Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Gdp sloots suing for $500k each
  1. Results 211 to 233 of 233
  2. First
  3. 6
  4. 7
  5. 8
post 1582255871 06-17-2019, 08:57 PM
-
#211
  1. anonkunbrah
  1. anonkunbrah
  2. Join Date: Jul 2015
  3. Posts: 52,506
  4. Subscribers: 1
  5. Rep Power: 372780
Originally Posted By solidus2k3
who are these cucks marrying them
ex miscers
post 1582256191 06-17-2019, 09:02 PM
-
#212
  1. ErnieMccracken
  1. ErnieMccracken
  2. Join Date: Nov 2013
  3. Posts: 100,062
  4. Rep Power: 330290
Originally Posted By mingrey02stg2
how could you possibly think that a porn video would not have at least the potential to go viral/mainstream?
Because they are young HBB's who have been worshipped by the world since they hit puberty. Kind of like these famous athletes who do the dumbest chit because someone has always bailed them out. Even AFTER all this, there will still be a line around the block to save these thots and maybe sniff real hard as they walk by.
post 1582257091 06-17-2019, 09:19 PM
-
#213
  1. kalvinmc
  2. ( ͡ಠ ͜ʖ ͡ಠ)
  1. kalvinmc
  2. ( ͡ಠ ͜ʖ ͡ಠ)
  3. Join Date: Sep 2015
  4. Location: Balding, North Carolina, Chad
  5. Posts: 5,971
  6. Rep Power: 22988
Originally Posted By getsetmane
what's the #? Asking for a friend
e157
"Sometimes nobody shows up and you automatically win."

27.55lb x 12 alternating bicep curl
220lb x 8 barbell hip thrust
post 1582257181 06-17-2019, 09:20 PM
-
#214
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  1. FAPhaggot
  2. Hawaiian shirt hoarder
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 24,226
  5. Rep Power: 185354
I saw one pic on here of a Gross Domestic Product sloot that had got married and was at a hockey game with her husband. She was wearing a fan jersey with #69 on it. There was no #69 on that team.

These guys are aweir of what they are getting in to.
FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew

"Experience is something you get right after you need it."
post 1582257231 06-17-2019, 09:22 PM
-
#215
  1. eatmycrackers
  2. lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
  1. eatmycrackers
  2. lol @ nocoincels; 118 IQ
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 8,772
  6. Rep Power: 37689
Originally Posted By FA*******
I saw one pic on here of a Gross Domestic Product sloot that had got married and was at a hockey game with her husband. She was wearing a fan jersey with #69 on it. There was no #69 on that team.

These guys are aweir of what they are getting in to.
Strong username to post content ratio
Posts are for fun, not to be taken seriously or as truth.

Angie Varona Appreciation Club Founder
post 1582257371 06-17-2019, 09:25 PM
-
#216
  1. DeusExTerra
  2. Deuce
  1. DeusExTerra
  2. Deuce
  3. Join Date: Jun 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 2,082
  6. Rep Power: 12845
Originally Posted By OgeccaMaMa

post 1582257441 06-17-2019, 09:26 PM
-
#217
  1. VTheKing
  2. Allied Allies Alliance
  1. VTheKing
  2. Allied Allies Alliance
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: British Columbia, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 28,869
  7. Rep Power: 81290
Originally Posted By momo5
easy win for the defending lawyers, you can't sue when you signed a contract.
they quite literally set up an elaborate scheme and paid people off to conceal the fact the videos would be published on GDP, and it appears the website was never mentioned in the contract (which they didn't let the women stop to read). so odds are they're royally ****ed and could even be held criminally liable beyond monetary compensation.

I don't understand people defending the website lmao, imagine if you went "20 bucks is 20 bucks" mode under the guise of low profile then your employers plastered your face and dick everywhere without your consent. it's not even hackers or internet detectives doing it, it's the whole point of the scheme - set up maliciously at your expense, and you don't even get a cut for the undue exposure.
Go Canucks Go!



Mais notre monde érodé restera le même
Et demain toi et moi serons partis
post 1582257511 06-17-2019, 09:29 PM
-
#218
  1. ErnieMccracken
  1. ErnieMccracken
  2. Join Date: Nov 2013
  3. Posts: 100,062
  4. Rep Power: 330290
That mormon girl is prime LTC meat. She should get some royalties or something because her scene probably generated $1M+ revenue for GDP ayyyyy.
post 1582257771 06-17-2019, 09:37 PM
-
#219
  1. Lunatic
  2. The Cripple
  1. Lunatic
  2. The Cripple
  3. Join Date: Nov 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 57,101
  6. Rep Power: 494160
Originally Posted By VTheKing
they quite literally set up an elaborate scheme and paid people off to conceal the fact the videos would be published on GDP, and it appears the website was never mentioned in the contract (which they didn't let the women stop to read). so odds are they're royally ****ed and could even be held criminally liable beyond monetary compensation.

I don't understand people defending the website lmao, imagine if you went "20 bucks is 20 bucks" mode under the guise of low profile then your employers plastered your face and dick everywhere without your consent. it's not even hackers or internet detectives doing it, it's the whole point of the scheme - set up maliciously at your expense, and you don't even get a cut for the undue exposure.
If the GDP guys were that stupid.... just wow
AcetylCoA gets reps

"God your dunce." - Swept

LSU Tigers/Washington Nationals
post 1582257811 06-17-2019, 09:38 PM
-
#220
  1. BigRangs
  2. big💍💍💍
  1. BigRangs
  2. big💍💍💍
  3. Join Date: Sep 1999
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 21,033
  6. Rep Power: 364988
Originally Posted By ErnieMccracken
Do stupid sloots deserve to be deceived, from a legal contact standpoint? Srs question. There's zero doubt that they didn't understand the implication of what they were getting into and that was intentional.
Unless they had a gun to their head and were forced to sign the contract, they have no defense as far as that goes. Feeling pressured or rushed to sign a contract is absolutely not a legal defense.
Be the dog Iceman thinks he has
Seinfeld crew
Costco crew
Golf crew
Watch crew
MAGA
post 1582257921 06-17-2019, 09:41 PM
-
#221
  1. ErnieMccracken
  1. ErnieMccracken
  2. Join Date: Nov 2013
  3. Posts: 100,062
  4. Rep Power: 330290
Originally Posted By BigRangs
Unless they had a gun to their head and were forced to sign the contract, they have no defense as far as that goes. Feeling pressured or rushed to sign a contract is absolutely not a legal defense.
Here's a scenario that happens literally every single day:

Sloot wife:I felt pressured and rushed to sign this pre-nup. I didn't really want it.
WK Judge:I declare this pre-nuptial contract invalid since she felt pressured and rushed.
post 1582258421 06-17-2019, 09:53 PM
-
#222
  1. puffdaddy68
  2. Registered User
  1. puffdaddy68
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2015
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 365
  6. Rep Power: 1360
i actually work on cases similar to this (not pr0n, i wish, but similar lawsuits) and the girls likely will either win or GDP will settle out of court. there's no chance any of these girls would do GDP if they knew it was going to be on every website, so that leads me to believe they either outright lied or intentionally misled the girls. then, all these girls will have a chitload of death threats, people sending it to their families/work, etc, so it's pretty easy to show that this damaged their future earnings and/or mentally damaged them.

not saying these girls aren't dumb as fuark for doing this, they are. but they're probably going to get a big pay day.
post 1582259121 06-17-2019, 10:07 PM
-
#223
  1. BigRangs
  2. big💍💍💍
  1. BigRangs
  2. big💍💍💍
  3. Join Date: Sep 1999
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 21,033
  6. Rep Power: 364988
Originally Posted By ErnieMccracken
Here's a scenario that happens literally every single day:

Sloot wife:I felt pressured and rushed to sign this pre-nup. I didn't really want it.
WK Judge:I declare this pre-nuptial contract invalid since she felt pressured and rushed.
In all likelihood they just cave because of legal costs. That doesn't make it a valid legal defense, just some type of time wasting defense. It comes down to who's funding them, and how long are they willing to drag it out for. It's a sad part of our legal system.
Be the dog Iceman thinks he has
Seinfeld crew
Costco crew
Golf crew
Watch crew
MAGA
post 1582259391 06-17-2019, 10:14 PM
-
#224
  1. ErnieMccracken
  1. ErnieMccracken
  2. Join Date: Nov 2013
  3. Posts: 100,062
  4. Rep Power: 330290
Originally Posted By BigRangs
In all likelihood they just cave because of legal costs. That doesn't make it a valid legal defense, just some type of time wasting defense. It comes down to who's funding them, and how long are they willing to drag it out for. It's a sad part of our legal system.
I sat next to a divorce lawyer on a plane one and he said a client was rapidly selling assets to contest custody of a little rat dog. The bill was already approaching $100k.
post 1582259971 06-17-2019, 10:33 PM
-
#225
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 9,748
  6. Rep Power: 54369
This was a black mirror episode that ended horribly.
*Mechanical Engineering Crew*
*6'3" Master Race Crew*
*6 Figs Crew*

"Because the thing about repairing, maintaining, and cleaning is it’s not an adventure. There’s no way to do it so wrong you might die. It’s just work. And the bottom line is, some people are okay going to work, and some people … well, some people would rather die. Each of us gets to choose.”
post 1582260011 06-17-2019, 10:34 PM
-
#226
  1. ErnieMccracken
  1. ErnieMccracken
  2. Join Date: Nov 2013
  3. Posts: 100,062
  4. Rep Power: 330290
Originally Posted By JStrez
This was a black mirror episode that ended horribly.
Is that show worth watching?
post 1582260681 06-17-2019, 10:52 PM
-
#227
  1. Tune5k
  2. Bastet's Dream
  1. Tune5k
  2. Bastet's Dream
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 38,825
  5. Rep Power: 409521
never ever getting married crew....fuk this sht
post 1582260721 06-17-2019, 10:54 PM
-
#228
  1. ErnieMccracken
  1. ErnieMccracken
  2. Join Date: Nov 2013
  3. Posts: 100,062
  4. Rep Power: 330290
Originally Posted By Tune5k
never ever getting married crew....fuk this sht
Welcome, brother. Grab a beer and pull up a chair.
post 1582265621 06-18-2019, 01:51 AM
-
#229
  1. mcdojo
  2. Registered User
  1. mcdojo
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 19,514
  6. Rep Power: 42360
Originally Posted By VTheKing
they quite literally set up an elaborate scheme and paid people off to conceal the fact the videos would be published on GDP, and it appears the website was never mentioned in the contract (which they didn't let the women stop to read). so odds are they're royally ****ed and could even be held criminally liable beyond monetary compensation.

I don't understand people defending the website lmao, imagine if you went "20 bucks is 20 bucks" mode under the guise of low profile then your employers plastered your face and dick everywhere without your consent. it's not even hackers or internet detectives doing it, it's the whole point of the scheme - set up maliciously at your expense, and you don't even get a cut for the undue exposure.
Contractually there is no doubt in my mind that it says they can do whatever they want with the video. The contact doesnt need to mention the website, if it is signing all rights away. So based on the contract they have no case.

However they are arguing they were verbally deceived.
post 1582275571 06-18-2019, 07:11 AM
-
#230
  1. Legz422
  1. Legz422
  2. Join Date: Sep 2017
  3. Age: 57
  4. Posts: 45,714
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 625905
Originally Posted By ErnieMccracken
If it's wrong to prey on your demented Granny into buying bullchit magazines, security systems, vacuum cleaners, or whatever - it's also wrong to deceive dumb young sloots into taking a big ol' mexi-dink on camera for the world to see. At least morally. Imagine if women lost their rights on account of being cum dumpsters. brb moving to Saudi Arabia.
There is a very big difference between an elderly person who most likely has dementia and an 18-23 yr old. These guys are not preying on mentally disabled girls. They’re just stupid AF. BRB let me be a literal whore by getting paid to star in a porno and herp derp no way could this have any negative consequences in the future.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
post 1582279441 06-18-2019, 08:17 AM
-
#231
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 28,898
  5. Rep Power: 342064
Originally Posted By Legz422
There is a very big difference between an elderly person who most likely has dementia and an 18-23 yr old. These guys are not preying on mentally disabled girls. They’re just stupid AF. BRB let me be a literal whore by getting paid to star in a porno and herp derp no way could this have any negative consequences in the future.
Momma legz has spoken. No sympathy shall be imparted on dumb sloots
6'2"

OMAD results: 2/15/19-235, 10/13/19-190

OHP-205 Bench- 245 Squat - 405 C&J - 245

2021 Spring cut: 195lbs starting weight
post 1582280441 06-18-2019, 08:35 AM
-
#232
  1. mp83
  2. i need a tan
  1. mp83
  2. i need a tan
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: Wisconsin, United States
  5. Posts: 12,073
  6. Rep Power: 97658
This is why most porn sites use professionals and pretend they are amateurs. Less BS to deal with
{Misc Fisherman Crew}
{Misc Investing Crew}
post 1582280681 06-18-2019, 08:40 AM
-
#233
  1. Frank Drebin
  2. Cutting
  1. Frank Drebin
  2. Cutting
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 24,590
  6. Rep Power: 86323
So why is pornography legal but prostitution not? It's ok to pay for BJ's as long as you film it?
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts