- God (Christian God) creates angels and all life and requires them to praise him. Weird af, strong insecurity.
- God says if you don't do that, he's going to eternally torture you or end your life in some fashion.
- God creates conditions where he says it's a choice of either serving him or not, but that's not actually the choice. The question of whether he exists or not in the first place is more pressing of an issue. How can he rightly then justify murder of his creation when we don't even know "it" exists in the first place?
- brb many religions claim to have the "truth" and "know" it's the truth. Many religious people of all affiliations have "experiences". Doesn't prove chit and muddies the water even more.
- The above doesn't make logical sense, because God can do whatever he wants. It's his "will", he sets the "rules". But there's no consistency, because it's beyond our comprehension as human beings. So when God says he is "love", his "love" is so far beyond our understanding it's actually pointless to consider it "love". brb making bugs that feed off of starving African kids eyes. brb all the debilitating diseases.
- brb cancer
- God is sick is the ****ing head
- Satan most likely say all this nonsense and wanted to just die
- Satan amasses a crew of "1/3 of all the angels" - says it in the bible, who rebel.
- If Satan didn't have a good point to make, then why did 1/3 of all angels chose to follow him to death?
- Satan makes a claim that we don't need to serve God
- God then cripples us to show us that actually we do need him.
- The game is rigged in favor of God
- God is a ****ing ****ggot

Dead fkn srs, if any Christian ****ggs want to challenge me, I'll prove categorically, and from your own Bible that he is unhinged af and isn't worthy of praise. He's fkd in the head brahs

dead fkn srs this is the real tea

Smh at philosophical babble. Also at NDEs and deducing anything mystical or religious from them.

Implying NDEs are meaningless is just as much speculation ("philosophical babble") as suggesting that there may be something to them. Ultimately, we don't know - and acting as though it's moronic to discuss/consider/ponder anything that hasn't been proven by "Science" is pretty silly. There's clearly a shyt ton about the universe/reality that we don't know. Do we need men in white lab coats to prove something before discussing or speculating on it?

Not to mention you're "Phythagoras Crew"...who was into a lot of Mysical/Occult stuff.

You do need some controlled experiment to demonstrate a phenomenon, yes. People may personally have experienced things,but there is no way of knowing what they experienced or what happened without careful study.

Sure, but my point is automatically insisting that an idea or interpretation of something is absurd and dismissing it by default because that hasn't happened is what I think is silly. Huge difference between that and "I don't personally believe that because I haven't seen sufficient evidence to convince me". One is arrogant and very narrow minded - the latter is very reasonable skepticism.

Sure. Agreed. I take the latter approach, but with the added point that we already have some good reasons to believe NDE are due to hallucinations rather than an actual physical event. After all, it would throw a lot of ouralready established understanding of the world out the window. So, it is more likely that the simpler explanation, which fitsour current understanding, is true.

Smh at philosophical babble. Also at NDEs and deducing anything mystical or religious from them.

That's what satan would say, OP. Are you satan?

Isaiah 45:7 I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things