Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Imagine being a vaxcuck lol
  1. Results 211 to 240 of 275
  2. Page 8 of 10
  3. First
  5. 6
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. 9
  9. 10
  11. Last

Thread: Imagine being a vaxcuck lol

post 1659798043 04-17-2022, 11:36 AM
-
#211
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  1. Jasonw1178
  2. 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 44,104
  5. Rep Power: 271274
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Before I even clicked on the thread to enter, I predicted the chicken nugget brigade would make an error in scientific literacy.


Sure enough, there it was on the OP. The vax evaporates from your system like water on a summer sidewalk? That's meant to happen. It's by design. The mRNA is metabolized very quickly after it does its job to produce the spike protein. That's a good thing as it's so simple in composition and minimizes the risks of side effects.


A few days after your initial injection, there's nothing left of it in your body apart from the antibodies your own body has produced.
It's one of those thing where do what you want to do. There are side effects. Some people are more worried about heart problems than they are a virus, especially considering my family has a history of heart disease. Heart problems are one of those things where you don't know you have a problem until you have a problem, and once you have them they never go away. So I made my choice that I am better off without the vaccine than with the vaccine.

What I can't stand about liberals is how they think we are one society, that we are all in this together. We arent. This one woman's answer to "Do I owe you or something?" was "We owe each other everything". I hate to be negative but unfortunately there are far too many people that would fuk anyone over they could if it meant any personal gain for themselves if they thought they could get away with it without repercussions. So you think I should put myself in harms way for those people? No.
post 1659798753 04-17-2022, 11:49 AM
-
#212
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
So he's lying?
Try to get a PCR test without meeting the eligibility requirements. Also consider differences in desire to take a test between panicked jabbies and resolute purebloods.
post 1659798843 04-17-2022, 11:50 AM
-
#213
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Jasonw1178⏩
It's one of those thing where do what you want to do. There are side effects. Some people are more worried about heart problems than they are a virus, especially considering my family has a history of heart disease. Heart problems are one of those things where you don't know you have a problem until you have a problem, and once you have them they never go away. So I made my choice that I am better off without the vaccine than with the vaccine.

What I can't stand about liberals is how they think we are one society, that we are all in this together. We arent. This one woman's answer to "Do I owe you or something?" was "We owe each other everything". I hate to be negative but unfortunately there are far too many people that would fuk anyone over they could if it meant any personal gain for themselves if they thought they could get away with it without repercussions. So you think I should put myself in harms way for those people? No.
Reasonable position

But, keep in mind that heart issues are more common post-infection than post-vaccination - although both are rare.
post 1659799063 04-17-2022, 11:57 AM
-
#214
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Reasonable position

But, keep in mind that heart issues are more common post-infection than post-vaccination - although both are rare.
Dude, people were getting vaccinated the wrong way for close to a year. Anything to say about that?

Small mistake?

I mean, you remind me of those people who believed that lockdowns worked, thst the cloth mask was effective, that you should wear two of them outside, wear gloves and wipe everything down constantly.

It never even crosses your mind that you're wrong.
post 1659799103 04-17-2022, 11:57 AM
-
#215
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Joseph1990⏩
Sucking unprecedented levels of cock is restricted but here you are.
Where is that restricted?
post 1659799133 04-17-2022, 11:57 AM
-
#216
  1. pondus_levo
  2. mic dropper
  1. pondus_levo
  2. mic dropper
  3. Join Date: Oct 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 24,811
  6. Rep Power: 163138
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Reasonable position

But, keep in mind that heart issues are more common post-infection than post-vaccination - although both are rare.
Um, no.
Forever alone? Attraction and keeping the girl chasing you - http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=131498033

You will never know your limits, unless you push yourself past the imaginary lines you have drawn in the sand.

Knee Dragger - '06 GSX-R750
post 1659799143 04-17-2022, 11:58 AM
-
#217
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Dude, people were getting vaccinated the wrong way for close to a year. Anything to say about that?

Small mistake?

I mean, you remind me of those people who believed that lockdowns worked, thst the cloth mask was effective, that you should wear two of them outside, wear gloves and wipe everything down constantly.

It never even crosses your mind that you're wrong.
Vaccinated the wrong way? Can you clarify?
post 1659799173 04-17-2022, 11:58 AM
-
#218
  1. mk2kh
  2. Registered User
  1. mk2kh
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,076
  6. Rep Power: 1849
I know so many vaxcels saying the only way to end the pandemic is getting double vaccinated now they have covid….
post 1659799183 04-17-2022, 11:59 AM
-
#219
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
But, keep in mind that vaccination does not prevent infection.
Lowers the odds though.
post 1659799633 04-17-2022, 12:05 PM
-
#220
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Does it?
Doesn't it?
post 1659799823 04-17-2022, 12:08 PM
-
#221
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
You tell me:



Just LOL @ Justin's Little Cuck srs.
How or why do you interpret that plot as risk?
post 1659800423 04-17-2022, 12:18 PM
-
#222
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I see we went from "odds" to "risk", is that another "hyperbole"?
Okay. How or why do you interpret that plot as reflective of odds (probability of infection occurring/probability infection not occurring)?
post 1659800673 04-17-2022, 12:22 PM
-
#223
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  1. Skeptical_Hippo
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
  5. Posts: 26,147
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
And another lie.

edit :



Is your use of the word "restricted" in place of "recommended" another "hyperbole"?
Oh god, he literally provided your rebuttal in his own post.

post 1659800853 04-17-2022, 12:27 PM
-
#224
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Are you going to admit you changed the terms on purpose before getting caught - again?
So no help with going from rate to odds?
post 1659801293 04-17-2022, 12:36 PM
-
#225
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Vaccinated the wrong way? Can you clarify?
Geeee, I don't know Skippy, how about the fact that you shouldn't get the second jab 3 weeks after the first one? Now it's been revised you get the second jab, 8 weeks after the first one.
post 1659801353 04-17-2022, 12:37 PM
-
#226
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Geeee, I don't know Skippy, how about the fact that you shouldn't get the second jab 3 weeks after the first one? Now it's been revised you get the second jab, 8 weeks after the first one.
That means vaccines don't work?
post 1659801403 04-17-2022, 12:38 PM
-
#227
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Reasonable position

But, keep in mind that heart issues are more common post-infection than post-vaccination - although both are rare.
Nah, post vax is far higher.
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1659801413 04-17-2022, 12:38 PM
-
#228
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Are you going to admit you changed the terms on purpose before getting caught - the third time in this thread?
It wasn't intentional. Odds and risk are related. I'm asking for help on how to get from rate to either odds or risk.
post 1659801543 04-17-2022, 12:40 PM
-
#229
  1. ghostfacedup
  2. Registered User
  1. ghostfacedup
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 16,948
  5. Rep Power: 80672
there are people who still believe in the vax for people under 50?? lmao.
post 1659801593 04-17-2022, 12:41 PM
-
#230
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Joseph1990⏩
Nah, post vax is far higher.
It doesn't look that way.
post 1659801603 04-17-2022, 12:41 PM
-
#231
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
That means vaccines don't work?
They work.
Spoiler!


Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1659801633 04-17-2022, 12:42 PM
-
#232
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Please quote where he stated that.
Please quote where I discussed government rollouts
post 1659801713 04-17-2022, 12:43 PM
-
#233
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By ghostfacedup⏩
there are people who still believe in the vax for people under 50?? lmao.
Dude, people still go to war over belief in different sky wizards.
post 1659801793 04-17-2022, 12:43 PM
-
#234
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Are you going to admit you changed the terms, regardless whether it was intentional or not?

It seems like English is your second language ( although I do hope it's at least the third, since it seems to be really, really weak ), so I thought I would help you out:

odds
ŏdz
noun plural
A certain number of points given beforehand to a weaker side in a contest to equalize the chances of all participants.
The ratio of the probability of an event's occurring to the probability of its not occurring.
The likelihood of the occurrence of one thing rather than the occurrence of another thing, as in a contest.

risk
rĭsk
noun
The possibility of suffering harm or loss; danger.
A factor, thing, element, or course involving uncertain danger; a hazard.
The danger or probability of loss to an insurer.

Please study the provided definition of these words, let me know when you are done.
All done. Can we have the definition of rate, too?

Definitions in the current context:

“Risk” refers to the probability of occurrence of an event or outcome. Statistically, risk = chance of the outcome of interest/all possible outcomes. The term “odds” is often used instead of risk. “Odds” refers to the probability of occurrence of an event/probability of the event not occurring.
post 1659802503 04-17-2022, 12:57 PM
-
#235
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I'll do one better, here's your next set of words you seem to be confused by:

restricted
rĭ-strĭk′tĭd
adjective
Kept within certain limits; limited.
Excluding or unavailable to certain groups.
Available only to authorized persons.

recommend
rĕk″ə-mĕnd′
intransitive verb
To praise or commend to another as being worthy or desirable; endorse.
To make attractive or acceptable.
To advise or counsel.

I shouldn't have to teach basic, everyday words to a smart cookie like yourself.
I'm still kinda stuck on how to interpret that plot of rates as odds.
post 1659803473 04-17-2022, 01:17 PM
-
#236
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I mean, if acting like you're dumb is the hill you want to die on, so be it. Thanks for the ammo though.

But I'm still kinda stuck on how "unvaccinated can't get tested".
So you won't show us how you're inferring efficacy from that plot?
post 1659803753 04-17-2022, 01:21 PM
-
#237
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
But, keep in mind that vaccination does not prevent infection.
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Lowers the odds though.
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Does it?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Doesn't it?
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
You tell me:



Just LOL @ Justin's Little Cuck srs.
How does that plot of rates relate to odds?
post 1659804213 04-17-2022, 01:29 PM
-
#238
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Are you going to admit to intentionally changing terms to change the question or not?
Are you gonna help us get from rates to odds?
post 1659804393 04-17-2022, 01:34 PM
-
#239
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Are you going to admit to intentionally changing the terms to change the question or not?

Or that you flat out lied when you stated that "unvaccinated can't get tested"?

Or that you apparently don't know the difference between "restricted" and "recommended"?

Remember, you would have to do answer all of these questions to demonstrate that you are arguing in good faith.

Until that happens, keep acting dumb and pretend that you can't read plots.
Are you gonna help us get from rates to odds?
post 1659804573 04-17-2022, 01:37 PM
-
#240
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Are you going to admit to intentionally changing the terms to change the question or not?
I changed terms, unintentionally.
Or that you flat out lied when you stated that "unvaccinated can't get tested"?
While I didn't "flat out lie", it was an overstatement of my opinion. My apologies
Or that you apparently don't know the difference between "restricted" and "recommended"?
I do know the difference. When taken together with the term "eligible" the distinction is less clear.
Remember, you would have to do answer all of these questions to demonstrate that you are arguing in good faith. Once that happens, and I have the smallest indication that you are not just looking for a gotcha by changing what you stated initially hoping no one notices, I will engage.

Until that happens, keep acting dumb and pretend that you can't read plots.
That plot is of rates and reads as such. I'm asking for your help in translating it to odds.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts