Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Just because the FED has propped up the housing market
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 177
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. Last
post 1587982571 09-16-2019, 12:41 PM
-
#61
  1. Ratfish
  1. Ratfish
  2. Join Date: Jul 2009
  3. Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
  4. Posts: 113,850
  5. Rep Power: 576095
bought house near the bottom here in summer of 2013
paid off at end of 2018

feels good man

don't care if market crashes. i simply prepaid all of my housing costs for the rest of my life at a cheap rate (~1/2 of home rental costs) since i'll never sell.

the peak of the market here at least was around november. just lol @ anyone who bought at that point
Make Europe Germany Again
post 1587982741 09-16-2019, 12:45 PM
-
#62
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  2. Join Date: Jul 2018
  3. Age: 56
  4. Posts: 35,151
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By Witrebel
But who was 3 and 4 unit multi family properties....

If purchased properly, a 30 year mortgage backed multi family has a few profit centers:

1) The obvious monthly net income that you can skim off the top
2) The built in equity increase every month from your tenants paying your mortgage
3) The potential for appreciation increase
4) Future payments being paid back in FUTURE value of money, not present value, a nice safe haven from hyperinflation.

Yes, I am currently in escrow on a 3 unit. $20k down on a $490k property. PITI roughly $3000 and fair market rent around $4500 for all units. After a year of living on the property I can move out and rent it out fully.

Expecting severe short term depreciation when this market corrects, but long term it seems like a no brainer. Putting away 17% of gross monthly rent per month for Vacancy/Repairs/Capex, still leaves me a modest profit monthly to re-invest in the next property.

CLIFFS:
Single Family Residence are for *******s
Multi Family Master Race checking in
I was just looking at a big apartment like building for $369k. Not sure of the location, but $369k is damn cheap. And the interior doesn't even look bad.

https://www.realtor.com/realestatean...-17961?view=qv

Here's one for 575k which is a big stretch, the monthly calculator is saying $2900/month. But with that location I'm pretty sure you can charge $1500/month per apartment.

https://www.realtor.com/realestatean...-46988?view=qv

Duplexes are even cheaper.
post 1587990171 09-16-2019, 02:49 PM
-
#63
  1. CulturalDecay
  2. Registered User
  1. CulturalDecay
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 3,737
  6. Rep Power: 50713
Originally Posted By Witrebel
I look at it a little differently, but I am working to build a portfolio more than just have a place to live. For me, a single family represents a mortgage payment that can suddenly be 100% my responsibility if the unit goes vacant. Versus a 3 unit where I can basically pay the mortgage with a single unit being vacant, and have the mortgage covered 50% with 2 units vacant. Down the road I will probably start acquiring single families, but for now the math in my market doesn't really start to make sense until you hit 3 units. My first choice was a nice simple duplex, but in the northeast those properties are rarely self sufficient.

Interesting that you think multi family will depreciate MORE than SF. The appreciation shows just the inverse. Multi family pricing is tightly tied to rental income, which historically is less volatile than housing prices. I.e. when prices plummet, rent stays relatively stable. Which leads me to believe that when/if things correct, my 3 unit will have a much more stable valuation than the surrounding single families.

.
It will depreciate faster, it also has a lower ceiling. I don't know the specifics of the NorthEast, but in California new home construction almost doesn't exist, it's simply not cost effective for builders to build homes. On the other hand, condos, apartment complex's, multi-unit housing, is exploding, it's the ONLY thing being built, but the demand is there for it due to these people being priced out from ownership. But they WANT to own, it takes them years to save for a down payment in this market, but some % eventually manage to do it. Also a large % of the renters are now preferring to RENT single family homes, as opposed to living in these crowded apartment complex's, lots of garbage, noise, lack of parking etc. 3 Bedroom homes are a bargain for renters, they rent for ~$3,500/mo + utilities (So basically $4k) so divide that by 3 ~$1350/person which is MUCH cheaper than renting an apartment.

In short - condos and apartments will be very over built in the case of a correction - single family is a tight market, with huge demand, so in the case of a "correction" (Which nobody in RE thinks is coming) there will still be pent up demand for Single Family.

I know this is location specific - but same is true in LA, Seattle, Oregon, SF, and every other big metro area.
post 1587993561 09-16-2019, 03:45 PM
-
#64
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 11,787
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Witrebel
But who was 3 and 4 unit multi family properties....

If purchased properly, a 30 year mortgage backed multi family has a few profit centers:

1) The obvious monthly net income that you can skim off the top
2) The built in equity increase every month from your tenants paying your mortgage
3) The potential for appreciation increase
4) Future payments being paid back in FUTURE value of money, not present value, a nice safe haven from hyperinflation.

Yes, I am currently in escrow on a 3 unit. $20k down on a $490k property. PITI roughly $3000 and fair market rent around $4500 for all units. After a year of living on the property I can move out and rent it out fully.

Expecting severe short term depreciation when this market corrects, but long term it seems like a no brainer. Putting away 17% of gross monthly rent per month for Vacancy/Repairs/Capex, still leaves me a modest profit monthly to re-invest in the next property.

CLIFFS:
Single Family Residence are for *******s
Multi Family Master Race checking in
this is a good post and makes sense for someone making a long term investment. Im talking about those *******s that bought a house in a lucky real estate market have 30k in fake equity and all of a sudden come on here and think they are financial geniuses. Saw these same morons lose it all in 2008.
post 1587994121 09-16-2019, 03:53 PM
-
#65
  1. A-man
  2. Registered User
  1. A-man
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2004
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 2,434
  7. Rep Power: 12262
Agreed that housing has been propped up by low interest rates. Here it's the Bank of Canada to blame.

Agreed it's a terrible investment in 2019. Illiquid in the best of times.

It's amusing when "owners" or "landlords" gloat they own anything. Actually...the bank owns it. Even when the thing is paid off, try skipping out on property taxes, maintenance, and utilities to find out how much you actually "own".

It's equally amusing when "owners" or "landlords" think house prices never go down.
post 1587997031 09-16-2019, 04:48 PM
-
#66
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: East Coast, Australia
  5. Posts: 39,502
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 593683
Originally Posted By Godfrd824
I can't believe they let you guys have unrestricted internet access at the care facility for the mentally challenged.
Lmao on spread

But for real thanks op

It’s cucks like you that make my business model viable
post 1587997971 09-16-2019, 05:05 PM
-
#67
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 11,787
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By LordBroski
You do own the property
Pretty sure daddy government has something to say about this LMFAOO
post 1587998301 09-16-2019, 05:10 PM
-
#68
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  1. r32gojirra
  2. Registered NEET
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: East Coast, Australia
  5. Posts: 39,502
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 593683
Originally Posted By GainzMcgee
Pretty sure daddy government has something to say about this LMFAOO
Well might as well say that you don’t own your labour as well since that’s taxed

Don’t buy any consumer goods either since that’s taxed

Might as well LDAR

Wait a second...
post 1587999071 09-16-2019, 05:20 PM
-
#69
  1. RainingBlood
  2. Daniel Larson 2024
  1. RainingBlood
  2. Daniel Larson 2024
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 34,890
  5. Rep Power: 106497
wtf is a mortgagecel lmao
post 1588001801 09-16-2019, 06:07 PM
-
#70
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Posts: 39,767
  5. Rep Power: 166638
Originally Posted By r32gojirra
Well might as well say that you don’t own your labour as well since that’s taxed

Don’t buy any consumer goods either since that’s taxed

Might as well LDAR

Wait a second...
Those are all taxed once, not perpetually, hurr durr.
The billionaire and the beggar both have 24 hours in a day.

That's why grandma's apple pie rocks and yours sucks.
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
At least it will thunderstorm tonight, and we know how they feel about water. :)
^^^Racist police officer who also cries about how racism doesn't exist, also cries reverse racism and typifies the stupidity of the racist right, referring to black people as "they" and regurgitating racist stereotypes.
post 1588002231 09-16-2019, 06:18 PM
-
#71
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  3. Join Date: Sep 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 41,691
  6. Rep Power: 169649
Originally Posted By MBisonSon
Those are all taxed once, not perpetually, hurr durr.
Renters pay maintenance costs as well as property tax. They just aren't intelligent enough to know its factored into their rent.


Three ways to avoid property tax.
-Live with parents for free.
-Join military and live in barracks.
-Live on a boat.
post 1588003211 09-16-2019, 06:33 PM
-
#72
  1. mr.left hook
  2. PHF member
  1. mr.left hook
  2. PHF member
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Posts: 20,191
  5. Rep Power: 126540
Originally Posted By hendrixfreak70
My new house I am getting with my 100k plus equity. U mad op? Yeah, u mad.


https://www.realtor.com/realestatean...1_M75514-26143
nice place.... hell you can't even get half that home here in SoCal these days for that price. if you didn't buy a home in the early 2000s your fukd in Cali
MR.PHF '09

“Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants? I intend to do battle with them and slay them.”- Don Quixote

''damn right I like the life I live

'Cause I went from negative to positive

And it's allGood..."


"friends come and go but enemies accumulate"


< H.T.C Till I D.I.E >
"Zero tolerance Crew" ZERO, NADA !!!!
post 1588031261 09-17-2019, 08:06 AM
-
#73
  1. Witrebel
  2. Aware since 2004
  1. Witrebel
  2. Aware since 2004
  3. Join Date: Mar 2011
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 1,663
  6. Rep Power: 9198
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey
I was just looking at a big apartment like building for $369k. Not sure of the location, but $369k is damn cheap. And the interior doesn't even look bad.

https://www.realtor.com/realestatean...-17961?view=qv

Here's one for 575k which is a big stretch, the monthly calculator is saying $2900/month. But with that location I'm pretty sure you can charge $1500/month per apartment.

https://www.realtor.com/realestatean...-46988?view=qv

Duplexes are even cheaper.
Das it mane, just run the numbers and be conservative aka prep for worst case and then add another 5-10% for uncertainty.
Originally Posted By CulturalDecay
It will depreciate faster, it also has a lower ceiling. I don't know the specifics of the NorthEast, but in California new home construction almost doesn't exist, it's simply not cost effective for builders to build homes. On the other hand, condos, apartment complex's, multi-unit housing, is exploding, it's the ONLY thing being built, but the demand is there for it due to these people being priced out from ownership. But they WANT to own, it takes them years to save for a down payment in this market, but some % eventually manage to do it. Also a large % of the renters are now preferring to RENT single family homes, as opposed to living in these crowded apartment complex's, lots of garbage, noise, lack of parking etc. 3 Bedroom homes are a bargain for renters, they rent for ~$3,500/mo + utilities (So basically $4k) so divide that by 3 ~$1350/person which is MUCH cheaper than renting an apartment.

In short - condos and apartments will be very over built in the case of a correction - single family is a tight market, with huge demand, so in the case of a "correction" (Which nobody in RE thinks is coming) there will still be pent up demand for Single Family.

I know this is location specific - but same is true in LA, Seattle, Oregon, SF, and every other big metro area.
Very interesting, definitely something to keep in the back of my mind. Potentially this applies to the greater boston area as well, but I am buying on Cape Cod where there is virtually zero inventory for multis. They are such a rarity here that its the complete opposite I believe, they hold value much better then single families, even in relative disrepair. Also in this market alot of the inventory is second homes that rarely get used, there are plenty of 3 season rentals but nothing is available for the summer. So any form of affordable year round rental housing goes at a premium.
Originally Posted By LordBroski
Agreed. Multi-unit properties are better for cash flow, but don't write off a single family detached homes yet. At some point, people will want to buy one, but they're just not being built (even up here in BC). I just acquired a single family detached, but a rare property that was already converted for 2 separate rental units in the home. It's almost unheard of to get positive cash flow out of a single family detached out here, or even close to break-even cash flow, and there's the risk of a vacancy leaving you with a full mortgage payment to make, but far more appreciation potential imo.
This is a good long term perspective. I think after the first 2-3 properties (multi's) when I have around 10 units or so, it may be easier to flip over to buying single families, as they will cost less. Long term I can see your point, they may be the next big thing if the rental wave ever slows down.
We are all gunna make it
post 1588093111 09-18-2019, 07:25 AM
-
#74
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 18,570
  6. Rep Power: 128694
Originally Posted By ANumber1
Neither are retarded. They just both cost money and should be viewed objectively as such.

Literally spent thirty minutes on my lawn just now with the plumbers again because the GD city ran the sewer line at a 45 degree angle under my driveway and now they're not sure they can honor the original estimate to install a backflow valve because they may have to pull the toilet, run a locator, and maybe break up my driveway if the city can't give them a straight answer on where the fitting is. I'm going to bill that conversation to the "I'm a homeowner" account as another $50 of my fukkin' time.

You guys caught me with this thread right when I'm at max skepticism on this topic.
Update nobody asked for: turns out the sewer line runs under the edge of the driveway and directly under my front steps instead of under the yard like we'd thought, and is also ancient clay pipe that was probably put down when MacArthur accepted the surrender of Japan. I really have no choice but to fix this because I had to make an insurance claim for ten grand of damage and that's going to do in the disclosures, so I really need to show I did something to fix it for good when I go to sell the house.

Of course, the steps are brand new, I just had them redone in brick and bluestone with a new pad after the old poured concrete steps crumbled deep. So now this $2,500 job is a $4,500 job if they can tunnel under it like Bugs Bunny without disturbing it, but there's a coin-flip chance that won't happen and it will be a $7,000 job.

At least I built equity, tho, right?

Nah, fukk that. I’m not doing that.
post 1588093921 09-18-2019, 07:40 AM
-
#75
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 11,787
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By ANumber1
Update nobody asked for: turns out the sewer line runs under the edge of the driveway and directly under my front steps instead of under the yard like we'd thought, and is also ancient clay pipe that was probably put down when MacArthur accepted the surrender of Japan. I really have no choice but to fix this because I had to make an insurance claim for ten grand of damage and that's going to do in the disclosures, so I really need to show I did something to fix it for good when I go to sell the house.

Of course, the steps are brand new, I just had them redone in brick and bluestone with a new pad after the old poured concrete steps crumbled deep. So now this $2,500 job is a $4,500 job if they can tunnel under it like Bugs Bunny without disturbing it, but there's a coin-flip chance that won't happen and it will be a $7,000 job.

At least I built equity, tho, right?
Sorry to hear bro, if people actually sat down and calculated their tax, insurance, repair, interest and miscellaneous costs of home ownership they pretty much are on par with renting especially if you couple in the time it takes to commute from living farther out from the city then if you rent closer to your job.No one ever talks about the time lost commuting in mindless traffic because the only home you could afford was 30 miles outside city limits.These idiots that get butt hurt and say "hrr drr equity" also don't add in the time and costs to maintain your home including lawn maintenance and other cleaning, repairs etc.

Like I said in the OP these morons get 10k in "equity" after buying some house made of plywood and all of a sudden act like they have a PhD in economics. Lol chit is funny af to see.
post 1588095811 09-18-2019, 08:16 AM
-
#76
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 18,570
  6. Rep Power: 128694
Originally Posted By Anachron
So you are essentially saying that cost wise ( even including commuting time ) renting and owning is at par...

So why would you not want the equity?

Congratulations, you played yourself.
That's with the equity factored in, obviously.

There is rarely, if ever, a free lunch in investing, and that rule applies here, too.

Much of the money a landlord makes comes in the form of creating a job and paying himself for his time out of the cash flow (or, in the case of a bad landlord, deferring maintenance and cutting illegal corners), efficient practices, and proper handling of the money.

This is fine. It's how business works. However, if you're your own homeowner, you're in that position. A lot of money you're "saving" because your mortgage is ostensibly cheaper than renting and you're building equity needs to be set aside and put back into the "business".

Once you do that, it becomes clearer that there's no magical cash machine inside homeownership that spins off free money. It's just the ordinary gainz from sweat equity and investing that you can generate through numerous other channels. If you don't think in those terms, you're ending up taking out a loan for that new roof or whatever and it's the mortgage industry that's skimming the cream off your property, not you. People rarely think clearly about the money they lose that way.
Nah, fukk that. I’m not doing that.
post 1588097501 09-18-2019, 08:39 AM
-
#77
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 18,570
  6. Rep Power: 128694
Originally Posted By Anachron
Remind me, how many investment properties do you own?
None, because I did the math and would rather own stock. I've seriously considered buying up several properties in the last few years, they'd certainly be profitable, but it always comes back to the value of my time. The only situation I'd seriously consider taking on right now is a managed vacation rental that would be available for my personal use, as well.

For some reason, there's always a common thread with people who get butthurt about this topic notwantingto hear that it isn't a magical money machine and that it's just a business where they're getting compensated for the value they add. The successful real estate investors I've known are always keenly aware of this and that their tenants thinking they're making money off of them for free are idiots.

The world is full of poorly-run small businesses with prideful owners who make next to nothing and would have been better off putting the money in a stock portfolio and focusing on something else with their time, but point to whatever they did make and think they're doing great. Landlords are not immune to the biases that tend to screw over retail investors.
Nah, fukk that. I’m not doing that.
post 1588097901 09-18-2019, 08:43 AM
-
#78
  1. pengh
  1. pengh
  2. Join Date: Apr 2007
  3. Posts: 20,224
  4. Rep Power: 233191
Owned a house for 10 years now. I agree the bank is raping me. But bought at 160K and neighbor just sold for $290 (his is smaller house). Also $1225 a month for 3b, 2bth, garage 2 living rooms a porch and a huge backyard. You ain't renting something like that anywhere close to $1200 (S Florida). Also they are building a Top Golf right around the corner so I'm hoping that sparks more business and cool sh*t.
* Eggs and Rice crew *
* No Washcloth Crew *

Sloots in jail are hnnnggggg

Strange hobbies

#FREEPH*GGOT

MMGA
post 1588098971 09-18-2019, 08:59 AM
-
#79
  1. JLay87
  2. Registered User
  1. JLay87
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 1,142
  6. Rep Power: 1673
Originally Posted By jiujitsubro
My uncle bought a house in the 1970s at 100k.

It's worth 700k now. He bitches about taxes and insurance but at the end of the day its his secret loan stash.
That's a 4-5% CAGR. Better than the average of like 1% home value appreciation but not really that great.
post 1588099171 09-18-2019, 09:01 AM
-
#80
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 10,691
  5. Rep Power: 35630
just lol if you cant see the housing/real estate scam.

Your nations "financial sector" props up and inflates the housing and real estate sector into a bubble

when the bubble pops, these same "financers" buy these houses and properties on the cheap.

housing market comes back up, sell houses for huge profit

time goes by, not enough people buying houses, gotta lower qualifications to get a loan

demand goes up, people default, bubble pops again, "financers" get richer, rinse and repeat ad nauseum
post 1588099381 09-18-2019, 09:05 AM
-
#81
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 10,691
  5. Rep Power: 35630
Originally Posted By Anachron
Lifetime renter detected.
no need to rent if you live in a tent
post 1588099581 09-18-2019, 09:09 AM
-
#82
  1. TraininWh33ls
  2. [300 Spartan Crew]
  1. TraininWh33ls
  2. [300 Spartan Crew]
  3. Join Date: Jun 2006
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 4,456
  6. Rep Power: 43277
Originally Posted By GainzMcgee
Doesnt mean you are the smartest guy in the room. LMFAO at mortgage cells.

just lmfaoo at mortgagecels.

bonus lmfaoo : thinking you actually own something when if you dont pay your tax bill daddy government will take your chit with the quickness.
brb living in a souless suburb next to bob that only talks about the weather -Great reasoning dip sh!t
brb having to get a new roof, appliances and remodel your entire kitchen after 5 years -Train of thought thinking people need to remodel a kitchen and buy new appliances every 5 years.. obviously you are oblivious to logic.
brb when market finally does tank for good house will be worthless -If you say so, think smart - buy smart.
brb being the banks BISH for 30 years -Pay extra every month into principal and I won't be anyone's bish for 30 years.
brb thinking a piece of plywood built by illegal mexicans is a good "investment" -Another stupid reasoning behind your ignorance.
brb thinking your house is "worth" something when you havent even sold it and got cash in hand yet -Pull out equity...

Keep paying my bills on my rental properties. Thanks; come again.
Originally Posted By pengh
Also they are building a Top Golf right around the corner so I'm hoping that sparks more business and cool sh*t.
I'm guessing you live in St. Pete
post 1588101691 09-18-2019, 09:42 AM
-
#83
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  1. ANumber1
  2. Duke of New York
  3. Join Date: Jul 2013
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 18,570
  6. Rep Power: 128694
Originally Posted By Anachron
And on the flipside, the "rent and invest" crowd are also blissfully unaware of their own numbers. Statistically speaking, homeowners tend to be ahead financially ( a thought that is more due to the forced "savings" in the form of equity versus the lack of discipline to actually invest the excess ).
I not only agree, but would agree that renters, as a whole, tend to be more confused about the math than homeowners. Yet a lot of what homeowners believe comes straight from brochures handed to them by people with incentives to sell them things, not to give them a clear picture.
If your math works out better for stocks, I'm not going to argue with that.
Yup, and I'm not trashing real estate investment. If I had free time to do tradie things myself - and I do enjoy some of it - I'd absolutely do that, but that's really my point. It'scompletelylegitimate to cash in by creating an opportunity to pay yourself for your time.

Once you pare that all down, though, to an equivalently passive investment, a property is just a small business, non-diversified and very exposed to day-to-day vagaries ranging from tenants turning into pitbull hoarders to the utility company causing a gas explosion. If you're getting compensated, you're getting compensatedforsomething, and if you can't figure out what it is, it's almost certainly a risk you haven't identified yet. Larger, professionally-managed businesses pay a team to stay ahead of that, and that's part of what you're paying yourself for, too, if you take an active role in managing your own property.

Case in point is the 2-4% of my home's value I'm spending simply because itrained really hardfor 15 minutes, and the only reason it wasn't 10-15% is because I did identify some of the risk and bought an optional insurance rider for it. It also helps that I was physically present to start the initial pump work, organize the cleanup team, and drag out property on my own time, because two days later, I'd have been on vacation and outsourcing that - or the security system might not have tipped me off and I'd have come home to an unbelievable festering disaster that went way, way beyond my insurance coverage.

...and of course, I have cash to put back into the "business" of the property. Some of my neighbors are taking out equity lines, putting it on credit cards, or not able to afford repairs at all and are simply losing some of their investment - on which they may still owe money. For those people who were operating their home on thin margins and weren't managing it carefully, some are getting absolutely brutalized over renting.
Originally Posted By JLay87
That's a 4-5% CAGR. Better than the average of like 1% home value appreciation but not really that great.
In fairness, he also got the use of a house, but yes. This kind of mistake is exactly the issue.
Nah, fukk that. I’m not doing that.
post 1588103351 09-18-2019, 10:10 AM
-
#84
  1. GreatOldOne
  2. Cthulhu fhtagn
  1. GreatOldOne
  2. Cthulhu fhtagn
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Posts: 39,712
  5. Rep Power: 210947
Living in a house makes me happy.
post 1588103541 09-18-2019, 10:13 AM
-
#85
  1. OPGenesis
  1. OPGenesis
  2. Join Date: Mar 2015
  3. Posts: 34,785
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 305856
Originally Posted By Anachron
Lifetime renter detected.
Boomer again going off the rails about home ownership lol.

Did you post some simplified scenarios in the previous pages of the thread to get your point across this time?
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"

"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"


**Summer Walker Crew**
post 1588103621 09-18-2019, 10:14 AM
-
#86
  1. Spahgetti
  2. Banned
  1. Spahgetti
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2019
  4. Posts: 8,774
  5. Rep Power: 0
One of the main reasons to own rather than rent is that your mortgage payment is fixed for the life of the loan (assuming you have a traditional mortgage). Your insurance and tax payments will likely go up, but if your mortgage payment is $1000/mo in 2019, it will be $1000/mo in 2029, $1000/mo in 2039, and ideally $0/mo in 2049.

In most cases, rent increases year-over-year. If your rent is $1000/mo and increases, on average, 2% per year, it will be ~$1218 in 2029, ~$1485 in 2039 and $1811/mo in 2049.

When we bought our house two years ago, we could make the mortgage payment without any trouble, but it really did take a bite out of our monthly income. Two years of raises/promotions later, and that bite is much smaller. Meanwhile, rent in our area has increased by 5-7% over the same timeframe.
post 1588103871 09-18-2019, 10:17 AM
-
#87
  1. OPGenesis
  1. OPGenesis
  2. Join Date: Mar 2015
  3. Posts: 34,785
  4. Subscribers: 3
  5. Rep Power: 305856
Originally Posted By Spahgetti
One of the main reasons to own rather than rent is that your mortgage payment is fixed for the life of the loan (assuming you have a traditional mortgage). Your insurance and tax payments will likely go up, but if your mortgage payment is $1000/mo in 2019, it will be $1000/mo in 2029, $1000/mo in 2039, and ideally $0/mo in 2049.

In most cases, rent increases year-over-year. If your rent is $1000/mo and increases, on average, 2% per year, it will be ~$1218 in 2029, ~$1485 in 2039 and $1811/mo in 2049.

When we bought our house two years ago, we could make the mortgage payment without any trouble, but it really did take a bite out of our monthly income. Two years of raises/promotions later, and that bite is much smaller. Meanwhile, rent in our area has increased by 5-7% over the same timeframe.
I didn't know you worked.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"

"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"


**Summer Walker Crew**
post 1588104031 09-18-2019, 10:19 AM
-
#88
  1. Spahgetti
  2. Banned
  1. Spahgetti
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2019
  4. Posts: 8,774
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By OPGenesis
I didn't know you worked.
that was a copypasta, there's no 'we' in my situation LOL ALLLL ME brudduh.

i..kinda...work. sometimes. should do a lot more but ya
post 1588104121 09-18-2019, 10:20 AM
-
#89
  1. Bo_Flecks
  2. Registered User
  1. Bo_Flecks
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Posts: 16,196
  5. Rep Power: 348820
Originally Posted By orangetide
no need to rent if you live in a tent
Or when sponging off your mom while living in her basement.
post 1588104201 09-18-2019, 10:21 AM
-
#90
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  1. GainzMcgee
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 11,787
  6. Rep Power: 0
really sad to see how desperate the boomers are itt when proven wrong by real estate. They have been so condition, so programmed, so brainwashed by the elites and the huge banks that if you say anything against them they get so angry and butt hurt just lmfaoo and their only argument is "urine idiot!". LOLOL
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts