Jewish influence in Hollywood always portraying natural penises in a negative light.

My mind continues to be blown that this is even a debatable issue. That an ENTIRE GENDER could be born "wrong" and need part of their dik cut off... the retardation of this concept is at astronomical levels. It really scares me what masses of people can be socialized to believe. It proves that people on average, really are sheep and it makes sense how entire groups of people can be brainwashed to do terrible things like Nazi Germany that we mistakenly think we're now better than in modern society. For this case, instead of brainwashing others to hate a group of humans enough to think they're sub-human and kill them, you got people (in this thread) brainwashed to hate a natural, normal part of their own human body enough to want to mutilate their children and celebrate their own mutilated diks.

There is no need to insult brahs for being cut cause it's not their fault but holy **** at them cucking themselves and still pushing the concept in 2020 and wanting to do it to their children. Again, it's not even just this issue specifically, but how easily they can feel so sure of something so crazy.

Also as an uncut brah, I didn't even know about the difference til i was like 19 and had already had sex with 2 girls in long term relationships and another girl in college. None of them ever even knew the difference either. I think I only knew about it after finding an article on it. LOL at one miscer saying he wouldn't have the same confidence if he wasn't cut as if uncut brahs are even thinking about it. LOL wtf is wrong with you people.

lol, there are studies saying whatever the feck you want.

Kigozi G1, Lukabwe I, Kagaayi J, Wawer MJ, Nantume B, Kigozi G, Nalugoda F, Kiwanuka N, Wabwire-Mangen F, Serwadda D, Ridzon R, Buwembo D, Nabukenya D, Watya S, Lutalo T, Nkale J, Gray RH.
Author information
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To investigate the effect of adult medical male circumcision on female sexual satisfaction.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS:
We investigated self-reported sexual satisfaction among 455 women partners of men circumcised in a randomized trial of male circumcision for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus in Rakai, Uganda. Women aged 15-49 years were interviewed about their sexual satisfaction before and after their partners were circumcised. We analysed female-reported changes in sexual satisfaction using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS:
Only 2.9% (13/455) of women reported less sexual satisfaction after their partners were circumcised; 57.3% (255/455) reported no change in sexual satisfaction and 39.8% (177/455) reported an improvement in sexual satisfaction after their partner's circumcision. There were no statistically significant differences in sexual satisfaction before and after partner's circumcision by age, religion and education status.

CONCLUSION:
The overwhelming majority of women (97.1%) report either no change or improved sexual satisfaction after their male partner was circumcised. These findings suggest that male circumcision has no deleterious effect on female sexual satisfaction.

No avi + no credible evidence

Clearly a fat virgin frauding online

RIP your cockskin boyo

Tbh even when cut dicks would be better for female sexual satisfaction IT WOULD STILL BE RETARDED.

haha, so having a chit tier avatar like yours would make me more credible? pls fist yourself

Soz 4 loss of cockskin

Try lifting some time to make up for what you're lacking

Then why do they smash European dudes every time they go abroad.

Been lifting for 10 years sport. Actually i'm interested in this thread because i have a child due in 6 months and, while i'm all for circumcision, the idea of inflicting pain on my newborn is kind of troubling, even if it will lead to a life of superior cock aesthetics and female salivation. Also you have to pay out of pocket for circumcision, i dont think it's medically covered anymore

I still hold the position that girls have sex literally ALL THE TIME with natural dicks and don't even know it due to retraction when erect.

^ thats why you dont do it now and let him make that decision for himself when he is older.

When he hits puberty, he might have issues with keeping it clean, and it can like stick and is painful to loosen, which is why he might want to get it done. It also really stinks.

It's a completely unnecessary cosmetic surgical procedure on an infant child based on a barbaric religious tradition.

Now read that 10 times and then tell me what your decision is.

You want to know how I know you have no idea what you're talking about?

It literally takes 2 seconds to wash your dick. Literally.

The people with stink dicks are people that don't wash their penis.

Thing is, i'm a jew, i remember dudes getting blasted for having uncirc'd dinks back in the day, i remember females being grossed out by them and all preferring cut dinks, and i've heard of many men having issues with their foreskins either getting infected or not being able to retract properly which has resulted in them having to be circumcised later in life.

And, every single uncut bruh in here admits that a circ dink looks better. People do plenty of things to make themselves look better, ie bodybuilding.

I acftually don't know the gender of the child yet, but if it's a boy, i'm going to have to do alot of thinking. It's just the pain/trauma and money factor that deter me, everything else i'm for it.

I remember coming out my moms vag and them removing my skin, traumatized me.

Could be, I think some guys have more/less skin too.

lol @ you believing any of the crap that austitic kid spurts.

That's true as well.

my nephew (good looking kid with good future) wasnt circumsized and i felt horrible that they never did that. feels like a burden he will have to live with.

Lmao fuk off, you guys are absurd

My friend had to teach his sons when they got to be about 11 and he told me about all that. They had issues like that

LOL'd. Every single cut bruh in here doesn't know the simplest fact...erect penises, cut or uncut, look identical.

I don't get it. Do you know how to wash your hands? Thats how easy it is to wash your penis. You guys make it sound so complicated like those dumb infomercial of a dude not being able to balance a bowl or some crap lol.

I guess if your dad is a moron and doesn't teach you how to wash your own penis you'll have issues.

americans are fukking weird, brb mutilating baby dicks is normal

LOL @ brahs who say "I've been with XYZ girls and they are always raving about the aesthetics of XYZ cocks"

LMFAO really?

Your actual conversation when having sexual relations with a female is all about cock prererences/statistics from around the globe?

ROFLMFAO the saddest thing about that is it's probably true.

Yeah but some of the best enjoyment comes from what can be done when they don't look identical


The idea that girls will reject you over this stuff is farcical. If a girl is into you and wants to make you feel good, she won't care and being intact can give her another avenue for generating them good feels. When she pulls the skin forward and jams her tongue in there to swirl it around the head, sweet fukn jesus

whys that? whats argument for? But who was sensitivity? who cares man last thing i want is sex to be too good

The one benefit of genital mutilation is that you've weakened your penis and now you can successfully focus on money and not women just like Jews. A sacrifice must be made to earn the bag.

First world Americans mutilating babies in 2020 and it's not even for religious reasons just lol. It's for profit but was originally because of sociopathic puritan Kellogg, the man who trailblazed this degenerate barbarism - the lifetime God fearing virgin. The man was a fanatical lunatic obsessed with the destructive power of masterbation (possible nonce) and curtailed it through his power and influence by introducing his baby genital mutilation indoctrination that is seen as essential in this day and age in America. He experimented with medieval looking chastity belts that would cause agony if you got an erection. And if that didn't do the trick for sinful boys, he'd get them circumcised without anesthetic to make them remember and associate erections with pain.

You're all victims of this victorian sociopaths obsession who believed he was doing Gods work with his anti-masterbation crusade.

Truly tragic in 2020. But you are keeping the lube industry going you poor men.

In before but but but women like it more. Only in you country and I'd rather please myself with my 20k more nerve endings.

If the guys who are circumsized are the ones coping, how come the only people talking about it are the uncircumsized guys?