it's been 2 years you ****ing moron. not to mention you live in a diff country. oh and OP said 26-27. but you're so narcissistic you just couldn't help but input how much better you are than 'most of the misc'. every clown on here with an ego thinks he's better than 'most miscers' 'lol at miscers'. Give me a break. It is men with such egos that are always the easiest for women to manipulate.

Yeah brah really jealous about you living in that communist paradise. I'd rather just slay and do my own thing than go that route

That would be "kid" there cuz, Jingping's 1 child law of prosperity

Me too

Pretty sure that isn't you in the Avi brah

He makes a good point. He just comes off as psycho and mentally unstable. Anyone shouting their beliefs will not have many people following them. If he came off as more of a gentleman people would be more inclined to listen. I agree with him but not in the extremist way he outputs his opinion.

She was probably a career sloot

Don't be naive

Mirin your 1996 Olympic Gold Medal win brah

Another day on the misc and another stupid post. This guy speaks of logic, that is quite amusing. Typical bro science coming from a neanderthal.

Your whole post is predicated upon an asinine generalisation.

Mate you have no idea why a woman is single at age 27. Maybe she is focusing on her career, maybe she just came out of an unfortunate relationship, who the f3ck knows. There are many reasons why people are single at that age. To make such a stupid generalisation shows you are not the brightest tool in the shed and you again have conformed to a bias of which you are largely unaware.

You dont have any f3cking idea and it is completly pointless to speculate.

Anyone reading this guys post disregard.

The day I stopped thinking in this bro logic terms 5 years ago I exponentially got better with women. I feel sorry for people that will follow your mentality.

Pft you fit right here in the misc buddy, a saturation of insecurity and confusion.

27 and focusing on career? You can bet she's on that carousel, "finding herself" until that clock starts ticking louder and louder then you are the nice beta that can get her after Alphas have stretched her into oblivion

27 and just getting out of a relationship? Wtf hasn't she been able to make a relationship work by that age? Likely some emotional damage

With a rebuttle like that you might as well spread my cheeks and give me a rim job you little p3ssy.

You have just validated my point. This whole alpha, beta rationale is another conformed view by the confused mediocre man.

When i said focusing on career etc you missed the point. I was giving some arbitrary examples, there are tens of thousands of reasons why people are single at various ages. My whole point was, and please pay attention, that these generalisations have zero validity, have zero legitimacy, zero credibility. The reasons people are single vary far and wide and range in exceeding complexity of which your tiny pea brain could not fathom. And so it is because of this that making a generalisation in this area is a complete fallacy.

Do you understand?

Edit: it says your 31, jesus I hope for your sake your 15. The rationale of a child wondering the world blind, deaf and dumb.

I understood your point to begin with, you are still incorrect. Genrealizations exist for a reason. Career focused women are far more likely to be liberal and sexually loose. That is an accurate generalization. Also, once you get to a certain age and have numerous failed relationships you build up emotional baggage and you don't really want to marry someone like that. Lots of walls and too much chit to overcome. That's also a fact.

Understand, beta *******?

it's perfectly normal for a certain percentage of them to have been in a ltr and that ltr not work out for countless reasons, op. don't act like such a hater. sounding pretty bitter.

there could be nothing wrong with them, but after a few years their bf cheated or was finally caught and the girl left. or the bf was not ready for marriage and bailed, or the girl bailed after realizing she didn't want to still be dating him in her 30s with no ring. they could've gotten with the dude when they were younger, then later realized he was a loser as they matured. just a ton of reasons.

but yeah on average, I agree with you for the most part in that they should be mostly not single at that point, especially if they're very beautiful.

lol at 25 year old brah arguing with 31 year old brah. He has no idea.

pretty obvious with the way he writes.. 'neanderthal', elitist language and attitude, refuses to generalise.. that he is a beta redditor.

I thought they both made some good points. Why dont you take something from both of their POVs and incorporate that into your view of dating/marriage, instead of acting like a butthurt beta cuck.

Why are you giving me a blow job? I didnt ask for one.

Liberal and sexually loose. Hahaha those characterisations apply to the few and to the many, irrespective of gender and are dependent on many factors.

Maybe the reason why I find it so hard to accept your foolish rationale is because I have dealt with so many women that put the majority of guys to shame. The original post said at the age of 27 if your single there is something wrong. Dont go off topic. Stick to the stupid thesis point.

Your emotional baggage point is ridiculous. That is accredited to life in general. The older you become the more pain, hardship and suffering you experience. You have not been in another persons shoes so you have not one iota of comprehension of why they are single. The corrolary of being single is a factor dependent on a myriad of possibilities. To superficially, and with such simplicity condense the notion of being single to be at that specified age as unconventional is pure idiocy.

Ill tell you something. I am incredibly succesful with women now, i just finished a chemical engineer degree, am well versed on a broad range of topics, ripped at 90kg and have many people who highly respect me. This is all because I do not think like you do. Enjoy yourself on p3rnhub, stroke your ego and remain inept, confused and pissed off at the world like the mediocre fool you are.

that was a random attack brah, i haven't even posted my view. u mad?

It amazes me how age is used to render opposing sentiment as null and void. Try to think outside the bubble.

Edit. Additional point.
It has always surpised me that there are a specified set of ideals, requirements that a person must have at a speficied point of life in order to be considered normal.

Not really brah, just thought they both make valid arguments. Dont see why people gotta take sides...when both sides of the argument have truth to them.

Jesus Christ lmao. I can't fathom why you're red when you post solid logic like this..

As someone who has "dated" a lot of women north of 27 and south of mid 20s, I can also tell you that (anecdotally, right? *rolls eyes*), women in the aforementioned group are far more likely to be hard to date, jaded and ****ed up by a life full of more cocks and potential cocks than their younger counterparts. There is a sweet spot. It's not like I'm saying 15 year old girls are ideal. And no, I'm not saying there are no younger women with more experience of cock than older ones. It gets substantially worse when a woman is actually decent looking and still has a lot of experience, AND is older. That's even more of a red flag.

I kind of feel sorry for you though, because you come across like the sort of person who is just inexperienced with women and just don't understand just how different the dynamic becomes as soon as a woman starts to rack up a ton of partners.How do you think a woman who has had one sweetheart after the other can POSSIBLY not be jaded and worn out psychologically with endless emotional walls and barriers?There have been studies that show that the more sexual partners a woman has, the less suitable she is for long term commitment. You don't even need a study to draw that conclusion, it's simple logic. With EXCEPTIONS.

I honestly don't even know what you are arguing. Or why you feel the need to argue it, you're just plain wrong.

Location: United Kingdom

..point?

Meaning you cant be taken seriously. I dont know if this is just an aussie thing, but everyone here thinks poms are a bunch of annoying, whining little bitches with irritating accents. Hence we refer to english people as "whinging poms"

but you have no avi?

Mate it's hard to take any woman serious nowadays, no matter what age

Repped you for logic brah. Unfortunately, the more you try to shed light on this subject, the more your objective approach to life will be ridiculed... all the while, those who ridicule your advice are the ones who are most likely to fail at even getting a partner. Dont forget that miscers want virgins because they are FA virgins themselves.lol.

and inb4...stfu or what are you doing out the kitchen sloot.

Not true. A woman with legitimately very few sexual partners and at maximum, 2 serious LTRs by her mid 20s is still just as likely to have her "receptors" for new partners relatively fresh.

You can't just keep starting over again and again and again and again and expect a different result each time. And, no woman can claim to have been a "player" in the past and then suddenly decide it's time to settle down. Like I said, I know a good few guys who were what a woman will call a "fukboi" or "player" (not in the sense of manipulating women, but in the sense of playing out our natural sex drive as men) who still VERY MUCH were capable to sticking to one woman afterwards once it was all out of their system. It's a chase for men. For women, they're already at the destination from the get go.

A lot is on the woman to be A) Responsible with the way she opens her legs and B) exercise good judgement with her partners. Because with the way they get bombarded - how the FUK could they NOT and expect anything half decent and long lasting?