America has a higher STD rate than here and we don't cut. So idk. Not going rawdawg on a bunch of trashy sloots has had a great impact on my disease avoiding goals of 2020

You're right bro, I had never actually tried walking around like that for an extended period of time. I just tried it and holy chit that hurts more than I thought it would. There's no way I could go more than a few minutes like that. The glans definitely wasn't meant to be exposed like that all day. I think we have even more sensation than I previously thought compared to them.Depends on the water pressure from the shower head. But yeah it can be painful if the water is shooting out at a higher pressure.

You're not very smart are you.

My religious argument wasn't about how different religions work, it's pointing out the inconsistency of God creating you in his image, yet somehow you come out imperfect and needing a surgical procedure... Only on males... To make you whole.

The evolutionary purpose of the foreskin is to produce lubrication for the penis, to keep the mucus membrane of the head soft, moist and sensitive, and to house 20,000 pleasure receptors for the enjoyment of sex. Those are very relevant to me in 2020 and why I choose to keep mine, as all uncut brahs choose to do.

Keep trying to justify baby mutilation tho.

You're not very smart are you.

A covenant with God doesn't make you whole lmao. You don't need circumcision to be "whole."

I never justified baby mutilation either, only explained that you don't understand religion.

Agreed. Like i said, just makes sense

Honestly saying i have a more sensitive penor sounds annoying to deal with. Id also imagine i would think about sex more and pursue sex more and...no thanks jeff

Good, then whether you believe in creation or evolution, you must admit that you were born with a foreskin for a function in your body

The foreskin has a function.

But sacrificing something in exchange for something else is not mutilation either.

Lubricated for what? For you to jerk off with?

Also, those receptors aren’t for pleasure it’s to make you bust hella quick so you can get in and out as quickly as possible.

Well, I don't need to tell you how it sounds like because I have my foreskin. Sex feels fuking great and isn't annoying at all. I own a business, have friends, pets, a new garden and work out. I love sex but my life doesn't revolve around it. I'm not annoyed by having a foreskin brah. It's just another part of my body.

My foreskin keeps my penis head moist and supple. It's called a mucus membrane and here's a list of all the mucus membranes in your body:

Eyes, ears, inside the nose, inside the mouth, lip, vagina, glans penis

Guess what they all have in common? They are meant to stay moist. I cringe hard when I look at porn and see cut brahs with dry/callused leathery looking dik heads.

My pleasure receptors feel amazing for me and I fuk for hours. I'm very happy with my sex life brah lmao strong easy debunking of your post. I could have typed my response with my foreskin and it couldn't have been easier.

These threads always go the same way. Misc is filled with religious braindead morons, who think that chopping the end of your penis off is ok because it's hygenic (LMAO) and that girls prefer it (LMFAO). Basically you're saying you're a braindead simp who cba to wash.

Just look at porn - all the cut dicks are dry, keratinised and usually not even 100% hard because they're so desensitised. Absolutely tragic that this still happens in 2020 and there are even guys in here who plan to do it to their unborn sons. Seriously, a topic that isn't given enough focus.

You didn’t debunk chit you coping turtle neck *******. You still didn’t answer why does it need to be lubricated. If your fukkin eyelids weren’t there and you didn’t continuously have eye drops, your eyes would wither away and stop working. Cut dinks? They keep on working perfectly fine lmao
And you fukk for hours? Lol sure. If you fukk for hours you should try having sex with someone you’re actually attracted to.

Strong cope after I debunked your “receptors for pleasure” bull chit. If you believe in evolution, you know that the advantage goes to the animal that can dump clips as quickly and frequently as possible. Those receptors assist in that “perk” or ability, it’s not so you can enjoy it more...

Look, you claim to enjoy being uncut yet you’re here projecting your insecurities with dozens of posts that reek of cope and ignorance. If you’re as happy as you say you are, why so rustled? Keep wearing turtlenecks and eating sausages with extra casings, and while you’re at it wear your socks to bed too fukking LMAO
This illustrates the intelligence level of an uncut coper. Looking to PORN as a case study for anything remotely normal fukking LMAO! Also your ability to get hard has NOTHING to do with the sensation you feel. Remember puberty when you get those random rock hard boners? Yeah...

Lol, similar description. Yeah they look really weird compared to mine. They have like.. Actual wrinkles on the head like old people skin. Das not it meng

Google mucus membrane and why they are kept moist.

You ask why I care if my life is so good. I care because babies are being mutilated, clearly without consent, in the year of 2020. It's a human rights problem that I feel strongly about.

Keep advocating for the mutilation of babies though. Strong moral compass you got there.

Just did a quick read and yes, same old shít.

Vinnypazrules taking 1st place in the brainless turd compeition. HUR DUR gurls like it so I'm glad my parents did it to me! lol.

Others asking why we're obsessed with other people's dicks? What? Like another poster said, female genital mutilation is looked down upon and illegal in most places whereas male genital mutilation, people just shrug their shoulders. There is zero reason to cut your child's foreskin off in 2020 and not a single post in here says otherwise (as usual). Just do your future son a favour and leave him intact. Trust me, it's a million times better.

In on daily misc dink thread.

Circumcels mutilated crew always have the most hilarious argument.

-aesthetic
-clean
-girls like it more

COPE.

Keeping your dink clean is just common sense. Would you walk around with a chitty ass? No... you wash it.

And girls will zuck natty dinks no problem whatsoever.

Again. Anytime we natty boys want we can mutilate our dinks but we don't. Why would I want to chop off the best part of my dink?

Keep making excuses for your sick twisted parents who mutilated their babies genitals

i just searched anti circumcision on google ( no homo)





feels good man

I never understood the aesthetic argument. Like... when your dick is hard your skin pulls back and it looks just like a cut dink...
Unless you have erectile dysfunction it shouldn't be a problem.

And yea obviously being cut is not a big deal, it's something that worked for Israel for forever and worked in the US as well. You can live perfectly fine.
But it's true there must be changes in penile tissue that happen after being cut. I would not be able to just walk around right now with the tip of my dick out of it's cap. It would drive me crazy. Clearly there is a certain amount of desensitization that has to happen.

It's not only uncut people, many cut guys are not happy, especially the ones with complications. But that’s not the point. The point is not to perform unnecessary operations on infants. A concept that any clear thinking individual should grasp, mutilated or not.

"Bollinger estimated that approximately 119 infant boys die from circumcision-related each year in the U.S. (1.3% of all male neonatal deaths from all causes). There are several case reports of death in the medical literature. These are deaths from various infections."

Yeah bro, not really a big deal eh. Imagine actually dying from it. The absolute degeneracy of the parents and doctors involved. Deserve to be made infertile.

These threads always go the same way. Cut guys get absolutely owned and blown away, and are never seen again, until the next thread, where they spout off the same nonsense again. Don't even have the maturity to have a discussion about it. Just don't do it to your kids.

Imagine being a manlet, and also your parents mutilated your penis as a baby.

Life would be worthless.

LOL these threads are the best...it looks like there may be some brain cells in the foreskin as well...

The cope of cut brahs is always sad to see.Honestly it must be hard to admit your parents were wrong. I think it's more a sad thing than a funny thing. Good thing some people are waking up though and won't do the same harm to their own children.

Well, back in the 90's and prior, you didn't have the internet to easily and instantly research things for yourself. Back then and prior, even general family practice MD's were basically mini gods of their towns in how much people relied on them for even the most basic of medical knowledge. So it was a lot easier to blindly trust everything they said and reccomended at face value without putting much thought into it.

Also, medical opinion on male circumcision in the U.S. only changed somewhat recently to the point where a lot of them admit it doesn't help hygiene as much as they used to claim. So it's hard to blame people for making the decision back then compared to today. They were following a social norm that their doctors routinely told them was a standard medical practice at the time.

Let's be honest. As long as you live in the U.S., it doesn't matter unless you're among the select few cases where a doctor botches the job and screws you up badly for life. Women in the U.S. are pretty accustomed to cut dinks due to how "normal" it was for so long, and some are even grossed out by uncut dinks due to that. So it's not like you'll be missing out on broads over it. I also assume the issue of sex being less enjoyable for men by having cut dinks and "losing nerve endings" is pretty exaggerrated by the hardcore anti-cut dinks crew. I mean they always say that uncut dinks hardly look any different from cut when a dude has a hard on, so I can't imagine the feeling is THAT different during sex based on more exposed nerve endings.

Having said all that, I wouldn't do it if I had a son knowing what I do today. It seems like a pointless procedure with a slight risk of botching it at best. But you're being a bit retarded to be railing on parents from the 90's and earlier for just doing what their doctors told them to while having little elsewhere to look for medical advice, and considering medical standards about it at the time.

Imagine looking down at your aesthetic penis every day and it's looking back up at you and it brings a smile to your face cause he's all shiny and happy, not looking like a dolphin wearing a turtleneck sweater.

And the sensitivity cope excuses are lulzy. I'm great at cooming, I coom 100% of the time everytime. Apparently I shouldn't be able to do that

The aesthetic argument has to be the worse argument ever lol. Your dick looks circumcised when you are hard because the skin is always back unless you are showing girls your soft dick lmao. Strong cope for cut brahs.

not really.. like i said before, it seems pretty easy to see that the extra skin fold can cause complication. e.g. someone exposed to std. with cut weiner and exposure to air a number of things can clean it not to mention easily brushing off with water or something. BUT if the foreskin happened to be exposed and then it retracts and tucks underneath the head it could harvest it. and in fact, i didnt even know this i just mentioned it in the thread. and what the studies found are in foreskin it increases anaerobic response (exposure to air) and that in circumsised men the aerobic response killed it right away. they also think it might have to do with the skin that is developed to circumcision

also, much of the empirical evidence states otherwise, and it is the uncut brahs that have to cling to an "illusion" as though it is a conspiracynow, it seems that OTHERS (uncut) brahs are the ones pointing out complications with this, but then...i don't see any study stating otherwise. i would def. retract on my statement. but #1 i don't believe it's true (from what i said before with the extra skin), and #2 i haven't seen data stating otherwise

i def. think a grand conspiracy could happen. but supposing that there have been NO medical doctors throughout the history of medicine to have qualms with the act seems a bit much

pretty sure doctors are heavily worried about medical malpractice and it seems like there would be someone with some qualms out there

the civil rights discussion is maybe slightly different from this, but kind of joined at the same time, because you could just easily argue that those that are uncircumcised are contributing to a higher std rate

i'm sure being cut is fine as long as the doc didnt do a botched job or left you with a two-toned dick.

I'm uncut, but i wonder if they do partial circumcisions in case my sleeve ever becomes longer than usual due to age (overhanging foreskin)

that said, i think circumcisions should probably not be done unless necessary