Thread:
Just LOL @ Race
06-08-2020, 05:48 PM
-
#31
- SWDeath
- Custom User Title
-
- SWDeath
- Custom User Title
- Join Date: Oct 2018
- Posts: 6,412
- Rep Power: 37010
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
In which you questioned what it is to be white or black like they aren't even real.. What is genetics?who said genetics don't exist? the first thing i posted was a genetic test.
Lets start with this:
"How would he even define black? African ancestry that doesn't include Egypt, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia and Libya? Do you decide based on where the arbitrary borders end in latitude? What about Mauritania? What if someone has really dark skin but lives in Egypt? How much black is enough? How much is too little? How do you prove it?"
"black" is sub saharan african.
Is that clearer?
MAGA One day at a time.
06-08-2020, 05:49 PM
-
#32
- BulkingIsHard
- Registered Bigot
-
- BulkingIsHard
- Registered Bigot
- Join Date: Aug 2016
- Posts: 12,670
- Rep Power: 70015
-
-
Lucky **** you get to say the n word
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_decline
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_collapse#By_absorption
06-08-2020, 05:50 PM
-
#33
- HairyWBush
- Democrats are terrorists
-
- HairyWBush
- Democrats are terrorists
- Join Date: Oct 2012
- Location: Florida, United States
- Posts: 20,103
- Rep Power: 77712
-
-
i think you should get your own dna test.
race exists. that's how we classify humans. same with breeds....and how we're able to reconstruct a skeleton from thousands of years ago.
race exists. that's how we classify humans. same with breeds....and how we're able to reconstruct a skeleton from thousands of years ago.
R 135
L├┼┤
246
"Slide down your throat?? We chew them, savor them, suck up the little juice left behind in the shell then swallow them. Only amateurs try to swallow them whole."
-Kingfabian: BBC loads: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=181634953&p=1666337753&viewfull=1#post1666337753
"America lost pretty much every war in history lol" -pandaboy89
as seen here: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180019913&p=1636230303&viewfull=1#post1636230303
06-08-2020, 06:10 PM
-
#34
I came to a very similar conclusion after taking the tests and doing research, watching other people's DNA reveals etc. The differences between genotype and phenotype. How visually looking at someone is not a always an exact match to their actual ancestral origins. How people migrated all over the globe and developed into semi-homogeneous subgroups after isolating for centuries.
It's not a perfect system, but you can typically separate human beings into 4 different classifications: Negroid, caucasoid, mongoloid and australoid. All of the subgroups are a combination of these things.
It's not a perfect system, but you can typically separate human beings into 4 different classifications: Negroid, caucasoid, mongoloid and australoid. All of the subgroups are a combination of these things.
06-08-2020, 06:20 PM
-
#35
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By SWDeath⏩
so all south africans are black. got itIn which you questioned what it is to be white or black like they aren't even real.. What is genetics?
Lets start with this:
"How would he even define black? African ancestry that doesn't include Egypt, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia and Libya? Do you decide based on where the arbitrary borders end in latitude? What about Mauritania? What if someone has really dark skin but lives in Egypt? How much black is enough? How much is too little? How do you prove it?"
"black" is sub saharan african.
Is that clearer?
Lets start with this:
"How would he even define black? African ancestry that doesn't include Egypt, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia and Libya? Do you decide based on where the arbitrary borders end in latitude? What about Mauritania? What if someone has really dark skin but lives in Egypt? How much black is enough? How much is too little? How do you prove it?"
"black" is sub saharan african.
Is that clearer?
Make Europe Germany Again
06-08-2020, 06:26 PM
-
#36
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
-
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2018
- Posts: 5,398
- Rep Power: 24375
-
-
Just lol @ OP trying to obfuscate the concept of race just because he is a mutt, which should have been obvious by looking at himself and comparing himself with how White people normally look
we are all the same, yasss op
we are all the same, yasss op
27
6'3"
06-08-2020, 06:27 PM
-
#37
- thunderykoala
- Registered User
-
- thunderykoala
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2015
- Posts: 4,360
- Rep Power: 8824
-
-
One drop rule, homie. You know the deal. You're now 100% North African.
06-08-2020, 06:29 PM
-
#38
06-08-2020, 06:31 PM
-
#39
- doughnutking
- The Booty Warrior
-
- doughnutking
- The Booty Warrior
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Posts: 23,440
- Rep Power: 97706
-
-
Well i knew there would be some Jew in there.
06-08-2020, 06:36 PM
-
#40
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By RagnarChadbrok⏩
please define white and black for meJust lol @ OP trying to obfuscate the concept of race just because he is a mutt, which should have been obvious by looking at himself and comparing himself with how White people normally look
we are all the same, yasss op
we are all the same, yasss op
Originally Posted By doughnutking⏩
zero debt crewWell i knew there would be some Jew in there.
Make Europe Germany Again
06-08-2020, 06:36 PM
-
#41
- SWDeath
- Custom User Title
-
- SWDeath
- Custom User Title
- Join Date: Oct 2018
- Posts: 6,412
- Rep Power: 37010
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
Thats not what sub saharan means.so all south africans are black. got it
"Sub-Saharan Africa is, geographically and ethnoculturally, the area of the continent of Africa that lies south of the Sahara. According to the United Nations, it consists of all African countries and territories that are fully or partially located south of the Sahara."

The white people in actual south africa are mostly swiss, german.
MAGA One day at a time.
06-08-2020, 06:53 PM
-
#42
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
-
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2018
- Posts: 5,398
- Rep Power: 24375
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
White means European, Black means African.please define white and black for me
zero debt crew
zero debt crew
Inb4 "What if I'm a citizen of Nigeria?" Obviously I'm talking about where one's descendants originate from
27
6'3"
06-08-2020, 06:57 PM
-
#43
- A-GAME
- Pedicabo ego vos et irrum
-
- A-GAME
- Pedicabo ego vos et irrum
- Join Date: Nov 2006
- Posts: 47,648
- Rep Power: 280053
-
-
Originally Posted By Redfish225⏩
We all bleed red bro!We made race up op, I’ve been saying this lol. Leave it to humans to over complicate chit.

Still Cuckin On Four Fours, Wrapped In Four Voes
06-08-2020, 07:06 PM
-
#44
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By SWDeath⏩
so what year is the cutoff? what about east africans who were colonized by arabs thousands of years ago? what about vitiligo and albinism? what specific genes get someone in the club?Thats not what sub saharan means.
"Sub-Saharan Africa is, geographically and ethnoculturally, the area of the continent of Africa that lies south of the Sahara. According to the United Nations, it consists of all African countries and territories that are fully or partially located south of the Sahara."

The white people in actual south africa are mostly swiss, german.
"Sub-Saharan Africa is, geographically and ethnoculturally, the area of the continent of Africa that lies south of the Sahara. According to the United Nations, it consists of all African countries and territories that are fully or partially located south of the Sahara."

The white people in actual south africa are mostly swiss, german.
Originally Posted By RagnarChadbrok⏩
i thought all humans started in africa. what year is the cutoff? how do you classify "mixed race"?White means European, Black means African.
Inb4 "What if I'm a citizen of Nigeria?" Obviously I'm talking about where one's descendants originate from
Inb4 "What if I'm a citizen of Nigeria?" Obviously I'm talking about where one's descendants originate from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289685/
That study shows that the average self-identifying "black" American has about 1/4 european ancestry
Make Europe Germany Again
06-08-2020, 07:11 PM
-
#45
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
-
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2018
- Posts: 5,398
- Rep Power: 24375
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
Out of Africa theory has been debunked several times recently and was never conclusive. It was just academic dogma.so what year is the cutoff? what about east africans who were colonized by arabs thousands of years ago? what about vitiligo and albinism? what specific genes get someone in the club?
i thought all humans started in africa. what year is the cutoff? how do you classify "mixed race"?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289685/
That study shows that the average self-identifying "black" American has about 1/4 european ancestry
i thought all humans started in africa. what year is the cutoff? how do you classify "mixed race"?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4289685/
That study shows that the average self-identifying "black" American has about 1/4 european ancestry
And yes, the reason African Americans have some European ancestry is because they were raped by White people. Not sure how that's surprising. It's not because they spontaneously had European DNA develop in Africa lmao
27
6'3"
06-08-2020, 07:13 PM
-
#46
06-08-2020, 07:14 PM
-
#47
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By RagnarChadbrok⏩
of course it wasn't spontaneous. if they are 1/4 european, but still black, at what proportion do they stop being black and start being european? is it whichever proportion is greater than 50% or whichever is the largest portion if none exceed 50%?Out of Africa theory has been debunked several times recently and was never conclusive. It was just academic dogma.
And yes, the reason African Americans have some European ancestry is because they were raped by White people. Not sure how that's surprising. It's not because they spontaneously had European DNA develop in Africa lmao
And yes, the reason African Americans have some European ancestry is because they were raped by White people. Not sure how that's surprising. It's not because they spontaneously had European DNA develop in Africa lmao
Make Europe Germany Again
06-08-2020, 07:19 PM
-
#48
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
-
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2018
- Posts: 5,398
- Rep Power: 24375
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
Who cares? There's "White" and "Black" as racial classifications, and by those classifications they are X percent White and Y percent Black. It doesn't matter what kind of ratios they've got going on. As for what they identify as, kinda depends on their phenotype expression and who they fit in with better, but that doesn't change or affect the biological reality of their racial compositionof course it wasn't spontaneous. if they are 1/4 european, but still black, at what proportion do they stop being black and start being european? is it whichever proportion is greater than 50% or whichever is the largest portion if none exceed 50%?
27
6'3"
06-08-2020, 07:27 PM
-
#49
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By RagnarChadbrok⏩
i thought continent of ancestry was all important. how then do ratios not matter? if obama's father was zero % european and his mother was 100%, then was he really a black president?Who cares? There's "White" and "Black" as racial classifications, and by those classifications they are X percent White and Y percent Black. It doesn't matter what kind of ratios they've got going on. As for what they identify as, kinda depends on their phenotype expression and who they fit in with better, but that doesn't change or affect the biological reality of their racial composition
this all seems pretty arbitrary and completely non-scientific to me
Make Europe Germany Again
06-08-2020, 07:32 PM
-
#50
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
-
- RagnarChadbrok
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2018
- Posts: 5,398
- Rep Power: 24375
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
Okay, you've completely misrepresented me. Idk if that's intentional or just poor reading comprehension, so I'll try to explain one more time.i thought continent of ancestry was all important. how then do ratios not matter? if obama's father was zero % european and his mother was 100%, then was he really a black president?
this all seems pretty arbitrary and completely non-scientific to me
this all seems pretty arbitrary and completely non-scientific to me
Someone whose DNA is 25% African and 75% European, is 3/4 White and 1/4 African.
Someone whose DNA is 99% African and 1% European, is 99/100 Black, and 1/100 White.
It's that simple. Now in the latter case it would make sense if they just colloquially referred to themselves as "Black." There would be basically no White phenotypical expression, so their White DNA would be inconsequential. However it would still be there, and from a scientific standpoint they are 99% Black and 1% White.
In the instances of mixed people, whatever they identify as is irrelevant because it doesn't affect their racial composition. They will still be X percent White, Y percent Black, genetically speaking. They may personally identify as mixed, or as White, or as Black. Just depending on their phenotypical expression, who they prefer, and who they fit in with better. But how they identify is irrelevant when we're talking about biological race
Literally none of this is complicated, arbitrary, or non-scientific. It makes perfect sense and you seem like you're deliberately trying to not understand, or you're just dumb. No hate. If a dog is only part German Shepherd, does that mean that German Shepherds don't exist at all because it's a "nebulous concept?"
27
6'3"
06-08-2020, 07:34 PM
-
#51
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
yep. it goes even further than that
humanity has been a huge clusterfuk of everybody usurping everybody
i will say that doesn't mean some haven't experienced injustices, but if you include everybody's lineage they most likely have
humanity has been a huge clusterfuk of everybody usurping everybody
i will say that doesn't mean some haven't experienced injustices, but if you include everybody's lineage they most likely have
06-08-2020, 07:35 PM
-
#52
- Aristotelian
- Positive Mental Attitude
-
- Aristotelian
- Positive Mental Attitude
- Join Date: Jun 2017
- Posts: 12,849
- Rep Power: 263689
-
-
Originally Posted By 401Delta⏩
By the entirety of the General Assembly I'd wager. Was OP born in June by any chance?Does that mean your mum was gang banged at a UN convention when she got pregnant?
06-08-2020, 07:44 PM
-
#53
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
except it's only caucasoids that do that to other races so don't project your evils on usyep. it goes even further than that
humanity has been a huge clusterfuk ofeverybody usurping everybody
i will say that doesn't mean some haven't experienced injustices, but if you include everybody's lineage they most likely have
humanity has been a huge clusterfuk ofeverybody usurping everybody
i will say that doesn't mean some haven't experienced injustices, but if you include everybody's lineage they most likely have
name a single non caucasoid ethnic that's tried imperialism to a different race than their own
06-08-2020, 07:45 PM
-
#54
- whitepaper
- Registered User
-
- whitepaper
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Posts: 20,840
- Rep Power: 55720
-
-
23&Me is nothing more than a penis-length-measuring experiment.
And Op, I've got some bad news for you, buddy.
0.4% West African...

And Op, I've got some bad news for you, buddy.
0.4% West African...

2014 Misc Resolution: Negging no pics (screen captures of text don't count as pics)
HairyWBush Reps for life - Hamster Compassion: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=181804893
06-08-2020, 07:51 PM
-
#55
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By RagnarChadbrok⏩
race isn't biological; it's social. africans can differ by a larger % of genes than an african and a europeanOkay, you've completely misrepresented me. Idk if that's intentional or just poor reading comprehension, so I'll try to explain one more time.
Someone whose DNA is 25% African and 75% European, is 3/4 White and 1/4 African.
Someone whose DNA is 99% African and 1% European, is 99/100 Black, and 1/100 White.
It's that simple. Now in the latter case it would make sense if they just colloquially referred to themselves as "Black." There would be basically no White phenotypical expression, so their White DNA would be inconsequential. However it would still be there, and from a scientific standpoint they are 99% Black and 1% White.
In the instances of mixed people, whatever they identify as is irrelevant because it doesn't affect their racial composition. They will still be X percent White, Y percent Black, genetically speaking. They may personally identify as mixed, or as White, or as Black. Just depending on their phenotypical expression, who they prefer, and who they fit in with better. But how they identify is irrelevant when we're talking about biological race
Literally none of this is complicated, arbitrary, or non-scientific. It makes perfect sense and you seem like you're deliberately trying to not understand, or you're just dumb. No hate. If a dog is only part German Shepherd, does that mean that German Shepherds don't exist at all because it's a "nebulous concept?"
Someone whose DNA is 25% African and 75% European, is 3/4 White and 1/4 African.
Someone whose DNA is 99% African and 1% European, is 99/100 Black, and 1/100 White.
It's that simple. Now in the latter case it would make sense if they just colloquially referred to themselves as "Black." There would be basically no White phenotypical expression, so their White DNA would be inconsequential. However it would still be there, and from a scientific standpoint they are 99% Black and 1% White.
In the instances of mixed people, whatever they identify as is irrelevant because it doesn't affect their racial composition. They will still be X percent White, Y percent Black, genetically speaking. They may personally identify as mixed, or as White, or as Black. Just depending on their phenotypical expression, who they prefer, and who they fit in with better. But how they identify is irrelevant when we're talking about biological race
Literally none of this is complicated, arbitrary, or non-scientific. It makes perfect sense and you seem like you're deliberately trying to not understand, or you're just dumb. No hate. If a dog is only part German Shepherd, does that mean that German Shepherds don't exist at all because it's a "nebulous concept?"
.01% of your genes constitute your physical appearance, but everyone acts like it's 100% of their identity. pretty crazy
the only value of any of this is to determine predisposition to disease
i bet the police in reality are profiling people based on how their car and clothes look far more than skin color anyway
Make Europe Germany Again
06-08-2020, 07:58 PM
-
#56
- SWDeath
- Custom User Title
-
- SWDeath
- Custom User Title
- Join Date: Oct 2018
- Posts: 6,412
- Rep Power: 37010
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
I bet anthropologists and genealogists look at the clothes when trying to figure out what a skeleton was right?race isn't biological; it's social. africans can differ by a larger % of genes than an african and a european
.01% of your genes constitute your physical appearance, but everyone acts like it's 100% of their identity. pretty crazy
the only value of any of this is to determine predisposition to disease
i bet the police in reality are profiling people based on how their car and clothes look far more than skin color anyway
.01% of your genes constitute your physical appearance, but everyone acts like it's 100% of their identity. pretty crazy
the only value of any of this is to determine predisposition to disease
i bet the police in reality are profiling people based on how their car and clothes look far more than skin color anyway
Oh wait, they can measure the bones and take DNA samples to see race, ethnicity, gender, height....ect..
WEIRD how that works right?
MAGA One day at a time.
06-08-2020, 07:59 PM
-
#57
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By SWDeath⏩
yeah, most of their scientific papers talk about how the skeleton they dug up was white or blackI bet anthropologists and genealogists look at the clothes when trying to figure out what a skeleton was right?
Oh wait, they can measure the bones and take DNA samples to see race, ethnicity, gender, height....ect..
WEIRD how that works right?
Oh wait, they can measure the bones and take DNA samples to see race, ethnicity, gender, height....ect..
WEIRD how that works right?
Make Europe Germany Again
06-08-2020, 08:06 PM
-
#58
06-08-2020, 08:10 PM
-
#59
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
Originally Posted By 58220⏩
you know the theory is that white skin only developed cause its more sensitive to sun light right? that's why most whites are northern european. aka far away from the equatorexcept it's only caucasoids that do that to other races so don't project your evils on us
name a single non caucasoid ethnic that's tried imperialism to a different race than their own
name a single non caucasoid ethnic that's tried imperialism to a different race than their own
i have seen another theory that it was nutrition and a lack of vitamin d, but it's the same result in that the skin turned white in order to absorb more vitamin d
06-08-2020, 08:16 PM
-
#60
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
what?you know the theory is that white skin only developed cause its more sensitive to sun light right? that's why most whites are northern european. aka far away from the equator
i have seen another theory that it was nutrition and a lack of vitamin d, but it's the same result in that the skin turned white in order to absorb more vitamin d
i have seen another theory that it was nutrition and a lack of vitamin d, but it's the same result in that the skin turned white in order to absorb more vitamin d
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts