Really?

Oh wait...

What women really want: to marry a rich man
Women still want to marry men who are better educated and earn more money than them, a report finds today.

"The idea that women dislike being financially dependent on men is a myth, with more choosing to “marry up” now than did so in the 1940s, according to Dr Catherine Hakim from the London School of Economics.
After decades of gender equality campaigning many women now find it hard to admit that they want to be a housewife more than they want a successful career of their own, she said."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...-rich-man.html


Clear evidence not from the misc that most relationships = an exchange of sex for money.

I like to think you are being funny and just posting "in character" like Stephen Colbert used to do on Colbert Report.

Anything else is just sad.

Yes and it's killing Anglo countries. I know from personal experience when I'm getting laid I'm more positive, motivated to work hard, driven and accomplished in my career. I always work hard at the gym but overall much more productive when getting laid on the reg.

Not getting laid regularly = don't give a chit about much.

So to you a relationship means giving money and resources to your partner?

not time, love, support, care, strength, fun, joint goals ...

Traditional gender roles = whore? K.

Anyway, what the other person said is that women tend to want relationships not just sex. Unless you are talking about sugar baby arrangements or Anna Nicole Smith type things relationships are not just about sex and that' women only want sex if they're being paid is not even close to what she said.

She was clearly referring to wanting to have a connection with somebody rather than being used as a cumrag.

There's plenty of girls who do want sex as much as guys.

These "what women really want" reports make me LOL hard. Get your north end out of your south end and quit reading this trash, son.

You must only "date" escorts.

My husband and I were both broke when we got married

To most women, relationships are about receiving money and resources. Probably 80% of the time, it's nothing but a business transaction.

I earned more than husband when we stared dating and he moved into my place and paid rent

LMAO

I don't think anyone said that.

At the end of the day, sex is something men have to chase. No matter how much of a Chad you are, it's you that's got to make the move and she who decides whether you're good enough or not.

What this does is make it much much easier for the average girl to get laid but not for the average guy. Men have higher sex drives for the most part and women know they can use sex as a tool and be selective. Since sex is a lot easier for women to come by, they usually have higher standards. This is evident even on the misc and irl. If a guy doesn't want to bang a girl because he's better looking or not into whales he's called low test, *******, and a pussy.

This isn't really optimal for a monogamous society. If 70% of women only want 30% of men they shouldn't have a problem with men not being loyal to them because of math. Every girl is like brb I'm gonna find some 10 outta 10 stud. brb I expect him to be loyal to me. brb every girl wants the same kind of guy. brb limited supply. If the average girl dated the average guy everyone except for Chads would be happy. This is why in my opinion throughout history marriage has always been such an important concept and resulted in an optimal society where everyone had incentive to work hard.

Women mock fa's because they don't want to acknowledge their own flaws but as bitter as they are it's not only their fault either.

tl;dr:
- as a guy you're best off if you're in the top 30% and have good social skills and confidence or in the bottom 20% where you can plow other sloots in the bottom 10%. Most fas imo are probably neither bottom 20% nor top 30%.
- there are no female fas. Every woman can get laid. The ones who don't get laid only don't get laid because they are not happy with their options. Never underestimate how men will throw it all away for a woman. Some of the world's best decision makers, innovators, are completely retarded when it comes to women (see Elon Musk). If a female says she can't get laid it's mostly her own fault. Same can be said for guys to an extent but there are still guys who in their current physical shape and looks simply cannot get laid barring a miracle.
- lift take a multi socialise, etc.

80%

It's always the go to stat when people just want a number to back up their crap isn't it?

I don't disagree that getting laid is easier for women.I was referring to thigoonar or whatever his name is who did say that.

No, because not everyone's take on a relationship = getting resources and money.Do you frequent a lot of strip clubs by any chance?

pathetic

I never really get this.

So if a man suddenly also wants a relationship then he can get sex easier? Like, you have to be sexually attractive to find a girlfriend to begin with.

Having tons of great, passionate, casual sex with handsome big-dicked slayers must be so terrible...

Can't agree with that. Do you think it's the same the other way around, that men only get into relationships for the sex they get if they provide money?

Sounds like utter bullchit to me, for the majority anyway, obviously it does happen.

Most sloots have lots of friends and are out socially doing chit every day/every weekend. You'll never find a sloot alone on her computer on a friday night.

Meanwhile the average miscer has 0-2 friends and goes out like twice a year, does nothing other than work/school/gym/jerkoff/misc.

Healthy social life = healthy sex life srs.

high value wiomen want HIGH VALUE men. #shocker.

high value coiuld be really hot, great personality, social circlke, lots of friend, high status, own pad, high in all areas.

and stop assuming all women want a guy. Esp in toronto where like 30% of all women are gay/bi. Many many women turn down guys cuz they're into women. It's not even you.

kinda like how many miscers here are homer. Women it's like 3x more. Sadly, they pretend to be straight when clock is ticking and try to trick some wussy provider.

That's not what we're saying, simply that for most women having a never-ending supply of sex but no relationship isn't going to really make them happy. For some new this is probably the case too, and it's probably not the case for some women, but as a generality it's true.

Oh look, this thread again.

no where close to true op. I used to work in a bar, trust me there are female incels

When I was 16 years old, on a hot July evening, I accomplished the greatest accomplishment of my life.

my views on this havent changed. if youre a person who cant get any, just pay for it. Its much easier than going without sex for a decade and turning into a miserable kunt just to prove a point. Do whatever you have to do to experience the joys of life.

The report said - "Women still want to marry men who are better educated andearn more money than them". Therefore women do marry for money. In essence, serious relationships/marriage is an exchange of sex for money, no different to prostitution.The majority of the time a "connection" = "You buy me xyz".I said most relationships are like that, not all. You must be in the small minority.

However, "love" from a woman to a man is rarely unconditional. That's reality.A 52-page report from a London School of Economics scholar is trash?

K den.

oh lol that guy..

Okay, so what if there are guys around who are looking for a relationship but are not as attractive as the guys that are just looking to bang, are you telling me that the former is more satisfying than the latter?

















(someone pls take me im tired of tfw no gf)

Lol at arguing a topic that's been beaten to death many times already here instead of just ignoring this troll. 3 phucking pages already. Male and female miscers, it's your personal business whoever you decide to penetrate or let penetrate. If you have the capacity to attract many sexual relationships then so be it. It's your prerogative. Don't let a bitter troll lecture you.

If it's the right person for you, yes. Obviously you do need to be attracted to them, I don't think anyone is arguing that attraction is not important here.