00 PM
-
#213
  1. Twice11
  2. Registered User
  1. Twice11
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 937
  7. Rep Power: 11427
Originally Posted By pancakemouse
I don't know what there is to be unsure about, it's very clear. Tinder is a face validator app.

Hotter girls + more matches = good face. That's all there is to it.

Your observation of "brahs complaining about getting no Tinder action" are guys with average or below average faces.
Yeah, I think my face is decent but not misc 10/10 face... probably 5-6/10 face and 1-2/10 body. Don't care tho, still burying my dink. Got out of LTR month and a half ago, still trying to adjust to tinder and chit while preparing for job interviews.

Sloot had two REALLY nice tats, claimed she was a "tattoo model" and her profile also said "need a hook up? Get a hooker." Was creampie-ing her within an hour of meeting her. Lul
post 1464758241 10-02-2016, 01:22 PM
-
#214
  1. mTOR
  2. Registered User
  1. mTOR
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Posts: 3,293
  5. Rep Power: 4394
Originally Posted By Twice11
if I consistently use it I get maybe 2 good matches per week.
What does this mean? How many matches do you accrue overall per week? Or, more reliably, what's your match rate per swipe session before you hit the hard limits (~100 likes)


As pancake said, it's a direct indicator of profile attractiveness, which itself can be decomposed into several factors with the main driver being facial attractiveness (although the level of mate competition and social norms/milieu of a given area, which both feed into desired mate expectations, can have a dramatic impact on match success, even more so for those with identifiably ethnic features)
post 1464758311 10-02-2016, 01:22 PM
-
#215
  1. spadelexus
  2. Registered User
  1. spadelexus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 11,575
  6. Rep Power: 43014
Originally Posted By luntao1
Looks, Money, Status - I'm assuming you don't look like a typical 40+ white dude. Balding, wrinkling, dad bod, etc..




Lol.. shiet only works if you're that aussie model..



NYC is easier but it's not that easy. Hell, I can get some good matches and DTF with my matches. But I still have to drop lines.


....

I just need to up my pics again. Shiet is hard for an asian brah. I need to make myself look like some ****ing movie star/model to just to compete with a 6/10 white dude.
I have looks. I look early thirties and I'm fit (swimmer-athletic build in pix). I do have love handles and abs are now closing in on 6 pack but in my pix were at 4 pack. Did a serious cut these past couple months and lost mass in my arms and shoulders and now weigh 185, so have more of a swimmers build. Still muscle definition all over.

I make good money...but don't flaunt it at all on tinder. My ig is linked to tinder and kinda does as there's pix of me traveling to exotic locations.

I have pix chillen with hot girls 8/10+ on tinder and ig but don't have any pix chillen with brahs.
post 1464763971 10-02-2016, 02:08 PM
-
#216
  1. ineed$
  2. Registered User
  1. ineed$
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2007
  4. Posts: 9,636
  5. Rep Power: 17322
u can get trash ass sloots off online dating but the competition is high and a lot of time must be invested per action vs doing it in real life.

Saying that, it is an option if time is not a problem and u have nothing to do out IRL

Yes there is the slotty hos that will respond 1/500 who are easy
post 1464765531 10-02-2016, 02:21 PM
-
#217
  1. ineed$
  2. Registered User
  1. ineed$
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2007
  4. Posts: 9,636
  5. Rep Power: 17322
My thoughts on dating apps so far:

1) Hos like to talk a lot the first day and then there short attention span forgets u the next. some talk a week then forget or randomly block

2) They expect u to go out ur way for whales. You drive to there place, ect.

3) hos will show lots of interest and then flake
post 1464771261 10-02-2016, 03:13 PM
-
#218
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 985
  5. Rep Power: 314
Originally Posted By mTOR
What does this mean? How many matches do you accrue overall per week? Or, more reliably, what's your match rate per swipe session before you hit the hard limits (~100 likes)


As pancake said, it's a direct indicator of profile attractiveness, which itself can be decomposed into several factors with the main driver being facial attractiveness (although the level of mate competition and social norms/milieu of a given area, which both feed into desired mate expectations, can have a dramatic impact on match success, even more so for those with identifiably ethnic features)
mirin SAT-level sentence composition. I think I like you, mTOR.
Tinder Science Crew
post 1464771791 10-02-2016, 03:18 PM
-
#219
  1. LurkoLantern
  2. Registered User
  1. LurkoLantern
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Posts: 8,607
  5. Rep Power: 55368
Set up a day date with a sloot. I sit at the Starbucks for 40 minutes, she never shows. She later texts me that she overslept.

Boyos, this is why it's always worth having a plan B. I'm on my way to a local sports bar to watch the rest of the cowboys game with this cute sloot. Women will often flake. It happens, and is just part of the dating game. Don't ever get discouraged by it. Rather, use it to embolden you with your next sloot.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Glow, glow, glow your boat
post 1464772381 10-02-2016, 03:24 PM
-
#220
  1. Snooging
  2. Registered User
  1. Snooging
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 755
  5. Rep Power: 932
Yeah....tonight. is the first time a sloot has flaked on me. And we actually vibed really well and got along the best out of all the ones I've talked to. ****...
PSN: andr01d_713
post 1464772671 10-02-2016, 03:26 PM
-
#221
  1. Slyrz
  2. Registered User
  1. Slyrz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 1,878
  6. Rep Power: 0
Is the strategy of spoofing to a more favorable location to boost your ELO score actually legit?
post 1464774541 10-02-2016, 03:43 PM
-
#222
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 985
  5. Rep Power: 314
Originally Posted By Slyrz
Is the strategy of spoofing to a more favorable location to boost your ELO score actually legit?
No one knows unless someone brings back actual data. I just sprung for a Plus account to run some tests for you guys but I can only run one experiment a week to avoid changing too many variables.

You can easily test any Tinder theory by:

1. Resetting your profile at the same time every week.
2. Autolike X amount of girls using Flamite. Say, 10000 girls to make sure you have a good sample size.
3. At the end of the week, count number of matches. Record somewhere (I use a Google Spreadsheet).

Change variable, repeat.

If you want I can make this my next test, but it will have to wait until next week because I'm using this week as a control week.

More guys need to jump on this train. We need more hard data.

BRB, changing name to "Tinder Scientist"
Tinder Science Crew
post 1464775051 10-02-2016, 03:47 PM
-
#223
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Location: Prince From, Lagos, Nigeria
  5. Posts: 28,971
  6. Rep Power: 379644
Originally Posted By spadelexus
Hes being sarcastic saying you dont need game in NYC. And no a girl in midtown is not hopping on a train to go into the ghetto of brooklyn to bang. Manhattan is a completely different animal.



They dont see my location. My story is Im in town on biz for a week or two.

Edit: Having chit luck in TA right now. Gonna head to Istanbul for a few.
Oh so that's what that is. I kept thinking those were bots or android glitches when I saw no distances
****Bringing sixy back in 2019****
6'6" 666lbs......str8 sixy!

Who Tests God and Does Not Wager Their Lives?
post 1464776731 10-02-2016, 04:03 PM
-
#224
  1. Nicklol
  2. Bodybalder
  1. Nicklol
  2. Bodybalder
  3. Join Date: Jul 2010
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 59,702
  6. Rep Power: 147685
Originally Posted By pancakemouse
Yup. Have tried it with two accounts this week. Make ******** account. Find random Indonesian/Indian/Filipino FB group. Add random people. They all want to have Americans as friends. Got to 50 friends in less than an hour.
please tell me how to find one of these groups..

ive been tryin to get past the sms verification for a month now.. cuz I use fake ******** with no friends..

help

what groups do I use?
Doordasher crew (SRS)
Bidet Crew
Nissan Versa 2023 crew
Bald crew
post 1464777641 10-02-2016, 04:12 PM
-
#225
  1. Slyrz
  2. Registered User
  1. Slyrz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 1,878
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By pancakemouse
No one knows unless someone brings back actual data. I just sprung for a Plus account to run some tests for you guys but I can only run one experiment a week to avoid changing too many variables.

You can easily test any Tinder theory by:

1. Resetting your profile at the same time every week.
2. Autolike X amount of girls using Flamite. Say, 10000 girls to make sure you have a good sample size.
3. At the end of the week, count number of matches. Record somewhere (I use a Google Spreadsheet).

Change variable, repeat.

If you want I can make this my next test, but it will have to wait until next week because I'm using this week as a control week.

More guys need to jump on this train. We need more hard data.

BRB, changing name to "Tinder Scientist"
How would you measure it? I spoofed to Europe and got more and better looking matches. Did my ELO already show me to the better looking girls or is it because women in Europe are just so much hotter than even women with average ELO scores in Europe are still hot?
post 1464779221 10-02-2016, 04:27 PM
-
#226
  1. spadelexus
  2. Registered User
  1. spadelexus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 11,575
  6. Rep Power: 43014
My cleaning girl comes by my house once every couple weeks. She works like 6-7 hrs, cleans my entire house thoroughly, does my laundry and makes me a meal (sometimes). I also fuk her really hard and nut in her face before she leaves. I pay her $100 for all the above.

I met her on tinder.

She flaked on me today.
post 1464780881 10-02-2016, 04:42 PM
-
#227
  1. zer0time
  2. Registered Anti-Feminist
  1. zer0time
  2. Registered Anti-Feminist
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Posts: 3,936
  5. Rep Power: 22290
Originally Posted By spadelexus
^^^ Not really. I game way more on Tinder than Bumble.

Saw this in another thread. Lol

That's hilariously legit pic. Saved.
post 1464782981 10-02-2016, 05:01 PM
-
#228
  1. Nicklol
  2. Bodybalder
  1. Nicklol
  2. Bodybalder
  3. Join Date: Jul 2010
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 59,702
  6. Rep Power: 147685
Originally Posted By Nicklol
please tell me how to find one of these groups..

ive been tryin to get past the sms verification for a month now.. cuz I use fake ******** with no friends..

help

what groups do I use?
K so my ******** has hundreds of friends now.. reinstalled tinder, signed into ******** and then it still asks for my number to send sms.. I enter number.. doesnt send sms..

wtf do I do??
Doordasher crew (SRS)
Bidet Crew
Nissan Versa 2023 crew
Bald crew
post 1464790661 10-02-2016, 06:05 PM
-
#229
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 985
  5. Rep Power: 314
Originally Posted By zer0time
That's hilariously legit pic. Saved.
It's delusional nonsense, absolute masturbatory fantasy for looks whiners and their ilk. "Outside of LTRs, normies are doomed", guess that's why I've banged 15 women this year despite having average or below average facial attractiveness.
Originally Posted By Slyrz
How would you measure it? I spoofed to Europe and got more and better looking matches. Did my ELO already show me to the better looking girls or is it because women in Europe are just so much hotter than even women with average ELO scores in Europe are still hot?
You need to control week to week against a certain city. I've even thought about rating my matches from 0-10 and coming up with an average rating.
Tinder Science Crew
post 1464791521 10-02-2016, 06:12 PM
-
#230
  1. KingSaddam
  2. Registered User
  1. KingSaddam
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 61
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By zer0time
That's hilariously legit pic. Saved.
Couldn't be further from legit. Just more crap from messed up people on the internet. (Not you zer0time, the pic) Some of the most ordinary even ugly guys pull hot girls. Some of the brainiest guys are ugly and the model tier guys are often dumb. Very dumb. Many of these top guys are also socially poor. Very poor. The young "normal" guy on the left is pretty good looking and could easily have a lot of girls around him etc, etc. Totally fukked up and very pernicious thinking in those descriptions.

I see loads of geeky/very ordinary guys around with attractive gfs. Also many older dudes 50/60s with attractive much younger women. That's the real world, but that pic is probably close to how women see guys on tinder.
post 1464791561 10-02-2016, 06:13 PM
-
#231
  1. lakersfan360
  2. Registered User
  1. lakersfan360
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Location: Brooklyn, New York, United States
  5. Posts: 719
  6. Rep Power: 3039
new tinder update where you can have an anthem and link your Spotify hahaha YASSSSS!
post 1464798661 10-02-2016, 07:05 PM
-
#232
  1. spadelexus
  2. Registered User
  1. spadelexus
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 11,575
  6. Rep Power: 43014
Originally Posted By pancakemouse
It's delusional nonsense, absolute masturbatory fantasy for looks whiners and their ilk. "Outside of LTRs, normies are doomed", guess that's why I've banged 15 women this year despite having average or below average facial attractiveness.
This.
Originally Posted By KingSaddam
Couldn't be further from legit. Just more crap from messed up people on the internet. (Not you zer0time, the pic) Some of the most ordinary even ugly guys pull hot girls. Some of the brainiest guys are ugly and the model tier guys are often dumb. Very dumb. Many of these top guys are also socially poor. Very poor. The young "normal" guy on the left is pretty good looking and could easily have a lot of girls around him etc, etc. Totally fukked up and very pernicious thinking in those descriptions.

I see loads of geeky/very ordinary guys around with attractive gfs. Also many older dudes 50/60s with attractive much younger women. That's the real world, but that pic is probably close to how women see guys on tinder.
And this. That scale is harsh. Even the slayers are really male model 10/10's and they call them 8+'s... Probably need to scale them all up 2 points. But its funny as fuk.

-----

While the Turkish and Israeli girls sleep....

back in NY (...butnot NYC)


post 1464808331 10-02-2016, 08:20 PM
-
#233
  1. upperdeckroner
  2. Registered User
  1. upperdeckroner
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 113
  7. Rep Power: 714
What's your thoughts on deleting tinder and then remaking a new one, and using the tinder flame app. A friend told me about it but im not sure if its legit. Haven't used tinder in like a year and I just bought plus. I used to get tons of matches with regular free version and now getting nothing. What happened? What do?
https://instagram.com/upperdeckroner/

**follow back crew**
**canadian crew**
**crypto crew**
post 1464809651 10-02-2016, 08:30 PM
-
#234
  1. Slyrz
  2. Registered User
  1. Slyrz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 1,878
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By spadelexus
This.



And this. That scale is harsh. Even the slayers are really male model 10/10's and they call them 8+'s... Probably need to scale them all up 2 points. But its funny as fuk.

-----

While the Turkish and Israeli girls sleep....

back in NY (...butnot NYC)
when you bounce around to multiple locations you don't notice you always get a lot less matches in other locations vs. the first location you spoofed to?

(assuming the demographics are somewhat equal)
post 1464822431 10-02-2016, 10:43 PM
-
#235
  1. BRBMakingMoney
  2. Registered User
  1. BRBMakingMoney
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 2,201
  7. Rep Power: 6232
@Spade, missed this
Originally Posted By spadelexus
I spoofed in Sydney for a few hours last month. Most of my matches were either milfs or foreigners. # and date closed on the Latina bodybuilder here at the top, and could have # closed on a couple Milfs... but I went NC on them then they eventually unmatched me. The two below that were the best talent I matched in Sydney. Top one unmatched me after I went direct and the bottom one went NC after I asked for the #.
...
LOL. They all would have flaked, 90% chance, your # close and your 'could have' # closes mean nothing. You are overestimating your results because you don't realize that things get exponentially worse as you move them through the 'sales' pipeline, ie. 50% less matches, 60% more chicks not responding to your opener, 75% more chicks going nc on a date pitch or # close, 90% more flakes etc.

Which is brutal, because as you move them further down the pipeline your time investment has grown. Imagine investing time texting, # closing, setting up the date, sometimes even chatting on the phone (to try and reduce flakes). By this time you've spent 20x as much time just to get a single girl out for drinks as you would have in NYC. Then you arrive to the date, and she's a no show, you've been stood up... AGAIN... Now repeat that process hundreds of times. That is the reality in Sydney.

Location is (almost) everything.

Oh and...


LOL, haven't even bothered opening. Because I know it's a waste of time.

Only dates super models crew because no other girl is worth the time investment in Sydney anymore.
post 1464826901 10-02-2016, 11:29 PM
-
#236
  1. Ashfrolicious
  2. Registered User
  1. Ashfrolicious
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Location: The Vagina, Australia
  5. Posts: 8,895
  6. Rep Power: 15910
Indian brah, checkin in on new Tinder thread.






Spent last night, this morning, and early afternoon clapping this 23 year old Euro/Polynesian babes cheeks, brahs.

Holy fuk she was good. Spooned while watching Casino last night (classic movie). She gets horny, and takes off her dress... and her body was rockin. Could see the outline of her abs (not crazy fitness model level but I could tell she looks after herself). Ended up raw-dogging her - she's on BC. Her pretty face, big natural teddies, nice legs, soft lips, effeminate American accent etc. Perfection.

Woke me up with a BJ this morning. Icing on the cake





What I've learned through this? Once you act nonchalant and detached about things, the chick craves you much, much more. Early in that text, she said "I can't see you tonight" (LOL.. yeah right). Anyway, I was like "cool no problem"... then there was 1-2 messages back and forth until I said "OK back to study".

Then, their craving for cawk comes on strongly.
Positive Crew
Dentist Crew
Seen the Eiffel Tower but haven't been to France Crew

"Your thoughts become your beliefs. Your beliefs become your words. Your words become your actions. Your actions become your habits. Your habits become your values. Your values become your destiny."
post 1464834651 10-03-2016, 01:22 AM
-
#237
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 985
  5. Rep Power: 314
I know that "why am I getting less matches than before" has been the general sentiment in the thread for weeks, if not months, but I finally have the data to prove it.

Got Plus again after five weeks of not having it. Did my usual routine of swiping right on everyone within a 10 mile radius (about 9500 girls) on Friday after work.

In the past, I have gotten between 25 and 60 bangable matches between Friday at 5 PM and Sunday at midnight (I unmatch fat chicks and uggos). The 25 was an outlier, usually it's around 40.

This weekend I got 19 matches.

Tinder has changed something in their algorithm that is resulting in less matches for the average guy (me). What I'm curious about is if they made a change to benefit the top 5% of slayers, or if they changed something that means that everyone just gets less matches overall.
Tinder Science Crew
post 1464834841 10-03-2016, 01:26 AM
-
#238
  1. Pennzoil22
  2. Banned
  1. Pennzoil22
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 31
  6. Posts: 8,071
  7. Rep Power: 0
Anyone else get matches that disappear and then reappear after you unmatch someone...

And ye I'm pretty sure Tinder flagged me as a spam bot since I tried the only right swiping thing


used to get 4-6 matches a day, now I'm lucky to get 1-2..

Fuk that tinder social crap, what a stupid idea that was
post 1464836011 10-03-2016, 01:55 AM
-
#239
  1. BRBMakingMoney
  2. Registered User
  1. BRBMakingMoney
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 2,201
  7. Rep Power: 6232
Originally Posted By pancakemouse
I know that "why am I getting less matches than before" has been the general sentiment in the thread for weeks, if not months, but I finally have the data to prove it.

Got Plus again after five weeks of not having it. Did my usual routine of swiping right on everyone within a 10 mile radius (about 9500 girls) on Friday after work.

In the past, I have gotten between 25 and 60 bangable matches between Friday at 5 PM and Sunday at midnight (I unmatch fat chicks and uggos). The 25 was an outlier, usually it's around 40.

This weekend I got 19 matches.

Tinder has changed something in their algorithm that is resulting in less matches for the average guy (me). What I'm curious about is if they made a change to benefit the top 5% of slayers, or if they changed something that means that everyone just gets less matches overall.
Or the male/female ratio has gotten worse
post 1464836241 10-03-2016, 02:01 AM
-
#240
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  1. pancakemouse
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 985
  5. Rep Power: 314
Originally Posted By BRBMakingMoney
Or the male/female ratio has gotten worse
Could be, but that seems like a drastic change for a month. To be fair though, it's been going downhill for the past few months, although I had hoped matches would spike again now that they moved Tinder Social to a different tab.
Tinder Science Crew
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts