Forum
»
Natural immunity found to be as effective as COVID vaccine
02-28-2023, 01:17 PM
-
#241
- CalmWind
- Yeshua is Messiah
-
- CalmWind
- Yeshua is Messiah
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 27,975
- Rep Power: 143687
-
-
Lastly...
studies have shown, like this one :
"Cardiovascular involvement in autoimmune diseases"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459468/
that your heart is particularly vulnerable to autoimmune diseases, leading to things like myocarditis
Interedasting
studies have shown, like this one :
"Cardiovascular involvement in autoimmune diseases"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459468/
that your heart is particularly vulnerable to autoimmune diseases, leading to things like myocarditis
Interedasting
Ave Christus Rex
Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
02-28-2023, 01:18 PM
-
#242
- CalmWind
- Yeshua is Messiah
-
- CalmWind
- Yeshua is Messiah
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 27,975
- Rep Power: 143687
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
As you pointed out earlier, other traditional vaccines "wane", as the body regulates autoimmune response back down to normal levels.Not that I know of. Should we be doing that for influenza and other vaccines as well?
So it seems only the mRNA jabs, which keep your body in an elevated response.... are unique to this
Ave Christus Rex
Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
02-28-2023, 01:20 PM
-
#243
Originally Posted By CalmWind⏩
Can you expand on why you think vaccines lead to autoimmune disease? If that's your argument.Lastly...
studies have shown, like this one :
"Cardiovascular involvement in autoimmune diseases"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459468/
that your heart is particularly vulnerable to autoimmune diseases, leading to things like myocarditis
Interedasting
studies have shown, like this one :
"Cardiovascular involvement in autoimmune diseases"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459468/
that your heart is particularly vulnerable to autoimmune diseases, leading to things like myocarditis
Interedasting
We have seen that covid infection increases that risk, which is one among many risks of infection that I feel people should balance against the risks of vaccination.
Is there increased risk novel autoimmune disease following vaccination?
02-28-2023, 01:21 PM
-
#244
Originally Posted By CalmWind⏩
Well no, one of the criticisms of the mRNA vaccines was antibody waning (neutralizing antibody titres decreasing over time). Antibody levels wane following both vaccination and infection.As you pointed out earlier, other traditional vaccines "wane", as the body regulates autoimmune response back down to normal levels.
So it seems only the mRNA jabs, which keep your body in an elevated response.... are unique to this
So it seems only the mRNA jabs, which keep your body in an elevated response.... are unique to this
02-28-2023, 01:21 PM
-
#245
- rocketfish
- San Diego
-
- rocketfish
- San Diego
- Join Date: Feb 2008
- Location: Nevada, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 21,413
- Rep Power: 57311
-
-
daily vaccel L
*** Free Thinker Crew ***
*** Herbert The Future GOAT Crew ***
*** HTC ***
02-28-2023, 01:33 PM
-
#246
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
LMFAO!!! You still don't (intentionally) get it do you lol.Is there something between those posts with which you take issue?
Vaccines weren't, and still aren't globally available."Multiple COVID-19 vaccines, representing diverse vaccine platforms, successfully protect against symptomatic COVID-19 cases and deaths"- for those who both have access to and accept them. Global travel is a daily occurrence.
Relying on a single mitigation measure to which much of the world did/does not have access seems like a poor strategyto me. Do you disagree?
Vaccines weren't, and still aren't globally available."Multiple COVID-19 vaccines, representing diverse vaccine platforms, successfully protect against symptomatic COVID-19 cases and deaths"- for those who both have access to and accept them. Global travel is a daily occurrence.
Relying on a single mitigation measure to which much of the world did/does not have access seems like a poor strategyto me. Do you disagree?
The vaccine was going to be THE mythical end-all be-all God that was going to save us all from the terrifying Rona monster. Remember.. And there has been one advertising campaign after another after another urging people to get said vaccine. And in fact our very own government has given billions of dollars to other countries specifically FOR covid assistance.
https://2017-2021.state.gov/foreign-...-19/index.html
But now here you are saying "much of the world" doesn't have access to the sacred Fauci Fluid - and because of that...
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Which still begs the same question that you keep ignoring... If we can't vaccinate our way out of this global black plague zombie apocalypse virus of DOOM, then WTF was the point of them? Why send billions in aid around the world if the vaccines won't help?It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic.

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
02-28-2023, 01:34 PM
-
#247
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
My point was that relying on vaccines as a single mitigation was a poor strategy. Is that not clear in what I posted?LMFAO!!! You still don't (intentionally) get it do you lol.
The vaccine was going to be THE mythical end-all be-all God that was going to save us all from the terrifying Rona monster. Remember.. And there has been one advertising campaign after another after another urging people to get said vaccine. And in fact our very own government has given billions of dollars to other countries specifically FOR covid assistance.
https://2017-2021.state.gov/foreign-...-19/index.html
But now here you are saying "much of the world" doesn't have access to the sacred Fauci Fluid - and because of that...
Which still begs the same question that you keep ignoring... If we can't vaccinate our way out of this global black plague zombie apocalypse virus of DOOM, then WTF was the point of them? Why send billions in aid around the world if the vaccines won't help?
The vaccine was going to be THE mythical end-all be-all God that was going to save us all from the terrifying Rona monster. Remember.. And there has been one advertising campaign after another after another urging people to get said vaccine. And in fact our very own government has given billions of dollars to other countries specifically FOR covid assistance.
https://2017-2021.state.gov/foreign-...-19/index.html
But now here you are saying "much of the world" doesn't have access to the sacred Fauci Fluid - and because of that...
Which still begs the same question that you keep ignoring... If we can't vaccinate our way out of this global black plague zombie apocalypse virus of DOOM, then WTF was the point of them? Why send billions in aid around the world if the vaccines won't help?

02-28-2023, 01:37 PM
-
#248
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
So what other options were there?My point was that relying on vaccines as a single mitigation was a poor strategy. Is that not clear in what I posted?
And why the gigantic push for vaccines and not these other options?
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
02-28-2023, 01:40 PM
-
#249
Originally Posted By CalmWind⏩
Autoimmune conditions following mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) COVID-19 vaccination: A descriptive cohort study among 1.1 million vaccinated people in Hong KongAs you pointed out earlier, other traditional vaccines "wane", as the body regulates autoimmune response back down to normal levels.
So it seems only the mRNA jabs, which keep your body in an elevated response.... are unique to this
So it seems only the mRNA jabs, which keep your body in an elevated response.... are unique to this
"This study included around 3.9 million Hong Kong residents, of which 1,122,793 received at least one dose of vaccine (BNT162b2: 579,998; CoronaVac: 542,795), and 721,588 completed two doses (BNT162b2: 388,881; CoronaVac: 332,707). Within 28 days following vaccination, cumulative incidences for all autoimmune conditions were below 9 per 100,000 persons, for both vaccines and both doses. None of the age-standardized incidence rates were significantly higher than the non-vaccinated individuals, except for an observed increased incidence of hypersomnia following the first dose of BNT162b2 (standardized IRR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.10–1.94)."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008125/
02-28-2023, 02:45 PM
-
#250
- CalmWind
- Yeshua is Messiah
-
- CalmWind
- Yeshua is Messiah
- Join Date: Sep 2012
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 27,975
- Rep Power: 143687
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
28 days?Autoimmune conditions following mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) COVID-19 vaccination: A descriptive cohort study among 1.1 million vaccinated people in Hong Kong
"This study included around 3.9 million Hong Kong residents, of which 1,122,793 received at least one dose of vaccine (BNT162b2: 579,998; CoronaVac: 542,795), and 721,588 completed two doses (BNT162b2: 388,881; CoronaVac: 332,707). Within 28 days following vaccination, cumulative incidences for all autoimmune conditions were below 9 per 100,000 persons, for both vaccines and both doses. None of the age-standardized incidence rates were significantly higher than the non-vaccinated individuals, except for an observed increased incidence of hypersomnia following the first dose of BNT162b2 (standardized IRR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.10–1.94)."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008125/
"This study included around 3.9 million Hong Kong residents, of which 1,122,793 received at least one dose of vaccine (BNT162b2: 579,998; CoronaVac: 542,795), and 721,588 completed two doses (BNT162b2: 388,881; CoronaVac: 332,707). Within 28 days following vaccination, cumulative incidences for all autoimmune conditions were below 9 per 100,000 persons, for both vaccines and both doses. None of the age-standardized incidence rates were significantly higher than the non-vaccinated individuals, except for an observed increased incidence of hypersomnia following the first dose of BNT162b2 (standardized IRR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.10–1.94)."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9008125/
I specifically used verbiage as "many months and years" and "up to 24 months of elevated immune response" etc.
I never assumed an autoimmune condition could develop within 28 days. I specifically cited long periods of time, because of the constant boosters.
you clearly have an agenda here
Ave Christus Rex
Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
02-28-2023, 02:59 PM
-
#251
Originally Posted By CalmWind⏩
That's what I found with a quick search. Can you share where you're seeing increased incidence of autoimmune disorders and/or prolonged immune responses from mRNA vaccines?28 days?
I specifically used verbiage as "many months and years" and "up to 24 months of elevated immune response" etc.
I never assumed an autoimmune condition could develop within 28 days. I specifically cited long periods of time, because of the constant boosters.
you clearly have an agenda here
I specifically used verbiage as "many months and years" and "up to 24 months of elevated immune response" etc.
I never assumed an autoimmune condition could develop within 28 days. I specifically cited long periods of time, because of the constant boosters.
you clearly have an agenda here
02-28-2023, 03:24 PM
-
#252
02-28-2023, 04:48 PM
-
#253
Interesting to see how J.L.C. claims to not have backpedaled, yet...
We have not seen the source for this claim:

We have not seen the source for this claim:
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
So yes, confirmed case ofOriginally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
https://c2cjournal.ca/2021/11/no-we-...-the-pandemic/
https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/10/...-end-pandemic/
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/wh...-with-covid-19
https://www.voanews.com/a/who-chief-...-/6255192.html
Which paper is your name on?Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00728-2Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Reference for that claim, please.Yep. Many,myself included, said that right from the start.

https://c2cjournal.ca/2021/11/no-we-...-the-pandemic/
https://www.statnews.com/2021/02/10/...-end-pandemic/
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/wh...-with-covid-19
https://www.voanews.com/a/who-chief-...-/6255192.html


02-28-2023, 04:48 PM
-
#254
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Interesting to see how anytime anyone else posts something, you demand the source.That's what I found with a quick search. Can you share where you're seeing increased incidence of autoimmune disorders and/or prolonged immune responses from mRNA vaccines?
Yet you refuse to provide the source of the majority of your claims/statements.

02-28-2023, 04:50 PM
-
#255
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Even better, why the giant push for experimental mRNA vaccines and not any other types of vaccine?So what other options were there?
And why the gigantic push for vaccines and not these other options?
And why the gigantic push for vaccines and not these other options?
My money is on J.L.C. completely ignoring this one.

02-28-2023, 04:18 PM
-
#256
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I don't know how I can be expected to have an answer for that. But it does seem the mRNA covid vaccines work better than the traditional covid vaccines.Even better, why the giant push for experimental mRNA vaccines and not any other types of vaccine?
My money is on J.L.C. completely ignoring this one.
My money is on J.L.C. completely ignoring this one.

02-28-2023, 06:13 PM
-
#257
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
And for the first time ever, you decided to be less intellectually dishonest than you are usually. Finally posted the correct statement - although you still haven't posted the complete statement, and you're still only factually correct because you included "seem" in there.I don't know how I can be expected to have an answer for that. But it does seem the mRNA covid vaccines work better than the traditional covid vaccines.
However, you still ignored the post, and deflected with that statement.
So yup, I called it correctly, yet again.

Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?

02-28-2023, 05:17 PM
-
#258
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
"Seem" because we have data as evidence and analysis of those data to draw inference. No model is correct, but some are useful.And for the first time ever, you decided to be less intellectually dishonest than you are usually. Finally posted the correct statement - although you still haven't posted the complete statement, and you're still only factually correct because you included "seem" in there.
However, you still ignored the post, and deflected with that statement.
So yup, I called it correctly, yet again.
Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?
However, you still ignored the post, and deflected with that statement.
So yup, I called it correctly, yet again.

Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?

I dunno how replying directly can be considered ignoring.
02-28-2023, 06:20 PM
-
#259
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Except you didn't reply "directly". You made an irrelevant statement. You do know the difference between the two, right?"Seem" because we have data as evidence and analysis of those data to draw inference. No model is correct, but some are useful.
I dunno how replying directly can be considered ignoring.
I dunno how replying directly can be considered ignoring.

And here's the rest of the post you ignored:
Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?

02-28-2023, 05:22 PM
-
#260
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Even better, why the giant push for experimental mRNA vaccines and not any other types of vaccine?
My money is on J.L.C. completely ignoring this one.
My money is on J.L.C. completely ignoring this one.

Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I don't know how I can be expected to have an answer for that. But it does seem the mRNA covid vaccines work better than the traditional covid vaccines.

02-28-2023, 06:43 PM
-
#261
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
So instead of ignoring the post, you ignored the contents. What's the difference at the end of the day?

And here's the rest of the post you ignored:
Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?

02-28-2023, 05:53 PM
-
#262
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I didn't ignore the contents. I asked how I could possibly be expected to have an answer to the question.So instead of ignoring the post, you ignored the contents. What's the difference at the end of the day?
And here's the rest of the post you ignored:
Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?

And here's the rest of the post you ignored:
Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?

Similarly, how can I provide a source, other than myself, for my own opinions, inferences, and statements?
I am the source of my own opinions, statements (verbal and written), inference, and positions.

02-28-2023, 06:56 PM
-
#263
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Perfect. Thanks for confirming you have no opinion for the question of "why the giant push for experimental mRNA vaccines and not any other types of vaccine?".I didn't ignore the contents. I asked how I could possibly be expected to have an answer to the question.
Similarly, how can I provide a source, other than myself, for my own opinions, inferences, and statements?
I am the source of my own opinions, statements (verbal and written), inference, and positions.

Similarly, how can I provide a source, other than myself, for my own opinions, inferences, and statements?
I am the source of my own opinions, statements (verbal and written), inference, and positions.

And also, since you keep ignoring this part, I have to repeat it yet again...
Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?

02-28-2023, 06:02 PM
-
#264
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Correct, I don't have an opinion. The US provided funding, it seems China invested similarly. Which was ready for pseudo-global scaling first?Perfect. Thanks for confirming you have no opinion for the question of "why the giant push for experimental mRNA vaccines and not any other types of vaccine?".
And also, since you keep ignoring this part, I have to repeat it yet again...
Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?
And also, since you keep ignoring this part, I have to repeat it yet again...
Any update on the source of how you explicitly stated "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Or are you going to keep ignoring that as well?

I don't have historical transcripts of my conversations with friends and colleagues.
02-28-2023, 06:05 PM
-
#265
02-28-2023, 07:05 PM
-
#266
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
You know the answer to that - let's see if you're intellectually honest enough to provide the answer yourself.Correct, I don't have an opinion. The US provided funding, it seems China invested similarly. Which was ready for pseudo-global scaling first?

I don't have historical transcripts of my conversations with friends and colleagues.
Interesting - so you are saying you haven't posted anything along those lines on the misc?Edit : Remember, "along those lines" is referring to explicitly stating "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?

02-28-2023, 07:09 PM
-
#267
02-28-2023, 06:10 PM
-
#268
02-28-2023, 07:13 PM
-
#269
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
By asking that question, you confirmed that you aren't a real intellectual. If you were, you wouldn't be asking such a question.Do real intellectuals commit many or most patent filing dates to memory? Across industries?

Thanks for that!
Now go back and answer the post you ignored.

02-28-2023, 06:17 PM
-
#270
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I have considered vaccination to be a personal health decision since the beginning of vaccine availability. My post history reflects that position. As does the timing of my own, personal, decision.Interesting - so you are saying you haven't posted anything along those lines on the misc?
Edit : Remember, "along those lines" is referring to explicitly stating "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?
Edit : Remember, "along those lines" is referring to explicitly stating "right at the beginning" that "It was poor strategy to think we'd vaccinate our way out of a pandemic."?

Herd immunity wasn't going to happen, which was one of my main criticisms of the GBD.
If you suspect otherwise, please offer some evidence that I have encouraged, suggested, or "pushed" vaccination for anyone, at any time.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts